Comments by "" (@NinjaKittyBonks) on "Matt Walsh Did NOTHING Wrong" video.
-
118
-
3
-
1
-
@sole__doubt .. Let me guess. You are a fan of Steven Crowder, well... I am as well. You think that DW works on behest of big tech and that when SC gets booted permanently from YouTube, that DW, or anybody, should continue to pay $50M or whatever the contract? Seems that you are happy to spend $50M of someone elses money, even though you lose 50% of the revenue generated by the employee. Look.... nobody, including myself, is going to argue that this was a good contract, as we know SC is worth that much money. Here's the problem... SC is a hair's breath from full cancellation 24/7, because we have seen it with AJ and others. SC does not want to be removed from YT any more than DW, because SC makes a LOT of $$$ on this platform. Yes, he does, but not due to monitization, but because he builds his brand, sells MC subs and has his ads.
.
If SC wants independence, he cannot as for guaranteed $$$, when he is inches from being removed from nearly all platforms at all times. SC needs to strike a deal with The Rumbles and take the hit in salary.
1
-
1
-
@sole__doubt ... EDIT: I just now found can see a reply that was invisible until AFTER I wrote the following. For context, I will leave this comment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I DID make several points, that I am more than willing to expand upon and provide other reasons why I disagree with your opinion. Your reply..."Im not here to convince im here to convey". Um, you did not convey anything, but your opinion. I offered to expand WHY I hold my position and you are unwilling to do so yourself. Please tell me again who amongst us is not providing an argument?
.
Please tell me where I said or indicated in ANY way, that "... the more money a channel brings in the better?". What I provided was a very brief description of the things that show DW is NOT about appeasing or on the side of big tech. I can go on and on with many more examples. What you are asking me to do is make my case, so you don't have to do so yourself. This is called failure of presenting your argument in good faith. YOU said that DW works 110% for big tech, therefore, it is incumbent upon YOU to make the case as to why. Seems you are asking me to prove a negative and that is not how a good faith discussion happens.
.
You are going way out of your way to avoid supporting your claim, so until you do, no good faith discussion can be had. Again... have a nice day, SD 🐈
1
-
@sole__doubt ... EDIT: Dammit.. YouTube did not display this comment until AFTER I had posted my last one... GRRR the censorship is frustrating as hell...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I will re-iterate that we should both refrain from staw manning, yet you have now done so multiple times! Yes... it is true that larger channels get away with things smaller ones do not. That is not something I support, just happens to be how things work in general. YouTube has a WHOLE lot more to lose from DW or SC leaving the platform, than say MY channel with its 72 subs and 9 videos.
.
Please tell me how reality "proves they are in the club" and that I support them for that reason"? Yes, it is also true that once a business or entity becomes larger and larger, they have a greater amount of people to which they need to support, so I will not argue that compromises are and must be made. This is HOW business works and is unavoidable, because with bigger business becomes bigger responsibility to make sure that business survives. However, that does NOT mean that because they make some compromises, that this company should be automatically removed from being considered authentic or genuine. This depends on evaluation of each "compromise" as we see them and making the determination.
.
DW does make certain concessions in order to remain on YouTube... just as SC or ANY conservative channel. This is because, whether we like it or not... YouTube IS the shark in the pond and we must ALL deal with that shark, in order to swim in it! If you feel that DW makes too many compromises... fine. No doubt they do make some, but the compromises they DON'T make, are the reasons I support them.
.
Conservatives are in an EXTREMELY vulnerable position, so while I am not in lock-step with any one channel, I support those that fight the WOKE cult. DW has done more to fight the WOKE cult than many have. They do so by supporting JBP, Matt Walsh, Ben Shapiro and others. YES... there are those who take issue with DW... fine. They have their reasons, just as you do.
.
I support DW's efforts to fight the WOKE cult and I will support them, even though they make some compromises that may lose a battle, but continue to fight the war!
1
-
@sole__doubt ... I get that is your opinion and I both disagree and have expressed why. This does not mean I am lost any more than you are. Why is it that your opinion must be 100% correct and mine is 100% wrong? I accept that as companies / businesses or in this case, social media channels, have to compromise some things in order to survive. Here is the problem, if DW makes NO compromises, they are removed from YouTube and they have precisely ZERO voices on the inside for which to fight the culture war the leftist cult is waging upon us all. As you said, this there is no science to determine what can and cannot be compromised, but we must make that determination for ourselves. What is too big? What if the audience is as 100% committed to fighting the WOKE cult as that channel? What do you think it costs to produce the documentary "What Is A Woman"? Matt was flown across this globe to other countries and many, many interviews. You are aware that taking on such an undertaking takes money... right? Much of DW's content is demonitized, so they must fund their business and the many dozens of people via sponsors. Well, as you and I both know, there is no over abundance of companies willing to pay good money to advertise on conservative channels, because the WOKE cult WILL attack them and a MASSIVE number have folded to the fear of that mob.
.
The pay wall allows users to get exclusive content for a fee and that fee PAYS for the machine that CREATES all of the content that fights the WOKE cult! If you don't see the value in supporting the channel, that is your option. However, to in any way equate a channel or business as in some way "selling out" (not your exact words, but sums up what you are telling me), because they have an option to charge for special services, tells me you have never run a business or company. Well, I have.... and it takes money to support the machine that makes the commitment to pay for it all.
.
Go ahead and not like DW, but I won't call you "lost" because you and I disagree 🐱
1