Comments by "" (@NinjaKittyBonks) on "My Chat with Evolutionary Biologist Heather Heying (THE SAAD TRUTH_805)" video.

  1. Heather is a wonderful example of class. I have heard her speak on several interviews / conversations and am ever impressed. Evergreen lost more than they will ever know in more ways than they will ever realize, when they ran Bret & Heather off campus. Yes.... George "Feel free to humiliate me, as I have no spine, no self-respect and willing to be humiliated and ordered to stay put at your whim" Bridges orchestrated the entire uprising of Evergreen. While it is true that the entire campus was filled with spoiled little brat students that were protected from all of life's harm, via helicopter & bulldozer parenting, it was Bridges job to "ween" them from that bubble of protection. He failed not only the students, but the entire facility, faculty, administration and college will likely cease to exist :( EDIT: I will take a bit of an issue with her take on Brett Kavanaugh hearing. To say that "he was that kind of guy" in reference to one who women would best avoid, is what, exactly? I did not know him but maybe he was an entitled, spoiled rich brat that always got his way and was a complete dick to everyone when he was younger. He has been in the judicial system for the last 35 years and there is no evidence that such behavior has affected his rulings. I am not going to make excuses for anyone being an ahole when in his / her youth, but was not relevant to the hearings. If he was a prick, he was a prick, but there were TONS of people in their youth that were ahole's and changed their ways over time. No one can undo harm causes by such people, but pointing out that he was a dick 35 years ago, does not mean he is a dick today. If there is / was evidence that such behavior influenced his rulings, by all means, bring them up at the hearing. If not, then don't use them as a "fall back" position to say he should not be confirmed, because we didn't get him on the other stuff. The accusations against him were unsubstantiated and impossible to prove, but the "he was that kind of guy" anyway, is a BS argument that does not hold water. Using that logic, society just needs to "muddy the water" enough to make somebody look bad and we can then use it as justification to not hire or fire somebody. I think that The Gadfathers explanation is likely the closest to the truth.
    1