Comments by "" (@NinjaKittyBonks) on "The Officer Tatum"
channel.
-
1100
-
574
-
498
-
357
-
350
-
302
-
225
-
182
-
175
-
174
-
167
-
130
-
122
-
121
-
99
-
95
-
80
-
78
-
60
-
55
-
47
-
45
-
41
-
40
-
38
-
38
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
28
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
@ninadaly7639 ... My reply was in response to your 1st comment, in which you seemingly suggested that the property was worth a max of $18M, because it should never have been developed beyond its initial worth of that amount. My point was to illustrate that if this were the case, than the city must make a decision to either force Trump to tear down ALL of the resources that elevated that $18M max worth OR.... force him to pay the fines, penalties and whatever else to keep them. If the bank did the due diligence to discover that property was illegally improved upon, that would have been done and Trump would be F'd then and there. This would mean no huge loan, that would have exceeded the properties "actual" worth, but like 10x's?. What Trump did was precisely the same as every property owner / developer whom has ever or will ever exist, from the beginning of time, until it ceases to exist.
.
As anyone with 2 brain cells to rub together can see (not disparaging you here), this is nothing more than an outright political witch hunt to do LITERALLY anything that can conceivably be done, to eliminate the possibility that Trump EVER make POTUS again and, if possible... toss him in jail for 1M years.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@themadrapper101 ... The very first time I heard the term "wh-ite pr-ivile-ge", was on Gre-y's An-ato-my . I was watching on a certain service that when mentioned HAS gotten this comment deleted 4x's already, and was late 2015, I think. That episode was several years old, but even though I had ZERO idea about WOKE at that time, I was really ticked off by hearing it. It was not until another year or so later, I'd heard it again and been probably 1K times since! What amazes me is the self-delusion that treating an entire race of people as a pariah will lead to ANYTHING but resentment, anger and, if goes on for much longer... ext-re-me c-iv-il un-happ-ine-ss. I would argue that the worst part of s-lav-er-y, is the d-ehu-man-iza-tio-n of those who are e-ns-lave-d.
.
While nobody is ens--la-vi-ng people in America any longer, white people are indeed being deh-um-ani-zed openly on social media, commercials, TV and MarxistWood, to name but a few places. In the end, there can be no question that the Western World WILL have additional people who will describe themselves as wh-it-e s-upr-ema-ci-sts, because they will have been raised in a culture which rewards people for openly expressing racism toward them. I get that the Regressive wants to tear down the "evils" of ca-pit-alis-m for so-cia-li-sm, as if that is not catastrophic enough, but what we are heading towards is a reversion to the most base of all human responses to a complete co-lla-ps-e of a so-cie-ty.
.
I don't know what is going to happen here, but there is no way America can withstand another 6 years, if that red wave does not come, of Regressive rule without a huge number of people snapping. I am still trying to hold out hope, but it is getting darker every single day :(
.
EDIT: Took me about 10 tries to get this past the minions of anti-1a
2
-
2
-
2
-
Jimmie Jay Bohorn ... Um, what is not accurate? I copy / pasted YOUR EXACT quotes directly from your comments above. Are you denying you said them? Cannot say out of context, because the context is exactly as much as you gave. ANYONE who votes yes as Ketanji for SCOTUS does so 100% on ideological grounds and that is an absolutely OBJECTIVE FACT! I am opposed to her, because she cannot even answer the most basic of ALL questions posed to her. I may not know the law as well as she does, but how in the hell is she to apply it, when the case before her is the following:
.
She has two defendants before her in a courtroom. The defendant has a lawsuit because she feels wrongly overlooked for promotion because she is a woman. By Ketanji's OWN admission, she is unqualified to rule in that case. She cannot define a woman, so how can she rule on the merits of the case? SHE..... CAN.... NOT!
.
This is pure insanity at the highest of levels, yet you defend her as a qualified for the highest court in our land. Now, Jimmie... if you have the balls to come back her and ACTUALLY address my questions right here, I will be thoroughly impressed. However, I will be fascinated to see what kind of argument you make and if you actually stay on topic.
2
-
Jimmie Jay Bohorn ... Classic :) Jimmie pulls the "R" card as that is the ONLY card you can play. You cannot defend your backing of this SCOTUS nominee NOR answer the issue I gave you, so what is the next best thing to the cult...? "RACIST!"
.
My God, the lack of intellectual honesty from you is exactly what I expect from a leftist ideologue. You have NOTHING but talking points and as soon as you are asked an honest question that ANY honest person would be able to address, you come back with a change of topic, exactly as predicted, and claim I am racist because reasons. Even if you failed to give a good answer, I would offer you respect for trying. As it stands, you have nothing to offer that is worthy of my respect in backing this SCOTUS nominee.
.
What a truly pathetic attempt to shift your inability to defend your position, into a personal attack on me, which cannot be substantiated, but that does not matter to the ideologue... only the accusation. How sad this all is.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@hortenciamonjaras153 ... While it is true that a bank account can never be phat enough, that is what this is about... he wants to be relevant again. He is an extreme narcissist, as are all leftists, and he wants to pump up his "brand" again, as he has not been in the news lately. He will be in the spotlight for this "tryout" for a day at most and then try to stretch it out as long as possible, with cries of "racist scouts" and "white supremacist NFL coaches, who won't draft a black QB" bullshit. It is clear that the people are just getting sick and GD'd tired of all the cries of racism, and while it has taken WAY, WAY, WAY too long for them to figure this out, there will no going back again.
.
Give Colin a couple days and we will hear his cries of racism for not having been given a $350M contract to start for NE. Hell, some team may pick him up for as cheap as possible, JUST for the publicity!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@PBJ ... Yes. I realize that, but was being facetious :) Clearly, they want division, but that is NOT what they would say, should you get them to speak of this in a conversation.
.
Beyond all that though, even if division is what they want, how do they think it will go? Do they think white folks will just say... "meh... I am gonna move out of this country and leave you all to America". No, there are those that are going to snap at some point. Someone, somewhere, will just overhear two blacks laughing about a white person who was killed, robbed or had their business burned down by BLM and have a psychotic break. Sooner or later we WILL get public brawls, as those blacks who think it is OK to 100% openly spread racism toward whites, is gonna get a beat down.
.
I am not advocating or think this is the correct response, but it WILL happen at some point.
2
-
@J.J. Guerrieri ... Agreed! His tone is threatening, but so are many of his words. Easy for us to be calm and say what he needed to do, but he needed to step away. Imagine being so upset / frustrated to tell an 8 mo. pregnant mother of YOUR children, to take an Uber. Here's an idea, Steven... YOU get an Uber, if it turns out you need to go somewhere. No way they only have 1 car, so my guess is the other was getting repaired or something. Rather than get a rental, he uses the 1 car as a means to control her movements. I lost quite a bit of respect after his poor handling of DW, but seeing this...? There is no context I can apply, to see this as justified means in which to treat her and for multiple reasons! Without infidelity, as he says there was none, there is just no way for a relationship to get to this point, since she became pregnant. They both have been ignoring issues and I would say this is, was... a toxic relationship for a while. This is just so ugly and the fall out for Steven next week is going to be even worse, as he WILL lose more support and subs.
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
No.... you're not trippin'
Gavin Newsom is part of that far-left progressive ideology that thinks cops are evil and must be 100% accountable for the actions of ALL persons during a police action. He, and others like him, have no issue spending 3 weeks analyzing video footage AFTER an incident involving the police. They take no issue comparing the 5 different cell phone views of police interaction, in which a suspect refuses to comply to the direct orders of as many officers. Even then, it is not always obvious what happened, but since the suspect was black, you should NOT have used deadly force, regardless of situation.
The officer had .2 milliseconds to weigh 8 possible scenarios of a suspects action, in which each one could have resulted in the injury or death of an innocent person. According to Newsom, the 5 different cell phones and 3 weeks of investigation, the officer should have KNOWN the future and that the suspect was just an innocent kid messing around..... with a gun..... resisting arrest..... not trying to hurt anybody..... yelling he is the victim of systemic racism.
Cops get a raw deal, man :(
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you exhibit: A and precisely why I have been saying a "Peaceful Divorce" is simply not possible. While @Jimmie Jay Bohorn is passionate about his defense of and support for Ketanji Brown-Jackson for SCOTUS, there is no intellectually honest exchange for his part. There are some brief excerpts lifted from WIKI about Ms. Jackson's scholastic achievements, but when posed with very legitimate concerns as to why she fails the requirements of occupying SCOTUS seat, he changes the subject to ...."The GOP is Racist..." "Such and such senator voted to suppress the black vote" and various other things irrelevant to the topic at hand.
.
Now, there may be a conversation to be had on those topics, but they are not and should not be part of the discussion here, because they have nothing to to with the subject at hand. When @Jimmie Jay Bohorn's own quotes from comments in this thread are not only given with full context, but bring direct challenge to why Ms. Jackson is objectively NOT qualified for SCOTUS... Jimmy's response is, and I quote again "That ain't accurate, Boy! [imoji of child]". When challenged a second time to show me where / how I am inaccurate, we get the next ideologically possessed response ..... "It is a fait accompli. Stop exposing your racism. Move on, bud!". Jimmy is not only unwilling to address legitimate questions about statements he has made, but since he now has nowhere he can go to avoid exposing his own hypocrisy... he then drops the "racism" card. Of course, the "racism" card is the absolute 100% go-to for those possessed in this way, because, as we know, one cannot ask legitimate questions and / or have an intellectually honest exchange when the person who is being discussed is black... and NOT be a fundamentally racist attack upon the character of that person.
.
Back to the reason mentioned, atop this comment. How would it be possible to negotiate a "peaceful divorce" when THIS is a textbook example of whom it is we would need to enter into such negotiations? Jimmy, as well as all of those on the ideologically driven Marxist / post modern left who claim to be "Democrats", are not willing to engage in a debate / discussion / conversation, when presented with facts, logic, reason and objective reality. It is because EACH one of those arguments falls under the heading of "my truth" to such an ideology, there is no "good faith" that can be reciprocated from the ideologically possessed position of those who would lay claim they should be chosen to negotiate for that "Peaceful divorce".
.
Now tell me, Mr. / Ms. internet reader... beyond the many reasons I could give why a "Peaceful divorce" is simply not a possibility, how would we EVER get to a negotiated agreement, when THIS is the way in which negotiations / debate / conversations are held? Answer... we could not!
.
I wish I could say that this thread was fruitful, in that maybe I would learn some legitimate reasons to re-consider my lack of support for Ms. Jackson, but sadly... this was not to be. While my purpose to engaging in such discussions, is not simply to state my opinion, but to learn, it is Jimmy's goal to "win an argument". For I do not consider myself as "always in the right" or always correct about all of my positions, so I am forever open to and continually seek challenges to my assumptions / positions, so as to make sure I am not blindly supporting an idea / person, with an ill-informed or from an ideologically driven position. While I am certainly far from perfect, I always have and will continue to challenge what I think and why I think it.
.
While It is not likely Jimmie Jay Bohorn would be on the opposite side of such a "Peaceful Divorce" negotiation table, it is the same intellectually dishonest, inherently deceitful and bad-faith manner in which those of us who are sincere, would need to address at that table. For when THIS is the response we get when attempting to move forward and get beyond the inevitable collapse of all Western World societies at the hands of this ideologically possessed and self-described "tolerant left".. nobody stands a chance!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Solidus78 .. Please tell me where I or another in this thread, said that there is a father in any of these homes. There are statistically likely to be some, but whether there is or is not, the father of these children have COMPLETELY failed them. The whole thing is not only tragic and HORRENDOUS for society, but sad. We get to watch another generation of lost black youth who are more violent and less accountable to the one prior.
.
Were I POTUS in 2024, in my top 3 list of things to address... Welfare. I would turn it on its head and remove financial assistance, for fatherless homes and look to create some incentives for marriage. However, this is a societal issue and simply being "married" will not automatically a good father, make. One thing is for sure... paying single moms MORE for each child they have without a father in the home, has worked to destroy the black family.
.
So long as Democrats continue to treat blacks as their pets in the voting booth, identity politics will thrive and endlessly paint them as victims of a systemically racist system that DOES NOT EXIST.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Andreallen4 ... I certainly don't want to see that, nor do I think most pro-lifers. There are 2 issues that MUST be agreed upon, before this freak out will EVER end. Those who are pro-choice (pro-abortion, if one prefers) need to answer the following:
1. What is the pro-life persons issue with abortion?
2. When does life begin?
.
Unless BOTH of those questions have a common ground, this argument will NEVER, EVER, EVER, EVER end! The first question, could probably be agreed upon, at least in so far as to understanding the motivation of pro-life argument. The 2nd, however.... no way would there be consensus. Some will agree "at conception", but still fall back to "her body, her choice" position. Most though, will say "heartbeat", has "fingers" or some physical characteristic to "look" human. We know that this is a thinly veiled cover to shield their sensibilities from the horrendous act they partake, because it would be extremely difficult to accept the idea of human murder.
.
What makes this all even worse than has been all along, is the absolute demonizing of conservatives, so that even having a discussion is verboten. This leads us to why 1a is such a threat, because the leftist wants to attribute "words" to violence. If they can control language, they control ALL of humanity, because discourse is essentially made illegal. I think that full scale 1960's style resolution is where we will end up, as the cult will NEVER stop pushing the rest of us to the point where anything else is available.
1
-
@The_Phoenix_Saga ... Agreed :) The life on Mars analogy is a perfect one, but the problem is the telegraphed response when using it. If you can get a pro-choice person to calm down long enough to actually HAVE a rational discussion, I can all but guarantee it will end, the moment you say... "If we land a probe on Mars and find a clump of cells, scientists would call tha...." instant anger will likely be the response.
.
Pro-life people most certainly want people to take responsibility for actions, but the argument will nearly 100% of the time be instantly hijacked with VERY rare examples of r*** and in*** pregnancy and to the straw man of how pro-lifers don't care and should be forced to have the baby anyway.
.
Unless one is LITERALLY a conception absolutist, the overwhelming vast majority of those who are pro-life will concede a VERY limited exception for such extreme cases. While the baby / fetus is STILL innocent, the trauma may be to much for the mother and could very well lead to harm in development of the baby anyway. Such harm IS a form of "child abuse", but the health of the mother MUST be taken into consideration in such specific circumstances.
.
Safe, legal and EXCEPTIONALLY rare, is something that would be a bit fragile, but if we could ALL agree on this, I think all of this anger would go away. Some on both ends would STILL be unhappy, but we cannot please everyone.
1
-
@mentos93 ... It is most certainly a wedge issue and is EXACTLY why this information was leaked. Whether it was an intern or even one of the judges, it is either a "testing of the waters thing" or a deliberate attempt to rile up the outrage mob and this has most certainly succeeded.
.
We must also acknowledge that it is the extreme left that is driving a MASSIVE wedge in our society, as there is ZERO self-policing within the Democratic party and has lost a TON of support due to it. At the end of the day, the completely OPEN demonizing of conservatives from Regressives, big tech, public education K~12, colleges / universities, Gen Z and the Twitter outrage mob means that any and all discussions on ANYTHING of which we disagree is verboten.
.
The abortion issue aside, the discourse has gone to pretty much ZERO, because conservative voices are told to STFU on ALL of social media, so we cannot even sit down to seek compromise. Conservatives are getting so sick and tired of being told their evil, their patience is running thin, so we are seeing more of them gloat or otherwise play some of the same games Regressives have been playing for nearly a decade now.
.
Of one thing we can be certain... for every time we hear our political "leaders" call conservatives "white supremacists" and "neo-Nazi's" for SIMPLY being conservative, it further emboldens the extreme left to perpetuate violence as a means to address speech to which they disagree.
1
-
@Battleborn357 ... I agree with all that you have said :) To be clear, and I am not certain on this, so clarify if I am reading you wrong. I personally am not so extreme as to force a r*** or in*** victim to carry to term, as I do think that is it's own kind of evil. I did mention that even if the case it is STILL and innocent fetus / baby, so I while I am not a "conception absolutist", I understand how / why people make that argument. I think that is JUST as extreme as the argument some make for 'up to and including birth" for abortion. While the latter may be more rare, BOTH exist.
.
Unfortunately, while both extremes exist, the "up to and including..." one is a position more have been embracing, as a show of just how committed they are to choice. As mentioned earlier, we cannot allow THOSE extremes to drive the conversation, but the squeaky wheel gets the grease, as they say and that latter person is NOT being told they have gone too far, by the pro-choice community.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@chrisallison9151 ... RE: It's not a strawman... : I will answer your question, but will you offer me the same respect to answer mine?
.
Besides, answered your question, I just did so with sarcasm, as it was the most civil way to answer such a question that was posed. Yours is a ridiculous argument, because one is a direct expression of wilful malice, while the other is an extremely unfortunate possibility of a 100% natural and 100% NECESSARY risk. To make myself clear.... NO. When this happens it is ALWAYS tragic and not only for the mother. The baby, while he / she will now have an opportunity to survive, will miss out on a special bond that is most strong, when with the biological mother.
.
Now.. i will ask that you show me the same respect to answer the questions I have posed. Feel free to "zing" me, as I have you, but I would like an honest answer to very reasonable questions. If you cannot or will not answer those questions, it will say something about your willingness to have an intellectually honest conversation and this is ALL I ask of anyone with whom I disagree :)
1
-
@chrisallison9151 ... RE: I dont' think financial responsibility equates... : Chris..... pregnancy is a 100% legit possibility with most encounters of heterosexual sexual contact (you know what I mean, when I say "contact"). This is something that BOTH participants hold responsibility and goes without saying that FAR, FAR, FAR too many women become pregnant, when they did not wish to be. There is NO perfect, yet NON permanent solution to this issue, so let's just be honest and accept that this will probably forever be the case.
.
Now, I used the words "financial responsibility", because other than emotional / psychological support, that is all that the father can offer during pregnancy. It goes without saying, that HER commitment has many more obligations, as well as commitment, but again.... BOTH knew this possibility, but far, far, far too often... this "consequence" is not fully acknowledged by one or both parties.
.
YES... both who agree to enter into a sexual relationship SHOULD absolutely discuss the ramifications ahead of time, but we all know this is far too often ignored by one or both and particularly, at the first such encounter. Since sexual contact is 100% driven by the biological instinct of BOTH participants and is a 100% natural progression of the human experience, someone needs to be the adult in the room.
.
It would certainly by my hope, that BOTH are willing to be that adult, but fair or not... babies are created within the mother, so women pay a much higher "price" for NOT being the adult in the room. We have not even touched on the regret, be it very small or huge that many women understandably feel after an abortion, but there is also a risk of FUTURE pregnancies or even a woman's life, by getting one.
.
One can be mad about why these things are, but he / she will just have to take it up with our creator.
1
-
1
-
@Battleborn357 ... I have been meaning to not only re-read The Constitution and Bill of Rights, but I would need to spend a LOT of time to truly "digest" them. Sadly, with each generation, starting with probably Boomers, the appreciation for what amazing documents these are is slowly becoming lost :( The Constitution is certainly not perfect, but we must take into account it was written LONG before much of the technology we have to day was even dared to be conceived, but was written by humans and we are fallible creatures.
.
The Constitutional amendments are a way to address the "wrongs" the founding fathers KNEW would be discovered, as they had the foresight to recognize and fully acknowledge there would be flaws or failings of that document. We need only take a look around to see Canada, Australia, Germany and MANY Western World nations, who's laws and rights are loosely based on The Ten Commandments, The Constitution, Bill of Rights and Declaration of Independence, but NONE of them have those documents codified into not only national law, but as "natural rights".
.
Were it not for The Constitution and VERY specifically, the Bill of Rights, we could VERY easily go by way of what we saw in Canada recently over the Trucker's protest. What Trudeau did was BEYOND criminal, by ANY metric of Western values and due to the Regressives of the Leftist Cult, have watched Biden LITERALLY create treasonous acts on at minimum of 3 times and at least an impeachable act at our Texas border, last year.
.
If we did not have 300+ million guns in this country, and most of them legally owned by good American citizens... Biden would do EXACTLY the kinds of things we are seing world wide and has even gotten away with some already!
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jefferygoines ... RE: If it's murder.... : Not sure to whom you are directing this comment, as you probably have somebody specific in mind, but I will chime in on it anyway :)
.
There are some who would argue that she should go to jail, however, I am not one of them. While I am pro-life, I understand there are exceptions to every rule, I would like to see those exceptions as very, if not exceedingly, rare. In order to understand why so many are pro-life and upwards of 67%, if memory serves, want at least some restrictions on abortion.... Matthew, please answer the following questions:
1. Why do YOU think those of us who are pro-life, feel this way? I am talking about probably 99.9% of us.
2. When does "human life" begin? In your opinion, at what point does that "clump of cells" become a human?
.
I will throw in some food for thought, of why I, and would safely say 99.9% of pro-life people would say (tossing out the .01% who think "tossing out" is murder... lol). My answer to #2 is conception. I say this because, that "clump of cells" has 100% of the DNA necessary to become a person, just like all of us, except it only need time and nourishment from the mother's care. I happen to have my Dad's hair and my mom's eyes. My father and I have always been about as far from close as it saddens me to say, but I have always written the capital letter "R" in the exact same, albeit odd, way. My torso is a bit longer than proportionally relative to my legs and is the same as my dad. More and more of my physical features resemble my father, as the years go on.
.
My point....? If this "clump of cells" is something OTHER than an under developed human life, how is it that children VERY often assume may facial features, eye color, skin tone as the parents? Take a look at your and any family, then note physical similarities between parents and their off-spring. Is some of this random...? Sure, some of it is.However, the number of those born with similar or nearly identical features as the parent, cannot be all explained away, via random coincidence.
This all tells us, that the "clump of cells" is a "mixture" of both mother and father, with the addition of basic human building blocks, so as to keep the human race more resistant to genetic degradation over time.
.
Lastly... why is the subject of your comment, a "political coward"?
.
I await your reply, Matthew :)
1
-
1
-
1
-
@cj-gj2io ... Ya, the Atlantic is known as a balanced bastion of non-bias journalistic integrity! My mother cited the Atlantic, among several other Joseph Goebbels Propaganda media (CNN, MSNBC.. etc) and she is the Queen Bee, Grand Pupa of TDS Local Chapter 38. It takes no more than my experience of their "articles" to know how TDS driven they are, but my mother LITERALLY begins violently shaking with what looks like and EXTREME case of Parkinson's, at the mere mention of Trumps name in ANY capacity, that is not equated to Hitler himself. There is no way in hell, she could ingest anything but pure vitriol, disgust and the presentation of PURE EVIL, when it comes to Trump. It would be an actual health risk, for her to watch news or read an article that was even neutral about trump, much less say ANYTHING less than Hilteresque about him.
.
PS> Looking at the author, I find the odds infinitesimally small anyone would have @cj-gj2lo as screen name and not be a bot. Since he / she / it has not returned for reply to the many referencing it here, also says one or two things. 1) This is a leftist who does not have actual evidence to back up claims of something racist, fascist, homophobic that Trump has committed and 2) A bot doe not get notifications of responses to comments.
1
-
1
-
@zltp10 ... RE: did he condemn them or not for their actions ? Simple yes or no : Any response to my debunking of the lie you have been fed on this? I am not looking for a pat on the back, I am looking to break through some of the BS you have been told about Trump. NOBODY will say, Trump is not guilty of running his mouth (or thumbs), when he should STFU and better consider his words. However, while he has next to no filter on his mouth or thumbs, he says what a MAGA sheet ton of us think, but do not have the platform he does. I don't care so much if Trump is an ahole, as I am not just looking for a "nice guy" to be POTUS. I want someone who has the strength to face foreign leaders, protect children from the ABSOLUTE EVIL of teachers unions and federal alphabet agencies who are TREASONOUS against the American people.
.
Whether Trump will seriously address these things or not, he is the ONLY one, who does not give two F's about a political future and THAT is the biggest reason the Dem's TDS drives them to such hate.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@cowel8734 ...
#1 Opening sentence: Correct, but the foundation of an "excuse" has been given, by the endless demonizing of [people+pale+skin] as acceptable and rewarded behavior
#2 Second sentence: Spot-on
#3 Closing sentence: You have confused me. It is perfectly OK for me or anyone to blame those responsible for not just what we see in this video, but express disgust for Joseph Goebbels Propaganda media, who will overwhelmingly ignore this story or simply report and "altercation" between students at school. Were this to be [reversed+attacked/attackers]... there is a 100% chance this story would be covered by ALL of those same "journalists / news" outlets, with a headline stating some variation of.... "single [dark+grey+skin+person] student violently attacked by [pale+skin+person] and was unprovoked" (see #1 above). YES... everyone should be held accountable, but since overwhelmingly, those depicted doing aggression, are exceptionally often not held accountable or to a very small degree. It is THESE exceptions of accountability being demanded (combined #1 above), that bolster the "excuse".
.
This sounds extreme. However, consider the worst of the worst actions that made slavery (the 'excuse" stems from this) so evil... it was the dehumanization of black people! Society is being told that it is perfectly acceptable to perpetrate this SAME action, so long as that person fits [demographic] seen against the lockers in this video.
.
(algorithm hoop jumping was necessary)
1
-
1
-
@cowel8734 .... I will repost with further changes:
==========================================================================================
#1 Opening sentence: Correct, but the foundation of an "excuse" provided, by the endless [treatment+poorly] of [fair+people+skin] as [alright] behavior
#2 Second sentence: Spot-on
#3 Closing sentence: You have confused me. It is perfectly OK for me or anyone to blame [persons] for not just what we see in this video, but express [thoughts+about+media], who will overwhelmingly [pretend+didn't+happen] this story or simply report an "altercation" between students at school. Were this to be [reversed+rolls]... there is [complete] chance this story would be covered by ALL of those same "journalists / news" outlets, with a headline stating some variation of.... "single [dark+grey+skin+person] student [harmed] by [pale+skin+person] and was [not+warranted]" (see #1 above). YES... everyone should be held [standard+accept], but since overwhelmingly, those depicted doing [things+bad], are exceptionally often not held [such+standard] or to a very small degree. It is THESE exceptions of [standard] being asked (combined #1 above), that bolster that "excuse".
.
This sounds extreme. However, consider the worst of the worst actions that made [labor+forced+dark grey+persons] (the 'excuse" stems from this) so [actions of being who lives center of earth].. it was the [subtraction+humanity+ of [people+dark grey+skin]! Society is being told that it is perfectly acceptable to do the same, so long as that person fits [demographic] seen against the lockers in this video.
.
(hoop jumping entirely necessary)
1
-
1
-
@cowel8734 ...I will try a 3rd time...Truth, logic, evidence, fact. Facts, truth, logic. Logic, truth fact. Fact, logic, truth. Conclusion because fact, logic and truth. Shown to be truth, by logic, evidence and fact, combined with more truth.
.
To summarize... facts, logic, evidence, truth are not allowed here.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Typhus-th6ud .. I don't understand why you are putting this much effort into what I said and projecting so much upon it. The line "Do not become that which you fight" is a philosophical statement that is a warning that one must not compromise their own morals, in order to defeat / overcome another by doing the same thing.
.
Tell me, why is it a bad thing to consider your own moral standards when "engaged" with one who's are far lower? This is would be like one person cheating at sport to win and then you cheating MORE to win yourself. Would you feel good about that win? I would not feel good about that win, so my goal, in such a scenario would NOT be to "cheat more" , but rather try to stop his / her ability to cheat or simply expose it to others, so that they must face the public scrutiny.
.
I literally could not care less who it was that first said that line. It could have been in a Cracker-Jack box and would be 100% as valid a moral compass as if were proposed to be said by God in the Bible.
.
Your closing line is really where we are and what I said in my OP. I would and DO my best to overcome, but not sell my own principles. So, as abhorrent as what we see in the [lee + gall] system happening today, must be [reese } iprocated] in order to expose to them how bad it is. The problem we have is that the media will not report in good faith, so is very hard to play the SAME game, yet not be claimed as infinitely worse.
.
That is the price we are gonna have to pay.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ha haaaa.... Colion Noir had the EXACT same take as you... lol
Credit on showing the .50 cal bullet, he didn't go that far. That is one hell of a bullet and is like what is found on battleships and maybe some larger tanks.
EDIT: Forgot where I saw it, but was just a few days ago. There was a lady who lived in Germany (was filmed in '70's) and she was saying how it started with Hitler saying "crime is too high, so come in and register your firearms so we have s/n on file" Everybody did that, because they had no reason to not trust the government... right?
Well, after everybody registered there guns, about 2 months goes by and Hitler says... "Crime did not go down, so bring in your weapons so we can get them off the street" Well, the government already knew who had the guns, so if you didn't turn it in, they came breaking down your door.
That happened prior to the major crackdown of Nazi regime!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nigelplumley8188 ... Ya, I don't understand either. But one thing is absolutely clear.... this is intentionally malicious. If we think back to slavery, which is pretty much always the underlying go-to focus of resentment, what was it about slavery, specifically... that made it so horrific? Of course, the forcing of labor and destruction of the family is very high on the list, but not the TOP reason, in my opinion. The fundamentally worst part of slavery, was the dehumanization. It was treating people with contempt and "less than", simply for being black. This was an intentional and exceedingly malicious act, in order to break the spirit of those who were enslaved, so disgusting beyond words.
.
Now, fast forward to what we see here. We see a black woman, dehumanizing white people. While they have not been enslaved, forced to work in a field or kidnapped from their land and had their families destroyed, they are most certainly being dehumanized. Somebody please tell me, how it is OK for this black woman to dehumanize white people, when the dehumanizing of blacks by whites during slavery was not.
.
We can talk about "degree" of humiliation or circumstances, but treating people in this way cannot POSSIBLY lead to anything but resentment, hatred and ultimately people who will feel bigotry toward blacks. For all of the never-ending decries of racism we have been forced to hear for the last 6+ years specifically, there is absolutely no way to look at how whites are OPENLY treated and not understand the following. The number of people who will feel prejudice or bigotry toward blacks or become "white supremacists", will ABSOLUTELY be higher in the years to come, precisely because of the acceptance of the attitude of the racist black woman depicted in this video.
.
The leftist is getting EXACTLY what they want. They get to be exceptionally rude to white people, by calling them racist for simply having white skin and the self-fulfilling prophecy of CREATING more of those of whom they claim to despise. This just goes to prove, the leftist cult knows NOTHING about healing, but only destruction!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1