Comments by "" (@NinjaKittyBonks) on "Gad Saad"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@georginatalamo2451 ... Thank you, this is kind of you to say and is probably true or at least I would like to believe so :) Such thinking is much like what one does with a VERY close call, like stopping your car JUST before hitting another or swerving around to narrowly avoid a collision. Those moments get frozen in our minds and, if not obsessive, we avoid dwelling on what might have been and learn to foresee the signs we ignored last time. However, we all have such instances when although avoided the accident, the "OMG, what if I was going just a little bit faster" or "had I looked up just a second or two later, after picking up the item dropped on the floor of the car, that would have been disastrous" can be terrifying to consider :(
.
I think we can be a bit hard on ourselves, as the reason we looked that second sooner or WASN'T going faster, is because last time and did better this day. I have heard many times that it is the negative consequences of which we are most likely to learn and NOT having that collision can be very damaging in and of itself.
1
-
@c3cubed .. If you have followed James Lindsay much, he repeats a viewpoint HE got from another, drawing blank on name, but did the documentary on The Grievance Papers... anyway, it is akin to this "liberal tree" of which the "SJW tree" grows from the side of its trunk. They are busy chopping down the "liberal tree" because it is racist, homophobic... etc and fail to recognize that without the "liberal tree" the SJW tree they so lovingly describe as the TRUE way to be humans on this earth, would fall right along with the other!
.
It is true that the current generation has not suffered TRUE oppression or sacrifice, say WWII or even the societal unrest from Vietnam war, but most of us have not either. While I was born in 1964, I was not really effected by Vietnam issues, I recognize that things like freedom of speech, universal truths are absolutely CRITICAL to our continued existence, but the leftist thinks 10K years of humans just never got it right!
.
While we have all seen the arrogance of the teenager who thinks they know it all... the SJW is DEMANDING that we accept their perception of all that has come before them and bow to the new world order.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Wylee Coyotee ... Didn't have ANY rights, prior to 1950's my GD'd ass!
.
How about the right to vote in the late teens? Ever stop to think that it was 100% men who were corrupted by politics and wrote the 19th amendment and who twisted Roe out of the 14th? Guess what happened in beginning of the 60's....The Pill! The single worst thing to happen to the male / female dynamic and ushered in the sexual revolution which created the foundation of the OF's women we see sad and lonely in their mid 30's without a family. You know the ones, those who "don't need no man" and aren't getting them, because turns out... men don't like women who sleep around or share their body on the internet. The sexual revolution told men that they no longer had to show honor, respect and chivalry to attract a woman he liked, because she did not fear pregnancy... so she gave it up for free!
.
Flash forward 60 years and here you are telling other women they are anti-feminist, because they don't blame men of today for not taking rights away that they already have...WTF? Why are you still complaining? Yes.. women did lack many rights, but 100% of them have been corrected for well over 50 years now (Title IX which is now being dismantled by WOKE cult with the help of women!). If you are not seeking rights, than ALL you are doing, is seeking to look at yourself and women through the lens of oppression or being a victim. This makes men less likely to want to be around you, because bitterness is the only thing that can come of it.
.
Exactly WHAT good does that do you...? I can tell you.. less than zero! This can only serve to make you unhappy or feel as though lacking and blaming men for it! There is certainly some praise and admiration for women of some 50 years and many years prior, but the sexual revolution was right in the middle and forever damaged the male / female dynamic.
.
Please... stop buying in to the feminist lie that you need to keep reaching out for "women's rights" when they have them.
.
Take care and dig the screen name, btw
1
-
1
-
Heather is a wonderful example of class.
I have heard her speak on several interviews / conversations and am ever impressed. Evergreen lost more than they will ever know in more ways than they will ever realize, when they ran Bret & Heather off campus. Yes.... George "Feel free to humiliate me, as I have no spine, no self-respect and willing to be humiliated and ordered to stay put at your whim" Bridges orchestrated the entire uprising of Evergreen. While it is true that the entire campus was filled with spoiled little brat students that were protected from all of life's harm, via helicopter & bulldozer parenting, it was Bridges job to "ween" them from that bubble of protection.
He failed not only the students, but the entire facility, faculty, administration and college will likely cease to exist :(
EDIT: I will take a bit of an issue with her take on Brett Kavanaugh hearing. To say that "he was that kind of guy" in reference to one who women would best avoid, is what, exactly? I did not know him but maybe he was an entitled, spoiled rich brat that always got his way and was a complete dick to everyone when he was younger. He has been in the judicial system for the last 35 years and there is no evidence that such behavior has affected his rulings. I am not going to make excuses for anyone being an ahole when in his / her youth, but was not relevant to the hearings. If he was a prick, he was a prick, but there were TONS of people in their youth that were ahole's and changed their ways over time. No one can undo harm causes by such people, but pointing out that he was a dick 35 years ago, does not mean he is a dick today. If there is / was evidence that such behavior influenced his rulings, by all means, bring them up at the hearing. If not, then don't use them as a "fall back" position to say he should not be confirmed, because we didn't get him on the other stuff.
The accusations against him were unsubstantiated and impossible to prove, but the "he was that kind of guy" anyway, is a BS argument that does not hold water. Using that logic, society just needs to "muddy the water" enough to make somebody look bad and we can then use it as justification to not hire or fire somebody. I think that The Gadfathers explanation is likely the closest to the truth.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@j4Rose ... The only thing Sam Harris is a victim of is TDS. I have seen MANY people afflicted with this psychosis and is like no other mental illness I have ever seen. Nobody ever said that Trump is without fault, as he clearly fails far too often to apply a filter between his thoughts and is mouth.... or thumbs! Those with TDS are absolutely incapable of ANY separation between Trump the man and reality as it pertains to him.
.
I really like DeSantis, but while he is LIGHT YEARS better at using appropriate verbiage to accomplish his goals, the MarxistCrats will demonize him with 95% of the same vigor, as with Trump. DeSantis is a political animal, so he will "play the game" in a way that ruffles the least amount of feathers, so will likely stop short of a goal, should he get enough push back.
.
Trump.. on the other hand, has NO eye on future politics, so he has ZERO political future to protect. For this reason alone, the Democrats hate him with a passion that can ONLY be adequately described as TDS. If Trump wins, and the Democrats will do EVERYTHING possible, both legal and illegal to stop it... Trump will take a freaking wrecking ball to the establishment (FBI, DOJ... etc) and if he does NOTHING else, address the issues of Sec. 230. When big tech is held accountable and no longer able to play both sides of that legislation... we will FINALLY be able to get somewhere in fighting censorship on the platforms that have become the Town Square.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@captainmaim ... YES! I remember it all very well and the dripping hypocrisy of Pelosi in china Town of San Francisco and that 100% of what Trump wanted to address, was instantly some extroversion of "ist" that he was attempting to impose on us all. TDS is arguably the most detrimental disease ever faced in my lifetime of 58 years and the direct path to the compounding of societal division we see killing us all presently. Those with TDS cannot be reached, for they are so entrenched in the hatred, they are blinded by rage and overcome with terror at the mere mention of his name. My own mother is VERY much afflicted by this disease and will LITERALLY begin shaking like a full-blown level 4 Parkinson's sufferer, at the simple conversation that MAY lead in the following 5 minutes lead to the mention of his name! Yes.. it is that bad and leads her to heckler's veto me many times and has become a major rift in our relationship. I get the whole blood is thicker than water and I avoid going near politics, but basic conversations, beyond what is on TV, will eventually lead to SOMETHING political.
.
In some ways, she hates Trump, MORE than she loves me. That sounds insane, but it is absolutely true! TDS is like nothing I have ever witnessed in my entire life and as far as I can tell, it can only be mitigated by complete agreement with one who is governed by it.
1
-
1
-
Carbon Proksi ... Well said 🐱I was thinking about this for a few moments after my last comment in this thread. It occurred to me that those who think ideologically, seem to think that those who have an opposing view must ALSO think ideologically. I am sure that in some cases and for some people this is true, but Sam is making the case that those (all) who were skeptical or vax hesitant were responding this way on ideological grounds. That is to say, if one opposed the vax, it was ONLY because others are for it. What he his utterly failing to recognize, is those who were skeptical, because of the data we had and as a pre-caution to over-reaction. I was among those and while we were proven correct in the end, we very well could have been wrong. To this end, I cannot speak for all who were skeptical, but I was willing to change my opinion, had the evidence concluded that this was a bigger life saving threat to the general or child population. The ideologue will make no such concession, as their position will remain constant to seemingly no end. There are certainly those who WILL change their opinion, but takes a MASSIVE amount of evidence that is conclusive.
.
Then we have the true cult! Those who will double-down 100% of the time and NEVER allow new information to update their initial response. We have seen this time and time again with the MarxistCrats, but up until the last year or so, I never would have imagined that Sam Harris would be among them. Now, I DO think that he will come around one day, because while he is ideologically driven currently, he was not indoctrinated to ONLY respond in this manner. He will one day look back and recognize how he sold his principles for an ideology and have a very difficult awakening.
1
-
1