Comments by "EvilGuacamoleGaming" (@EvilGuacamoleGaming) on "Fox News" channel.

If there is no problem with voting anything done to 'fix' voting will only make it unfair to those most marginalized. More importantly it's fundamentally anti- Democratic. If you love democracy then you should want people to vote.
5
@Divenity You can not make something more secure that is already secure. There is no function here beyond voter suppression. Show me any proof that there is a problem with voter security and we can start discussing how to 'fix' it. Again, I repeat. You can not make something more secure that is already secure. This bill is not capable of doing ANYTHING but suppress votes.
2
@checa2321 Yeah, Democrats win when more people vote. I'm sorry, do you hate democracy? Should we return to a monarch? Putting up meaningless walls is a racist tradition of Republicans it seems...
2
Yes, I want the government to have my finger prints so I can vote. Typical republican wanting the government jammed into our lives. Anyway, there is no current problem with the voting process. Nobody is voting illegally. Why would we waste tax payer money on a non-problem? Typical republican being reckless with my tax money.
1
@Chai_biscuits77 I'm not interested in installing lie detectors for anyone, as they are extremely unreliable.
1
@Frostbite08 You have made the mistake that conservatives actually believe in small government.
1
 @Frostbite08 it's so hard to find any of these assholes that are honest.
1
I mean, he was selected by 7 million more people than the last guy.
1
@jamesgray6697 I'm sorry, facts don't care about your feelings. Fact is, the last election was the most secure in history. Many attempts were made to find irregularities but it all amounted to a few dozen votes, often in Biden's favor. Maybe if Trump wanted to win he should have not let half a million Americans die to covid-19.
1
@jamesgray6697 if you think anything besides Biden won handily with ease you are without facts. If there was anything to your lunatic conspiracy theory it could have made traction somewhere in the 60+ court cases on the subject. Y'all are allergic to facts.
1
Not true, incorrect and also it's unconstitutional to require payment to vote.
1
@Divenity I'm unfamiliar with this specific requirement but anything that tries to 'solve' a problem that doesn't exist is not trying to solve the problem it says it's trying to solve. Anything that makes mail in voter more difficult makes it less likely to happen. You don't have to be in a marginalized community to have a difficult time finding appropriate documents. Now, if you are well off you can go 'well, I'll just vote during a work day' but if you are poor your options are limited. To short version is thus: there is no evidence that any of these steps will eliminate illegal voting, therefore they can only eliminate legal voting.
1
@Vulkan Georgia did not experience any irregularities. There was no problem with the Georgia election. There were big babies that whined because they lost and now they want to 'fix it' by making Black people not vote. That's the simple part. Also, to be clear, these new bills are designed to make it so Georgia State officials can override the votes of certain counties at will if they feel like it. That's the biggest way this will be used to eliminate legal votes. So this imaginary thing you just talked about with the Federal government coming in and altering it is actually what the Republicans want to do to cities.
1
@Divenity any extra step required to solve a non-existent problem is there for an ulterior motive. Tell me this. What is the purpose of this bill if, as we know quite clearly, there is nothing wrong with our election process? The burden is on you to explain why you want more government regulations.
1
@Divenity I mean, Trump did cheat. Or at least the election was interfered with. This is a matter of public record. I don't think there has been anyone saying the vote count was wrong. If there is cheating enough for it to sway an election is relevant if you are using that as an excuse to do something that WILL sway an election. If we disenfranchise 100,000 voters (in a combination of all these efforts) to eliminate 10 cheating votes that we catch already... that's a problem. You do not have to show ID in all states and it has only ever been implemented to limit certain groups from voting. Why should I believe a method that has only ever been done as a racist act to limit voting has now been fixed to the point where it isn't going to limit voting? And to be clear, it is more regulation. Again, I come back to the baseline. You must prove there is a problem to justify anything to fix said problem. You are trying to sell me mouse traps. I don't have a mouse problem. The area doesn't have a mouse problem. I already have cats. Why do I need to buy your mouse traps? You are telling me your mouse traps are safe and won't hurt my cats but... why should I do anything like that? Even if you are giving them to me and promise they are safe... I'm not going to risk hurting my cats in case mice show up in the future. Which, since I have cats, I already have a solution for EVEN IF said problem started. Stop trying to prove your mouse trap is safe when you haven't answered why I should have them in my house at all.
1
@Divenity I'm unfamiliar with any irregularities that were an issue that would not be capable of being caught with the current system much less caught with the suggestions. Please provide evidence to these supposed claims.
1
@PAHighlander24 can you idiots stop with this nonsense. Black people, on average, are less likely to have photo ID and since they are less likely to already need it it does make it more likely that it would be a set of tasks that would make voting more difficult. There is nothing inherent to being Black that makes this true. What makes this true is that Black people have experience centuries of systemic oppression that has lead them to live in poorer areas; said areas are more urban where people are much less likely to drive a car because it's impractical. There are less DMV locations in such places for this reason. It is not racist to observe patterns that exist in reality. It is racist to ascribe those patterns to their race. I know you idiots think people use racist about anything but that's not the case.
1
@donaldaltman4764 I want any adult who lives here to vote once. Because that's democracy. You vote for the government that you live under and pay taxes to. However, no federal or state laws exists to extend voting rights to those who aren't citizens. Voting twice is extremely rare and it is something on average is done mostly by Republican voters... but it's such a small number I'm willing to deal with it.
1
We all know Rove's agenda is NOT to make sure Biden can get to work. So his only possible motive is to protect Trump.
1
@hannahnwhite anything that makes it more difficult to vote will cause some percentage of people not to vote. This is just basic sociological statistic analysis of human behavior. Everyone has a threshold of how much they are willing to do to vote. Adding bureaucratic hoops and red tape means less people vote. How would a requirement of ID in the form of a bus pass restrict white voter, for example? I mean everyone can get one. Of course, more white people live in rural areas where they may 50 miles away from the nearest place that can issue a bus pass, but nothing is stopping them. And a bus pass is as logical a system of ID as a driver's license.
1
@otaku_mclovin4209 it's not racist to suggest that people who have been made poor due to their race and beyond their control... are poor. This is just fact. It turns out that you can't just call anything racist. Further, no, many people move quite a bit without being immigrants of any sort. Also there is no evidence of undocumented immigrants voting so it's not really a concern in this issue.
1
@mostlypeaceful1817 yes, they can. If a law makes it more difficult for a particular race to vote... it's racist. This is not 'common sense' because common sense says 'if it isn't broke, don't fix it'. There is nothing broken with the voting system. This isn't about fixing the problem of 'illegal votes being cast'. This is about the 'problem' of too many Black people voting. And this will 'fix' that, as Republicans desire. You know, they called a literacy test a 'common sense' election law. Just saying, you are doing the same things as the racist assholes who supported Jim Crow laws.
1
@hannahnwhite Until you prove there is a problem I will not accept any solution to your imaginary problem as acceptable. Particularly when we know that it will decrease participation in voting. And we know that it will be poor and Black people most likely to be disenfranchised. Also, how does one get this 'free' ID? What hoops must be gone through? Is it technically free but requires you to do something else that isn't free? I don't trust Republicans to do something like this because I know that Republicans know they are unpopular and their policies suck and that they can't win by an actual democratic process and they, by necessity, must figure out ways to cheat. We are talking about the party of racism. This is the party that invaded the Capital. This is the party that voted for the most racist person available. We know that Republicans have taken great strides to block Black people from voting and such efforts have to be blocked by the supreme court. So no. There is no hypocrisy. You can play pretend if you like or be stupid, but I'm not stupid and I know why this is happening.
1
@diamonddave62146 I mean, when they were enacted they were done by Dixiecrats. You aren't stupid enough to think those parties are the same. The parties changed due to the Democrats supporting Civil Rights and the Republicans coming in and sweeping up all the racist vote in the Southern Strategy, yeah? This is all well documented. I mean, it's not even like I like the Democrats. But it sounds like you are about one breath away from saying something really stupid so I thought I'd stop you with clear fact on the matter.
1
@0xredrumx078 The last major anti-gun regulations put in place were done by Trump. At any rate, most of the increase of gun sales is due to fear mongering done by gun manufacturers. I don't think it's fair to compare the actions of irrational, paranoid people with money to those of poor people who just want to vote. Of course well off people afraid of brown people and the guverment are going to get guns in this country.
1
@hannahnwhite You are the one depicting the situation as being lazy. I'm still unaware of this free ID you talk about. Further, I have to guess you've been at a DMV, right? This is a process that can take a long time, time poor people don't have. To get something they do not otherwise need. This is an unreasonable burden to place on the poor, who are disproportionately Black, because we never gave back pay to their families for centuries of not paying them for work. So Black people work twice as hard for half the money. You continue to fail like all Jim Crow warriors to prove ANY need for this. The burden is on YOU to justify changing a law when nothing is wrong.
1
@hannahnwhite you have failed to prove your laws are needed. And it isn't racist to state facts about how the consequences of the law would disenfranchise Black people. This is, of course, only the lightest of issues involved in this Jim Crow bill. The change in hours and the ability for State officials to just alter votes if they say they don't agree with them is far far more important. Still, there remains no justification for ID requirements.
1