Comments by "" (@NinjaKittyBonks) on "2016/10/05: Part 3: The PC Game (and some counter-tactics)" video.

  1. Jordan B. Peterson is a bonafide bad ass! These SJW's have no idea the power they wield nor the consequences of it. I wish there was a atom-bomb of knowledge that could be detonated above the earths atmosphere and rain education down upon the masses. EDIT: For fun, I checked the links to Pokemon packs and those links now direct toward official merchandise :(
    3
  2. I don't claim to have his level of education nor intelligence, but I know when I see it. I have watched probably 100+ hours of his speaking and if you think I am being "scammed", it only serves to say that you are likely one of those who whom he refers constantly. You appear to be either a troll, an SJW or unable to distinguish between them.
    3
  3. I know, but kinda fun to get my gotcha on :) Besides, anyone got a problem with kitties, gots a problem with me ;)
    2
  4. While I don't have the education of Jordan, I do have more then adequate intelligence to discern most of what he says. While I do not have his command of the English language, my own education allows me to understand most of his topics. Beyond this, there is no way for you to determine whether I do or do not have the ability to discern the validity of what he says :) For example, I have no issues at all understanding his position on why he opposes C-16 or what he discussed with Cathy Newman, as a good example of why I appreciate his point of view. Do I worship the ground he walks on...? no. If my initial comments gave you that impression, you read something into them that I did not say. I will admit, that when he gets deep in discussion with Sam or Matt Dillihunty about God, some of the words and / or concepts can escape me, but I get the gist of what he is saying. Why would you say "much of what he says must be a lie"? I have heard enough conversations he has had with many different people and have not heard anybody call him out as you have. Some disagree, but those I've seen deny science and get cornered by their ideology and end up with "so you're saying" type of response. I would ask that if you feel he is a fraud or delusional, contact him for a Skype debate.
    1
  5. As mentioned above, I have seen propably 100+ hours of his lectures, speeches, debates and discussions. I cannot speak to the 4 you have seen, but you would need to give me an example of inconsistency, as I have not seen it. I am not saying he is incapable of making a mistake, but never seen him talking out of both sides of his mouth. Jordan is an extremely deliberate speaker and have heard him say he will re-think a position if he gets a good rebuttal. Have also watched him say directly that he will not answer a question, as he has not given the topic enough consideration to hold a debatable position. I have never seen him take any position that he does not feel is correct and he says continually that one should never tell a lie or say something that one knows to be untrue. With the thousands of hours on line and the EXTREME scrutiny he has received by the SJW crowd, if there were even one instance found of hypocrisy or lies recorded, it would be used by the founder to take him down. If there is such a recording, I would honestly like to know.
    1
  6. I just realized, I missed one or two of your comments above, so will get back to them. The following, is in regards to my being in the "cult" of Jordan. Honestly, I find that analogy to be very rude. Please explain to me where I said that I ingest everything that Jordan says as beyond question. I am not religious and have only watched 3 or 4 videos of him regarding God and the origin of truth. The existence of God cannot be proven to exist or be false and the topic is essentially kryptonite to Jordan. Try as he may, he cannot articulate some things, as they are just beyond his words. Does that make him a liar or deceitful? Apparently, you seem to think so. I am not religious and just don't find those particular discussions to make any headway. Neither Matt or Sam are going to change their position and seems to me that anyone attempting to "prove" the existence of God, particularly to an athiest, is just doomed to failure. As for C-16, I am not going to debate the specifics of what is or is not in the bill. Jordan has shown several pages in these videos and see why he has an issue with it. Just as Jordan, I feel that free speech is probably the single most important amendment, as nothing can be resolved without speaking ones mind. Saying someone is a liar is much different than saying someone is wrong about something. One is intentional misrepresentation of the truth, while the other is an error. I am not going to argue for or against either one, with the information I currently have. I certainly cannot vouch for everything he says on C-16, nor would I have any reason to do so, I understand his point of compelled speech and in his corner on that. You have obviously found some issues with him and decided to discredit him completely, that is your right.
    1
  7. This is reply to your comment @Lil uzi Advert and enforced monogomy: I see you are a troll and at least admit it. As for me being male or female, it is not relevant to anything we are discussing here. On his statement of enforced monogamy, I know that he has used the term, but not seen a video in which I saw it myself. I have heard him and others explain what he meant and is referring to marriage being the ideal scenario for couples. This is my interpretation of what he said and am not obliged to attack or defend it. He thinks marriage is the ideal and.... OK, fine with me.
    1
  8. Wow... you are a piece of work, Pat. Since when is anybody forcing you to believe or follow 100% of everything they say and think? I don't follow blindly to everything ANYBODY says nor do I believe that EVERYTHING any person thinks or says is the right thing for me. If you do or don't believe marriage is good for you, that is your opinion. Jordan happens to think that marriage is the ideal and is his opinion. You do not, so I guess you feel that everything Jordan has ever said, done, believes, thinks or discussed must be discounted and he is a complete and total fraud with no right to even have an opinion. Take some of it or take none of it, that is the choice for all of us and is ultimately what he would say, should such a question ever be posed to him. I am sorry that Jordan is so threatening to you and your way of life that you see the need to troll around for others in the attempt to poison their minds against another, due to his opinions. we're done here.
    1