Comments by "" (@NinjaKittyBonks) on "Actual Justice Warrior" channel.

  1. 1000
  2. 964
  3. 696
  4. 610
  5. 578
  6. 498
  7. 497
  8. 463
  9. 462
  10. 440
  11. 438
  12. 434
  13. 404
  14. 397
  15. 385
  16. 376
  17. 373
  18. 358
  19. 356
  20. 353
  21. 346
  22. 337
  23. 333
  24. 323
  25. 311
  26. 305
  27. 303
  28. 292
  29. 289
  30. 286
  31. 278
  32. 275
  33. 273
  34. 261
  35. 261
  36. 255
  37. 254
  38. 254
  39. 231
  40. 224
  41. 216
  42. 212
  43. 193
  44. 192
  45. 188
  46. 188
  47. 184
  48. 174
  49. 173
  50. 172
  51. 169
  52. 156
  53. 152
  54. 151
  55. 146
  56. 146
  57. 145
  58. 145
  59. 142
  60. 141
  61. 138
  62. 138
  63. 135
  64. 132
  65. 129
  66. 127
  67. 127
  68. 118
  69. 117
  70. 117
  71. 116
  72. 113
  73. 112
  74. 112
  75. 111
  76. 110
  77. 106
  78. 104
  79. 104
  80. 102
  81. 100
  82. 99
  83. 97
  84. 97
  85. 94
  86. 94
  87. 94
  88. 93
  89. 91
  90. 88
  91. 88
  92. 87
  93. 87
  94. 86
  95. 83
  96. 82
  97. 81
  98. 80
  99. 78
  100. 78
  101. 78
  102. 77
  103. 74
  104. 73
  105. 72
  106. 71
  107. 70
  108. 68
  109. 68
  110. 66
  111. 65
  112. 60
  113. 60
  114. 59
  115. 59
  116. 58
  117. 57
  118. 55
  119. 55
  120. 55
  121. 54
  122. 54
  123. 54
  124. 52
  125. 52
  126. 52
  127. 51
  128. 50
  129. 50
  130. 49
  131. 49
  132. 47
  133. 47
  134. 47
  135. 47
  136. 47
  137. 45
  138. 45
  139. 45
  140. 45
  141. 44
  142. 44
  143. 42
  144. 41
  145. 41
  146. 40
  147. 40
  148. 39
  149. 39
  150. 38
  151. 38
  152. 37
  153. 36
  154. 36
  155. 36
  156. 35
  157. 35
  158. 35
  159. 35
  160. 33
  161. 32
  162. 32
  163. 30
  164. 30
  165. 30
  166. 29
  167. 28
  168. 28
  169. 27
  170. 27
  171. 27
  172. 26
  173. 26
  174. 26
  175. 26
  176. 26
  177. 26
  178. 25
  179. 25
  180. 25
  181. 25
  182. 25
  183. 24
  184. 24
  185. 24
  186. 23
  187. 23
  188. 23
  189. 22
  190. 22
  191. 22
  192. 22
  193. 22
  194. 22
  195. 22
  196. 22
  197. 22
  198. 22
  199. 21
  200. 21
  201. 21
  202. 21
  203. 21
  204. 20
  205. 20
  206. 20
  207. 20
  208. 20
  209. 20
  210. 20
  211. 19
  212. 19
  213. 19
  214. 19
  215. 18
  216. 18
  217. 18
  218. 18
  219. 18
  220. 18
  221. 17
  222. 17
  223. 17
  224. 17
  225. 17
  226. 17
  227. 17
  228. 17
  229. 17
  230. 17
  231. 16
  232. 16
  233. 16
  234. 16
  235. 16
  236. 16
  237. 16
  238. 15
  239. 15
  240. 15
  241. 15
  242. 15
  243. 15
  244. 15
  245. 15
  246. 15
  247. 15
  248. 15
  249. 15
  250. 15
  251. 14
  252. 14
  253. 14
  254. 13
  255. 13
  256. 13
  257. 13
  258. 13
  259. 13
  260. 12
  261. 12
  262. 12
  263. 12
  264. 12
  265. 12
  266. 12
  267. 12
  268. 12
  269. 12
  270. 12
  271. 12
  272. 12
  273. 12
  274. 12
  275. 12
  276. 12
  277. 11
  278. 11
  279. 11
  280. 11
  281. 11
  282.  @Richard_Potato  …. But the employee IS the one who will pay the price of safety, NOT the store owner. If this guy was locked behind a cage or something, then coming out to attack would not be the same thing. . In this case, he had LITERALLY 2 seconds to take action. Had he only shoved or punched, let’s say and the guy ducked or was not otherwise incapacitated. Then, he strikes back while the other guy comes from behind in less than 3 seconds. He now has 2 guys on him and the guy in back smashes his head or pulls his own weapon…. he is now dead . So, in the span of LITERALLY 5 seconds, he goes from just hitting this guy to being dead or seriously wounded. It is INCREDIBLY easy to sit back from the comfort of our desk, with two weeks to consider 1000 options, zero risk and with full knowledge of everything that has happened since and say “woudla shoulda coulda”. . It sucks that this guy had to make that choice, but he had only 2 seconds to take ALL of the possible scenarios into account, his previous life experiences and act. We can say… “it was only $150 of stuff that wasn’t even his”, but it IS his life that could easily be taken, if the one guy ducks a punch and the other joins from behind. . The legalities will get worked out, but speaking strictly from a moral perspective…. I have no issue whatever with his actions. . EDIT: Let's say, he stood back and LET them take stuff. What if they smell fear and BOTH attack him suddenly from each side? He now has 2 guys on him and he is in REAL trouble. He tried to do the right thing and allowed them the freedom to get away with theft, but what if that proved not to be enough? What if the wanted to get greedy and go for the cash register?
    11
  283. 11
  284. 11
  285. 11
  286. 11
  287. 11
  288. 10
  289. 10
  290. 10
  291. 10
  292. 10
  293. 10
  294. 10
  295. 10
  296. 10
  297. ​ @godzillamegatron3590  ... Guess what... that is how the overwhelming amount of people feel. If it weren't for the Regressives and WOKE outrage mob viewing LITERALLY everything through the lens of skin color, ethnicity, sexual identity and racism, we would not have anywhere NEAR the extreme polarization we have today. It is the Regressives and leftists who are injecting racism into everything they see another do or say. It is quite simply impossible to meet the demands of an ideologically driven cult as we see in the Twitter Outrage Mob. What the outrage mob calls "racism" is 99% of the time called "accountability" to those of us they seek to demonize daily on social media.  . So long as the outrage mob is setting the ever-changing rules and regulations in which the ENTIRE WORLD is being bullied into trying to follow, we will have an ever growing division between the leftist cult and normal society. That normal society has existed, matured and adapted to a basic set of rules for some 10K years based on BIOLOGY of the human species, but suddenly, Gen Z has decided that IT knows better about the human condition, after 20 something years on this earth. Nobody wants to be judged on such a level and never ending consistency as is done by the morality police the rest of us call The Twitter Outrage Mob. . Please spare us with your moral superiority of how YOU were taught racism and discrimination is wrong and how society must learn from YOUR example, because the rest of us are just seeking to oppress PoC. PS> Are you going to address the questions I asked of you in an earlier comment?
    9
  298. 9
  299. 9
  300. 9
  301. 9
  302. 9
  303. 9
  304. 9
  305. 9
  306. 9
  307. 9
  308. 9
  309. 9
  310. 9
  311. 9
  312. 9
  313. 9
  314. 9
  315. 9
  316. 9
  317. 9
  318. 9
  319. 9
  320. 9
  321. 9
  322. 8
  323. 8
  324. 8
  325. 8
  326. 8
  327. 8
  328. 8
  329. 8
  330. 8
  331. 8
  332. 8
  333. 8
  334. 8
  335. 8
  336. 8
  337. 8
  338. 8
  339. ​ @swannydabs620  ... I would probably do the same thing, but we must look at this from BOTH perspectives: a: If Ahmaud was NOT guilty of anything and no idea why two guys would get out of trucks and confront him with a gun, it would be reasonable to think that these guys were NOT reasonable and therefore take the first opportunity to take them by surprise. I don't know if I would have done that, but either way, Ahmaud felt that was the thing to do. b: If Ahmaud WAS guilty of stealing stuff and had committed a crime, based on his criminal history, he knows that getting arrested would be a very bad thing. I don't know anything about details of his history with police, but if was very violent, as I think Sean mentioned in this video, than can we be surprised that he would go for a gun, given EITHER of the two above scenarios? . I don't know how privy those who stopped him were on the legal history of Ahmaud, but not likely they knew much. Again, hindsight is 20/20, but citizens arrest is ALWAYS going to be a fine-line thing for those doing the arrest legally, but there is just no telling how the person is going to react. Since you are not a cop, this person has no reason to think you would be accountable to anyone for your actions, as police have to follow the law or your case might be thrown out or something. I don't know if audio of their interaction was recorded on that video, but for all Ahmaud knew, these two were just a couple looking to be hero's. . Based on all of the incredibly insane level of leftists self-victimization, we also have to recognize that Ahmaud may feel that America IS full of racists looking to lynch PoC, so reacted as such. Now, you and I know that is all a TOTAL CROCK OF SHEET, but if Ahmaud fell victim, no pun intended, to this line of thinking, than society has taught him to believe that a white guy with a gun is certain death!  . One thing is for certain, had this IDENTICAL scenario happened, say 10 years ago, I think that Ahmaud would have held still until cops arrived. Since Regressives have taken power and the State, Joseph Goebbles Propaganda Media Machine, big tech, all of academia, BLM, Antifa and the Twitter mob have had the last 6 years to beat the drum on "systemic racism", this has most definitely had a profound effect and very well led Ahmaud to make a decision, he may not have made, in say 2012!
    8
  340. 8
  341. 8
  342. 7
  343. 7
  344. 7
  345. 7
  346. 7
  347. 7
  348. 7
  349. 7
  350. 7
  351. 7
  352. 7
  353. 7
  354. 7
  355. 7
  356. 7
  357. 7
  358. 7
  359. 7
  360. 7
  361. 7
  362. 7
  363. 7
  364. 7
  365. 6
  366. 6
  367. 6
  368. ​ @godzillamegatron3590  ... what? Biology drives nearly all of our actions as humans, but we continually try to "over-ride" that biology with the whims of societal mandates on all kinds of things. Take gender, for a perfect example! There are EXACTLY 2 genders that exist in human beings. That is fact and cannot be disputed, by any uniformly recognized metric. Now, there are inter-sex people, who have physical attributes that conform to both male and female anatomy, but they are very rare. That does not mean we should not treat them as humans, of course we should. However, we have a society today that is trying to claim that "gender" and "biological sex" are different and no such argument can be made, without the never-ending revolving door of leftist word games that are designed SPECIFICALLY to trip up others when in discussion / debate. . There are most certainly different races of people, as evidenced by skin color, shape of the eyes and what-not, but that we are ALL human and biology is universal between ALL of them. Sure, there are societal variations of cultural preferences for music, food and a billion other things, but THAT is what makes the human experience so beautiful. We have a MEGA sheet-ton of various religious and spiritual values and beliefs, but this really only becomes an issue when one is attempting to force THEIR values / beliefs upon one another person not interested in adopting all or some of them. There are those that go out of their way and seek out others for which to apply such pressure to change, but these are very few, as the overwhelmingly VAST amount of people just want to live their lives and be left alone by such demands of others. . For some 10K years, humans have lived by this code, both written and un-written and the wars we have seen, are often caused by one society seeking another to conform to ITS will, ways or values. This lead to countries, states and nations, as groups of like minded people tend to flock together and has served the world pretty well, overall. I am glad to year you say you are proud of the USA, as I am, but there are many who would not dare say such a thing. It is most ironic, that those who would condemn the USA for being "racist" or "homophobic", are able to openly do so BECAUSE they are in USA and afforded The Constitution and Bill of Rights affording them the GUARANTEED right to express that hatred or condemnation of this country.  . I support the rights of those who wish to make such condemnation, but it brings me never ending frustration to see that they are seeking to destroy the VERY THING that has afforded them the voice to speak out and say as much! For the record, I have no problem with you, nor your views. While I will push back on what I disagree, I will not be disrespectful, unless another brings it down to such a level. I am a 1a absolutist and I want to hear what EVERYONE has to say or what they think, REGARDLESS of how politically correct, evil or hatred they may spew. For the light of day is the best disinfectant and when voices are silenced, they do not go away, they simply go underground. Others who have the SAME, let's say anti-social voices, WILL find them and create an information bubble of ALL like minds. This is when we have a MASSIVE problem, as those voices will often grow to resent those who have outcast them, mainstream society, and far too often lash out in acts of terror. . I am getting off track here, but I would like you to consider more of the questions on my list. I think there was about 6 or 7, but I find you interesting to converse, so would like to hear your thoughts :) Peace, GodzillX... lol ;) PS> Been giving all the names of people to which I reply in this thread, the "X" treatement :P
    6
  369. 6
  370. 6
  371. 6
  372. 6
  373. 6
  374. 6
  375. 6
  376. 6
  377. 6
  378. 6
  379. 6
  380. 6
  381. 6
  382. 6
  383. 6
  384. 6
  385. 6
  386. 6
  387. 6
  388. 6
  389. 6
  390. 6
  391. 6
  392. 6
  393. 6
  394. 6
  395. 6
  396. 6
  397. 6
  398. 6
  399. 6
  400. 5
  401. 5
  402. 5
  403. 5
  404. 5
  405. 5
  406. 5
  407. 5
  408. 5
  409. 5
  410. 5
  411. 5
  412. 5
  413. 5
  414. 5
  415. 5
  416. 5
  417. 5
  418. 5
  419. 5
  420. 5
  421. 5
  422. 5
  423. 5
  424. 5
  425. 5
  426. 5
  427.  @Richard_Potato  …. I understand your point. . Again…. We are judging this TWO WEEKS LATER and having never been in the situation he found himself with zero warning. He walks out from the back room and has to process a multitude of scenarios, that you and I see from a camera behind it all. . I understand that the law will see this from a dry and unbiased point of view, but he now has adrenalyn (sp?) and watching 2 guys on either side of him with NO idea how they will respond, if one guy is only punched or grabbed. Those of us watching the video have none of the fears or considerations he MUST decide in that moment. . The law may screw him for some minutia of breakdown after having examined all of this data months later with a TON of info he could not possibly have known, much less the calm and reasonable time in which to process all those scenarios in real time on that night. . Yes…. The law will see this differently, but regardless of what happens legally, had he acted with less aggressive force, the ENTIRE scene would be completely different. Maybe that guy would have ran away and prompted the other to do the same thing and this story would be nothing more than a closing segment on the local news. . However, had he been less aggressive and they ganged up on him…. he could have easily been stuck in the head from behind and dead. Wanna take a guess of what you and I would be talking about right now? . We would be saying he should have used the knife on that guy and he would still be alive! . We don’t get such chances in life and this guy would have been just another victim who tried to give a break to a … “person who is just down on their luck through no fault of their own”
    5
  428.  @Goulash45  .. My moral compass is just fine, thank you. . You continue to say “small amount of merchandise”, as if they have a right to just walk in and take it. Let’s say he totally complies and sits there and lets them steal. How long can these two be expected to stop “shopping”? . Is it reasonable they will just grab, what $50 worth of stuff and then just leave? How long before they realize he is not going to resist and they keep “shopping”? Why not…? He is not going to resist, why not go for a bigger payday and hit that register? . Is he supposed to say..”oh, excuse me…. I will just allow you to step past me and get to the register”. Do you really think that is realistic? Do you think these two might feel like he needs to be taken out of the equation? . Suppose one makes a move for the register and this guy is pressed into a situation in which he is face to face and the guy behind clocks him with something? If he is not resisting, it is completely reasonable to assume they will get more aggressive. . Does the schoolyard bully just have his fill of harassing someone, or does he get emboldened by the weak prey and step up his abuse? On top of ALL this….. the entire situation happened in the matter of a single moment. One minute he is finishing his cup of coffee in the back room and the next he has two guys with ski masks jumping his counter. . Simply amazes me how you can sit back and judge this guy, when you have no GD idea what it it is like or if one or both of them will get the SAME fight response he had and attack with a weapon of his own. . What if this was your wife, husband or child and saw two guys jumping the counter? What would you do…. Oh, don’t tell me, let me guess. You would hop on the phone, call your lawyer and have all of the laws explained, so you would have the legally measured response. . Ya, see how that works out for your family member who very well could be needing emergency surgery or a coroner,
    5
  429. 5
  430. 5
  431. 5
  432. 5
  433. 5
  434. 5
  435. 5
  436. 4
  437. 4
  438. 4
  439. 4
  440. 4
  441. 4
  442. 4
  443. 4
  444. 4
  445. 4
  446. 4
  447. 4
  448. 4
  449. ​ @jdmac157  ... First: OK, just watched the entire Bernard Goetz interview from LINK above. Second: I have ZERO training / schooling as psychiatrist in any way, shape or form, so the following is 100% my take on what was shown in that video and the little that I recall from when it occured -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ABSOLUTELY FASCINATING is the only way I can describe how Bernard spoke on what led up to and including the events of that day. He was brutally honest and did not hide or shy away from anything and laid bare his very soul to be judged by anyone who were to see that recording. I was especially impressed with the jury members that were interviewed and specifically how Ms. Serpe very intellectually broke down her interpretation of Bernard speaking to the Cabey. I thought she understood and found words to describe how many of us respond or think in the past-tense and find a way to relay those details to another, as if they happened in real time during an event. It is extremely clear to me that Bernard was VERY, VERY traumatized from his being mugged 3 years earlier and was not known to me until the last couple days. . Bernard had literally years to think about the events of that 1st mugging and slowly built up the determination to avoid such treatment in the future. However, I cannot say he was "looking for trouble", but was able to recognize it when he was exposed to it. When he described in great detail talking with these 4 and how they positioned themselves to be on each side of him, there is NO PERSON ON PLANET EARTH who would not see that as a threat. I don't care if it was 4 priests with Bibles, it would still make someone weary of being surrounded or movement prohibited. His description of verbal exchanges, motions and such by all involved, were very detailed and probably rehearsed in the days prior to turning himself in to police. . What was equally fascinating, if not disturbing, is those that were pushing a racial angle. There was absolutely nothing in what Bernard said at any point, to suggest any kind of racial bias or factor in any way. One of those interviewed mentioned this specifically and pointed out how nearly impossible it would be to hide racial motivation by someone so distressed as Bernard was, during this video. It just goes to show that there are always some who will always play the race card and is 10 fold in current society. Just as Bernard took exception, so did I with the off-camera psychologist, I suppose she was, asking..."Why these 4 people". Clearly, such a question was designed to initiate some kind of uncontrolled response to manipulate Bernard into saying something racist or that he was looking to take someone out. Bernard answered her question with much more control than I think I would have, as I would have fallen into her trap. It was also particularly frustrating to hear the prosecuting attorney saying that anyone who is NOT a racist, cannot possibly have not found him guilty. Essentially, impugning the jury as idiots or just plain stupid, as to not see that he over reacted to a group of people on the subway. . Bernard Goetz was about as honest, open and forthcoming as anyone I have ever seen regarding any event. In the end, the one conclusion I was unable to escape was that Bernard was VERY clearly a much different man after that 1st assault and played out ways he would respond differently, should something similar happen again. The psychology he used and broke down to very fine detail, shows that his response to this attack was much more thought out than I believe most people would consider, should they find themselves in the same situation.  . It is not possible to know what would have happened, if he had just given them $5.00, but in my opinion, he was 100% justified in making the first move, so to speak, in defense of his life. What was also telling was the pending cases and current jail time for a couple defendants who testified at the trial. These were career criminals who were no stranger to doing bad things to random people, so they got what such people nearly always get... dying by the sword in which they lived. . Peace to you, John Daniel :)
    4
  450. 4
  451. 4
  452. 4
  453. 4
  454. 4
  455. 4
  456. 4
  457. 4
  458. 4
  459. 4
  460. 4
  461. 4
  462. 4
  463. ​@Neo One ... As Sean mentioned in this video, there are a number of reasons: 1. She is pretty. We can all say how sad it is that we put such a priority of physical appearance to raise her level of importance, but need only look anyone who is used to advertise a product. We are particularly driven by the sight of a pretty person, but most specifically women 2. Lots of video and particularly that of joy: The media LOVES to have new video, as it $ell$ the news to juxtapose many happy "full of life" images, against the idea she has very likely been killed. The media, and by extension, its audience is particularly drawn to this narrative and speaks pretty sadly about both. 3. He returns home alone: Not only that, but he immediately lawyers up, does not say word and later disappears completely. 4. The police made some mistakes: While it can be seen as hindsight to say "she would still be alive, if the police had made arrests and brought them into custody, after being pulled over on the highway", I have heard at least a few legal people say they should have been detained. She would likely be alive, had this been the case, but is easy to say all that now. 5. She was a blogger and documenting here trip: She had posted all of the videos we have seen on social media, so there were many who had a vested interest in what had happened to her. There were LOTS of people talking about it, calling the police with tips and keeping the investigation going, so that helped. . There are a few other small reasons, but if ALL circumstances were the same and she was considered unattractive, by the standards we hold TV and movie stars, let's say... it would not have gotten this much attention.
    4
  464. 4
  465. 4
  466. 4
  467. 4
  468. 4
  469. 4
  470. 4
  471. 4
  472. 4
  473. 4
  474. 4
  475. 4
  476. 4
  477. 4
  478. 4
  479. 4
  480. 4
  481.  @TheJustice35  ... RE: @Brad Miles that's a nice way to say the government.... : While this comment not directed toward myself, specifically... I will throw in my $.02 :) . I really wish people would stop the following: conflating, straw-manning and intentionally misinterpreting someone, seemingly in order to "score points" or "win" a discussion. I cannot speak for all, but I engage in these discussions, in order to understand not only WHAT another person thinks, but WHY they think it. Sometimes I change peoples minds and sometimes I just seek to give them more to think about, but intellectual honesty and understanding is my PRIMARY goal. . The feds have FUNDAMENTAL requirement to follow Constitutional law. Written into that Constitution is to ensure that people have the right to "Life, Liberty and pursuit of happiness". Since this is foundational law, it supercedes state laws that would othewise restrict those "natural rights". The "medical procedure" you are referring to as a right, is in DIRECT opposition to the rights of another. Therefore, under the Constitution, one person cannot be granted a right that eliminates another's fundamental or "natural" rights. . There are exceptions to every rule and one of them relates to capital punishment. This comes back to a person(s) malicious taking of another persons rights and is in all cases that I am aware, the taking of a life. Whether one agrees with Capitol Punishment or not, this is a penalty for violation of "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness". . It is not only a serous leap, but one in bad faith, to equate the concern of taking the life of the unborn, to supporting mask mandates or vaccines. One can argue, and I would make such an argument, that forcing a mask or vaccine DOES violate the principle of "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness". This is an entirely different topic, but another that I am deeply passionate about. We'll leave that for another time :)
    4
  482.  @outofcompliance1639  ... I sorta WANT a massive influx of trans into ALL women's sports. Think of it this way, for every time a trans (biological male) <---- God, how insane is it that this actually requires clarification!!!!!?????, enters a "female" area, the culmination will eventually drive those who are indifferent to finally give a sheet. Right now, the gymnastics teams are not worried about it, because of the inherent flexibility of females over males. What if the equivalent to "Rubber Man" declared himself to be trans and started dominating on the parallel bars with like tripple-flips or routinely common quad back-blips on the mat? . The longer this goes on, the more I fear by the time trans DO infiltrate all of these other female spaces, there will have been too much precedent set and too many new records made to untie it all. Those trans competitors will have an absolute right to dispute having their records nullified or trophy's taken away, as they played by the rules. It is not the trans fault the rules allow them to compete against females, it is NCAA and other leagues who let them in! While the women didn't have the "ballz" to say NO, when they had the chance and the feminists were busy bitching about "the patriarchy", that patriarchy slid in right under there noses and DESTROYED female only sports and spaces. . This whole GD'd thing is disgusting and women have ZERO people to blame, but themselves! EDIT: After having proof-read my comment, I failed to say how pathetic and weak these trans are to ONLY be competitive in the females arena. How sad is it to be a man that can only gain success by competing against women?
    4
  483. 4
  484. 4
  485. 4
  486. 4
  487. 4
  488. 4
  489. 4
  490. 4
  491. 4
  492. 4
  493. 4
  494. 3
  495. 3
  496. 3
  497. 3
  498. 3
  499. 3
  500. 3
  501. 3
  502. 3
  503. 3
  504. 3
  505. 3
  506. 3
  507. 3
  508. 3
  509. 3
  510. 3
  511. 3
  512. 3
  513. 3
  514. 3
  515. 3
  516. ​ @Bradley_Lute  ... I don't care if Lia is a "committed" trans or an impostor / poser. Lia's body is THAT OF A MALE and therefore, has a massive advantage over those with whom competing. I have ZERO issues with any adult deciding to do ANYTHING with their body, for any reason, so long as it does not endanger other bodies. Say, set themselves on fire within a crowded building or drive 100 MPH through a down town street. A person can take all of the testosterone or estrogen he / she wants, provided that person is the age of consent... 18. I will not nor would not harass, bully, threaten or in any way attempt to cause any harm whatever to such person and would gladly share a beer and talk about whatever the hell we wanted to for any reason. . My problem is NOT with Lia being tans, it is being a biological male competing against biological females and destroying girls dreams, because Lia cannot cut it on the men's team. I would be 100% willing to bet that Lia would be able to compete on a male swim team. No doubt, there would be some who would oppose it, but would NOT be for having an unfair advantage over the others, as Lia most CERTAINLY does in female swim teams. Lia is absolutely mopping the field in female swim competitions and was WAY, WAY, WAY below such position in the male swim team. . Now, you tell me honestly... does this sound like it is fair to the female swim team? Seriously, please make the argument that this is fair to these girls? Now, that said, there is NO QUESTION that Lia is in a very difficult position, assuming that this there is not deception and is, let's say "authentic" trans. No question that this sucks for Lia, in such a case. However, Lia is FORCING girls that have just as much right to compete OUT of the running, simply by virtue of competing in their events. There is no good answer for the authentic trans who want to compete, but Lia's right to swim should NOT trump the girls right to have fair and honest competition between themselves.
    3
  517. 3
  518. 3
  519. 3
  520. 3
  521. 3
  522. 3
  523. 3
  524. 3
  525. 3
  526. 3
  527. 3
  528. 3
  529. 3
  530. 3
  531. 3
  532. 3
  533. 3
  534. 3
  535. 3
  536. 3
  537. 3
  538. 3
  539. 3
  540. 3
  541. 3
  542. 3
  543. 3
  544. 3
  545. 3
  546. 3
  547. 3
  548. 3
  549. 3
  550. 3
  551. 3
  552. 3
  553. 3
  554. 3
  555. 3
  556. 3
  557. 3
  558. 3
  559. 3
  560. 3
  561. 3
  562. 3
  563. 3
  564. 3
  565. 3
  566. 3
  567. 3
  568. 3
  569. 3
  570. 3
  571. 3
  572. 3
  573. 3
  574. 3
  575. 3
  576. ​ @bluepinkman4488  ... Sadly, we are both correct :( For the life of me, I fail to grasp how someone gets to the point, or rather "lives" to the point at which this seemed like the smart play. Not only to catastrophically over-react to an very common incorrect order at a fast-food place, but then to brandish a weapon, rather than just ask to have it corrected. On top of that, he sits outside and waits for them to fix his order, when a complete IDIOT knows that the cops are on the way. . There is really only one explanation I can think of here... death by cop and go out in a blaze of glory! Clearly this guy had some very serious mental issues going on, as he chooses to have both of his very young children there to see it all go down. One has to hate life to such a degree, as to be indifferent to his children likely watch their father die in a brutal way. . I think it likely we will hear about mental / psychological / legal issues this guy had in the coming days /weeks. To top it off, the mother of his children was interviewed and she had given him custody for a period of time and then extended it further. Where the hell was she when all this was going on? Why would she not only have children with this PoS, but then decide that they were better off with him than her? Nobody can tell me, that this guy did not show some SERIOUS signs of mental problems long before any of this event. This whole thing is just sad for all involved, but mostly the kids. They did not ask for these two for parents, but now they might end up being raised by grandma or the state, because the mom failed them as well. . Just what these kids need... being raised by someone other than thier parents :(
    3
  577. 3
  578. 3
  579. 3
  580. 3
  581. 3
  582. 3
  583. 3
  584. 3
  585.  @MorteWulfe  ... Looks like I misspelled it... lol :) My comment has nothing to do with whether Sean is right or wrong... it has to do with people who base their opinion on ANOTHER'S opinion. This guy didn't go look at Sean's video himself, he looked at Vaush's video, which stripped ALL of the context out of Sean's reasoning and, and then proceeded to be critical of Sean saying he doesn't know what he is talking about. WTF? If this person wants to know what Sean ACTUALLY said and understand WHY he said it, he needs to look at the un-edited original video. Now, if he has a bone to pick with Sean at that point... fine. I may or may not agree with his conclusion, but at least he would have been intellectually honest arriving at it. . When this is the manner in which one derives what Sean is believed to have said, it is no wonder communication with an ideologue is impossible. Based on how he views conservatives, it is no wonder why we are demonized to a never ending degree. Ideologues live within an information bubble, and rather than seek out what is true or correct, they look for whatever supports the existing confirmation bias. That is what I was is wrong with this guys critique :) . As to your critique of me... Like Sean, I also feel that there MUST be some sort of means to help reduce recidivism rates and goes beyond straight jail / prison time. That said, when the leftist continues to "catch and release", as they have been doing a LOT over the last few years and never hold people accountable for criminal activity, there WILL be a higher rate of crime, because there is no punishment as a deterrant. If people don't get in trouble for doing crimes... they WILL continue to do more and will escalate to more dangerous ones.
    3
  586. 3
  587. 3
  588. 3
  589. 3
  590. 3
  591. 3
  592. 3
  593. 3
  594. 3
  595. 3
  596. 3
  597. 3
  598. 3
  599. 3
  600. 3
  601. 2
  602. 2
  603. 2
  604. 2
  605. 2
  606. 2
  607. 2
  608. 2
  609. 2
  610. 2
  611. 2
  612. 2
  613. 2
  614. 2
  615. 2
  616. 2
  617. 2
  618. 2
  619. 2
  620. 2
  621. 2
  622. 2
  623. 2
  624. 2
  625. 2
  626. 2
  627. 2
  628. 2
  629. 2
  630. 2
  631. 2
  632. 2
  633. 2
  634. 2
  635. 2
  636. 2
  637. 2
  638. 2
  639. 2
  640. 2
  641. ​@Don ... it is not "communists" that we fear, it is communism! It is the implementation of "from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" that is the true enemy of us all. While this may sound like a good idea, it is the state enforcement of one person to support another without consent. Since there is always going to be a VERY high percentage of people, myself among them, who will not abide by such tyranny, there is ALWAYS a catastrophic loss of life in such societies. The state has ZERO choice but to separate those who would not willingly participate in a communist system and those people ALWAYS end up dead. This serves 2 functions and both are necessary to enable it to work.  . The first is the state cannot and will not accept things like free speech and citizens who own guns. This is why Nazi Germany became a fascist state, as you cannot control a public that has the means to fight back with deadly weapons. The second issue is the number of people who fit into each of the "ability" or "needs" category". Easiest way to understand is a small group, which is really the ONLY way communism can work and with the agreement of all those involved. Say 10 people decide all by themselves to live as a communist society and you have 1 each of the following: 1 farmer, 1 car mechanic, 1 teacher, 1 electrician, 1 plumber, 1 engineer, 1 doctor, 1 house builder, 1 banker and 1 tailor. If each person is willing to live under "from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs", it works pretty well. . Now, imagine that society of, oh... I don't know, 330+M people, for example! If you have a ratio of 25% car mechanics to 35% engineers, their cannot be such an imbalanced ratio, so some of those engineers MUST provide other services to the community or must be eliminated. There will ALWAYS be a percentage that will refuse to be a farmer or house builder and another percentage who cannot make the transition, due to lack of skills or whatever. The state must FORCE compliance or remove those in each category from the equation. . This is why the gulag was created and why people "mysteriously" vanish one day, never to be heard from again in a communist state. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EDIT: I have since read many additional comments by you in this thread, I had NOT read until this comment was created. While I did not apply serious consideration to each and every other comment by you, nor reply by others, it would appear that you either play the same word games or have FALLEN for the word games by Marxists. Regardless of which is more accurate, it seems clear that you are OK or support this admin and Marxism as a rule. This makes you incompatible with the values upon which this nation was founded and will find yourself at serious odds with the overwhelming number of people in this country who will ABSOLUTELY not stand for a Marxist or communist utopia. I would urge you to read up on the history of communism and what it does to the societies in which it is practiced forced upon a nations people!
    2
  642. 2
  643. @Don ... so you left one echo chamber, but did you enter another...? Both are a problem, because honest dialog cannot exist in a vacuum. While both are bad, it is the left that controls all of the major mediums in which information is disseminated (Google, YouTube, Twitter, FB, IG, TikTock) and the echo chamber of the left is forced upon the rest of us. I have been censored probably 100 times for saying things that are 100% protected by 1a, but defy the leftist cult of ideology. Since the Overton window has moved to the VERY far left, those who are moderate or even center-left are considered alt-right. Sadly, the endless screams of the leftists claiming the growing number of alt-right extremists is growing are actually correct. Not because of anything I say or even defend, but because not only the definition of "alt-right" now includes those who are centrist, but because of things like "those who identify as a woman, are allowed to enter a female space". We have males who identify as female entering women's sporting events and winning the overwhelming amount of competitions. Walking around in ladies dressing & locker rooms displaying the full male anatomy, because they "identify" as a woman and the law has been manipulated to allow it. If anyone thinks that this is not going to lead to a CATASTROPHIC backlash and MAJOR amount of people who will unfairly become VERY anti-gay and homophobic, they are deluding themselves. This is sad, because it is NOT the LGBTQ community who are arguing for this, it is the leftist activist and they DO NOT speak for about 98% of that community. . I have been called a right-wing extremist on many occasions, because anyone to the right of Nancy Pelosi is considered right-wing. Me, for example, am a very moderate libertarian / conservative, who is just fine with gay marriage and becoming trans AFTER the age of 18. I am about as free-speech absolutist as anyone would ever meet and so long as what you do does not infringe on my rights, I could not care less what 2 consenting adults do in the privacy of their own home. Now, don't take that on the street or teach it in classrooms and I am gonna want parents to be involved with the curriculum. I believe slavery and Jim Crow laws should be taught in schools, am 100,000,000,000% against ANY Marxist interpretation of CRT or identity based hierarchy indoctrination of victim hood status in our public schools. Now, if such information, not indoctrination, is made available, but NOT REQUIRED, in post high school education, I am 100% fine with that. . While I am as anti communism, socialism, Marxism as ANYONE you will ever meet, I absolutely want people to understand what these ideologies are about. They should learn the theory behind them, as well as the ramifications of those societies who have lived under such ideologies. . Sowwy... got a little side-tracked there... lol :)
    2
  644. 2
  645. 2
  646. 2
  647. 2
  648. 2
  649. 2
  650. 2
  651. 2
  652. 2
  653. 2
  654. 2
  655. 2
  656. ​ @GhostOfBillCooper  .... OK. I saw your video LINK, thank you :) . This does indeed differ from my understanding from other research I have done (a local report from LA News outlet and Sean's video here. which was edited for YouTube age restriction). It is clear from this video, which I have not seen before just now, he does throw, what can only be reasonably assumed to be the gun. . That said, I have to also must consider several other factors: . 1. We are seeing a different angle than officers. I am not saying the cops could not see what we did, but there is a lot to process in that 3 seconds. . 2. The police KNOW they are chasing a suspect that is armed and into an area, in which he is cornered. Since he did not just drop his weapon, it is only reasonable he is seeking cover and shoot at them. Now, if he did not know these were cops, and I they did give commands, per witnesses other than his friend, but did not realize these were cops, than the only reasonable consideration, is that he WAS going to shoot back from behind the cars. . 3. When the cops are chasing him, they are specifically watching his right hand, because they can see the weapon in it. When he turns to the left to throw weapon, it is at THAT EXACT moment, the reasonable consideration is that he will CONTINUE to rotate around to the left and shoot back at them. . I get that they likely SAW the gun go flying out of his hand, but what the eye sees, cannot be processed in that literal "blink of an eye" amount of time. In other words, 2 nano seconds AFTER the officer shot him with that fatal wound, he was able to process that gun being thrown over the car. . It takes a literal fraction of a second to continue rotating and shoot back, so the INSTANT he began to swing his arm around his body... the cop shoots. We also need to consider adrenaline is flowing HARD and they are also keeping an eye on BOTH suspects, because it is not unreasonable to figure they are both armed. We see the other guy hold his hands up, but again... AFTER his friend is shot and on the ground. . It is interesting, that Sean said that the gun WAS still in his hand, no ambiguity at all on that point, but is what Sean found in his research. We could assume the cops lied, but they both have body cam and video, while not perfect, exposes a lot of things. They may or may not have known about the roof camera we were seeing here, but probably did not. . This video is also pixilated, so maybe the a gun is visible and something else was thrown. This would be EXTREMELY unlikely he had switched the gun we SAW with drugs or something, but it is also EXTREMELY unlikely he would toss the gun and not just drop the gun and throw hands in the air. If he thought they were NOT cops, he would NEVER toss his gun, because they could not possibly be anything but VERY bad intentions, as they are chasing him with guns of their own. . He was running into a corner he could not really escape, so in the amount of time the cops had, was very reasonable to think he was going to continue to rotate and shoot at them. . Thank you for the LINK, as it does give me slight pause, but we can ALWAYS look back and say "woulda, shoulda, coulda" from both sides. At the end of the day, this was a convicted felon who KNEW that serious prison time would result if he was to surrender with a weapon. . I think he realized the officer was too close to gain cover from car, so threw weapon, but was too late to stop the chain of events. . PS> Why did the friend not tell that reporter that Roberts threw the gun to him and was going to surrender. Something doesn't add up here.
    2
  657. 2
  658. 2
  659. 2
  660. 2
  661. 2
  662. 2
  663. 2
  664. 2
  665. 2
  666. 2
  667. 2
  668. 2
  669. 2
  670. 2
  671. 2
  672. 2
  673. 2
  674. 2
  675. 2
  676. 2
  677. 2
  678. 2
  679. 2
  680. 2
  681. 2
  682. 2
  683. 2
  684. 2
  685. 2
  686. 2
  687. 2
  688. 2
  689. 2
  690. 2
  691. 2
  692. 2
  693. 2
  694. 2
  695. 2
  696. 2
  697. 2
  698. 2
  699. 2
  700. 2
  701. 2
  702. 2
  703. 2
  704. 2
  705. 2
  706. 2
  707. 2
  708. 2
  709. 2
  710. 2
  711. 2
  712. 2
  713. 2
  714. 2
  715. 2
  716. 2
  717. 2
  718. 2
  719. 2
  720. 2
  721. 2
  722. 2
  723. 2
  724. 2
  725. 2
  726. 2
  727. 2
  728. 2
  729. 2
  730. 2
  731. 2
  732. 2
  733. 2
  734. 2
  735. 2
  736. 2
  737. 2
  738. 2
  739. 2
  740. 2
  741. 2
  742. 2
  743. 2
  744. 2
  745. 2
  746. 2
  747. 2
  748. 2
  749. 2
  750. 2
  751. 2
  752. 2
  753. ​ @miraann3997  .. RE: You can still empathize... : The only way to get to the root of the problem, is afford the opportunity for one to get out of it... capitalism does this. I am not going to argue that life is "fair" or that every person has the same difficulty or ease at exercising those opportunities, but that is how life works. There is ZERO reason why the poorest person in America, cannot become the richest person in the world, say for a few things that cannot be controlled by society.  . Basic raw talent, the internal drive to succeed and discipline to follow the rules that societies have set down for millennia. Whether it be Herschel Walker playing football, Bach creating music or Bill Gates writing computer code. There was most definitely support for each along the way, but without basic raw drive / talent for these things, they would never in a million years get to where they arrived and no amount of effort can create that raw drive or intrinsic talent. We have seen extremely poor kids from the worst parts of town, become Mike Tyson, for example, and make millions, upon millions of dollars, but only to piss it away, because raw talent and hard work are not enough... one has to have that discipline as well.  . For without it, all of the hard work, talent and even a massive amount of support structure cannot save them from ending up like countless musicians and actors that ended up dying of OD :( Poverty is NOT the reason people don't make the most of themselves, it is merely a hurdle to those who have :)
    2
  754. 2
  755. 2
  756. 2
  757. 2
  758. 2
  759. 2
  760. 2
  761. 2
  762. 2
  763. 2
  764. 2
  765. 2
  766. 2
  767. 2
  768. 2
  769. 2
  770. 2
  771. ​ @hllymchll  ... a VERY fine recording indeed, Ms. Michelle :) . Just a few weeks back I played some PF demo's including the original mix of WYWH. It was brilliant to hear the origins of how the song was perceived prior to getting the producers and engineers involved. While it is really great, it lacks the looooooooong fading out after that 4th Gilmore note that builds the intro. That fading sustain that builds that incredible anticipation of the next set of notes. When I was very young, born in '64, I did not get into PF at the time. I was into Van Halen, Rush, April Wine, Black Sabbath and many other groups, but for all the talk of PF, I just never gave them a chance in HS days :( However, when I finally got around to really listening to them, I quickly learned what all the fuss was about for all those years :) I am now a HUGE Floyd fan and am still in awe with every listen I afford to their music. . One record I highly recommend, if you have not already gotten into it, is Roger Waters Amused To Death . It is an absolutely BRILLIANT piece of music and maybe picks up where The Final Cut left off, but certainly some of its inspiration. I recommend sitting quietly in a completely dark room and relax for a few minutes, maybe a dog or cat sleeping on your lap :) and then begin the CD. I have always described it as the "perfect meal" of a recording. A small salad, little bowl of soup, the entree and a wonderful glass of red wine then a nice satisfying desert before a finishing cup of coffee (not a coffee drinker myself, but many like to close a good meal that way... lol). Just like with PF material, there is just sooooo much going on and will take many, many listens before you really get your soul around the complete message of what that record is saying. BTW.... Jeff Beck plays guitar on that record, so certainly worth a listen for that reason alone ;)
    2
  772. 2
  773. 2
  774. 2
  775. 2
  776. 2
  777. 2
  778. 2
  779. 2
  780. 2
  781. 2
  782. 2
  783. 2
  784. 2
  785. 2
  786. 2
  787. 2
  788. 2
  789. 2
  790. 2
  791. 2
  792. 2
  793. 2
  794. 2
  795. 2
  796. ​ @susansmith493  ... It doesn't matter to me who invented what, where, when or how... only that this issue will not go away without a fight. It is most unfortunate, but if women and girls are not willing to fight for what is rightfully theirs, others will not endlessly fight on their behalf and they will be cheated out of opportunities, because they allowed it to happen. I have not dog in this fight. I don't have a daughter who spent the last 5+ years of her pre-high school life going to swim competitions and dreaming of a professional career or Olympics one day. I am not invested here, so I am not going to go to swim meets and protest, so these girls, their parents, coaches and local governing bodies have to deal with this. . What is most sad to me, is that we have all seen the many angry feminists who are willing to bash men for "toxic masculinity" and "the Patriarchy", but will not do a damned thing to condemn men in women's locker, dressing and bathrooms. Now we have males in direct competition with women and girls driving them out of the positions they have worked to achieve for sometimes many years, because they are too GD'd weak to put in the work to succeed in men's sports. While I DESPISE feminist ideology with a passion, it is truly pathetic they have NOTHING to say about HS girls hearts getting broken because of males who don't have the balls to compete against other men but do ONLY to against them! . I am not barking at you, Susan... I am just frustrated as hell to see this BS happening and those who are most hurt by it, do little more than write anonymous comments on blogs or hidden face interviews on the handful of news outlets that will report on it. If these girls and women are willing to play the game by rigged rules, they deserve EXACTLY what they get!
    2
  797. 2
  798. 2
  799. 2
  800. 2
  801. 2
  802. 2
  803. 2
  804. 2
  805. 2
  806. 2
  807. 2
  808. 2
  809. 2
  810. 2
  811. 2
  812. 2
  813. 2
  814. 2
  815. ​ @totorosghost  ... I have at least 3 comments that were removed and none of which came within 500 miles of any ToS lines. At least one of them was in simple agreement with another, so it was removed. The take in my OP was as you stated in the middle of your reply here, though I just afforded a higher degree of respect. That respect does not travel beyond what you said, but I stand behind it, for what it is. I have done additional clarification in more than a few replies within this thread, so I would ask that you expand it, so as to better understand my position. Ana was willing to directly promote this channel on her platform and that is no small thing. This channel has been exceptionally critical of her platform on many occasions and those who are steadfastly in agreement with her for all this time, have heard it. I am not expecting a mass changing of minds, but she has earned their support, so it is a chipping away at the positions they hold. This is a good thing, just as it is for ANY person who hears a challenge to their long held belief / position on anything. . She has a LOT more of their respect, due to her long held political opinions, so this is a positive move. It does not undo or make up for anything, but it is a step in a more sensible direction. I don't see her ever going GOP, but society needs the left to re-adopt positions in which we have all agreed for millennia. I don't see how anyone can un-see what she has, so this is a good thing. On your closing line, I 100% agree and time will tell. Peace, Toto
    2
  816.  @totorosghost  .... Thank you and I agree. While I have never watched her show, only seen reactions to it (98% of those by Sean). I have seen a HUGE amount of segments, that include a lot of context, so I feel what I have seen is a good representation of each, though the totality of those dishonest segments, should never be ignored. My bias is certainly very strong against the show in general, but Cenk more than any one else. He is the undisputed👑of the straw man and is not possible to be as ignorant as he would need to be, in order to honestly believe a HUGE amount of what he says (being understated with my words, for reasons we both understand). You are correct, in that it is very little, within the context of all that she has supported over the years. I do hope she continues to allow what she is far more willing to recognize, to influence here world view going forward. Only time will tell and maybe I am unrealistically optimistic, but her sitting down with pub. en. #1, Ben Shaprio twice, is enough to end someone in her positions career. . In the end, I don't think any of this will matter much, as society is so incredibly fractured, I am not convinced we will escape collapse. Canada, UK and USA are in a race, though I think Canada will be the 1st to completely stop working into chaos. We are soo far along this path, we are gonna need to see such a thing happen, in order to hopefully get the wake up call necessary. I am an optimist, but very pessimistic about what I see. Best to you as well, Toto and want to say I appreciate the push back, you and others have offered. I see them all as balancing the scales, so as to keep my bias in check and that is something I always strive to do.
    2
  817.  @totorosghost  ... I get all that and why I freely admit I have not watched TYT to any real degree. However, NONE of that changes the credit I have afforded her. I made it exceptionally clear, that it does not erase anything she has done, only that she HAS seen some of the error of her ways. Accepting that error has in ZERO ways, righted any wrongs, only that I will welcome ANY human on the face of this planet, to move ANY degree toward a sensible position on ANY issue that necessitates it for a cohesive society. . I am not sure why you continue to read more into my opinion than I have made extremely clear on many occasions, within this thread. Your last comment, is very much in line with what I have been saying from the start. If she had one 1B horrendous lies, that does NOT erase any of the truths. It does not excuse them nor does it afford her my forgiveness for them. She has a VERY large platform and has taken owner ship for some of those things she has advocated for all along. . Do you think it would have been better had she NEVER been willing to speak to Ben Shapiro, NEVER had recommended (it seemed very sincere) this channel, had NEVER began calling out the liberal policies that she voted for are failing? If you answer a "NO" to even 1% of ANY of those questions, than you and I are in agreement. . I am not seeking a "gotcha" or "I told you so" moment, I am just standing behind what you have already gave a tiny bit of credit for doing. Now, maybe my credit is slightly higher, and that is an accurate way to describe it, than yours... but that is where we are. I also said that she cannot "unsee" what she has acknowledged were failed policies that she supported. This means, she will exercise more scrutiny going forward, because she has now accepted the consequences of that which she voted for in the past. Will she suddenly decide that she likes to be called a birthing person or person who menstruates? Will she suddenly decide that no bail for multiple time felons is a good thing, after calling them out...? It is "possible", but the likelihood is lower than a snakes belly. . Time will tell....
    2
  818. 2
  819. 2
  820.  @unnamedminus  .. Problem was, that you look at the "redaction" squares all over the place, there was no way that it could be more than 1 or 2 characters. While it is not saying it was DW, it was very clear to anyone who realizes how many players in the conservative game, that it was DW. I don't have a problem with SC taking issue and wanting a lot of stuff changed, but was how he went about it and particularly the timeline of events. This deal was dead for over 2 months and SC decides to rake his friends over the coal, when he could have just done a segment on his show just discussing how "some" of his contracts were worded. No, he was deliberately taking aim at DW, even if he did not say so by name. The fundamental issue is that 50% of LWC is tied to 6.5M on YT and he has been on the edge of perm. ban for years. Sooner or later, he WILL be banned, but he IS making money here. He is not monotized, but his MC has grown due to YT and he does his ads as well as exposure. He is worth more more money than proposal, but a) that was a starting point and b) he cannot expect to have guaranteed money, when he WILL lose YT entirely literally any day. He does not even have to do anything wrong, they will make something up, as they normally do. That is not SC's fault, nor DW's fault, but since 6.5M eyeballs are on THIS platform, when it is lost, DW would be on the hook for 50% smaller audience and 100% of the commitment to SC. This all sucks, but so long as YT is the big player, DW has to assume that they will perm delete him at any point. . Anyone who would take on SC is going to have the same concern, so nobody is going to give him the deal he wants. He needs to go to Rumble for less money but total security and then continue with MC bonus access.
    2
  821. 2
  822. 2
  823. 2
  824. 2
  825. 2
  826. 2
  827. 2
  828. 2
  829. 2
  830. 2
  831. 2
  832. 2
  833. 2
  834. 2
  835. 2
  836. 2
  837. 2
  838. 2
  839. 2
  840. 2
  841. 2
  842. 1
  843. 1
  844. 1
  845. 1
  846. 1
  847. 1
  848. 1
  849. 1
  850. 1
  851. 1
  852. 1
  853. 1
  854. 1
  855. 1
  856. 1
  857. 1
  858. 1
  859. 1
  860. 1
  861. 1
  862. 1
  863. 1
  864. 1
  865. 1
  866. 1
  867. 1
  868. 1
  869. 1
  870. 1
  871. 1
  872. 1
  873. 1
  874. 1
  875. 1
  876. 1
  877. 1
  878. 1
  879. 1
  880. 1
  881. 1
  882. 1
  883. 1
  884. 1
  885. 1
  886. 1
  887. 1
  888. 1
  889. 1
  890. 1
  891. 1
  892. 1
  893. 1
  894. 1
  895. 1
  896. 1
  897. 1
  898. 1
  899. 1
  900. ​ @sole__doubt  ... EDIT: I just now found can see a reply that was invisible until AFTER I wrote the following. For context, I will leave this comment. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I DID make several points, that I am more than willing to expand upon and provide other reasons why I disagree with your opinion. Your reply..."Im not here to convince im here to convey". Um, you did not convey anything, but your opinion. I offered to expand WHY I hold my position and you are unwilling to do so yourself. Please tell me again who amongst us is not providing an argument? . Please tell me where I said or indicated in ANY way, that "... the more money a channel brings in the better?". What I provided was a very brief description of the things that show DW is NOT about appeasing or on the side of big tech. I can go on and on with many more examples. What you are asking me to do is make my case, so you don't have to do so yourself. This is called failure of presenting your argument in good faith. YOU said that DW works 110% for big tech, therefore, it is incumbent upon YOU to make the case as to why. Seems you are asking me to prove a negative and that is not how a good faith discussion happens. . You are going way out of your way to avoid supporting your claim, so until you do, no good faith discussion can be had. Again... have a nice day, SD 🐈
    1
  901.  @sole__doubt  ... EDIT: Dammit.. YouTube did not display this comment until AFTER I had posted my last one... GRRR the censorship is frustrating as hell... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I will re-iterate that we should both refrain from staw manning, yet you have now done so multiple times! Yes... it is true that larger channels get away with things smaller ones do not. That is not something I support, just happens to be how things work in general. YouTube has a WHOLE lot more to lose from DW or SC leaving the platform, than say MY channel with its 72 subs and 9 videos. . Please tell me how reality "proves they are in the club" and that I support them for that reason"? Yes, it is also true that once a business or entity becomes larger and larger, they have a greater amount of people to which they need to support, so I will not argue that compromises are and must be made. This is HOW business works and is unavoidable, because with bigger business becomes bigger responsibility to make sure that business survives. However, that does NOT mean that because they make some compromises, that this company should be automatically removed from being considered authentic or genuine. This depends on evaluation of each "compromise" as we see them and making the determination. . DW does make certain concessions in order to remain on YouTube... just as SC or ANY conservative channel. This is because, whether we like it or not... YouTube IS the shark in the pond and we must ALL deal with that shark, in order to swim in it! If you feel that DW makes too many compromises... fine. No doubt they do make some, but the compromises they DON'T make, are the reasons I support them. . Conservatives are in an EXTREMELY vulnerable position, so while I am not in lock-step with any one channel, I support those that fight the WOKE cult. DW has done more to fight the WOKE cult than many have. They do so by supporting JBP, Matt Walsh, Ben Shapiro and others. YES... there are those who take issue with DW... fine. They have their reasons, just as you do. . I support DW's efforts to fight the WOKE cult and I will support them, even though they make some compromises that may lose a battle, but continue to fight the war!
    1
  902. ​ @sole__doubt  ... I get that is your opinion and I both disagree and have expressed why. This does not mean I am lost any more than you are. Why is it that your opinion must be 100% correct and mine is 100% wrong? I accept that as companies / businesses or in this case, social media channels, have to compromise some things in order to survive. Here is the problem, if DW makes NO compromises, they are removed from YouTube and they have precisely ZERO voices on the inside for which to fight the culture war the leftist cult is waging upon us all. As you said, this there is no science to determine what can and cannot be compromised, but we must make that determination for ourselves. What is too big? What if the audience is as 100% committed to fighting the WOKE cult as that channel? What do you think it costs to produce the documentary "What Is A Woman"? Matt was flown across this globe to other countries and many, many interviews. You are aware that taking on such an undertaking takes money... right? Much of DW's content is demonitized, so they must fund their business and the many dozens of people via sponsors. Well, as you and I both know, there is no over abundance of companies willing to pay good money to advertise on conservative channels, because the WOKE cult WILL attack them and a MASSIVE number have folded to the fear of that mob. . The pay wall allows users to get exclusive content for a fee and that fee PAYS for the machine that CREATES all of the content that fights the WOKE cult! If you don't see the value in supporting the channel, that is your option. However, to in any way equate a channel or business as in some way "selling out" (not your exact words, but sums up what you are telling me), because they have an option to charge for special services, tells me you have never run a business or company. Well, I have.... and it takes money to support the machine that makes the commitment to pay for it all. . Go ahead and not like DW, but I won't call you "lost" because you and I disagree 🐱
    1
  903. 1
  904. 1
  905. 1
  906. 1
  907. 1
  908. 1
  909. 1
  910. 1
  911. 1
  912. 1
  913. 1
  914. 1
  915.  @checkyoursixgaming  OMG... I wish people would just read what I said very clearly above. It MAKES NO DIFFERENCE that the weapon was a prop.... I was assumed to be real, so a "threat" is legitimately perceived. I am 100 BILLION % fine with that, but her lack of trigger discipline is the ONLY strength the prosecutor actually has here. We KNOW it is crap that they are in any legal trouble, but welcome to 2020 and leftist politicians running so much of our country. . Nobody physically approached the McCloskey's personal space, so they should have kept the weapons pointed down and OFF the trigger. I am not saying the crowd did not have harmful intent, they absolutely did. If they did NOT have weapons, there is ZERO doubt in my mind they would have rushed the house and at the very least caused damage, but likely burned it to the ground. Had the McCloskey's kept the weapons pointed AWAY from these people, there would be nobody siding with the prosecutor here. I don't blame them for pointing the weapon, but THAT is the issue that has them in hot water here. If the gun is facing down, it can be raised in a split second to fire IF NECESSARY. Pointing a gun all around at people creates the optics that SUPPORT the prosecutor pressing charges, as the media will sell it that way. We all know that in the end, it will fall apart, for several reasons. A huge swath of this country is blinded by leftist news and they are out there believing the lies because the images are manipulated to fit the narrative we ALL know they want to sell. That is sad, but it is reality :( . The McCloskey's would have been 100% just as protected if they kept the guns pointed down and off the trigger. Whether that is what any of us would have done is unknown, but a trained soldier in the military would NOT have waved a weapon at people as she did and that is being used as the excuse to press for prosecution. I don't agree they should be doing that, but I have no say in Mo. law.
    1
  916. 1
  917. ​ @checkyoursixgaming ... Am I OK with cops killing children? You actually ask that question? You and I disagree on some EXTREMELY fine nuances of this situation and your go-to is that I approve of cops killing children? WTF! Why don't you sit down with Cathy Newman on Channel 4 and play the "so you are saying" game with her, because I wont. . I am not a lawyer, I am just giving you a VERY reasonable interpretation of how a hell of a lot of people see this situation (without breaking down the fine points of state laws). It doesn't make one bit of difference of how you or I interpret the law here or what we think is morally acceptable. We both know that if the prosecutor has a stick up his arse to file charges, he will do exactly that. Maybe he doesn't believe he has a snowballs chance in hell of conviction, but he is just virtue signaling anyway and The Constitution and Bill of Rights are the ultimate victims here, so let's keep our eye on the ball. . Regarding your last sentence and even if it will be thrown out of court... here they are in a heap of trouble because they (she) unnecessarily pointed a weapon at people. Even if they are 100% exonerated from any legal wrong doing, my opinion that they could have handled this differently will not change. If there was someone pointing a gun at THEM, my opinion would flip 180 degrees, but from all that I have seen and heard, this was not the case. You and I can kick this back and forth all day, but it is the McCloskey's who must fight for their freedom and deal with all of this crap directly. As we both know, if the prosecutor can get JUST enough leftists to agree to a trial, it only takes a few more on the jury to get a conviction. Even if the gov. pardons them, they would still have VERY likely avoided ALL OF THIS had the weapons been pointed at the ground an finger off the trigger.... whether it there actions are in line with Mo. law or not.
    1
  918. 1
  919. 1
  920. 1
  921. 1
  922. 1
  923. 1
  924. 1
  925. 1
  926. 1
  927. 1
  928. 1
  929. 1
  930. 1
  931. 1
  932. 1
  933. 1
  934. 1
  935. 1
  936. 1
  937. 1
  938. 1
  939. 1
  940. 1
  941. 1
  942. 1
  943. 1
  944. 1
  945. 1
  946. 1
  947. 1
  948. 1
  949. 1
  950. 1
  951. 1
  952. 1
  953. 1
  954. 1
  955. 1
  956.  @nickkoyle3599  ... I have never watched any of Dore's work. I have seen bits and pieces, mostly reactions, so I don't have any legit opinion, other than what I have heard from those who do watch him. My understanding, is that he is not far left on all topics and willing to have a good faith conversation... as per what I have heard. Never watched any TYT, but seen a TON of reaction videos, so my bias is quite skewed against the channel. That said, most of what I have seen is from Sean here and while he is certainly biased against them, he will always give credit where due and is not one to utterly strip context from a Cenk rant and straw man him. Cenk is king of the straw man, as I have seen him say the most awful things about white people, conservatives and in complete context. . We all have our biases and I am certainly no exception. My issue comes from where TYT is formatted as a "News" outlet, so when they, and Cenk is the king of this, remove very necessary details or context from an event and then built an ENTIRE segment / rant upon that false premise... the entire argument is complete trash. All news outlets, including Fox, AON, Rebel and all the rest, have and DO inject bias and frame in a way that caters to an audience that can create a "bubble". However, the right-leaning media, is ever on the defense, as we see monumental bias to the point of lies, by omission, as well as other issues. Quick example is the [convent+kids+native+man] a number of years back. I can point to more recent, but this was especially bad, as several got their arses sued off over it. The news outlets [we both know who they are], had the entire video exchange, yet maliciously edited it to appear as though this young man was mocking or [bothering] the native man, when this was 100% the opposite of events. He was said to have had a [fruit-punch+able+face] on national broadcast news, to the point where his family got [removal+threats]. These outlets HAD the entire video, but wanted to make this boy look bad, because [dark+pink+baseball+hat] wearing. . I can come up with dozens more and particularly about Cheeto Man. Kinda went off rails there, sorry. I am fine with some bias, but the malicious editing, putting different parts of a speech, as if they were said together or leaving out ..."except the white supremacists and neo's, as they should be condemned completely" and others. TYT deliberately lies to its audience, under the guys of news.
    1
  957. ​ @RawOlympia  ... The "left" left us all, as the moderate liberals allowed a wholesale takeover by MarxistCrats and socialists those who would raise the West to the ground, in the hopes that utopia will simply spring up out of the earth like a flower. There are MANY abhorrent issues with the ideology that has now taken deep root with in the Democratic party, but chief among them is the outright demonization of those ideas that would challenge their position as "right-wing extremists" (this would be anyone who is 1 degree politically right of Nancy Pelosi). This level of pure narcissism has never before been seen on this scale in the Western world. There have and always will be those who are very self-righteous, but this is a whole new level and by those who have an EXTREME influence and incredible control over the flow of information. . We MUST have liberal ideas to work in concert with conservative ones, but the degree of malevolent self-appointed arbiters of what is and is not acceptable discourse and "values", is very literally tearing society apart. The wholesale abandonment of all the values upon what the Western World was built, is a runaway train with the brake-lever broken off and headed directly for a sharp bend in the tracks, just as it is about to traverse a bridge over the Grand Canyon. . Those of us who are still sane, are trying to reach across to those who have no interest in good faith address of issues, only to shove their idea of "values" down everyone's throat. I fear by the time we recognize that playing by the standard rules of discourse are quite literally not possible, it will be too late to stop that train. I happen to think that it is already too late, it just depends on how many of those train cars go off the end of that bridge into the canyon below. . Yes... I am very [dark+grey+pilled] these days, as we cannot [resist] so many problems on this many fronts
    1
  958. 1
  959. @RawOlympia ... The "left" left us all, as the moderate liberals allowed a wholesale takeover by [Marxist+Crats] and socialists those who would [remove+West+ground], in the hopes that utopia will simply spring up out of the earth like a flower. There are MANY [ab+horrent] issues with the ideology that has now taken deep root with in the [donkey] party, but chief among them is the outright demonization of those ideas that would challenge their position as "right-wing extremists" (this would be anyone who is 1 degree politically right of [former+speaker+house]). This level of [pure+narcissism] has never before been seen on this scale in the Western world. There have and always will be those who are very [self+righteous], but this is a whole new level and by those who have an EXTREME influence and incredible control over the flow of information. . We MUST have liberal ideas to work in concert with conservative ones, but the degree of [male+volent+self+appointed+arbiters] of what is and is not acceptable discourse and "values", is very literally [tearing+society+apart]. The wholesale [abandoned+values] upon what the Western World was built, is a runaway train with the brake-lever broken off and headed directly for a sharp bend in the tracks, just as it is about to traverse a bridge over the Grand Canyon. . Those of us who are [not+insane], are trying to reach across to those who have no interest in good faith address of issues, only to shove their idea of "values" down everyone's throat. I fear by the time we recognize that [standard+rules+discourse] are [not+possible], it will be too late to stop that train. I happen to think that it is already too late, it just depends on how many of those train cars go off the end of that bridge into the canyon below. . Yes... I am very [dark+grey+pilled] these days, as we cannot [resist] so many problems on this many fronts
    1
  960. @RawOlympia ... The "left" left us all, as [moderate+liberals] [allowed+wholesale+takeover] by [Marxist+Crats+socialists] those who would [remove+West+ground], in the hopes that utopia will simply spring up out of the earth like a flower. There are MANY [ab+hor+rent] issues with the ideology that has now taken deep root with in the [horse+kinda] party, but chief among them is the outright [de+monization] of those ideas that would challenge their position as ["right+wing+extreme+ists"] (this would be anyone who is 1 degree [politically+right+former+speaker+house]). This level of [pure+narcissism] has never before been seen on this scale in the Western world. There have and always will be those who [very+self+righteous], but this is a whole new level and by those who have an [EXTREME+influence+incredible+control+flow+information]. . We MUST have liberal ideas [working+with+conservative] ones, but the degree of [male+volent+self+appointed+arbiters] of what is and is not acceptable [discourse+"values"], is very literally [tearing+society+apart]. The wholesale [abandoned+values] upon what [Western+World+built], is a [runaway+train+brake-lever+broken+headed+sharp+bend+tracks], just as it is about to traverse a bridge over the Grand Canyon. . Those [not+insane], are trying to reach across to those who have no interest in good faith address of issues, only [shove+idea+"values"+down+throat]. I fear by [time+recognize] that [standard+rules+discourse] are [not+possible], it will be too [late+stop+train]. I happen to think [already+too+late], it just depends on how many [train+cars+fall+end+bridge+canyon]. . Yes... I am very [dark+grey+pilled] these days, as we cannot [resist] so many problems on this many fronts
    1
  961. @RawOlympia ... The "left" left us all, as [moderate+liberals] [allowed+wholesale+takeover] by [Marxist+Crats+socialists] those who would [remove+West+ground], in the hopes that utopia will simply spring up out of the earth like a flower. There are MANY [ab+hor+rent] issues with the ideology that has now taken deep root with in the [horse+kinda] party, but chief among them is the outright [de+monization] of those ideas that would challenge their position as ["right+wing+extreme+ists"] (this would be anyone who is 1 degree [politically+right+former+speaker+house]). This level of [pure+narcissism] has never before been seen on this scale in the Western world. There have and always will be those who [very+self+righteous], but this is a whole new level and by those who have an [EXTREME+influence+incredible+control+flow+information]. . We MUST have liberal ideas [working+with+conservative] ones, but the degree of [male+volent+self+appointed+arbiters] of what is and is not acceptable [discourse+"values"], is very literally [tearing+society+apart]. The wholesale [abandoned+values] upon what [Western+World+built], is a [runaway+train+brake-lever+broken+headed+sharp+bend+tracks], just as it is about to traverse a bridge over the Grand Canyon. . Those [not+insane], are trying to reach across to those who have no interest in good faith address of issues, only [shove+idea+"values"+down+throat]. I fear by [time+recognize] that [standard+rules+discourse] are [not+possible], it will be too [late+stop+train]. I happen to think [already+too+late], it just depends on how many [train+cars+fall+end+bridge+canyon]. . Yes... I am very [dark+grey+pilled] these days, as we cannot [resist] so many problems on this many fronts
    1
  962. 1
  963. 1
  964. 1
  965. 1
  966. 1
  967. 1
  968. 1
  969. 1
  970. 1
  971. 1
  972. 1
  973. 1
  974. 1
  975. 1
  976. 1
  977. 1
  978. 1
  979. 1
  980. 1
  981. 1
  982. 1
  983. 1
  984. 1
  985. 1
  986. 1
  987. 1
  988. 1
  989. 1
  990. 1
  991. 1
  992. 1
  993. 1
  994. 1
  995. 1
  996. 1
  997. 1
  998. 1
  999. 1
  1000. 1
  1001. 1
  1002. 1
  1003. 1
  1004. 1
  1005. 1
  1006. 1
  1007. 1
  1008. 1
  1009. 1
  1010. 1
  1011. 1
  1012. 1
  1013. 1
  1014. 1
  1015. 1
  1016. 1
  1017.  @sleepykittyH  ….Yup 😺 More frequent then I would like, I get comments or feedback that I am not pissed enough or pressing hard enough back, so am disrespected, as if I “am playing into the lefts hands” or “just a sheep who will just continue to comply, until we lose everything”. . These people know nothing about me, only that I don’t fight back in the same way they do. Mid 2020, I got a notice of jury duty. I contacted the clerk and told her I was fine with jury duty, this is being honest, but I would not wear a mask, under any circumstances. She gave me a reprieve, for 6 mo. because she thought requirement would be over by then. . Fast forward 6 mo. and still required. I again reiterated my stance and she said, too bad, you have to wear a mask. I told her I would show up at the courthouse, but when the people at the door demand I mask, I would refuse and they were going to have to arrest me. I went on to say, that if I was to be required to wear a mask ANYWHERE they take me, I would continue to refuse. . I fold her this was 100% non-negotiable under 100% of circumstances and if anyone attempted to force me to wear a mask, they would literally have to incapacitate me via stun or gun. If so, when I awoke, I would rip the mask off and it would start all over again. I was not kidding, but I was not rude or a dick about it, just that this was, and remains, a hill I will absolutely and literally die on. . She finally sent my “request” to the judge, along with this string of about 5 emails laying out all of the above. He refused to contact me, so along came the evening when I was to call in after 5:00 PM and confirm if needed the following day. . I was excused 😺
    1
  1018. 1
  1019. 1
  1020. 1
  1021. 1
  1022. 1
  1023. 1
  1024. 1
  1025. 1
  1026. 1
  1027. 1
  1028. 1
  1029. 1
  1030. 1
  1031. 1
  1032. 1
  1033. 1
  1034. 1
  1035. 1
  1036. 1
  1037. 1
  1038. 1
  1039. 1
  1040. 1
  1041. 1
  1042. 1
  1043. 1
  1044. 1
  1045. 1
  1046. 1
  1047. 1
  1048. 1
  1049. 1
  1050. 1
  1051. 1
  1052. 1
  1053. 1
  1054. 1
  1055.  @nunote2362  ... I am 59 and as mentioned prior, this has always existed, but was not the "norm" it is today. Obviously, there are parts of the country or inner cities when over the top and need to consider gang's, as these are in overwhelming cases, issues of "terf". . My point still stands. The average person who got in a fight, typically at school over some slight, legit or otherwise, was not a death match. I am not, nor have not said that such things never happened, because this is clearly not true. I can see, over the course of my lifetime, that the instances of fights turning into multiple people on one and often times, people who simply wanted to "get in on a beat-down", join in for a few kicks to the head, when the person was clearly unconscious or far too injured to go on. . This is a special kind of malice that stems from a fundamental lack of respect for human life and is vastly more prevalent in particular demographics. The primary of those, being fatherless homes with no proper male role model to instill those values and "fear" how dad would respond when the school called and said hit child was threatening / bullying another child. We have 3 full generations now, whom have been increasingly more indoctrinated with an "us vs. them" mentality of oppressed / oppressor. . The cannon of values that were the foundation of the West, are not just failed to be taught, but we have sitting Congress members who openly embrace socialism on a large enough scale that should concern us all. All my life there has been some oddball who was a "Socialist Party" member, but we saw this on mass scale, by BLM and Antifa, during the Summer of 2020. Times have changed and these kids seeking death over a disagreement, are a reflection of that change.
    1
  1056. 1
  1057. 1
  1058. 1
  1059. 1
  1060. 1
  1061. 1
  1062. 1
  1063. 1
  1064. 1
  1065. 1
  1066. 1
  1067. 1
  1068. 1
  1069. 1
  1070. 1
  1071. 1
  1072. 1
  1073. 1
  1074. 1
  1075. 1
  1076. 1
  1077. 1
  1078. ​ Mark Harris  ... I would approach it in the identical way. While all of these things were 100% true at the time of his murder, it takes a certain amount of time for ALL of it to not only be digested by the legal parties, but accepted as well. Once a trial has ended, the losing party examines it all and looks for things that may have been illegal or mishandled in some way and we need to allow time for that to happen. We HAVE seen cases, Thin Blue Line being an example, of when someone was wrongly convicted and may have been put to death. Such events MUST give us pause, if we are to be a morally grounded society that is based upon tenants of the Ten Commandments. . What we see here is that the system worked as it should, in the sense of exercising appeals and making sure we don't get a person recanting testimony and the like. What happened in THIS case, as with many.... activists! They, HollyMarx in this particular case, have VASTLY more influence on society than they aught to and for unconscious reasons, people will hear a very famous actress make a claim of racism or something and the idea catches fire among media and then society. There is literally ZERO reason why Denzel Washington should have any more credibility than you, me or any random stranger on the street.... but they do :(  . Once a large contingent of very influential people get involved, we all pop our heads out the window to see what all the fuss is about. When we have social and mainstream media willing to outright LIE, either by playing semantics, obfuscating or omission, people find it difficult to dismiss, because it is done with not only great conviction, but on video. Such communication is a POWERFUL thing and its influence should never be underestimated.
    1
  1079. ​ @kariahl8845  ... I apologize :( I did not mean to suggest that you did, but I can see how I wrote my comment, it might have suggested that :)  . As for the actual "system" being at fault, I would 100% disagree, as it is the people who mess things up. If ALL arrests were handled in a completely objective manner and to the letter of how it is written on that paper, we would have exceedingly few complaints about it at all. As far as I can tell, this case was textbook per that "paper", but only got screwed up now because of activists getting activated.Of course, we humans are NEVER 100% objective and there in lies the rub! . I am sure if we looked at all legal proceedings of all cases ever tried, we would find things that fell through the cracks, so to speak. There are literally infinite variables that can happen and there is NO system of any kind that can account for them all in every way possible. This is why we have a lengthy appeals process, court appointed lawyers and such, because we sometimes see long after the trial, that someone has a few too many and spilled the beans to someone and perjured him / her self. It is for this reason that I am not in favor of immediate execution, if a verdict of capital punishment is given. . Again, we can always find cases that were seemingly failed by the system, but we can look at every one and find where someone intentionally or otherwise, failed procedure in some way. Bill Cosby is a perfect example. While he admitted to drugging one woman, he had a deal with the then prosecutor that it would not be charged, in order to plea to other things. This is EXCEEDINGLY common in the system, but it was a replacement prosecutor who used that protected admission to imprison Cosby. While all of us may agree that he is among the worst of the worst, when it comes to how he treated many women, it was absolutely the correct thing to do, by letting him out of prison. It is the prosecutor and not Cosby who royally F'd up here, as far as his release from prison is concerned. . Derek Chauvin has filed an appeal and is likely due to the images we have all seen of one jury member who was well aware of BLM and even had a t-shirt in that photo, yet claimed non-bias when he was being selected for jury duty. While this does not exonerate Chauvin's behavior, there was VERY clear misconduct by a jury member and he is the one who should be blamed, if Chauvin gets a new trial. If BLM rampages through America again, I will blame them for what they do as well. There are many issues about that particular case that were not handled well, but in the court of public opinion, rightly or wrongly, a MASSIVE amount of earths population witnessed what they believe to be the murder of George Floyd. . Hopefully, this governor will get the message from objective observers and see that commuting his sentence would be a slap in the face, not only for justice, but for the family of the victim :(
    1
  1080. ​ @kariahl8845  ... Your right! After I wrote 100%, I took a little pause, but I believe I covered those anomalies a bit later in my comment. However, the judge determines bias is true, but a judge has bias of his / her own, so this STILL falls back to the people who operate the system. Based on this criteria, it can never be possible to have a "fair" (literally impartial) trial, therefore would be grounds for a mis-trial 100% of the time... see where I am going with this? The idea being is that both attorneys have the ability to challenge the judge on a particular ruling he or she makes during the trial and that is a check and balance thing, as written on that "paper". Of course, BOTH attorney's have a bias, as well as the jury members and we can go on and on. The system understands there is bias, but since it cannot be removed from the equation, there are ways to address an issue when bias is believed to be influencing the proceedings and there is literally no other way we can do this. . Both attorneys even have such power to ask the judge to recuse him / herself and there are other procedures that can get other judges involved to determine bias, if the issue is pressed hard enough. Yes, there are most certainly rulings that enable the ability for others to abuse, but again.... this is absolutely unavoidable and there are procedures in place for an attorney to call out bias, mistrial or other when it is believed to have occurred. Sometimes this is not noticed or picked up until well after the trial has concluded. . As for mandatory minimums, yes.... that would seem to be a "hard line" as dictated by legislation or laws passed by citizens. However, no matter HOW definitive that law or legislation, there is going to be extenuating circumstances in nearly 100% of those cases. That is why a judge has to do exactly that... judge. It then becomes the attorneys job to decide if that judgement was fair or shows a perceived bias. . As for underpaying for a soda, seems like you may be getting at the 3rd strike laws? If so, we have to consider that a person has already had 2 felony convictions, so when he steals a piece of pizza, which was one highly publicized case, he goes to prison for life or whatever the mandatory sentence is for that crime in that state. Such a sentence is NOT because he stole a piece of pizza, it is because he used a knife and has gotten two chances already and failed to live up to the agreement he made when released from that second conviction. I get that it sucks going to prison for stealing a slice of pizza, but that is NOT the actual reason he is going away again. . If I am understanding you correctly, you feel that the judge should have called for a mis-trial, once it became known that the jurist lied... am I correct? If so, than this again falls back to bias, procedure failure or whatever legal reason and is but one of the way in which the system works to correct human "errors", let's call them. I am not a lawyer, nor was I involved in that trial, obviously, but IMO, the judge seems to have violated Chauvin's rights and hence the appeal that has been make is all but guaranteed to include that action within the document filed by his attorney. . In conclusion here... I do get that no matter HOW hard we try, no matter HOW many procedures we have and no matter HOW much we want to get it right, there are just too many people involved. 100% of them, through action or inaction due to personal bias, has the possibility to have a direct impact on the outcome of a trial. Since we cannot possibly remove all of those from the equation, we also have done our best to not put the death penalty on a perfect citizen in EVERY single societal valued way, until that one day commits the most horrific crime imaginable. When this happens, such a case is always tried as a mentally deficient person, maybe a minor, and we don't sentence capital punishment on such people.  . So, we have to make a decision. Either we do the best we can as a people, and admittedly we certainly fail at times, and permit capital punishment in states that allow it OR lock them away until the end of time. We have to weigh these options as they BOTH come with a very high price. One in living with the execution of a person who may be found innocent at a later date, although exceedingly rare, it has happened. Or two... lock them away and pay a monetary price in building more prisons and taxpayer support until the end of their life. Or three... discuss rehabilitation and all three have drawbacks that can have a VERY difficult outcome with which we as a society must reconcile.
    1
  1081. ​ @kariahl8845  ... As I mentioned earlier, we can ALWAYS take individual cases and hold them up as a good or bad example of 3 strikes. There are going to be just as many that were fairly administered, in a sense we would have agreement, as those that were not. Specifically in the case of the person who failed to put the correct amount of money, I am not familiar, but that is also a petty crime and not a felony that led to a 3rd strike and therefore life in prison. If it DID, than I would need more information, as I would be willing to bet there is more to the story, even if you are not aware. I am not seeking to be an apologist for any type of failure upon the criminal justice system, but you and I both understand there is always more to a story than gets reported. We need only look at the exceedingly left-leaning media which painted The Covington Kids as white supremacists, very simply because some were wearing MAGA hats. The mainstream media is ALWAYS going to seek the heart-strings point of view to paint a picture of unfair treatment in the justice system, as that is what they do. Just look at the case of JJ right here and how many have very high profile platforms and flat out lying about this case. Again, we can go tit for tat forever. There was a case in my home town, where a drunk driver on a motor cycle blew a stop sign and struck a man walking his daughter in a crosswalk. She was killed, he lost a leg and was hospitalized for many months. The driver....? he already had something like 8 felony convictions for driving under influence and proceeded to covertly flip the bird to the victims family when he was in court. . Just like the example you gave that appears to be a miscarriage of justice, so is this one. He was given WAY too many chances and continued to piss them away. Just like virtually EVERY criminal that has been convicted several times, it is not realistic to assume these are the ONLY times he she committed such a crime and got caught 100% of the times he perpetrated one. I get that you are not for capital punishment, as you are certainly not alone. This topic is might be 2nd in controversial, to that of Rowe vs Wade. . I think that you and I have gone about as far as we can with this and we just disagree on a few points. While these may or may not be about lives being unfairly taken, they are points that will NEVER be rendered "acceptable" to both sides of the opinion on capital punishment. I will add one more thing, that I forgot to include in earlier comments. Just because a person has a bias, does NOT mean he / she is is automatically going to be driven to error because of it and therefore incapable of being objective. While you may be more inclined to spot the times punishment was incorrect or in humane, as you put it. I am more inclined to point out where the system failed, by giving a person too many chances and left one or more victims on a long list, that should NEVER have been victimized at all, for a system that failed in the opposite direction. . Peace, Kariah L. I think we had a good exchange here and while I don't think either of us changed our position, I think it fair to say we gave each other something more to consider when forming our own position, at least I hope so :). This conversation is EXACTLY why this nation will forever be divided, as to how we deal with those who enter the criminal justice system. It is most certainly difficult to get out of a revolving door, we must remember that before one seems trapped within that door, he / she had plenty of chances to avoid it, likely many years earlier via programs specifically designed to support 1st time offenders. Some will get trapped easier than others, but we are a forgiving nation. However, seeing the injustice perpetuated upon THIS family, by way of possible release in lieu of death sentence or even life in prison for JJ, is every bit as unfair as the guy and the soda can :)
    1
  1082. ​ @kariahl8845  ... Good morning, Kariah :) We also must recognize that the initial 2 crimes were likely NOT served to full term and release was a condition of accepting the harsher punishment, should they be caught offending again. At some point, we MUST hold people accountable and very often that accountability is harsher than would be otherwise, because they were given a second, and in these cases... a 3rd chance. To be clear... I am NOT defending the punishment of soda can guy's punishment. I doubt that YOU have any such criminal history to be concerned with 3 strikes, so why would that be? Well, because you have not engaged in the behavior that leads to those strikes, just as I have, along with the overwhelming vast majority of people. On that note, I would also look to the state that declares failure to pay for an item of less than $10.00 is considered a felony. By any metric, there is most certainly an issue there and it was peoples error to write such a statue into state law. . 3 strikes laws were not born out of whim or to just randomly punish people for instances like the case you cited. No, they were created as a response to many criminals who CONTINUE to victimize people time and time and time again, so the victimized got fed up. I understand that they are not always adjudicated in the manner in which they were intended, but the perpetrator CONTINUED to pursue crime at the expense of society. The case you cited, not withstanding, we can BOTH go back and forth with examples of how the people were seemingly over punished for a crime, as those who were given too many chances, by all objective measures (the DD I mentioned earlier as an example). I am not going to sit here and defend what happened to the soda can guy, because it does not sound like justice. However, 3 strikes was ONLY created after horrible continued abuses by career criminals, even if THIS particular one was unjust. . I suppose the best way to address such things as 3 strikes is a panel of judges who's job it is to consider specific situations in which 3 strikes law is specifically charged. I think this would be a fantastic way to avoid abuses, but there is one single problem. 3 strikes laws were a direct response to campaigns of victims and families pleading the cases of their HORRIBLE experience with criminals that repeatedly got released, only to kill or murder their mother, father, sister or brother :( Those exact same heart-strings you feel for the soda can guy are just not as powerful as a grieving mother in front of 20 microphones, tears running down her face, eyes bloodshot from crying holding a picture of her 5 yo boy who was ruthlessly killed by a multiple felon released on parole who promised to clean up his act. . BOTH of these are injustices, but how we proceed to fix them is the key. Due to many, many reasons, those who commit crimes are released from prison. Some have served their time and "appear" to be rehabbed, based on the panel that decides such matters, while others are released because of over crowding or maybe a procedural thing, like Bill Cosby was. In the end, we are human and there will ALWAYS be someone who rightly or wrongly got screwed over. . I certainly don't have all the answers, any more than you do. However, personal responsibility is at the heart of 100% of those we have spoken of in this thread and includes JJ. We, as a nation, must decide if imprisonment is designed for punishment, rehabilitation or both. Sadly, there are some, and I would say that JJ falls into this category, who will NEVER be "rehabilitated" and there is just no way to determine that, based solely on his earliest criminal conviction. Unless we as a society are willing to invest many times the amount of resources into rehabilitation facilities that can spend the time necessary in an attempt to undo the damage that leads to repeat offending, we will always have the soda can guy who was over-punished and 8 time DD who was released only to commit a 9th time. . society has a difficult time in accepting the amount of resources that go into addressing criminal behaviors, when the majority of us will never see that system, outside of a speeding or parking ticket. Just like ALL things, it comes down to money far too often. Paying ever higher and higher taxes to help those who perpetuate crimes against us all, don't get much sympathy and that is a powerful incentive to those who support harsh punishments.
    1
  1083. 1
  1084. 1
  1085. 1
  1086. 1
  1087. 1
  1088. 1
  1089. 1
  1090. ​ @Jessica Mason .... No question, that if ALL people in society, be them elected to enforce laws or simply enforce the recognized rules of a given society, did the "right thing".... but they do not. The problem in 100% of cases, comes down to the nature of human beings and there is LITERALLY zero systems that can eliminate the 3 issues I mentioned in my previous comment just above yours. So long as we humans are charged with making decisions, we cannot eliminate those that would abuse the privilege in which they were assigned. We can have any number of oversight committees or checks and balances, but for EVERY one of them.... human error, human ignorance and human malice WILL enter into the equation. . It all starts with a society that has legally, morally and tacitly agreed to a certain conduct of behavior and interaction. The moment just one citizen breaks those rules, regardless of how egregiously, those in the society must pass some judgement, punishment or correction to it. The first thing society gave up on was shaming. When society decided that "shame" was no less cruel then bullying, we began our decent off the rails of a polite functioning society. There have always been those who go WELL beyond things that simple shame would address, so we need to take the next step. Well, one in ALL cases, will lead some to take that next level of anti-social behavior. We can trace back probably 98% of serious anti-social behavior, gang killings in this case, to the failure of enforcing simple shame WAY back when it would have done some good. . Obviously, there are those who are just born bad and no amount of shame would have stopped them from the destructive path they were on. Hell, we can look back to the earliest days of Hitler himself, and see how events and how others handled them, influenced what we saw he eventually became. Systems will ALWAYS be abused and there is no way to eliminate it. All we can do, is enforce those things that have time tested as proven to lead to the most cohesive society of the past. . Society has failed itself and when this happens... chaos is the only possible result 😿
    1
  1091. 1
  1092. 1
  1093. ​ @natem1982  ... RE: There's really not any good solutions : I need to break this down a bit, so will go line by line :) I don't want to straw man you, but I am having a bit of trouble following you here. Please clarify where needed :) 1. The problem with just "letting it unfold" is that we must then accept whatever they cult decides to do and just live with the consequences. No, this is no way to live and makes one a sheep within a flock of wolves. I am not suggesting that we create chaos in order to fight chaos, but I sure as hell am not going to sit back and let the cards fall where they may and hope that Jesus saves me. I am in ZERO way religious, and don't seek to disrespect your faith, but is it your belief that Jesus will protect you from the hell the leftist wants to rein down on us all? . 2. I agree... and speaks to what I said in my last reply to you. Do not become the evil you fight, but that does NOT mean you should not fight. Fighting is not only physical confrontation, but a broad term for pushing back in whatever way one can, that avoids the pitfalls of becoming that evil. I will absolutely NOT sit back and just watch the leftist take from me, should they make such a direct move. I cannot control who ingests the Joseph Goebbels Propaganda Media Machine and takes it as gospel, but I am out here every single day, doing what I can to push back against the cult. I will not pretend it is easy or that I am making huge strides, but I will not just allow the chips to fall where they may. Those chips may end up where they go with or without my resistance, but I could not live with myself, should I sit back and hope for the best. . 3. Not sure where cancelling came in here, but I am as nearly a free speech absolutist, as it appears you are. I have never sought to cancel anyone, but I will most certainly be happy when one who DOES seek to cancel others, dies by their own sword. I have ZERO issues with people that fall victim to the censorship they once approved be used against others. You make interesting point that I have made myself, in regards to censorship. There are two fundamental questions, when it comes to censorship. The first is WHO decides what is deemed "in-appropriate" speech. Beyond fire in a crowded theatre, when there is no such fire.. calls for violence against another and such. The second is WHO decides WHO decides? The leftist cult is all about censorship, because they are currently in power, but they fail to grasp the clear and EXTREMELY obvious pitfalls of their current ways. There will come a time when the Regressives are no longer in power, hopefully in the next two election cycles, but I digress... , and the "who" that gets to decide what is acceptable will change. I am willing to bet they would be none to pleased, when a conservative appoints a new panel of arbiters of censorship! . 4. As for violence... I am not a fan. I don't wish to be violent and will do what I can to avoid it. However.... I will NEVER rule out the need for violence, when all else fails. There comes a time when violence is ABSOLUTELY the answer and if that time comes, I will know it and act accordingly. . Peace, Nado :) EDIT: I Have just re-read my comment here and I may need to clarify my thoughts on censorship. Simply put, I believe censorship to be evil! I want to hear what Hitler had to say, Ted Bundy and as much as Biden The Tyrantasourous Hex disgusts me, I would never seek to shut him up from whatever he has to say.
    1
  1094. 1
  1095. 1
  1096. 1
  1097. 1
  1098. 1
  1099. 1
  1100. 1
  1101. 1
  1102. 1
  1103. 1
  1104. 1
  1105. 1
  1106. 1
  1107. 1
  1108. 1
  1109. 1
  1110. 1
  1111. 1
  1112. 1
  1113. 1
  1114. 1
  1115. 1
  1116. 1
  1117. 1
  1118. 1
  1119. 1
  1120. 1
  1121. 1
  1122. 1
  1123. 1
  1124. 1
  1125. 1
  1126. 1
  1127. 1
  1128. 1
  1129. 1
  1130. ​ @Goulash45  ... OMG... lol. I was just making a joke because I saw that someone was being called a "contrarian" :) Didn't even know it was me... lol. . I have never, nor would I ever claim to NOT have a bias. Of course... I have a bias, just as you and everyone else does. However, that bias does not make anything I said not factual. . it is certainly a matter of opinion as to how much sarcasm, twinkle in the eye Ethan had when he suggested someone should bomb the building, but that is not the point. One cannot go into an airport an even in the most silly or joking ways, suggest someone should bomb the place. In the same manner, one cannot suggest one "harm" POTUS either. . Ethan said something that should NEVER be joked about when speaking about a CURRENT situation with the amount of intense emotional feeling as was the case when he said it. As mentioned already... he was speaking off the cuff and not caught up in the moment, but it is STILL inciting a violent act. He was talking to many thousands of people at the time and was a very irresponsible thing to say. . Do I think he should go to prison... hell no! Do I think he gave more than .2 nano's of consideration before he said that... hell no! Doesn't matter... he STILL he must be conscious of what he is saying, who is listening and the state of tension that was existing at the time. . I argue my position not from one that is looking to be right or seek a "gotcha" moment (I am not accusing you of saying that I am). I don't even argue from an ideological position, I say what I understand to be facts of an event and apply the most intellectually honest and good faith argument I can to whoever cares to listen. . If I am wrong... I will own it. This is not about what Ethan was thinking when he said this, it is about being responsible for the things he says. THIS was the wrong thing to say... period.
    1
  1131. ​ @Goulash45  ... Dude.. for the love of God.... it was irresponsible to make such a statement. This was not two people talking on the phone. This was not a guy at a party talking to a group of people that had a few too many drinks. This was guy with a huge following of very loyal subs in which he has quite a bit of influence. Just like a Steven Crowder... Ben Shapiro or Jordan Peterson. The context in which he made that statement was to possibly incite violence, because he has a lot of people who listen to what he has to say and, while it is not be fair, he MUST consider what one of them might do in such an emotionally charged condition. . You can claim he was joking or didn't really mean it or point to a definition or description on the internet... I don't care. I think he got exactly what he deserved, but I will certianly argue, that had this been identical scenario, but was a libertarian or conservative creator and not a leftist... the punishment would have been far more severe, as the channel would likely be removed. . Ethan got at minimum what he deserved. Hopefully, he will be more careful with what he says going forward. . EDIT: Let me clarify here. Even though, I 100% believe that a conservative would have gotten a much harsher penatly for saying this, I am not advocating that Ethan lose his channel over, as that would be an over-reaction. I am a free speech absolutist and is specifically as it relates to 1a. I want to hear what even the most extreme left, right or whatever someone things / believes, as I feel that allowing such ideas to the light of scrutiny would be far more beneficial than booting someone off of a platform, so they go underground to create an echo chamber of others who also may have anti-social opinions or views. .  Can we be done with this now, please?
    1
  1132. ​ @doctorbrown5957  ... I cannot speak to what you have heard The Timinator say on his podcasts, as I not seen but only a very few of them in total. I have been following his daily videos for about 6 years, so have seen him come a LONG way of of that "milk toast fence sitter" position he was on for the first several of those years. I also will not defend anything you have heard him say, but will ad the following for some thought. . I am uniquely on YouTube for ALL my social media life. It is not possible to tell you how many times I have had my comments deleted for "wrong think", as while I am only slightly right of center politically, that pretty much makes me Hitler to those of the farther left persuasion. I was mod for a short time on Unsafe Space (channel on YT) and was under the EVER watchful eye of YouTube minions and its algorithm. I have ALWAYS been able to say what I wanted, but most certainly had to choose my words carefully in most cases and completely re-edit my entire comment on literally hundreds of others. I had learned to copy / paste back up my comment PRIOR to "REPLY" and then refresh page 10 seconds later, to see POOF... I had wrong-thunk again. . All I am trying to say is that while Tim may very well be compromising to some degree, we ALL have to in order to remain on nearly all of the social media platforms. YouTube may or may not be less restrictive than some other platforms, Tim would rather not be removed, for playing the game to at least a small degree. That said, he may have compromised more than I am aware and I am not an apologist for him, but I do certainly give him some pretty good benefit of the doubt, as I have come to see him as quite principled. I don't always agree with those principles, but I don't need him to agree with me, I only need him to call out hypocrisy as he sees it.. whether from the left or right. . Peace, Doc :) PS> Did anyone ever believe that where your're going.. you don't need any roads? :P
    1
  1133. 1
  1134. 1
  1135. 1
  1136. 1
  1137. 1
  1138. 1
  1139. 1
  1140. 1
  1141. 1
  1142. 1
  1143. 1
  1144. 1
  1145. 1
  1146. 1
  1147. 1
  1148. 1
  1149. 1
  1150. 1
  1151. 1
  1152. 1
  1153. 1
  1154. 1
  1155. 1
  1156. 1
  1157. 1
  1158. 1
  1159. 1
  1160. 1
  1161. 1
  1162. 1
  1163. 1
  1164. 1
  1165. 1
  1166. 1
  1167. 1
  1168. 1
  1169. 1
  1170. 1
  1171. 1
  1172. 1
  1173. 1
  1174. 1
  1175. 1
  1176. 1
  1177. 1
  1178. 1
  1179. 1
  1180. 1
  1181. 1
  1182. 1
  1183. 1
  1184. 1
  1185. 1
  1186. 1
  1187. 1
  1188. 1
  1189. 1
  1190. 1
  1191. 1
  1192. 1
  1193. 1
  1194. 1
  1195. 1
  1196. 1
  1197. 1
  1198. 1
  1199. 1
  1200. 1
  1201. 1
  1202. 1
  1203. 1
  1204. 1
  1205. 1
  1206. 1
  1207. 1
  1208. 1
  1209. @Googlag Inmate #666 ... OMG... Perfect example right now! I left the page and YT had deleted my comment due to a word below --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This still leaves it up to a group or political body to determine WHAT is deemed acceptable speech. Clearly, you and I can come up with 20 or so words that are pretty much considered offensive or should not be said in mixed company. . Example: We might agree that saying "that girl is a *hore" is considered explicit. OK, what if I say..."That girl is a garden tool"? I just said the same thing, only used better language. That might make it past the "advisory" sticker, but do we want kids to say "garden tool" to describe a girl that is, ummm.... "experienced" ..lol. . This ALWAYS comes down to who decides what is / is not offensive. So, the breast thing we can do, is put a sticker for the 7 naughty words and expect that parents WILL BE parenting their kids. There is no doubt, kids will be exposed to it by their friends and such, but that has ALWAYS been the nature of adolescence. . Teach your kids a good moral center, teach them right from wrong, take the time to TRULY explain important topics when they come up and they will be just fine :) . This comment being deleted is a textbook example of YouTube taking on the role of "protecting its users". However, need only look at the context of what I said and COMPLETELY changes what I was actually saying. I have MASSIVE issues with YT censoring with such a broad brush, but happens to me all the time in discussions like this :)
    1
  1210. 1
  1211. 1
  1212. 1
  1213. 1
  1214. 1
  1215. 1
  1216. 1
  1217. 1
  1218. 1
  1219. 1
  1220. 1
  1221. 1
  1222. 1
  1223. 1
  1224.  @tsdobbi  .. You are right, the GOP will not flood the black community with resources... they will just be a HELL of a lot better at getting the hell out of their lives and allow them the opportunities they have. I never said that blacks were gonna jump ship to GOP, but blacks are far more conservative than most realize already. Sadly, it is those who are younger support the Democratic party, who does nothing but pander to how they will "save them" from conservatives, while not saying a damned thing about the rotten culture they embrace that keeps them exactly where they are in society. . The problem with black neighborhoods is 100% the responsibility of black fathers who don't raise their children and THAT is due in no small part, because Democrats require Welfare mothers NOT have a father in the home. I get the idea of not paying 2 parent homes, but I'd rather see us not pay a GD'd dime to any of them, so they have incentive to clean up their act. . What we have today, cannot be solved by politicians. We have a catastrophic divide, brought to us by Marxist indoctrination, because parents have absolutely failed their children for the last 3 generations. They were too busy "having it all" with a vacation home for the Winter / Summer months and allowed their children to be raised by nannies, babysitters, daycare and the worst of the worst.... the public school system. EDIT: and the internet! . There are many things wrong today and 100% of them could be well on the way to being mended, if there were common values that we shared. The Democrats have allowed the Marxist cult to take over their party, so there is JUST as big a divide with the Dem's, but the only difference being, is that the moderates won't say anything, for fear of getting cancelled. The GOP are fairly divided, but we only know it, because they say so!
    1
  1225. 1
  1226. 1
  1227. 1
  1228. 1
  1229. 1
  1230. 1
  1231. 1
  1232. 1
  1233. 1
  1234. 1
  1235. 1
  1236. 1
  1237. 1
  1238. 1
  1239. 1
  1240. 1
  1241. 1
  1242. 1
  1243. 1
  1244. 1
  1245.  @deadzoneternity  .... RE: The idea that you or any individual... : Either you have misspoke in your first few words or have not been paying attention to what I have / been saying.... I happen to think it is the former :) . I understand many of the reasons I hear one say they are pro-choice, I just happen to think the overwhelming number of them are excuses for lack of responsibility OR the false belief that men simply want to control women because patriarchy BS. . Your middle paragraph is spot on and I am in 100% agreement and have said as much, if not in THIS thread, but one or two others on the same subject of other videos :) . Little lol on your last paragraph, as it seems you completely misunderstood the meaning of 1 & 2. I was not listing them as in number or importance or even in ORDER of importance, as they could have been in either order. They are simply 2 things that MUST be understood, before a pro-choice person can understand probably 98% of pro-life people's motivations. . I think that you just read my response(s) too quickly, and I'm not applying malice to you in this regard, then wrote this reply. No harm no foul and as I always say, I appreciate those that make arguments or critique mine in good faith and you have done so :) Peace, TSM! . PS> I do appreciate your separation of paragraphs. Not only easier to digest changes of topic, but just easier to read in general. I have seen comments that surpass my own in length, but are one single paragraph and often lack proper punctuation so that much harder to understand... lol
    1
  1246. 1
  1247.  @deadzoneternity  ... RE: The reason I think people... : Ya, it was a bit hard to read. You were rambling a little... lol :) I really like your line of ..."it should be a procedure that isn't allowed, but with exceptions to allow it". This speaks to the camp of "Safe, legal and rare" which is something ONLY the most hardcore pro-life would say is not enough. . I think that it is foolish for anyone, you and I included, to think that abortion will ever be universally seen as evil, because it is not easy to judge oneself that harshly. I also think that, because the Western World values tilt VERY strongly toward the preservation / saving of human lives, the pro-choice crowd is just not going to be sold on a zygote or "clump of cells" being a human life. Some can be persuaded, as I myself was pro-choice most of my life. This was because I never really gave it the deep consideration it really deserves and saw it as a "woman's right". . At the end of the day, I would like to see as many laws written for the State level, rather than federal. The Constitution, it's amendments and The Bill of Rights, are the ONLY things that should be concerned with and the rest left to states. This will / would no doubt lead to some states going pretty far off-script, but would greatly reduce these impossibly polarizing issues, because if we hated something so much... we could move. Sure, that is inconvenient, but the alternative is federal over-reach which is EXACTLY what happened with Roe vs. Wade. . I support ANY legislation, aside from those mentioned just above, that falls out of the hands of fed and into the states! . Peace, TSM
    1
  1248. 1
  1249. 1
  1250. 1
  1251. 1
  1252. 1
  1253. 1
  1254. 1
  1255. 1
  1256. 1
  1257. 1
  1258. 1
  1259. 1
  1260. 1
  1261. 1
  1262. 1
  1263. 1
  1264. 1
  1265. 1
  1266. 1
  1267. 1
  1268. 1
  1269. 1
  1270. 1
  1271. 1
  1272. 1
  1273. 1
  1274. 1
  1275. ​ @isotopesreactor3019 ... N. Korea is not going to concede anything of value to any nation in the world, without doing EVERYTHING possible, to humiliate or degrade every nation that would seek concessions from them. Any worthwhile negotiations with N. Korea are gonna take months of meetings and that leader is going to have to appear to Kim Jong-Un, to grovel and humiliate his / her nation into getting concessions from N. Korea. That nation, just like Cuba, has survived just fine without the help of the West, so he is NOT about to give the West ANYTHING without a long fight to prove we have something he wants. Side note, while all of us can agree, living under the rule of N. Korea is not something any of us would wish upon anyone, a nations leader cannot sit at a podium one day, and espouse the evils of a N. Korean dictatorship one day and then seek a sit down meeting with KJU in the following ones. It is easy to point out the horrors committed by him and how he rules N. Korea, so this is why Trump "played the game" and walked across that bridge without escort into N. Korea. KJU respects that kind of thing and it would / will take a HELL of a lot more than that act alone to get anywhere with N. Korea. . Perhaps you have heard of the Abraham Accords? Ya, I get it... the Arab nations are not going to invite the Jews over for tea, but Trump was able to help make some very serious discussions between Israel and some of these nations and was a great few steps. Now, these would not be like dominoes and see Iran and others suddenly say... "I love you Israel, let's hug". Trump did this while 100% of the Democrats were ACTIVELY undermining his administration at every possible turn. From a general who ACTUALLY contacted China, in order to behind the scenes tell them that Trump was simply making a threat to appease the American people and he is not going to attack. If America does plan a military move, I will let you know. Ya, our own American Chief of staff committed TREASON against his own country, JUST to harm Trump. Go ahead and fight him at every turn. Call him to the mat for every action he wants to take, but FFS, don't LITERALLY sell out your own nation, in order to harm Trump! . Obama had a drone strike and there were Americans killed there as well. One of those times when it really SUCKS to be a POTUS. In 100% of every circumstance in which military actions are taken, the POTUS is not spending weeks in the War Room planning strategy and accounting for every move that leads up to to a call for an action. No... POTUS has and will ALWAYS rely on the various leaders of the military and intelligence to provide the information necessary to make the call and POTUS must decide. I am not excusing Trump, nor am I calling out Obama (I could go on for multiple paragraphs on what he COULD have done, as the 1st black POTUS, but utterly FAILED). What I am saying is that POTUS is certainly responsible for making that call, but there are an INFINITE number of things that can be misinterpreted, wrong or simply change, between the time an order call that drone strike and the time it ACTUALLY strikes it's target. No excuses for Trump or Obama, but every POTUS ever to occupy the Oval is subject to the information given. Since we have multiple examples of Trumps OWN admin turning on him, in order to punish him, is it really surprising that things he was called to do were not proposed in good faith? Trump must own strike, just like Obama must own his! . Leaving allies! Just like 100% of every POTUS ever, he relies on aids and can get things wrong, because guess what... we are human. Though we can also add exactly how many wars did Trump start and how many from the previous, say 4 POTUS'? Some of this is simply luck of the times, but it is also garnering respect by foreign leaders and not being a weak one who leaders can walk all over.... in steps Biden. While the evacuation plan to leave Iraq was formed by the Trump admin, the execution of it was ALL on Biden and his admin. No question, America needs to VASTLY reduce its presence in foreign nations, as this is an ever increasing risk / problem on multiple levels. Biden simply put America and it's allies tail between its legs and ran away. We left several billion $$$ worth of military vehicles, weapons and such behind, which the Taliban is now using to supply itself as well as VERY likely Hamas and others to do what they do. Remember the civilians LITERALLY falling from the sky as they were hanging on to a plane that was leaving the airport? That evacuation was literally treason against America and its allies and is absolutely IGNORED by mainstream leftist media. What Biden authorized was the most most poorly executed exit plan ever performed.... and Biden must own that. We needed to get the hell out of there, but a few hundred soldiers in strategic places could have been an IMMENSE help in assuring we got ALL of our allies and equipment out, evacuated the civilians and allies... THEN we have the military personnel taken out. As it stood, we had absolute CHAOS and a terrorist opted to take the opportunity to blow up a bunch of people while crowded at the airport. . I am not a Trump apologist, but I see things for what they are and I have the EXACT same bias as 100% of everyone who happens to make it to this part of my comment. No doubt, we could all go back and forth about the above and add / take away certain things to improve / worsen those events. My problem with those who I consider having TDS, is the hyperbole. The idea that Trump is simply explained away by accusing him of being the most evil man ever and that he is LITERALLY worse than Hitler, which I have heard once respected people, like Sam Harris, for example, is called hyperbole... and it serves nobody. . I support Trump today, because the state is so INSANELY corrupt and F'd up to such an extreme... desperate times require desperate action. Trump is light-years from the perfect man and as unconventional a POTUS as has been in my lifetime and maybe ever. He has many faults, but the overwhelming vast majority of them, as claimed by the left leaning of our world are simply false. We can look at "Russia, Russia, Russia" and know that it was Hilary Clinton behind the Steel Dossier with the corrupt as F-BI paying informants to lie, in order to spy on American citizens... THIS IS FACT! and is treasonous. I could name multiple Constitutional violations by Biden, but this is not about him... this is about Trump. . I am sure I missed some stuff that I will think of 5 seconds after I hit "post", but that is enough for now. As per ALL of my comments, I invite a good faith discussion with any / all who agree or disagree. I am not perfect, though I am a kitten, so I have studied hoomans to the best of my ability, but if wrong about something... I will own it and ask others to do the same . Now.... you begged and I delivered. I expect a good faith reply, as my PC is now out of ink 😿
    1
  1276. 1
  1277. 1
  1278. 1
  1279. 1
  1280. 1
  1281. 1
  1282. 1
  1283.  @Schlabbeflicker  …. My position has nothing to do with whether or not this mans actions were legally justifiable. . My contention is that by virtue of both of thes guys having hopped over the counter and literally cornering him with no reasonable way to escape, he at that point, became a “prisoner”. . Had he made a move either way to escape, it is not reasonable to expect no physical confrontation to occur, therefore it is reasonable, that the other guy would have given assistance to the one being confronted. In such a case, his back would be to this person and be EXCEEDINGLY vulnerable to being hit in the head or otherwise seriously injured as a result. . Wa can speculate all day long about what “might”have occurred, but the fact remains, there was a threat to his person, by the mere fact these two were committing a crime and he was trapped inbetween. . We were not there. We do not have HIS frame of mind and the moments he was limited to decide what action to take. We CANNOT say, they were “just going to steal a couple hundred dollars worth of product”. Had this guy complied and just sat there, it is EXCEPTIONALLY likely they would have been emboldened and gone for the register. . At that point, they would HAVE to deal with him, because he was trapped at the register. There is NO way to reasonably expect that with all the adrenylin (sp) and testosterone flowing in that little area, it is impossible NOT to get into a brawl right there. . This guy saw that he was trapped and his best chance to avoid serious injury…..? catch one of them by surprise! If he just threw a punch and had not immediately incapacitated him, then he would fight back and within 2 seconds, the SECOND guy would come in from behind and he would be guaranteed to be cracked in the head with whatever he could find behind the counter. . He may be in serious legal trouble here, but I will ALWAYS support his actions!
    1
  1284. 1
  1285. 1
  1286.  @Goulash45  …. Had ALLelse been the same and there were only a SINGLE guy…. you and I would be in agreement. . However… there was TWO guys and that changes the equation. Had he stabbed a lone person, I would be in full agreement that it would be WAY over the top. In such a case, it would have been reasonable to punch or tackle the SINGLE guy and a knife would have been 100% unjustified. . The problem is the second guy. If he just sits there, why not go for the register? Why not just keep getting more bold... what is to stop them, when he is cowering in the corner? These are two guys in ski masks brazenly stealing from this guy and that IS threatening behavior. It is a threat to his pride, it is a threat to his job responsibility and indeed a physical threat when they are on each side of his position committing robbery! . Tell me, Jon…. what would YOU have done? I already know, you would sitand there like a beta and let the steal from your store. Now…. what if you stood there complying and then they decided to go for the register? Why shouldn ‘t they be expected to do that? You aren’t resisting…. you pose no threat, so they are now emboldened and you are inbetween them and the cash? . As soon as those two make a move for you, there is very slim chance to avoid serious injury. One from the front and the other coming at you from the back. This was not one on one in an open parking lot, this was TWO on one, with your back GUARANTEED to be toward one of them! You try to jump the counter, they grab your arm or leg and trip you up and fall on your face on the other side. They jump over, while you are trying to get up and kick you in the head! Your moment of shock and awe is long gone and now you are getting your head kicked in by two adrenalin charged robbers! . What do YOU do, when you waited for them to get bored and leave…. but decide to score some cash?
    1
  1287. 1
  1288. 1
  1289. 1
  1290.  @maddoggibson1  ….. If you have not read my last handful of comments on this thread, I ask that you do, because I had a HUGE part of this story wrong. . I had initially thought BOTH guys were behind the counter at the same time and therefore saw him as surrounded and was 100% on board with clerks actions. Was only very late in this thread, I realized this was not the case and reversed my take completely. . With more reflection still, I am at least on the fence. One second the guy on his right leaned over and stole something and was at that point, the OTHER guy jumpred counter. In the fraction of a second, he was being “violated”, as his store was under direct assault, for lack of maybe a better word and on EACH side of his position. . .it was at that instant, he lunged for the guy and stabbed him. I will not argue that being stabbed was in any way not horrible, but this guy has a lot to think about in a very short period of time and we are sitting back several weeks later saying what WE would have done. We dont have is adrenalyn, his sense of 2 on 1 or feeling that at any second, the other guy may bet ballzy. . We see all of this from a detached perspective and had he ONLY punched or pushed, maybe the second guy or someone watching door outside gets involved. Had he not incapacitated that guy, could have been 2 on 1 and he is in big trouble.. . Is it fair he used a knife when we know now the robber did not have a weapon…? No. However, it was THEY who chose to violate this guy and his store. The F with playing fair, when they were counting on the 2 on 1 advantage to distract clerk. . We can see the guy run out of the store the moment clerk goes on attack, but the clerk is NOT processing this at all. He immediately went after the other guy and took him out of the equation. Was it harsh…? Yes, but we are seeing ALL of this from a MASSIVELY different perspective and am about 75% in the clerks corner on this. . As for crime in general, this is a societal thing. Whether gun or knife, the person who is committing the crime WILL create a reaction by his action and people are not predictable. That guy did not count on nearly dying, just as the clerk did not wake up thinking. “I think I will use a knife and stab a robber in the neck at work today". I just don't think it is "reasonable" for everyone to expect the clerk to be "reasonable" when dealing with unreasonable people who went in to his store with the explicit intent of stealing his property and while being distracted by the two of them. . These guys instigated this ENTIRE thing and I am not saying YOU say the following, but I am just not willing to completely condemn this clerk, because he had literally 2 seconds to act and when adrenalyn, fear and anger boil over, one is not really in a conscious state of mind any longer, one is reacting to eliminate a threat completely, not make legal or "reasoned" considerations as to what may happen, because he does not have the benefit of what WE know now. . Had he stood back or just complied, odds are they would have been emboldened and gone for the register. Maybe not, but he could not possibly know the future and I have very little issue with him making sure he did not play beta male and just hope for the best. . 😺
    1
  1291.  @ryans1623  On part one of your question…. context is everything. . What if this person is inside your home with your wfe and kids present? In the BLINK of an eye, that person could change up tactics and suddenly has a knife at one of their necks, or one person makes a move that distracts and the other uses that distraction to smash you or one of your family over the head? . This can ALL go horrendously sideways in that much time, so we cannot simply Monday Morning quarterback this stuff. The INSTANT one guy reaches over to steal something from 3 feet away, the second guy immediatelly hops the counter and is in his private space. One moment they have his full attention, so he grabs a knife, then……. BAM, suddenly they have intentionally or otherwise used a 2 on 1 ploy to take advantage of their physical position AND that his attention is now separated by a 90 degree head swivel to determine their next moves. . This is UNQUESTIONABLY a threat! We can argue the degree of that threat, but we not only have the 100% safety, calm, cool and collected view from a stationary camera behind all this, but with FULL knowledge of everything that has YET to happen and several weeks later. In the LITERAL span of 1 second, those two dramatically escalated their tactics to manipulate his attention and steal from behind his counter. This is a threat to his person and YES his property. property they were willing to press his ability to address, based on two guys and situated on each side of his position. . This IS a threat on several levels and the clerk is not prossessing all of these actions in reall time, as he is dealing with adrenalyn, fear and a sudden coordinated “assault” on his personal space and yes…. his property. I make no distinction as to the value of property they are taking, because this is indescriminate stealing on their part and they have every incentive to take as much as they can get away with. . In that instant, he is not PROCESSING this guy dashing for the door. He “sees” it, but is simultaneous to the second guy jumping the counter, in a clear escallation of their 2 on 1 advantage. While we all like to consider the knife as major over reaction, his eyes are immediatelly on the guy who hopped the counter and we are able to see and process the other making a dash for the door. . Sure, we can EASILY say he was no longer a threat of any kind, but the clerk cannot see and digest that in the living moment of all this. We can see the guy just standing there, but in that flash, he simply sees a guy who is now on his side of the counter and his fight or flight instinct has instataneously maxed out and he makes his move. . We will see where the law takes all of this, but there is NOTHING that can go back in time, put ourselves in the clerks head and expect us to act with perfect degree of force or subdue the guy with perfect precision a take down move. We have the benefit of TONS of criteria that was still unfolding at the time, so this could have all gone horribly sideways, from his perspective. We MUST consider his use of force was deemed reasonable, based on what he knew, when he knew it and the nature of 2 on 1 guys in ski masks who have exactly ZERO concern for his right to property OR any fear or distress any of that may cause. . .They are there to steal and 100% reasonable to think they will continue to escallate their advantage as long as it suits their position.
    1
  1292. 1
  1293. 1
  1294. 1
  1295. 1
  1296. 1
  1297. 1
  1298. 1
  1299. 1
  1300. 1
  1301. 1
  1302. 1
  1303. 1
  1304. 1
  1305. 1
  1306. 1
  1307. 1
  1308. 1
  1309. 1
  1310. 1
  1311. 1
  1312. 1
  1313. ​ @johnulmer6715  ... And what would you have me do? I don't disagree that the cult MUST be stopped, but what needs to be done, will take a MASSIVE uprising of those willing to sacrifice everything. . Early in 2020, I received a jury duty notification. I contacted the clerk and told her that I was unwilling to wear a Covid mask, may I reschedule. She gave me an extension, which ended up being 6 mo. I reached out to her again, after that time and reiterated my position. She said you will HAVE to wear a mask, because you will not get another extension. I told her in no uncertain terms, that I would NEVER wear a Covid mask and was non-negotiable and a hill I was willing to die on. . After 5 or 6 emails back and forth of her continuing to apply legal pressure to force compliance with mask mandates, she forwarded all of my communications to a judge. In them, I told her that I would show up at the courthouse for jury duty, should I be required to, but when if those at the door demanded I wear a mask, I would again refuse. In those emails, I said that the cops would have to come to my home, kick down my door and take me by force, for a contempt of court violation, which would be the case, should I NOT appear in the room for jury duty. I said that If I go to jail, I will NOT wear a mask and this remains 100% non-negotiable. . The judge released me, because he / she was not willing to challenge my position and risk the mess I would absolutely make over the BS mask mandates. . Before you tell me I am unwilling to do what it takes to fight back, I would ask that you know more about me, prior to doing so. . Peace, John 🐈
    1
  1314.  @johnulmer6715  ... I don't disagree, but I don't see you armed and storming the White House, do I? We also must recognize that The Forefathers WERE and organized group and the entire continent had a total of less than 300K people. There were no states, only colonies and there was no organized military. There were militia that was comprised of other citizens, so need only get their cooperation and it was the "government" who was organizing it all. It is not soo simple as to rise up today, as it takes a MONUMENTAL amount of citizens to rise in unison. I grant to you that far, far, FAR too many are unwilling to do so, but it is not so simple as that. . We have learned that there is a MASSIVE number of sheep in this America and the Western World. They thought that "2 weeks to flatten the curve" was reasonable, and it actually was. What they did NOT realize, nor did anyone else, that there was a MUCH larger plan at work and took another 6 mo. for that to only BEGIN to become clear. I do think that there is a HUGE number of people who have reached near wits end, but the organization necessary to "reverse" what is happening, to use language that won't trigger my comment to be removed, is infinitely more difficult now than it was when England would have to send SHIPS to sail for America to put down the rebellion. They need only stop them from coming ashore to win that fight. . It is a very different country today and while I freely admit we do not have the balls to do what must be done, apparently... neither do you 🐱
    1
  1315. 1
  1316. 1
  1317. 1
  1318. 1
  1319. 1
  1320. 1
  1321. ​ @PirateNinjaMegaRobot  ... OK, you aren't LISTENING to me here. Let me clarify AGAIN! I am NOT anti-cop NOR am I anti-No Knock warrant. What I am saying is that these type of entries create a very SPECIFIC danger to us all and here is why. The idea of No Knock is to give the police a supreme advantage, as they catch someone by surprise and, hopefully, unable to resist as they otherwise would. While this is FANTASTIC, if this happens to be the murderer, multiple time felon who's home you have entered.. . However, if this is NOT the correct home or happens to be some mistake and this is the home of someone who is NOT a bad guy, but has a weapon, because law abiding 2a and all that. You are asleep or otherwise laxed on the couch...whatever. ALL you hear is a bunch of people yelling what cannot be easily distinguished as "Police.. this is a warrant", because it is a whole bunch of them yelling this. As mentioned my comment above.... line up THIS video at the point when the cops are turning the key. Close your eyes, turn up the sound VERY loud and imagine you are sleeping or chilling in your room. What do you hear..? You hear what could VERY easily be a bunch of gang bangers rushing into your home, because you are taken 100% by surprise. You are not likely going to isolate ONE voice saying "Police... this is a warrant". No, you are going to be disoriented for at LEAST a few seconds, they bust through the bedroom door and you ALREADY have your weapon, because you are fire arm proficient and in your own home. . All you see is a bunch of guys dressed in black pointing guns at you and, because you already had YOUR gun, but not fully aware of what is happening yet, you have it pointed at the door they are entering. Now, you have done NOTHING wrong, but the cops have to assume you are a bad guy, understandably... and you are dead! . I think what would be MUCH better, is to designate ONLY a single person to yell "Police... this is a warrant" several times, with a couple seconds between each mention. Since they are announcing at that point anyway, at least those who are NOT criminals, have a moment to comprehend what is happening. I get that the surprise is what gives cops added safety, but it also creates a much higher degree of risk for average Joe who did NOTHING wrong, but is now dead. . Please tell me if this does not make sense :)
    1
  1322. ​ @PirateNinjaMegaRobot  ... No..... you are assuming this person, or ANY person would have a full grasp of what was happening in the midst of a iteral 9 seconds of chaos. If this was a murderer or a multi-felon with a weapon... I have ZERO... let me say that again.... [size 86 font... ZERO] issue with removing him from this earth. Yes, the first guy DID yell solo, but after about 1 second, all you hear is a bunch of guys rushing in and screaming. If you are asleep or completely relaxed and you hear that first "Police... this is a warrant", you are INSTANTLY overwhelmed by a bunch of guys yelling and 98% of all people are going to be so jarred by the suddeness of it all, won't be able to digest that INITIAL "Police... this is a warrant", before you are facing multiple black clad men swarming you from all sides. If you are NOT the bad guy and you have an actual conscious care for your fellow humans, as the thugs and murderers obviously don't... you are going to be dead before you EVER figure out what the hell is going on. . While the overwhelming is great from the cops perspective and I cannot blame them in the least for wanting such an advantage, when a mistake is made, bad intel or otherwise a person who was NOT the target of the warrant, this is what happens. This guy was legal 2a, and while a bit odd he awakes puling a gun, It is exceedingly unlikely that THIS particur man understood what the hell was happening, before he was shot dead. . Based on what we understand at this moment, and that may change in time, why would he not just comply with police orders? He was not on the warrant and, since legally possessing a weapon, he had NOTHING to fear... right? If it was soo obvious that these were a bunch of cops, it would be guaranteed suicide to pop out from under the blanket packing a gun.  . This is a GUARANTEED way to be shot, so are you suggesting that he KNEW it was police, but as an upstanding legal gun owner, decided he wanted to have a shoot out in the living room? It is beyond obvious, that he had NO IDEA these were cops, because he was not a criminal and had no reason to resist. No, he was supremely startled and his instincts were to exit the blanket with a fire arm to protect himself. . Tell me.. why pull a gun, when it was so obviously cops looking for someone else?
    1
  1323. ​ @PirateNinjaMegaRobot  ... Some things we know to be true: 1. The man shot, was in possession of a legal fire arm. Ergo he was not a convicted felon and for all we know, he had not committed any crimes 2. He was alone in this apartment and door was locked, so not expecting any visitors I will do my best to steel man your argument, as I understand it :) The police enter the door quietly with a key, so as to remain stealth. One officer immediately yells "Police... this is a warrant" (may not be verbatim) and within 1 second, multiple other officers yell the same thing. Very clearly, this is intended to startle any occupants and the idea is that they will caught off-guard and be less likely to reach for a gun or mount some kind of resistance. I get this, and I fully understand how this will make it safer for police, as entering a home in this way is about as risky as it gets for police. Now, the ONLY way I can interpret your position at this point, because it appears that you believe that the INITIAL officer announcing "Police.... this is a warrant" is sufficient for anyone within earshot to not only understand exactly what is happening, but NOT reach for a weapon, if you happen to not be a bad guy. Again.... I am NOT trying to straw man you, but this is how I understand you position to be. . Based on what I have written directly above, and subject to error, this is the only conclusion I can surmise. This guy not only knew it was cops, but understood it was a legal warranted raid upon the apt. he was within, his go-to move was pop out from under the covers, weapon first, and do what....? No reasonable person, particularly one who is 2a and legally carrying, is going to think that police are going to stand down or otherwise NOT react in such a way to protect themselves from being shot, which is the ONLY reasonable consideration the police would have at this point. . My conclusion, based on the above: This guy was asleep or at least relaxed enough to have no idea, that cops were going to enter into his space and begin yelling. When the first "Police... this is a warrant" is yelled, he is obviously not expecting such an outburst, so it takes the average mind a moment to digest the sound, process it and realize... "Oh, this is police and I have not done anything wrong, so I will just put my hands at "twelve and two", so to speak, and calmly comply with the officers. No, in such a state of sleep or rest, that FIRST "Police... this is a warrant" is yelled and just wakes you up.  . How many times in your life has the dog or cat knocked over something loud in the house and wakes you up in the middle of the night? You are suddenly wide awake, as you heard the crash of broken glass on the kitchen floor. Now, how long does it take you to put the sound together with one of your pets making a mess in the kitchen... lol. It takes you probably 3 maybe 4 seconds, until you yell... "Dammit, Fido... get out out of the garbage can!" (remember... this is REAL time 3 or 4 seconds). Now, fast forward to THIS moment, the initial "Police..." wakes you up, within 1 second, you are awake, but certainly not fully alert yet, you hear multiple others just yelling loudly. I would safely bet that 99% of all humans who are not living with the idea cops are going to enter their home, would be unable to process all this within the following 3 more seconds! It would be VERY reasonable to assume you were having your home invaded and you are likely to be in extreme danger immediately. You were JUST sound asleep and within 3 seconds, you think you may die! . If this guy was able to understand ALL of this, in the time allotted, why emerge with a gun when he KNEW there were multiple officers pointing guns directly at him? . I am doing my best to steel-man, so keep this in mind :)
    1
  1324. 1
  1325. 1
  1326. 1
  1327. 1
  1328. 1
  1329. 1
  1330. 1
  1331. 1
  1332. 1
  1333. 1
  1334. 1
  1335. 1
  1336. 1
  1337. 1
  1338. 1
  1339. 1
  1340. 1
  1341. 1
  1342. 1
  1343. 1
  1344. 1
  1345. 1
  1346. 1
  1347. 1
  1348. 1
  1349. 1
  1350. 1
  1351. 1
  1352. 1
  1353. 1
  1354. 1
  1355. 1
  1356. 1
  1357. 1
  1358. 1
  1359. 1
  1360. 1
  1361.  @TheJustice35  ... RE: You're fundamentally flawed.... : I too appreciate your good faith as well :) . No, my argument is not that you MUST abide by my principles, it is that we need to not be forced to live by EITHER yours or mine. This is why a federally enforced legalization of what many believe to be murder or homicide, is so divisive. By shifting the burden to the states, it allows the best compromise possible, because there is literally ZERO hope of consensus on this issue. . As it stands currently, the feds are forcing those that see conception as the beginning of human life, and I fall into this camp, to allow only ONE of the two people involved in creation of that life, to have SOLE discretion on how to handle it. The idea that the female is IMMENSELY more impacted than the male, is not lost on me, but it took two to tango, and currently he has ZERO to say about this. . To bring this full circle, and I am still awaiting an answer from another on THESE specific questions, but I will throw them to you: SCENARIO 1: Woman gets pregnant and decides to carry to term. Does the father have a LEGAL obligation to support that child... YES, he absolutely does.. PERIOD! SCENARIO 2: Same circumstances, but she wants to abort. He offers to cover 100% of ALL financial expenses and she is allowed to sign a release of any / all obligations for the end of time, as he will care for the child forever. She was a willing participant and KNEW the risks and became pregnant. The law as currently written still gives her 100% control over a mutually agreed upon risk, if you want to call it that. She could NOT have become pregnant, were it not for the voluntary act of her being with him, yet, she is the sole decision maker to the fate of that being they created. . Again... I am NOT dismissing the role she needs to play, but what of being responsible for actions? He must support if she keeps by her decision and he must stand by if she opts to flush it. There are many ways to greatly reduce the chance of pregnancy, but short of surgical intervention... NONE are guaranteed. . By kicking this back to the states, we don't by federal point of a gun FORCE one way or the other. In THIS respect... I am pro-choice :)
    1
  1362. 1
  1363. 1
  1364. 1
  1365. 1
  1366. 1
  1367. 1
  1368. 1
  1369. 1
  1370. 1
  1371. 1
  1372. 1
  1373. 1
  1374. 1
  1375. 1
  1376. 1
  1377. 1
  1378. 1
  1379. 1
  1380. 1
  1381. 1
  1382. 1
  1383. 1
  1384. 1
  1385. 1
  1386. 1
  1387. 1
  1388. 1
  1389. 1
  1390. 1
  1391. 1
  1392. 1
  1393. 1
  1394. 1
  1395. 1
  1396. 1
  1397. 1
  1398. 1
  1399. 1
  1400. 1
  1401. ​ @joriankell1983  ... It ultimately comes down to environment. Those that do such things as this, "know" better... but simply don't care. I am not a religious person, in even the slightest way, but when a society is raised upon the belief that there is NO "higher power" or over-arching moral code in which to live one's life... that person is left to his / her own conscious. When that conscious does not see inherent value in others or their property, this is the result. Sean had a video earlier today, in which the 3 armed guards were at the gas station and these kids not only stole items, but just needlessly destroyed property. They went out of their way to slash tires, break windows and tear down displays. They have NO moral code that is recognized by general society, so they have no internalized "red flag" that stops them from acting on such impulse.  . Of course, this is compounded by Democrat policies that are ever making excuses for those that commit such crimes, because they apply a "victim's hierarchy". Should this person fall under the umbrella of a "victim", the leftist response is ...."oh, that Jimmy is only lashing out, because of systemic racism. If we punish him, it will only make the systemic trauma worse". Here we are.... watching BLM and Antifa terrorists rampage across the country killing, destroying and violating everything in sight and when they attack someone who defends himself, Kyle Rittenhouse is prime example, but there are MANY others.... they get exactly what they deserve. However, the leftist must now turn ALL of the consideration of accountability and especially punishment, to any and all who do not fall under that victims hierarchy. . What makes this even crazier, is that if the gas station owner, DOES fall under that victims hierarchy, but does have a code recognized by society, but since he is holding little Jimmy accountable.... HE is now the one who should be punished. I am 58 and never in all of my days have I seen ANYTHING like we are seeing, in terms of excuses for not only bad, but ABHORRENT behavior. Those who do what we see here, need to learn a VERY, VERY harsh lesson in life, but society has apparently not suffered sufficiently enough to make that happen. . I highly doubt we will make it out of this decade without complete collapse and total breakdown of society that requires a brand new start. That is PRECISELY what the WEF wants to see!
    1
  1402. 1
  1403. 1
  1404. 1
  1405. 1
  1406. 1
  1407. 1
  1408. 1
  1409. 1
  1410. ​ @learningtocrash4030  ... I hear what you are saying, but we CANNOT allow ourselves to believe that you or I should be the arbiters of what is and is not acceptable speech. Yes... We can see ALL over big tech, that conservatives are most certainly and openly demonized by leftists, while they do ZERO to curb or punish it in any way. However, we CANNOT become that which we are fighting! I am fully aware of the evils that are perpetuated by leftists, but I have and WILL CONTINUE to be civil in the face of it, so long as it is confined to issues of dialog. To that end, this is where I draw the line! . To this very day, I have worn a Covid mask twice... EXACTLY TWO TIMES! Once to vote Trump last year and again to vote Larry Elder and oust Grewsom. I obviously live in Comifornia, so BOTH were wasted votes, beyond any possible "manipulation" that absolutely DID occur (careful with words as some WILL get comments deleted by algorithm). I am not vaxxed nor will I EVER be and is not because I am anti-vax. I have not taken a vaccine for literally 40+ years and that last one was for tetanus, as I was cut by a VERY rusty nail at work. All indications are that the vax IS helping to save lives and lessen the strain on health system. I understand the jury is still out on things, but debating Covid is another way to get comments deleted). . I will continue to believe in 1a, as I am as nearly an absolutist as ANYONE you will ever meet, when it comes to free speech. Even if that speech is allowed to tell ME I have no right to it, because "my speech" is that of a conservative... and moderate one at that!
    1
  1411. 1
  1412. 1
  1413. 1
  1414. 1
  1415. 1
  1416. 1
  1417. 1
  1418. 1
  1419. 1
  1420. 1
  1421. 1
  1422. 1
  1423. 1
  1424. 1
  1425. 1
  1426. 1
  1427. 1
  1428. 1
  1429. 1
  1430. 1
  1431. 1
  1432. 1
  1433. 1
  1434. 1
  1435. 1
  1436. 1
  1437. 1
  1438. 1
  1439. 1
  1440. 1
  1441. 1
  1442. 1
  1443. 1
  1444. 1
  1445. 1
  1446.  @totorosghost  ... You continue to read a LOT into at least my cooment(s). If you have not already, expand them and see each one of my replies, as I have been not only consistent, but have not gone beyond my OP. Like everyone else in this thread, I have a TON of disagreements, push-back and more, for many positions I have heard / seen her support / praise. . However, while ALL of those things were, are and remain true, she has been willing to not only accept a 180 degree turn on a number of big issues, but she cannot "unsee" what she has been accepting for a while now. She will certainly never be team Cheeto Man nor even a conservative, but as I have asked in one or two previous replies... how often do we see ANYONE so far on the left of so many issues, not go double, triple, quadruple and octuplet down on every single occasion? . She is still and will always lean very heavy to the left and maybe even more than ever on some of them, she has been willing to not just reverse course on some very key issues, but once a person's eyes have been opened to such a degree, she cannot simply close them again. She is allowing at least some of the sane back into her liberal world view, so I am merely recognizing that. . Furthermore, we must also recognize that she is on a MASSIVE platform, that has millions of followers, who despise these change of positions, but some of them WILL give some benefit of the doubt and listen, because she has their ear, regardless of yours, mine and all others in this threads opinion about those positions. She is now embracing fact over feelings in a number of issues those of us on the outside have been ripping our hair out, hoping she and many others would see. . I get that probably most of these changes of position, have come due to being directly effected by them, but that does count as changing position. We can ask.."what took so long" and similar questions, but the point is.... she is not only reversing course on some huge things, but now TELLING that audience of millions just why she is doing so and some of them will be moved, to some degree, as she has. Those people will now begin to think about them and guess what... THEY will talk to others and share those views. Sure, some will be dragged back again or just leave the channel, but she IS getting some of them to look at an opposing opinion and giving it consideration. . This is where I have stood since my OP. I have zero hopes she will begin wearing a dark pink hat with 4 letters embossed upon it, but we NEED sane libs and on at least some of the biggest issues (crime), she is not just moving that direction but to the point where she gave a sincere shout out to Sean's channel. Sean has been one of her harshest critics, yet here she is telling those millions of followers to check him out. . I am repeating myself and like you, I have had an INSANE number of comments removed (my story is worse than most reading this, I can all but guarantee it), so I will back this up to Wordpad, in the event that it is removed, so I can try again with some encryption. Though, my experience as of late is that once a SINGLE comment / reply has been removed, from a video, any further comments, are then auto-deleted for at least 24 hours and often times, permanently. I have a sheet ton of threads in which I cannot reply to strawman, obfuscation, conflation, lies and some extremely bad faith replies to my comments and not one GD'd thing can do about answering to them. What makes it worse, is then that person continues to call me out, for not remaining in the thread, as if I cannot refute his / her "facts". . I know your pain ALL too well, but will keep on trying anyway. Peace, Toto :)
    1
  1447. 1
  1448.  @totorosghost  .... (trying again)..... Seems you continue to read a LOT into at least my comment(s). If you have not already, expand them and see each one of my replies, as I have been not only consistent, but have not gone beyond my OP. Like everyone else in this thread, I have a TON of disagreements, push-back and more, for many positions I have heard / seen her support / praise. . However, while ALL of those things were, are and remain true, she has been willing to not only accept a 180 degree turn on a number of big issues, but she cannot "unsee" what she has been accepting for a while now. She will certainly never be team Cheeto Man nor even a conservative, but as I have asked in one or two previous replies... how often do we see ANYONE so far on the left of so many issues, not go double, triple, quadruple and octuplet down on every single occasion? . She is still and will always lean very heavy to the left and maybe even more than ever on some of them, she has been willing to not just reverse course on some very key issues, but once a person's eyes have been opened to such a degree, she cannot simply close them again. She is allowing at least some of the sane back into her liberal world view, so I am merely recognizing that. . Furthermore, we must also recognize that she is on a MASSIVE platform, that has millions of followers, who despise these change of positions, but some of them WILL give some benefit of the doubt and listen, because she has their ear, regardless of yours, mine and all others in this threads opinion about those positions. She is now embracing fact over feelings in a number of issues those of us on the outside have been ripping our hair out, hoping she and many others would see. . I get that probably most of these changes of position, have come due to being directly effected by them, but that does count as changing position. We can ask.."what took so long" and similar questions, but the point is.... she is not only reversing course on some huge things, but now TELLING that audience of millions just why she is doing so and some of them will be moved, to some degree, as she has. Those people will now begin to think about them and guess what... THEY will talk to others and share those views. Sure, some will be dragged back again or just leave the channel, but she IS getting some of them to look at an opposing opinion and giving it consideration. . This is where I have stood since my OP. I have zero hopes she will begin wearing a dark pink hat with 4 letters embossed upon it, but we NEED sane libs and on at least some of the biggest issues (crime), she is not just moving that direction but to the point where she gave a sincere shout out to Sean's channel. Sean has been one of her harshest critics, yet here she is telling those millions of followers to check him out. . I am repeating myself and like you, I have had an INSANE number of comments removed (my story is worse than most reading this, I can all but guarantee it), so I will back this up to Wordpad, in the event that it is removed, so I can try again with some encryption. Though, my experience as of late is that once a SINGLE comment / reply has been removed, from a video, any further comments, are then auto-deleted for at least 24 hours and often times, permanently. I have a sheet ton of threads in which I cannot reply to strawman, obfuscation, conflation, lies and some extremely bad faith replies to my comments and not one GD'd thing can do about answering to them. What makes it worse, is then that person continues to call me out, for not remaining in the thread, as if I cannot refute his / her "facts". . I know your pain ALL too well, but will keep on trying anyway. Peace, Toto :)
    1
  1449. 1
  1450. 1
  1451. 1
  1452. 1
  1453. 1
  1454. 1
  1455. 1
  1456. 1
  1457. 1
  1458. 1
  1459. 1
  1460. 1
  1461. 1
  1462. 1
  1463. 1
  1464. 1
  1465. 1
  1466. 1
  1467. 1
  1468. 1
  1469. 1
  1470. 1
  1471. 1
  1472. 1
  1473. 1
  1474. 1
  1475. 1
  1476. 1
  1477. 1
  1478. 1
  1479. 1
  1480. 1
  1481. 1
  1482. 1
  1483. 1
  1484. 1
  1485. 1
  1486. 1
  1487. 1
  1488. 1
  1489. 1
  1490. 1
  1491. 1
  1492. 1
  1493. 1
  1494. 1
  1495. 1
  1496. 1
  1497. 1
  1498. 1
  1499. 1
  1500. 1
  1501. 1
  1502. ​ @billybatson7852  ... Clearly there is a market for WOKE, but it is WAY, WAY smaller than these CEO's believe it is. The problem becomes when these companies saturate they ideology, as Disney has, OR invest money / resources / backing for something like Cuties, as N*****x did. . I would say that most people would not even make a big fuss over positive LGBTQ programming, if it were to just stick with portraying a positive message and / or light. The issue comes when there is promotion of such values toward children, by creating an ever increasing representation of it in their programming, such as Disney freely admits to doing. . Look, we continuously hear the Democrats and particularly Regressives and the WOKE crowd, claiming there must not only be "tolerance", but acceptance and respect for LGBTQ. Tolerance is a two-way street and the trans-activist is EXCEEDINGLY aggressive in forcing their pro-LGBTQ agenda down everyone's throats. It has SERIOUSLY crossed a line in the sand, when we see a bunch of public educators releasing video of them directly defying parents wishes and promoting ANY human sexuality in K~3rd. . Secondly is the demand for respect and I have news for anyone who is reading this, not only is respect earned, but there are some who are just not going to be on board with LGBTQ regardless of circumstance. Those mentioned above are just going to have to be "tolerant" of them, because some oft them will NEVER be moved on this issue... period. . I am 57 and live 30 miles from San Francisco. So I saw the rise of AIDS and press for many gay rights, as the news was so local, that it got lots of coverage. While gay people rightfully wanted to reduce discrimination, be legally recognized as partners for insurance coverage and things like hospital family visitation and gay marriage, being chief among them. That was a long road, but while there were many activists, they were nowhere NEAR as aggressive as the LGBTQ activists today. . By "aggressive", I am referring to what happens when the Twitter Outrage Mob decides that a person is a trans-phobe or wont respect their demand for proper pronouns and seeks to, and is often successful, in removing them from social media / employment. Just look at the children in legal trouble the other day for not using "They / Them" to address a girl in their school. This is pure insanity and is turning WAY more people against the trans-activists cause than they will ever gain. . EDIT: When the gay community was pressing for gay marriage and such, there WERE those who said that one day, they would come for the children. While this was NOT the case back in the 80's, it opened the door for the trans-activist today and they FREELY ADMIT, they are coming for the children. One must consider ALL of this, if to understand why so many are opposed to the LGBTQ forcing its message / ideology / lifestyle choice at every turn.
    1
  1503. 1
  1504. 1
  1505. 1
  1506. 1
  1507. 1
  1508. 1
  1509. 1
  1510. 1
  1511. 1
  1512. 1
  1513. 1
  1514. 1
  1515. 1
  1516. 1
  1517. 1
  1518. 1
  1519. 1
  1520. 1
  1521. 1
  1522. 1
  1523. 1
  1524. 1
  1525. 1