Comments by "" (@NinjaKittyBonks) on "Zuby"
channel.
-
1700
-
349
-
255
-
181
-
158
-
108
-
70
-
67
-
56
-
55
-
52
-
50
-
45
-
45
-
42
-
42
-
41
-
36
-
34
-
32
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
20
-
19
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
I like to speak with those of whom I disagree, because I not only want to know what they think, but why they think it. However, for this to work, it requires discussing / debating in good faith. The problem I run into constantly, is those who are tribal and these are particularly difficult to get anywhere. When one is ideologically driven, good faith VERY often goes out the window, because it is impossible to accept criticism. Bad faith, specious and straw-man arguments, along with obfuscating direct answers ends up driving me out of the conversation. That person will likely then just go back to their bubble and say how I ran away, because I cannot sustain my position. The truth is, THEY cannot argue their position, so make conversation impossible and then call it a win.
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
Yes, Zubinator. The analogy I use a LOT these days, is the Montgomery Bus Boycott. We saw an ENTIRE population, willing to stand up for what was right and walk every day, to avoid using the bus. Some walked for miles, to do this and was VASTLY more than simple inconvenience. Those of arrogant mind, thought them foolish, as the blacks will return to the bus system broken.... defeated. Of course, they did NOT return and the bus system was broken. Imagine if we had ALL done that when the lockdowns, turned from "10 days to 2 weeks" into 3 freakin' years? I was fortunate enough to have already been retired, but had I not been and was told to wear a mask or get jabbed to work... I would have walked.
.
I get that it is not so easy for a HUGE number of the population, but it WOULD have been... had we all stood up and said no! We humans are too weak. We don't have the fortitude to make the sacrifices necessary to do the right thing. Imagine for 1 nano second, had Gen Z been the society, when Pearl Harbor was attacked? We would all be speaking German.
.
DO.... NOT... COMPLY!
13
-
13
-
13
-
There can be no question, that "nurture" can trump "nature", as this is free will within the ebb and flow of society. The problem becomes when that "nurture" is guided by a denial of reality. Society has and will ever continue to evolve, so a wrinkle may be added to the mix, but the adjustments MUST remain slight in sight of and sustain the fundamental reality of nature. When an ideology takes precedence and diametrically opposes nature.... this is where the issues begin and what we are seeing in droves today. This is why truth must ALWAYS be held as the standard for all things and why "my truth" is so incredibly dangerous. For "my truth" does take precedence over THE truth, so enables a person to apply blinders to reality and seek to mold the world in whatever image that ideology dictates. This is a recipe for chaos and there is precisely zero societies that can survive under such conditions in the long term. Make no mistake, when someone says..."just do this ONE thing, so as not to upset another", if that thing is based on even the SMALLEST of lies, it is the erosion of society that is being demanded of you. Not only this, but once you DO accept that "small lie", you will be asked demanded to do another and that lie will not be so small. This is the incremental steps used to undermine all of society, so one must stand their ground and not subject yourself to living with even the smallest of lies... it will be your undoing!
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
10
-
Ā @bradyjohnson7705Ā .. Yup. Like 98% of us, the "10 days to 2 weeks" made sense, to limit hospitals from being rushed. It is easy to look back later and see the nefarious intent, but seemed a reasonable move. What is do damned disturbing, was the willingness for the vast majority of society simply accept when it dragged on and on and on and on. I think the real kicker was social media shutting down conversation, as we could not get people on the same path of thinking, as questioning ANYTHING was verboten. Still no excuse, but being removed from one of the only things to keep occupied, being online, kept everyone from mobilizing well.
.
In the end, I learned more about human nature that all of my previous 56 years. I learned that far, far, FAR too many are 100% willing to trade freedom for "perceived" safety! I have worn a mask precisely 3 times, during this hell and was twice voting and once for pet emergency. she ended up dying ABSOLUTELY TERRIFIED, because of authoritarian mask-holes that denied seeing my cat, after telling me on the phone I would not need a mask to enter lobby. There were a few prominent hold outs (Gym guy's in San Francisco Bay Area and restaurants), but were SEVERELY punished by boot stomper thug cops, who wanted to put them in cuffs for trying to make a living! Still pissed when I think about all that b*********t.
10
-
10
-
Reading the title of this video is not even remotely shocking. This speaks very directly to what JD was referring to, when he make the "Cat ladies" comment. Of course, the left immediately flew into straw-man mode and accepted the least generous interpretation possible, to be this great offense against women. As Whitney Houston, one of the most amazing voices said nearly 30 years ago, "children are our future", was the subject of JD's remarks. Once a person has children, their entire world changes and suddenly..... this is not about me any more.
.
Thank you, Zubinator and guest, Ms. Gina for sharing what so many of those who refuse to hear, get that opportunity š
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
Ā @shadowninja569Ā ... It is interesting, the era in which we now live. It is exceptionally rare, when a person is praised for a thing or action and one does not come right behind with something negative to say about him / her. I have heard that Chris has some less than ideal moments, in his career, but then... haven't we all? Not seeking to make excuses, but that the standard so many hold is that the capital one EARNED, is completely discarded and then usurped by that negative thing. I am not talking about a person who lived a good life and one day went on a shooting spree or killed a family member. I am talking about people who do real good in this world for quite some time, but then make a bad or even very poor decision and fall well short of that goal they normally achieve.
.
I am not attacking you, Razgriz, but rather this is a common theme we see far too much of in the last number of years. There is not ONE SINGLE ADULT on this earth, who has been a good person of high moral character, who did not COMPLETELY and utterly fail on that front at some point. What I am asking is that we not judge THAT person solely upon that one lapse of judgement and look more on the totality. Again, this is not to say we should look at Adolph Hitler the aspiring artist when he was a child to excuse away his truly evil behavior some 25 years later, but to keep it all in perspective. Take Chris to task for those poor decisions, but not be so quick to define his entire existence by them.
.
Peace, RR š±
5
-
Religion does not cause wars, people do. Many just use it as an excuse to do so, because they are not secure enough in their own faith. If I was to say, I believe in Jesus and someone said..."he never existed, as [fill in the blank] is the TRUE God". I would, in all possible cases, seek to have a discussion, as I am always interested in not just what another person thinks... but why they think it. Pretty much guarantee, we would not come to agreement, but that is OK, he / she can feel / believe whatever they want and I will do the same.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The news by absolute definition is fact. If someone is covering news, they are required under the guise of ethics to give the events as they happen or happened. There is obviously going to be some bias, as it is impossible to remove it from the description of events, but what is supposed to be "facts" become "opinion" and the mainstream media of today do not distinguish between the two.
They see an event and just let their own point of view tell the story to the listener / reader. When this happens, it is no longer news , it is opinion and the political left owns like 90% of the news outlets. Take my mom, for a perfect example of the disservice to the "news" industry. She doesn't know the vast majority of what is really happening, because if it does not fit the lefts narrative, they don't cover it or spin the crap out of it to fit their agenda. One does not even have to know what happened, to see the extreme bias, but too many prefer to live in a bubble of an echo chamber, so refuse to acknowledge they are being deceived.
The news IS supposed to just give the facts of an event to allow the listener to decide for his / herself. This means that doing their job of reporting "news" makes them watchdogs.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
HEY, YOUTUBE EMPLOYEE WHO INSTANTLY HIDES MY COMMENTS FROM VIEW... HERE IS AN IDEA, "TALK TO ME". YUP, THAT'S RIGHT, HOW ABOUT YOU REPLY TO SOME OF MY COMMENTS AND PUSH BACK ON ME? IT IS CALLED ENGAGING IN CONVERSATION, SO THAT YOU MAY LEARN WHY IT IS I FEEL AS I DO AND IN TURN, I WILL LEARN WHY YOU FEEL AS YOU DO. I HAVE ENGAGED IN MANY HUNDREDS OF CONVERSATIONS HERE AND EACH ONE OF THEM IS IN GOOD FAITH. I DO NOT ALWAYS AGREE WITH OTHERS, BUT I WILL ALWAYS LISTEN AND WILL OWN IT IF I AM WRONG OR HE / SHE MAKES A GOOD POINT. JUST SITTING BACK AND HIDING BEHIND THE ALGORITHM YOU HAVE WRITTEN TO PUNISH ME, DOES ABSOLUTELY ZERO TO CONVINCE ME OF ANYTHING, EXCEPT THAT YOU FEAR TO ACTUALLY STAND UP FOR YOUR IDEAS AND BELIEFS.
.
IF YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY TO ME... SAY IT! HIDING IN THE SHADOWS AND MAKING SURE NOBODY SEES MY COMMENTS DOES NOT CHANGE MY MIND, IT ONLY TELLS ME THAT YOU ARE UNWILLING TO STAND UP FOR WHAT IT IS YOU BELIEVE. YOU HAVE OTHERED ME, AS IF I AM A BAD PERSON, BECAUSE YOU DON'T LIKE WHAT I SAY NOR WHOM I SUBSCRIBE. YOU WANT TO KNOW WHO ELSE DID PRECISELY THAT?
.
.... ADOLPH HITLER!
2
-
2
-
2
-
āĀ @johnd1727Ā ... Well, masks are not THAT useless, but since most people fail to wear them even close to correctly, it is not very far off. The M-95 is the only one that I know of that is readily available that is fine enough to stop the Covid spores. Of course, this means it is more restrictive to breathing, so as soon as one steps up the heart rate.... that mask starts to become a problem. My fave is when it is under the nose or cut from a T-shirt or one person who had one crafted from yarn... lol.
.
Beyond even all this is that this person, not a few minutes prior, was not wearing the mask and rubbed their eyes, scratched nose or wiped mouth then touched every door knob, turn-style a bunch of items all over the store after pushing the shopping cart all over the place. Never in human history has such a CATASTROPHIC over-reaction been done to what was known VERY early on to be of limited life threatening, to anyone NOT of significantly older age or co-morbidity issues that are bad for ones health regardless.
.
I could go on with all the things we already know, but ultimately.... this was about control!
2
-
2
-
2
-
It is all by design. Gen Z is the 3rd FULL generation raised by overwhelmingly Marxist infiltrated public schools and critical thinking is 100% verboten. When critical thinking is not only avoided in the curriculum, but is actively discouraged, so public "education" has churned out the following. Those who were told WHAT to think, rather than HOW! This was a perfect storm, because at the same time, parents were busy seeking to have a Summer home, a boat, a dedicated car for getaways and a nicer home than their neighbor. They UTTERLY failed their children, but allowing them to be raised by public "schools", daycare, nannies, baby sitters, TV and the creme, de-la-creme of horrendous tutors.... the internet!
2
-
Ā @funstuffonthenet5573Ā ... Yes, of course. That line, is an exact quote of what feminists would tell young girls, back in the early 70's. There was this HUGE push to get women to enter work force and "compete" with the men to have those jobs to break the traditional considerations of "have children and be supported by a husband". Those feminists would say that this is being subservient to males and disrespectful / oppressive / misogynist, so they can climb the corporate ladder, not get married AND be a mother, if they chose.
.
There was this idea that "men have it all", because the were seen as creating a "glass ceiling" in work places, have children AND make plenty of money, while the wives were kept to clean the home, raise the kids, make him dinner when he got home and to share herself, whenever he desired. No question, that men need to take a larger roll in taking are of those things, but feminists told women, and are MUCH more influential on social media, that "women don't need no man". Well, if they want to raise a healthy, well-balanced child with values that work in the traditional West... they MUST have the burden of sole income lifted.
.
We can see where all of this has taken women... to OF and far, far, far too many racking up a body count until 30+ years old and THEN deciding that a child would be nice. Well, her disposition has led her to this place and now finding out that they cannot act like the most juvenile of males for 10+ years and THEN easily create a traditional nuclear family, as the fairy tales all suggest.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Ā @MomoGetsMoneyĀ ... Yes. Marriage is VASTLY more risky for the man, as the assets he has, and those he will make going forward, will forever be tied to her, if they have children. If they stay married, that is 100% what he signed up for and that is his commitment. However, as we know, divorce is more often sought by the wife and unless SHE was the mega bread winner, he is automatically gonna take a serious hit, financially. If he had already owned or substantially paid off a debt for a home, she will very likely end up with that home, while he continues to pay the mortgage, the rent on a new place to live AND child support / alimony to her.
.
The evils of feminist ideology have a lot to answer for and, as a society... we ALL pay for it. The Feminist has pressed for a "women vs. men" society and is catastrophic to it.Ā
.
For If something hurts men, it hurts women. If something hurts women, it hurts men.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You have pointed out problems, but offering zero solutions. How is it one can get those who REFUSE to hear.... to listen? I get that Zuby is "preaching to the choir", to use words I think you are getting at here, but short of driving around town with a giant speaker atop, seeking to reach those who intentionally ignore, what can be done? All that can be done is to flood the landscape (social media) with those whom are avoided, so that an organic change can be allowed to happen. I have had 50+ good faith attempts to reach across the isle and engage with those who are doing all in their power to raise the West to the ground. I do so, not because I am a glutton for endless straw-man, conflated, obfuscated and EXTREMELY bad faith discussions, but because I hope to chip away at the problems we can all see. I have reached a few, to at least a small degree, but that is some success, so I continue to try. I will not say it is not frustrating as hell, but to know that others are out there doing the same thing, helps us all to continue to push back.
1
-
Ā @drockopotamus1Ā ..... Thank you for a well thought out and considerate response.. šbonk. The reason I mentioned zero solutions, is that it is easy to call out somebody, thing or policy for failing, but that is not offering anything in the counter that would be preferable. That person is and should not be required to provide some alternative, but it makes a far better argument to provide what one considers a solution or at least a better direction, then support it with something. I welcome push back and engagement, but it taxes me when one takes a "this or that does not work, so do better" kind of position.
.
As for abortion push back, there are some with very harsh restrictions by very few on the right, but there no more than we have seen on the left. We saw a row of 4 leading women in the field of medicine on the Senate floor, who would flat deny ANY "line" of when abortion would be unacceptable. They were each posed the question multiple times and each time, obfuscated the reply. I felt some balance to that was necessary, so I felt the need to elaborate on it.
.
I do agree that extremes, especially when argued with such MASSIVE gulf between their positions, serves no purpose whatever. It brings me back to the horrible daytime talk shows who seek the most opposing points of view and sets them upon each other for the camera. My biggest issue with those who disagree, is the failure on one or both of their parts to do so in good faith. For if even ONE of them is not doing so, the entire discussion is a complete waste. I have always sought to engage with ANYONE on ANY subject, but when it comes to the prevailing ideology we see that has captured the universities, for example... good faith takes a back seat. When this happens, there IS no reaching any agreement, unless one of them 100% abandons his / her position.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
āĀ @burnttoast4424Ā ... OK, you are correct!. I will grant you that Affirmative Action is ABSOLUTELY systemic racism. However, in the context in which it is used on a daily basis by the WOKE cult, they ONLY that which they claim is written in to law that directly harms blacks.
.
Even AA was overturned in SCOTUS a while back, but it is without ANY question, that colleges / universities WILL find a loophole or simply ignore it.
.
You and are in 100% agreement, that hiring practices to avoid whites IS racism, but it is also 100% a violation of the Constitution. The issue being, is that the legal system is so GD'd corrupt by the WOKE cult, the feds nor the leftist states will bring / allow challenges without a MASSIVE fight. If one has the funds and tenacity to take it all the way to SCOTUS, that is the only thing they can do. But.... guess what, the states will CONTINUE to not enforce the ACTUAL rule of law, so until we rid the corruption out of the legal system... nothing will change.
.
Look at the FBI, DOJ and the rest. They are stomping ALL OVER the rights of "wrong-thinkers" (AJ, Trump, J6th and the rest), so if the feds are in on it... we are simply F'd. To say "systemic racism" against blacks exists in American law is false. This does not stop the white guilt from providing those with .000000001% Native American blood to build a casino just about anywhere they want and not pay taxes. I am less than 100 miles from probably 10+ casinos right here in Comifornia.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
āĀ @M1sterE321Ā ... I had for a moment, suspected a bot, as I have seen more than just a few in the last month, but I figured it was kind of a trick question, of sorts. Many are absolutely convinced that there is "systemic" racism, because... reasons. They have bought into the endless race-baiting hoaxes and while 98% of them are proven false withing less than a day (nearly all remaining are proven false later, with a microscopic number being aggressive force), the convincing has been done already. My suspicion is that Jacob was laying a trap, to see if I fell into it, by downplaying or trying to separate Jim Crow or slavery from the equation.
.
Long winded reply, but most likely a bad-faith actor, looking for a cheap way to "win" a debate.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
āĀ @svizzy4270Ā ... Amen <3
.
There is ZERO question in my mind that when we finally find a path beyond the horror of a society we find ourselves in today, and not AT ALL convinced it will happen without devastation to that society, will become what we had out of WWII. A much more conservative one that goes back to its roots.
.
For what we are facing now, is in MANY ways worse than those years, as this is an internal struggle within an existing society and NOT against an outside force that wishes us to take on THEIR society. We had a unifying force back then, so we actually stood united. Today... we stand very much divided and I do not see a path out of it.
.
Sure, we may run these cult leftists out of office and some legislation can be overturned, but what of those who FORCED this division upon us? How does society go on, with a huge number of people who think the country in which they live is evil in its very design? They won't move away, because they are benefiting by the values they so vehemently claim to despise!
.
The hatred is soo deep and so aggressive by some, I just don't see how we can share a society who refuses to live by ANY values created or held by the Western World.
.
Believe it or not... what this country needs .... is another 9/11!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ā @TheConsideredManĀ ... G. Michael Hopf is credited with the origin of the line with in the book "Those Who Remain: A Postapocalyptic Novel" (ya, I had to DDG that), but could not resist adding that last part. Feminist ideology is a solid 50 years past when it has done ANYTHING positive for anyone. The demand of "oppression" to rally against, is LIGHT-YEARS more than the supply, so here we are. Women don't need no man, just go on OF and be "empowered"! Ya, be empowered to be a slut and destroy your value as a mate, in 50% of the general male population and 100% of the "high value" men, that each and everyone seeks, when time comes to settle down. Well, "high value" men, have conservative tendencies, which is why they will give their life to protect and provide for their family.
.
I would argue a huge number of these OF girls will end up "settling" (in their mind), for a beta-male, because he will simp for her. She will grow tired of that simping and be a single, divorced cat lady then begin to realize that feminism lied to her.
1
-
1
-
Ā @redwall1521Ā ... Yes. there are weak men, but they have the excuse NOT to become strong ones! Back on Dec. 7th, 1941, there were a HELL of a lot of men and women, some weak, some strong, that volunteered to go across the world and fight against tyranny or do what they could to support the Allies. Those were hard times and it created a mega sheet ton of strong men and certainly some women out of those who might otherwise remain soft.
.
So, I get what you are saying, but hard times bring the "put up or shut up" to the weak ones. By contrast, when good times roll around, beginning after Vietnam war ended, we have had over 45 years, 2+ generations, with NO civic reason to become strong, if weak. Feminism seriously stepped up it's game in the early 70's, so that factors in as well.
1
-
1
-
āĀ @ThagomizerĀ ... Because it is true! Imagine for 1 nano second, if Gen Z were the society, when Pearl Harbor was attacked? Do you think it conceivable that Hitler would have been defeated? I wonder how they all would have responded, when the commander in chief told them, that they must leave their "comfort animals" in the barracks, when about to cross the channel on June, 6th? That there were no "safe spaces" in Europe and that they would be forced to hear "mean words" and not not have their banky?
.
That society, was raised during the depression, so they became hard and resourceful. Many had to literally fight to survive and that made them strong. Gen Z today, had the supreme hardship of awaiting for the PS2 update patch and iPhone 11, so they would have a fast enough internet connection to take out the boss.
.
For the last 50 years, there has been no draft, no military threat to the US, so we have climate catastrophe activists $100K in debt, demanding the taxpayer pay it off for them, while they scream fascist from the street where they are sitting with their hands glued to the asphalt!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ā @paradisecityX0Ā ... DeSantis is by LIGHT-YEARS the greatest governor in America without any question at all.That said, the fed is so COMPLETELY F'd up right now, if we are to make any headway in to blowing it up, Trump has zero to lose, because he has no political aspirations afterword. While DeSantis would be light-years better at negotiating with Dem's, they have made it quite clear, that ANYONE on the GOP side of the isle will be Hitler 2.0.
.
I just don't see them working with DeSantis, any better than anyone else on the GOP ticket, so I think he is best off to remain in FL and be the inspiration of other states that are red. The one MASSIVE advantage of not giving an F, as well as the monumental pride boost, should he make POTUS after all they have done to him, would make him an unstoppable force.
.
Trump has MANY flaws and what he needs more than anything else, is a right-hand man, who he LISTENS to and turns to that person about 250 times a day and before he lets his thumbs do the talking. If he were to TOTALLY clean house and go with a new admin, as was a catastrophic failure last time, he has the opportunity to blow up that place, but he NEEDS the houses and SCOTUS to get it done.Ā
.
Unless he finds that right-hand man and LISTENS to him, there is a slim chance he can make enough changes to shut down the MarxistCrats pure EVIL. In the end, so long as so much of society is hell bent on raising the West to the ground, in the end... all Trump could possibly do, is lay some ground work and conservatives need to STOP COMPLYING and make the cult EXTREMELY unwelcome.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1