Comments by "" (@psychcowboy1) on "Triggernometry" channel.

  1. ​ @mandykinha Did Peterson say something intelligent?
    2
  2.  @djseanoduill  His fan base is a cult. They feel he is a genius, but they can't find anything intellectual he has said.
    2
  3.  @LJMpictures  I am pretty sure that God is the spirit calls the inappropriately luxuriating out the terrible adventure of their life and then requires the highest possible sacrifice to obtain the highest possible goal, God orients you to the promised land and imbues you with the enthusiasm to make your way out of the tyranny...each story is a narrative circumambulation the union of virtues that could be embodied in perception and action that constitute the pinnacle of the pyramid...the hierarchy of society, if there is nothing placed at the highest place then then there is nothing in the highest place...the hierarchy of perception prioritization unites us socially, if we don't need a superordinate ethic to unite us then we are not united, we cannot cooperate together focus amicably on the same point, that is the death of God and the rise of nihilsm and cynicism, and that is where we are now. The world languishes to the degree that you are not all you could be, that actually could be the truth. [Do you agree?]
    1
  4.  @dickyt1318  Did Peterson say something intelligent?
    1
  5.  @nikitaw1982  We are searching for an intellectual idea by Peterson. No one has found one yet.
    1
  6.  @neilboyle7546  JP is a fake intellectual, I am a real intellectual since I realize that we do not understand pre-experimental thinking, so we try to explain it in terms that we do understand – which means that we explain it away, define it as nonsense. After all, we think scientifically – so we believe – and we think we know what that means (since scientific thinking can in principle be defined). We are familiar with scientific thinking, and value it highly – so we tend to presume that that is all there is to thinking (that all other “forms of thought” are approximations, at best, to the ideal of scientific thought). But this is not accurate. Thinking also and more fundamentally is specification of value – is specification of implication for behavior. This means that categorization, with regards to value –determination (or even perception) of what constitutes a single thing, or class of things – is the act of grouping together according to implication for behavior. Do you agree?
    1
  7.  @neilboyle7546  Thank you for recognizing the deep intellectualism in my idea.
    1