TheQuartering
comments
Comments by "" (@NinjaKittyBonks) on "The Daily Wire Declares WAR On Youtube! Candace Owens BANNED \u0026 Michael Knowles BANNED 200 Violations" video.
13
4
3
@Ninnjette- ... Yes. DW, just as LWC and every conservative / free-speech minded creator is. I followed Crowder for many years, but dropped him after his handling the contract offer and will have zero do to with him, after seeing how he treated his wife. That is neither here, nor there, as it relates to this issue, however. Crowder made compromises to remain on YouTube just as DW does, though DW does not "poke the bear" quite as aggressively... not that YT needs ANY actual ToS violation to do its evil unto conservative / free speech creators.
.
Crowder was making TONS of money on YouTube, by way of building MC, his own adds for pew-pew manufacturer and others. There was a specific reason why he did is special segment that would NEVER fly on YouTube on other platforms... he would have been immediately banned. DW has an infinitely larger business and built on multiple creators and many, many more employees. The risk is VASTLY higher, so they make some compromises (100% of conservatives make most of the same ones), so as to remain on by far the largest platform for content on planet earth.
.
It is my hope, that DW pulls stakes and goes to The Rumbles, then more and more follow suit. Viva Frei has a great deal going, by hosting content he can on YT, but moving to The Rumbles for what he can't and to give "first access".
3
@ABD-pc3jf ... No. I thought about the Crowder / DW situation with much critical thought and I landed on principle.... allow me to explain.
.
I have zero issue with Crowder not liking that offer. There were clearly at least a few things that were not omitted that were rightfully considered a bit offensive. My issue, was that it was an "offer"... that's it. An offer will ALWAYS be lower than what a person thinks they are worth, because if they propose an offer that is much closer to what they think will be countered... the recipient will simply UP their 1st counter offer. This WILL lead directly to a higher base negotiation dollar amount and no business who has a clue, will NOT aim what they believe to be "ball park" low.
.
We can argue of that "ball park" was even close, but we you and I are in a VASTLY different position to make that call. Crowder has been on the knifes edge of full ban for years. We know that YT has ZERO compunction to invent a ToS violation, because they are having a bad day. We can argue the penalty that should be paid for that, which WOULD be part of the negotiation that Crowder flat refused to have, but that is what negotiation is for.
.
My SOLE issue in why I took issue with Crowder, was that he took what was a private offer and brought it into the public sphere. The redacted name of the offer was IMMEDIATELY obvious, as it could not be more than 2 characters. PragerU would not be covered by that "black redaction box", nor would any other possible offer...but "DW" was easily coverd by that "black redaction box".
.
Crowder took to open abuse of one who is fighting the EXACT same fight as he is, and called them sellouts and literally in bed with YouTube and big tech.
.
Before you say that anyone who stood with DW, due to tribalism or not thinking.. is to show that you are playing tribal.
1
1