Comments by "" (@psychcowboy1) on "The Rubin Report" channel.

  1. ​ @arldoran  compassion isn't a virtue? Peterson is so full of crap every time he opens his mouth.
    5
  2.  @NiWdLES  Let's stick to what Peterson said, not what you think he meant.
    5
  3. 'Compassion isn't a virtue, compassion is a reflex, treating adults like infants is not virtuous, love is a blend of compassion and encouragement and truth, it is complicated man, to foster growth requires judgement... [What an absolute load of crap. Who on earth needs JP to tell us what love is or how to treat adults or to explain encouragement and truth? Is Rubin trying to claim that JP is sharing something worthwhile?]
    5
  4.  @redfeather22sa  Peterson pretending to be an intellectual.
    4
  5. Peterson sounds intelligent until you pay attention to what he is saying.
    4
  6. Dave, you aren't suggesting that Peterson has a solution to school shootings are you? I have never heard Peterson offer a solution to anything.
    4
  7. Peterson has been described as the stupid person's smart person.
    3
  8. Compassion is a virtue. As usual Peterson is totally full of crap every time he opens his mouth.
    3
  9. No one can find a profound useful idea by JP.
    3
  10.  @hotrodbod1  If you want to birth a disabled fetus that should be your choice, or visa versa. If you have a disabled fetus should you be forced to birth it? Of course not.
    3
  11. Peterson as usual is totally full of crap.
    3
  12.  @ralphdavidson9542  I assume Rubin approved this ridiculous click bait.
    3
  13. ​ @bgbgbg123 Lots of people wish women can chose abortion. Plus God is pro choice.
    3
  14. But conservatives think Jordan Peterson and Dave Rubin are smart.
    2
  15.  @TheMaxKids  Biggest US mistake in past 50 years. Iraq war, Republican idea. Biggest increase in federal debt... Reagan.
    2
  16.  @Hodl.on.forever  Ok there are no useful intellectual idea in this video, but some in that book. Like what?
    2
  17. Did JP have a profound useful idea? Quote please.
    2
  18. No one can find a coherent intellectual useful idea by JP.
    2
  19. Alternate title: JP goes off the rails with incoherent ramblings about setting the dinner table and climbing Jacob's ladder.
    2
  20.  @mrsqueakthecat.8061  We continue our quest for an intellectual idea by Peterson!
    2
  21.  @chrisbraid2907  I think most of his critics don't hate him, just notice that he is a pseudo intellectual.
    2
  22.  @superbarnie  Peterson said something intelligent and coherent in this video? Where?
    2
  23. Except Peterson always tries to win and never tries to learn.
    2
  24.  @oerjanlothe2369  The entire GQ interview. Were there any Peterson wins?  Here are a couple of Helen wins, starting at like 41:00. 1. Helen:  It works in two different ways, it makes lobsters more aggressive and it makes humans less aggressive.' Peterson interrupting:  No that's not right, it makes humans less aggressive...It makes a lobster more likely to fight again.' [uh Whoops Jordan.  She agreed with you that serotonin makes humans less aggressive, and she is wrong... for agreeing with you?  Lobsters that want to fight are not displaying aggression?  Fighting isn't aggression?  The relevant paper is called Serotonin and Aggression Motivation in Crustaceans, concluding that serotonin makes lobsters adopt aggressive postures...SCORE: Helen 1, Jordan 0] 2."I chose lobsters, the reason I made that argument was to put paid to the absurd Marxist proposition that hierarchical structures are a secondary consequence of free market economies which is as preposterous a theory as you could have about anything.' Helen:  'Lobsters say the thing that you ideologically want to talk about that your belief that there is a kind of Marxist ideology...' Peterson interrupting:  'How do lobsters say that?' [Uh what Jordan?  You just explained how lobsters demonstrate that.  Remember you chose lobsters to put rest to the absurd Marxist proposition, and now you are saying lobsters don't put to rest the absurd proposition?  Remembering what you said 2 minutes ago can be super challenging I know.]  SCORE: Helen 2, Jordan 0 3. Helen referring to equality of outcome:  'I don't think that is a widely held view.' JP Interrupting as usual: 20% of social scientist identify as Marxist. [Heads up JP, in the survey you are referring to, 3% of college professors identify as Marxist,  and you claim that universities are dominated by leftist ideology, thus 3% of a very Left leaning sample identify as Marxist... and you are disagreeing with Helen?  Whoops.  3% of a skewed sample group does not equal 'widely held view'.  I guess you can teach psychology even at Harvard without having a basic grasp on scientific and mathematical analysis.  The study Prevalence of Marxism in Academia states that Marxism is 'A tiny minority faith', i.e. Peterson cited a study to prove Helen wrong, when it actually proved her right. SCORE: Helen 3, Jordan 0]
    2
  25.  @oerjanlothe2369  Peterson's shtick is self appointed explainer of the world. He doesn't interact with others to learn, he speaks to present he has things figured out better than anyone else.
    2
  26.  @digitalnomad9985  The host wasn't aghast. Rubin is full of crap. When Europeans came to America there weren't laws against immigration, so how could there be illegal immigrants? Score for AOC, loss for Rubin.
    2
  27.  @Kipperbob  Peterson said some truth?
    2
  28. Pretenderhead at 36:00. 'Tech companies are trying deliver something you will attend to, AI machines that will analyze your eye movements, to see what you are looking at, they are trying to figure out what you want and deliver it to you fast, Can we trust us, not if we are lying, that makes misinformation, the naked desire for power, the systems get contaminated, look what we are doing, you and I are having a conversation that will be distributed, its a miracle, translators work on my YT content, its very hard to translate YT to other languages, it hasn't been thought through, there is a real time translator, this is unbelievable...this over simplification and demonization has to stop... I talked to democrats who think antifa is illusory, but who think there is a conspiratory force on the right.' [The king of over simplification and demonizing thinks we need to stop that, and in the very next sentence he over simplifies and demonizes democrats who think antifa is illusory and right wing conspiracy is real? Whoops dude. And how did he get from tech companies trying to sell us stuff, duh, to antifa in three sentences? Peterson is amazed at YouTube? Hasn't it been around for like 20 years? It's very hard to translate other languages but there is a real time translator? This guys brain is such total chaos. Dave; a coherent point anywhere in this video? Give me a nudge when you find it.]
    2
  29. No one can find a coherent intellectual useful idea by JP.
    2
  30. No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    2
  31. Peterson had facts and logic? Where?
    2
  32. JP confuses the pure physics concepts of work and energy, with people working at jobs or using energy to drive cars. What a dork.
    2
  33.  @candaniel2  Peterson's theories are complete nonsense. We can solve environmental problems by having India burn more coal?
    2
  34.  @thomasridley8675  He is a great salesman. The guy has great skill into turning nonsense into cash.
    2
  35.  @thomasridley8675  He alternates between super preachy know it all to whimpering on stage that we are remarkable creatures. Really a mystery why anyone can't see through this guys sham.
    2
  36. ​ @generica1 Rubin straw man again. His fan base... Gullible conservatives.
    2
  37. 'Compassion isn't a virtue, compassion is a reflex, treating adults like infants is not virtuous, love is a blend of compassion and encouragement and truth, it is complicated man, to foster growth requires judgement... [What an absolute load of crap. Who on earth needs JP to tell us what love is or how to treat adults or to explain encouragement and truth? Is Rubin trying to claim that JP is sharing something worthwhile?]
    2
  38.  @craigwall9536  We are looking for an intelligent statement by Dave Rubin. No one can find one.
    2
  39.  @bdelectr7411  So you are attacking the credibility of those claiming it was the most secure with no evidence by saying it was the least secure with no evidence? Whoops. Conservative logic never ceases to amaze.
    2
  40.  @Charlie_Davidson  'Democrats preferring to vote by mail is not proof there is no voter fraud.'. Straw man, I said nothing like that. You provided evidence? Remind me. You made up stuff I didn't say. I will review your link.
    2
  41. Peterson has a useful idea about politics? Come on Rubin.
    2
  42.  @yoyoclodie  Cool neither of us can find an intelligent statement by Peterson.
    2
  43. But Peterson tries to win by claiming that we need him to explain the world to us.
    2
  44.  @Wooptidoodoo  Peterson is the self appointed explainer of the world, continually projecting that he has things figured out better than everyone else. That is a trait of a person trying to win, not a person trying to learn. Try this. Find a statement anywhere in this video where Peterson is trying to learn rather than claiming he is the sole holder of some revelation.
    2
  45.  GR Reed  There isn't video of the same mules visiting different drop boxes. Gloves can be explained by COVID. How many mules used gloves?
    2
  46. God isn't a scumbag. He is pro choice.
    2
  47.  @ghettotrout2011  I am glad for you.
    2
  48. Did Peterson say something intelligent in this video?
    2
  49.  @MrOraas  Did Peterson say something intelligent?
    2
  50.  @BLEEP-1  I agree. You can't find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    2
  51. Jordan didn't convince Lex of anything, except proving how rude and arrogant JP is.
    2
  52.  @SicMundus7  He sounds smart until you start paying attention to what he says.
    2
  53. No one can find a profound coherent idea by JP.
    2
  54. Peterson had a reasonable and useful idea? Where?
    2
  55. Wait a minute, Did Rubin just say that places with more stringent gun laws have more gun deaths? You mean like all the countries with stringent gun laws with practically no gun deaths? Dave I know your audience as conservatives are super gullible but you are really pushing the limit of what even they will swallow. In a recent video you say you are all about solutions. Do you have one?
    2
  56.  @Wren1  Rubin playbook: Show a tiny clip of a couple people talking about a political issue. Make up some stuff to make it look like liberals are dumb. Nothing Rubin claims in the title or in his commentary actually happened in the video, but his gullible conservative fan base swallow it any way.
    2
  57.  @cryptic2079  No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    2
  58.  @projectclockcodes  No one can find a profound useful coherent idea by Peterson.
    2
  59.  @jeffpowell8308  Exactly, your right to pursue your own happiness is severely limited if you are forced to have children you don't want. All children born to caring and prepared parents is the best result all factors considered. The founders were considering fetuses? Sure, quote where they said that? Besides who cares what the constitution says, the opinion of a handful of guys 200 years ago should limit best practices today?
    2
  60. He reads a lot of books, he generally does not understand them.
    2
  61. Hey Dave, has Peterson ever offered a solution to anything? You have to impose limits on growth to have a sustainable planet... Yes Jordan you do. Are you seriously denying that? To give you all the power? Jordan, no one is pushing to save the planet as a will to power.
    2
  62.  @annjames1837  It's also a sexual problem... Angry socially isolated young males.
    2
  63.  @annjames1837  Pro choice reduces fatherless homes.
    2
  64.  @migatocomeoscuridad  You learned something? What?
    2
  65. @Soulfulways Peterson said something intelligent.
    2
  66. True, if you are pregnant with a disabled fetus, best solution is to wait until you are pregnant with a child that you want.
    2
  67.  @williamblakeslee4727  Peterson had a deep thought?
    2
  68. Two pretend smart guys, Shapiro and Kayne going after each other. Fun stuff. Kayne/Shapiro 2024.
    2
  69. Agreed she believes in taxing the rich, and wears a tax the rich slogan...not hypocrisy. Rubin's gullible conservative fan base will miss the obvious here.
    2
  70. No one can find a coherent profound idea by JP.
    1
  71. Rubin at 3:00 'Is it true that the rich aren't paying taxes?' Strawman Dave, no one is saying that. Again, what is your solution to regulating greed? Thank you. From your own chart the top 1% make about twice as much as the bottom 50%. That is the problem. And most of that income is made by investing in the work of others via high rents and low wages, in the words of Peterson tyrannical power forcing the masses to the bottom of the hierarchy.
    1
  72. Peterson said something intelligent and coherent?
    1
  73. ​ @sedula2328 no one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  74.  @caitcasali3207  No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  75.  @caitcasali3207  No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  76.  @jedswenson5667  No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  77.  @caitcasali3207  Did you find an intellectual idea by Peterson?
    1
  78.  @sedula2328  No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  79.  @jarredmattingly5369  No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  80.  @GeronimoPlaz  No one can find a profound useful idea by Peterson.
    1
  81.  @GeronimoPlaz  JP is a fake intellectual, I am a real intellectual since I realize that we do not understand pre-experimental thinking, so we try to explain it in terms that we do understand – which means that we explain it away, define it as nonsense. After all, we think scientifically – so we believe – and we think we know what that means (since scientific thinking can in principle be defined). We are familiar with scientific thinking, and value it highly – so we tend to presume that that is all there is to thinking (that all other “forms of thought” are approximations, at best, to the ideal of scientific thought). But this is not accurate. Thinking also and more fundamentally is specification of value – is specification of implication for behavior. This means that categorization, with regards to value –determination (or even perception) of what constitutes a single thing, or class of things – is the act of grouping together according to implication for behavior.  Do you agree?
    1
  82.  @georgeyoung92  No one can understand what JP is saying, including Samuel.
    1
  83.  @georgeyoung92  What did you understand from this video? Any profound intellectual idea? Use a fork and a plate to organize the cosmos to the shining city? Surprise me. Timestamp and quote. Identity is the proper union of faith and responsibility? What does that mean? It does that in a hierarchical subsidiary manner? Huh? There is no technical difference between thinking about yourself and being miserable? Psychobabble on meth.
    1
  84.  @samuelasnake3234  What did you understand from this video? Did Peterson have a profound intellectual idea? Where?
    1
  85. 50:00 If you were oriented in the highest manner you could be oriented then the contents of your categories would be subservient to the good, and you have to be immensely cynical to think that will to power is a more powerful force than that, that cynicism devours the world and we dont want to do that... [The contents of your categories? We don't want to devour the world? They grow the best shrooms in Canada for sure.]
    1
  86.  @sourdoughbakeroz  Peterson said something intelligent?
    1
  87. Where do you get the hydrogen?
    1
  88.  @MichaelJarratt22  I agree, 18 years of research has lead you to the level of deep insight that JP says good stuff, you just are not sure what the good stuff is. 'I did lots research, JP speaks plenty fact of good statements.' Is English your second language?
    1
  89. No one can find a profound idea by Rubin.
    1
  90. No one can find a coherent useful idea by JP.
    1
  91. Punching in at 7:00 to see what Rubin has to say. 'God given rights, through out the individual, abortion, the Left won't put an endpoint on abortion, do you have good ideas, for a truly tolerant society. I have the ideas if you want to discuss them Dave: at jgreene4prez2020 on FB.
    1
  92. Dave Rubin is so full of crap. AOC said building a wall is one possible solution. Oh well Rubin audience isn' known for their reasoning skills.
    1
  93. ​ @donaldmiller2654 You forgot to notice how stupid Dave Rubin is.
    1
  94.  @drm9979  Quote her saying that. Rubin tries to make a connection with European immigrants to America and Mexican immigrants. Do you see the stupidity of Rubin statement and click bait.
    1
  95.  @drm9979  Rubin to prove he is smarter than AOC says, our ancestors came here legally. Tell me you are not laughing your ass off. Uh sure Dave, there weren't laws about immigration at the time.
    1
  96.  @drm9979  The audience claps and the host nods in agreement... Interpretation by Rubin, the host was aghast. Not laughing yet?
    1
  97.  @Ken-ck4zn  It is painful to hear Rubin stupidity. Yes Dave, European immigrants to America were not illegal, because Indians did not have laws. Impressive dude.
    1
  98.  @Ken-ck4zn  Dave Rubin doing an excellent job looking stupid: AOC a big problem is an undocumented population that can be fixed with a wall or by giving them jobs and a path to documentation. [Claps and nod of approval by host. Conclusion by Rubin; the host was aghast.] AOC: Our public systems have to pay for undocumented, unless they have jobs, like our ancestors. Dave: AOC says our ancestors came here illegally. [Uh no she didn't Dave, immigration from Europe was legal because there were not laws against immigration. Do you think the native Americans would have outlawed Europe immigration if they could?] Dave: She says the solution is just document them. [No, she didn't say that Dave, she said a wall and green card jobs are two possible solutions.] Dave: She says their plan isn't about a wall, its just bring in as many illegal immigrants that we can. [Dave, do you have noise cancelling head phones on? She didn't say that either. Oh well, your fan base won't notice the strawman.]
    1
  99.  @digitalnomad9985  Try this, quote a statement by AOC that left anyone aghast. I already gave you statements by Rubin that leaves anyone with a brain aghast.
    1
  100. Let's see what Rubin has today: 1. There is a movement by the Left to 'Burn It All Down.' Rubin's evidence of this movement is Pete Butigiege asking Bernie if he wants to Burn It All Down. CONCLUSION: That has to be one of the wimpiest pieces of evidence to support a point I have ever seen in media. Burn it down would be burn the Constitution and fire all politicians to start over. Who is pushing for that Dave? Strawman. Rubin probably thinks his conservative audience is not sophisticated enough to see through his flimsy trick, and unfortunately he is probably right. Dave digs himself in deeper, knowing that his gullible conservative fan base will swallow the whole pill. 'The leftists the post modernists the socialists marxists are pushing throughout society...' Using the same unspecified fictitious bogey men Jordan Peterson uses. Dave if all this group is continually pushing this throughout society, you can identify even one right? So why didn't you? STRAWMAN. 2. Rubin steers clear of the complete and irrefutable hypocrisy by Lindsey Graham and other leading Republicans by calling hypocrisy by leading politicians merely irrelevant. Irrelevant? Really Dave. Well I guess Dave considers hypocrisy in politics irrelevant. Let's see...then he says that AOC is hypocritical beyond belief. Uh whoops Dave. Anyone see the irony? Dave is a hypocrite while discussing hypocrisy. Out of one side of his mouth, it is irrelevant if Republicans do it, but a really big deal if Democrats do it. 3. According to Dave 'Trump has to choose a justice now' because we could have a tie and the election will be disputed and then the country will be chaos. Sure Dave, Trump has to do it...Not. The country will have a tie and a disputed election that throughs the country into turmoil...Not happening. Pretty wimpy and agenda driven spin Dave. Don't you argue against agenda driven partisanship. Do this Dave. Interview me. I have far better ideas on every issue than either of the two dorks we have to choose from at jgreeen4prez2020 on FB.
    1
  101.  @TheRagingPlatypus  Vote by mail is awesome.
    1
  102.  @TheRagingPlatypus  I correct... An awesome idea. You get your ballot in the mail. You take your time filling it out, then put a stamp on it. Awesome.
    1
  103.  @TheRagingPlatypus  2000 mules is a hoax. Somehow fraudulent voters got millions of unfilled in ballots? Sure and monkeys fly out my butt.
    1
  104.  @23wtb  This one time at band camp Trump won the 2020 election.
    1
  105.  @TheRagingPlatypus  Tell me how you would aquire even 100 ballots and then how you could make Biden win by 4 million votes with those.
    1
  106.  @TheRagingPlatypus  They didn't show the same person at multiple boxes. Biden won get over it. Next film by Dinesh... How many abodiginals do you see modeling?
    1
  107.  @questioneverything9535  They picked up bunches of ballots that were filled in by registered voters? So?
    1
  108.  @TheRagingPlatypus  So they had great evidence they didn't put in the movie? Smells like a hoax.
    1
  109.  @TheRagingPlatypus  Again, you want your candidate to win in a vote by mail state. Describe how you do that? BTW one of the only documented cases of absentee/mail fraud was by a Republican Harris in NC.
    1
  110. Peterson said something intelligent?
    1
  111.  @bry8120  If you right down Peterson's ideas you realize it is all nonsense.
    1
  112.  @bry8120  Ok neither of us can find something intelligent by JP. Randomly at 16:00 with these two pretend smart guys; The climate conferences, we have to sacrifice, Obama bought a 15 million house. "There are hierarchies of competence and corrupted by power, how much, we should clean them up, to fix them, illness and death climb from the bottom up, psycho-physiologically easer at the top, we double energy cost old poor people die, which side are you on Leftists?, are you going to sacrifice the poor, there is no consensus in science...people go to the bathroom so there is no zero pollution, it is not detailed solutions, copious energy for everyone, you should only care about cheap energy if you are on the Left, what is work, energy is everything...the US has cut CO2 14% because of fracking..." So Rubin describes this as: Looking for smart and honest conversations ...increase your critical thinking by listening to different perspectives on a variety of topics? If so, then you’re in the right place because ... the ideas of some of society's most interesting thought leaders, authors, politicians and comedians. Rubin is calling JP a critical thinking thought leader? How the hell did JP get from sacrifice for climate change to hierarchies and competence? Because he can't go more than a couple paragraphs without leaning on his go to phrases, competence hierarchies and tyrannical patriarchy. There is no consensus in science...from a non-scientist, please Jordan, stay in your lane. People don't have detailed solutions -- from a guy who never has a solution to anything. You should only care about cheap energy if you are on the Left? What a total idiot. Did he forget he is talking about reducing CO2 levels? Energy consumption is where CO2 comes from dork. Peterson's claim about CO2 reduction is also incorrect. The levels have stayed about the same since 1990, influenced more by cleaner burning cars than more fracking.
    1
  113.  @bry8120  Peterson is apparently effective as a self help guru for lost souls. I am glad for them. His ventures into science, politics, and philosophy are comically deluded. He never has a solution to anything and his ideas, rather than derived from an observation of reality, are derived from his other ideas.
    1
  114. Did JP have a coherent insightful idea in this video?
    1
  115.  @franskat213  I have never heard JP offer a solution to anything. Most of this interview is incoherent rambling.
    1
  116. Improved title of this video: Dave Rubin Click Bait of Something that Didn't Happen.
    1
  117. Peterson said something intelligent?
    1
  118. One of them said something intelligent? Where?
    1
  119.  @deathgrinderb3284  Rubin playbook: Show a tiny clip of a couple people talking about a political issue. Make up some stuff to make it look like liberals are dumb. Nothing Rubin claims in the title or in his commentary actually happened in the video, but his gullible conservative fan base swallow it any way.
    1
  120.  @davidlang4739  I proved that Rubin playbook only convinces gullible conservatives, do you have proof of something?
    1
  121.  @TubTechGuru  The Afghanistan war was a spinoff of the Iraq war, a republican idea. Both Trump and Biden wanted us out of Afghanistan; we don't know how things would have gone different by Trump. True the border crisis is largely Biden fault. But even Trump doesn't have as good of an idea as I do. My main point however, is only gullible conservatives fall for Rubin videos.
    1
  122.  @TubTechGuru  NOEM: What has he done, what has he done, he has done nothing with tools and policy, he doesn't let us do our job, he will not keep us safe. RUBIN: She is saying what everyone knows, no one believes the federal government is doing their job, border agents don't like to be a travel agent, you can go to Chicago. The democrat party, one of your few jobs dude. Dave, this alleged Host is stumped by question turned against her? Where did that happen exactly? Here is what happened, Noem shared her made up feelings that Biden has done nothing with tools and policy, and then Rubin shared his made up feelings that no one believes the federal government is doing their job and border agents are forced to act as travel agents. At somewhere around the 80th percentile for gullibility you become a Rubin believer.
    1
  123.  @absolutium  I don't understand your point. My point is Rubin presents arguments with nothing but made up claims such as 'look at her face', only the super gullible ideologues fall for it.
    1
  124.  @laurelh1799  No one can find an intellectual idea by Rubin.
    1
  125.  @TubTechGuru  We don't know what would happen if Trump started the withdrawal. Both Trump and Biden wanted out of Afghanistan.
    1
  126.  @laurelh1799  JP is a fake intellectual, I am a real intellectual since I realize that we do not understand pre-experimental thinking, so we try to explain it in terms that we do understand – which means that we explain it away, define it as nonsense. After all, we think scientifically – so we believe – and we think we know what that means (since scientific thinking can in principle be defined). We are familiar with scientific thinking, and value it highly – so we tend to presume that that is all there is to thinking (that all other “forms of thought” are approximations, at best, to the ideal of scientific thought). But this is not accurate. Thinking also and more fundamentally is specification of value – is specification of implication for behavior. This means that categorization, with regards to value –determination (or even perception) of what constitutes a single thing, or class of things – is the act of grouping together according to implication for behavior.  Do you agree?
    1
  127. We are searching for an intellectual useful idea by Peterson. No one can find one.
    1
  128.  @piolin23iq  Did you find an intellectual useful idea by Peterson?
    1
  129.  @wannabecar8733  Jordan Peterson is the second coming.
    1
  130. No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  131.  @commanderthorkilj.amundsen3426  We are searching for a profound intellectual useful coherent idea by Peterson or Thomas Sowell on any subject anywhere. No one has found one.
    1
  132.  @commanderthorkilj.amundsen3426  No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson or Thomas Sowell.
    1
  133.  @commanderthorkilj.amundsen3426  So these guys have wisdom, rationality, and reason, but not intellect? I am confused. Anyway provide a profound and useful idea by JP or Sowell, I will check it out. 'Compassion isn't a virtue, compassion is a reflex, treating adults like infants is not virtuous, love is a blend of compassion and encouragement and truth, it is complicated man, to foster growth requires judgement... [What an absolute load of crap. Who on earth needs JP to tell us what love is or how to treat adults or to explain encouragement and truth? Is Rubin trying to claim that JP is sharing something worthwhile?]
    1
  134.  @MarMaxGaming  It's important for parents to use judgement and encouragement? Wow, if I had a PhD and taught at Harvard I might know that also, except I learned it from watching Mr Rodgers neighborhood. Clinical evidence shows that if you confront your challenges you can conquer them... Jordan Peterson. You needed clinical evidence to figure that out Jordan? I learned it from watching Dora the Explorer. Highly trained affective neuroscientists recognize that there is biological and behavioral continuity between humans and animals. Uh sure Jordan, but third graders know that also.
    1
  135.  @MarMaxGaming  JP is a fake intellectual, I am a real intellectual since I realize that we do not understand pre-experimental thinking, so we try to explain it in terms that we do understand – which means that we explain it away, define it as nonsense. After all, we think scientifically – so we believe – and we think we know what that means (since scientific thinking can in principle be defined). We are familiar with scientific thinking, and value it highly – so we tend to presume that that is all there is to thinking (that all other “forms of thought” are approximations, at best, to the ideal of scientific thought). But this is not accurate. Thinking also and more fundamentally is specification of value – is specification of implication for behavior. This means that categorization, with regards to value –determination (or even perception) of what constitutes a single thing, or class of things – is the act of grouping together according to implication for behavior. Do you agree?
    1
  136.  @MarMaxGaming  Peterson shared the fantastic advice that parents should use judgement and encouragement? Pretty low bar for fantastic, pretty sure I saw that concept discussed in a sesame Street episode.
    1
  137. Is Rubin joking? JP most important speech? Dave? Please timestamp and quote an important and useful idea by JP anywhere in this entire video. Good luck. Well the most important speech JP has ever made; not a very high bar. 'Identity is the proper union of faith and responsibility. It does that in a hierarchical subsidiary manner, if you have conflict, you need a counter position, that is subsidiary structure. Jacob's ladder the vine that unites the material and proximal realm of the earth with the eternal realm of heaven, how do we climb it, there is a vision of how we build ourselves, a glorious macro-vision; it is the proximal beginnings, we scaffold ourselves upward from the finite to the infinite, the scaffold constitutes our identity...' 'Sacrifice makes a difference, the hierarchy of identity, the lower to the higher, proximal hedonic whims, the payback is good, to escape from primordial narcissism, some things go wrong with children, having children can be rewarding, there is no technical difference between thinking about yourself and being miserable, serve a higher purpose, technically, think about a fork and a table and a plate as a microcosm of the universe, that is all real, we forgot responsibility...'
    1
  138. 'Dave Rubin of “The Rubin Report” talks about “The View’s” Whoopi Goldberg freaking out about the European heat wave, while Joy Behar suggests that the Eiffel Tower could melt.' Dave, I think you need a lesson in nuance. Was Joy Behar literally commenting that the Eiffel Tower might melt? No. Maybe a middle schooler can explain this to you?
    1
  139. ​ @mark_downunder Did Peterson say something intelligent that your average middle schoolers couldn't figure out on their own.?
    1
  140.  @mark_downunder  Pride comes before a fall? Already covered in Disney movies and on sesame Street. We continue our quest for an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  141.  @l000tube  We continue our quest for an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  142. No one can find an intellectual idea by JP.
    1
  143. At 55:00 JP has stated that athletes can break their own records or play a really great game. Ok duh. Let's check Rubin's response: 'Do you think it is weird that it is a fleeting moment? I did good for a month, but then I can have a bad month, you can't hold on to a great month forever.' [Let me see if I got this right Dave. You can have a good day, or a good month, or an athlete can have a great jump or scoring game...but then something happens and the next day or month or game might not be as good as the last? I think I actually agree with you on that, although I wouldn't call it weird. Weird would be if all days were good or the same.] JP: 'Minutes lasted hours and I mean that literally.' [Let me give you a heads up JP. The only way that could happen literally is if you were in some kind of time distortion device or a black hole.] 'The weight of time and mortality and self consciousness and you escape that immersed properly.' [Immersed properly? In what? You can escape mortality and time? Not on this planet dude.]
    1
  144. Easily the MOST nonsensical speech JP has ever done, and that is a pretty tough bar to clear.
    1
  145. At 29:00 JP: 'It is proving very difficult for defenders of enlightenment values to put up an effective fight against this assault on the idea of ompotence. There is nothing solid enough there for some reason'. [I bet even Rubin doesn't know what Peterson is talking about here. Dave? Is ompotence even a word?]
    1
  146.  @BodyLanguageBoss  So what is Peterson's point?
    1
  147.  @BodyLanguageBoss  At 43:00 Peterson astonishes us that truth and family are important. Man I wish I had a PhD so I could know this stuff.
    1
  148.  @BodyLanguageBoss  At 44:00 Rubin astonishes us that the internet increases the speed of communication. It is so great to watch two super geniuses addressing modern issues.
    1
  149. Peterson said something intelligent? What was it?
    1
  150. We are searching for a coherent insightful idea by JP. No one can find one.
    1
  151.  @Summerslake  No one can find a profound idea by Rubin.
    1
  152. I know, Shapiro and Peterson are super funny to watch... Peterson talks about the biblical corpus and Shapiro nods like he understands.
    1
  153. Peterson at 13:00 'The best way to save the planet is to make poor people rich as fast as we can...the biggest environmental issue facing us is over fishing...what does sustainable mean?...why should we care, how should we care? you have to prioritize, 200 goals is chaos, do you have a better idea, then what good is your criticism...' [Wait, is Peterson, a guy who never has a solution to anything trying to rip on people who criticize with no better ideas? Pretty funny. The biggest environmental issue facing us is over fishing? No it isn't. The only result of over fishing is there are too few fish, who will of course replenish within a generation. The best way to save the planet is to make everyone rich? This guy is so totally full of crap. Environmental problems are caused by consumerism, which is a direct byproduct of wealth. What does sustainable mean? It means Jordan that the rate of consumption equals the rate of replacement. In another section Jordan says that the best way to solve pollution in India is to burn more coal. What is a guy who claims we don't have an over population problem doing projecting to solve problems in India when their entire problem is over population? How about this Dave, lets do a debate with me, Jordan, and you and discuss actual solutions. HMU, anytime.]
    1
  154. 'A reduction of CO2 will eventually lead to plant death around the world and start a vicious cycle on this planet.' You are totally out of your mind, you might check out the scientific theories of another loon, his name is Jordan Peterson.
    1
  155. Dave says, 'We do like personal choice.' Yay, Dave is pro-choice. At 8:00 'The Left wants to control other people, they want to enact their bizarre morality and aren't concerned with liberty and freedom.' Uh whoops Dave, do you want to take this low hanging fruit or should I? Conservative pundit who is in favor of controlling other people's fundamental choice to become parents is alleging she is for liberty and freedom and not controlling other people?
    1
  156. What is Candaces solution to regulating greed?
    1
  157.  @ned_frankly  Biden won, get over it.
    1
  158. Randomly at like 44:00 JP 'There is an all out assault on the integrity of cultural structures, there is a technological assault on everything. You revert to the individual and try to make better people. [Isn't one of Peterson's rules to be precise in your language? An assault on everything is precise language? You revert to the individual is precise language? Let's see what Rubin has to say.] Dave: 'The speed of the internet, speed of information is changing us, the speed is unimaginable three decades ago.' [So let me get this straight Dave. The speed of the internet and communication is way faster than it was in 1990? I am pretty sure you are right on that, I will do some research and get back to you.] Alternate title of this video: 'Two guys pretend to sound intellectual while they discuss things every fifth grader already knows.'
    1
  159. CO2 from fossil fuel effects the climate.
    1
  160. Peterson studied gender personality differences for 20 years, do you know what that makes him? A gender studies major.
    1
  161.  @Mallchad  We continue our quest for an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  162.  @winstonsol8713  No one can find an intellectual idea by JP.
    1
  163.  @bogkazealijamislim5998  We are searching for an intellectual idea by JP. No one can find one.
    1
  164.  @snazzyd8866  We continue our quest for an intellectual idea by JP.
    1
  165.  @kaede15  True, JP has a lot of emotionalism and feelings.
    1
  166.  @MrTomyCJ  Be a Monster...sniffle...Jordan Peterson.
    1
  167.  @Desperate.Daniel.24-7  I clean JP room, it was a mess of chaos.... there is something to us...
    1
  168.  @rickraber1249  Did Rubin say anything insightful in this video?
    1
  169.  @spyputs660  Actually legalizing drugs reduces crime. Americans are unsafe in their own country? You mean from easy access to guns?
    1
  170.  @sephonvar2129  Did Rubin say something insightful or factual?
    1
  171.  @rickraber1249  Did Rubin say something insightful or factual?
    1
  172.  @spyputs660  Actually drugs are not legal anywhere in the US, with some exceptions for personal marijuana, so you made that up. If drugs are legal the crimes associated with supporting a habit disappear, likewise profits to drug dealers disappear, so you made that one up also. BTW, did Rubin say anything intelligent and factual in this video? The Colorado shooter had prior arrests or legal altercations, so strict background checks would have prevented his access to a gun. Rubin and Tucker won't tell you that. Sure not all guns kill people but you mentioned that Americans are not safe in their own country...from gun deaths and mass shootings.
    1
  173.  @spyputs660  Thank you for your feelings and insults. The normal debate skills of Rubin fans. Did you have any facts to share? Legalized drugs reduces crime, both theft to support habits, and crime committed by rival drug dealers. People who are opposed to legal drugs? Cartels.
    1
  174.  @spyputs660  Did Rubin say anything insightful and factual? Do you have an insightful or factual statement? Can you provide any argument that what I said is inaccurate?
    1
  175.  @spyputs660  Here is what I would suggest. Try making a counter argument using facts and logic. Point 1:. The bulk of crime associated with drugs is theft and other crime related to the attainment of said drugs. Prove me wrong. How much crime is there associated with people trying to get alcohol once prohibition ended? Practically none. Same as prostitution, legalize sex for hire and rape decreases. Point 2. Drug gangs and drug lords commit a lot of crime associated with the acquisition and sale of illegal substances. Prove me wrong. Again use facts and logic rather than feelings and insults. No data to support such a wild theory? Funny, only alcohol and less drug related crime in countries with more legal drugs.
    1
  176.  @spyputs660  Like I said, legalizing drugs reduces the crime caused by drugs being illegal, theft to support habits, drug dealer violence etc. Calling me retarded doesn't change that. This argument makes sense to everyone who isn't a prohibitionist. BTW what is your solution to regulating greed?
    1
  177.  @spyputs660  I gather you think government should insert themselves into personal choice. I don't.
    1
  178.  @spyputs660  You are an anti vaxxers also. All making sense now. Without the vaccine you are 5-10 times more likely to end up in the hospital from COVID.
    1
  179.  @spyputs660  As a conservative your debate skills peak at feelings and insults and just making stuff up. I point out accurately that legalizing drugs reduces crime... And you label me as gender confused or supporting gender confusion. Watching conservatives melt down in debate is always enjoyable.
    1
  180. @@catchphrase8914 Legalizing pot increases what type of crime and how? Legalized fentanyl means safe doses. BTW isn't the drug war unconstitutional? Freedom of choice in the pursuit of happiness. They are out on the street to steal to afford their habit? True. Due to drugs being illegal. How many people are out on the street stealing to afford their alcohol habit?
    1
  181.  @spyputs660  God is pro choice.
    1
  182. @@catchphrase8914 As for increasing crime rates, a primary cause of this is lack of hope and opportunity to achieve financial security. This problem has at it's source the greed of the wealthy profiting off the work of others via high rents and low wages. Which leads to the question, how do we regulate greed and thus increases hope among the working poor? Keep people happy hopeful and satisfied, crime reduces. Build homeless sanctioned camping areas with free drugs, homeless problems then don't trickle into the rest of society. Legalized fentanyl and MDMA reduces the horrible health effects of meth. Safe happy drugs at controlled doses. BTW what is your solution to regulating greed?
    1
  183.  @spyputs660  Trump sterilizes his enemies and still he couldn't win the election?
    1
  184.  @spyputs660  Did Rubin say something intelligent in this video? Timestamp?
    1
  185.  @spyputs660  Did Rubin say anything insightful?
    1
  186.  @lst9559  Did Rubin say something intelligent?
    1
  187. No one can find an intellectual idea by JP.
    1
  188. Let's check out Dr. Potaterson at 10:00: 'Climate change is the biggest health issue of our time, No, overreaching beaurocrats are, China is building nuclear reactors, we can't get our act together to build nuclear in the US, if you are concerned about the poor and the environment you make power as cheap as possible because there is no difference between energy and wealth, there is a bit of the problem getting rid of the waste, save the climate by making power as cheap as possible, as CO2 levels rise plants can grow more in drier environments, I read 200 books what I learned was things are way better than everyone thinks, the biggest environmental problem is over fishing in the ocean... [Help me out Dave, haven't you claimed that JP is some kind of intellectual? What is even remotely intellectual about any of this? There is a bit of a problem getting rid of nuclear waste? Sure Jordan, half life of cancer causing mineral of 50,000 years, a BIT of a problem? We can't get out act together for nuclear in the US? Wrong Jordan, we made an environmental and safety issue to limit new nuclear. You can help the poor by making energy as cheap as possible? Wrong, energy cost is not the biggest part of someone's budget. And making energy cheap helps the environment? Wrong again, cheap energy tends to result in more driving, more air conditioning, more manufacturing, and more consumerism; all at the bottom of the pyramid for environmental damage. Remember when you claim to use multi variate analysis? So why are you over simplifying to 'energy is everything' here? There is no difference between energy and wealth, and climate and everything are the same word? This guy seriously needs a vocabulary lesson and instruction in basic logic. Over reaching beaurocrats are the biggest health issue? Heads up Jordan, do a google search for Covid 19 and bring yourself up to speed with what everyone else in the world has known for the last two years.]
    1
  189. We are searching for a coherent insightful idea by JP. No one can find one.
    1
  190.  @walterstockhecker5579  we are searching for an intellectual idea by Peterson. Be responsible so you don't get taken advantage of... Thomas the train, my 3rd grade teacher, and Jordan Peterson.
    1
  191.  @walterstockhecker5579  I agree, you can't find a coherent useful insightful idea by JP. The quote here isn't deep; it is basically the same advice most parents give their fourth graders.
    1
  192.  @walterstockhecker5579  I agree with you again! Neither of us can find a profound intellectual coherent useful idea by Peterson anywhere. BTW make your bed isn't profound.
    1
  193.  @walterstockhecker5579  We continue our quest for an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  194.  @walterstockhecker5579  Let's have a contest for the least profound statement you can think of. Here is mine... Make your bed. Your turn, try to top it.
    1
  195. Peterson at 21:00 'People go to the bathroom there is not Zero pollution, net zero is an empty talking point, it is not careful thinking that produces a solution...' [Heads up Jordan no one is suggesting we can get to zero pollution, the stated goal is NET ZERO CO2. You are welcome for the lesson in basic logic and science. Careful thinking that produces a solution? Dave, has Jordan ever done that himself?] 'How about copious energy for everyone as clean as possible, resilient stable systems, the only thing you should care about is cheap energy, work makes people prosperous and secure, what is work, it is the expenditure of energy, what is energy, work wealth, energy is everything, US has knocked CO2 down by 14% in the last couple of decades because of fracking, war is not good for the environment...' Jump to 34:00 'I rewrote sections of the document and my rewrites stuck, I did the work, they didn't have time to rewrite it, high end people are busy, they don't have time to analyze sustainable development goals...the only person trained to do it is Lomborg...' [So JP's solution is lots of cheap energy for everyone? Does he have a magic wand to make this happen? Does he not realize that many of our environmental problems are related to energy consumption funding consumerism? What is work? Work is energy? I think JP is confusing work by people with the concept of work and energy in pure physics. Whoops. He wants to brag that he wrote sections that stuck? Maybe that happened, I will check it out. The other people didn't have time to analyze sustainable development goals? He knows this how? Literally every sentence out of his mouth is total nonsense, including that CO2 levels have dropped by 14% and that is due to fracking. The only person trained to analyze sustainable goals is Lomborg? Like in the entire world Jordan. Dave, help me out here, why are you nodding your head to this nonsense?]
    1
  196. No one can find a profound coherent idea by JP.
    1
  197. Wisdom? Where did that happen? Let's check out this allegedly important speech... a solution that beckons and is generous, we have odds about identity, to a psychological integration, and now I delve into what identity is, and also what social structure must and should be, faith and responsibility, faith is the courage to welcome the future, the future is the manifestation of possibility into actuality, the treasure house of the unknown possibility, with courageous faith, being and becoming are intrinsically good....Huh? Doesn't this guy claim to be precise in your speech?
    1
  198.  @bjkarana  Competent and useful aren't really in Peterson's tool set.
    1
  199. Question to Dave and Jordan; do either of you guys actually have a point? The effectiveness of the vaccine is based upon public opinion not on science? Are you guys denying global warming also? Flat earthers also? There is nothing behind the vaccine but the most cowardly random polling...Peterson as usual just totally making stuff up. How do you get accurate polling? What is his point? Polling doesn't measure public opinion? Another totally made up straw man. You have to get tested when you travel...what is your objection Jordan? The point is to slow the international spread of the disease duh? 'That vaccinated people are less contagious...' Straw man alert, no one is arguing that. It is reprehensible to vaccinate children? Reprehensible really? The Left wants to trust big pharma? Heads up Jordan. The Left trusts vaccines because we have a brain. You should try it sometime, having a brain that is. Health and safety is good. Yes Jordan, sorry you have a problem with the truth. Rubin calls this honest and thoughtful? Whoops. What it is, is pandering to gullible conservatives who can't see the rambling flimsiness of Peterson's arguments.
    1
  200. No one can find a coherent intellectual useful idea by JP.
    1
  201.  @slagebobs4109  You found a coherent intellectual useful idea by JP? Where? Dozens? Can I see one from this or any other video?
    1
  202.  @slagebobs4109  I understand, you are pretty sure JP has said some useful intellectual stuff in this or another video, but you aren't sure what it was. If you find it LMK.
    1
  203.  @slagebobs4109  Peterson said x at timestamp y and it is intellectual because z. Try that. Any useful profound idea that your average middle schooler couldn't figure out on their own.
    1
  204.  @slagebobs4109  True it is important to be personally responsible for your success and failures. I learned that from my parents and teachers in third grade. Vast swath believe in guaranteed income? Percent and source? Quote JP saying something insightful in this video. I promise to check it out, mixed with massive amounts of fake intellectual nonsense: Let's check out this allegedly important speech... a solution that beckons and is generous, we have odds about identity, to a psychological integration, and now I delve into what identity is, and also what social structure must and should be, faith and responsibility, faith is the courage to welcome the future, the future is the manifestation of possibility into actuality, the treasure house of the unknown possibility, with courageous faith, being and becoming are intrinsically good....Huh? Doesn't this guy claim to be precise in your speech?
    1
  205. Randomly at 16:00 with these two pretend smart guys; The climate conferences, we have to sacrifice, Obama bought a 15 million house. "There are hierarchies of competence and corrupted by power, how much, we should clean them up, to fix them, illness and death climb from the bottom up, psycho-physiologically easer at the top, we double energy cost old poor people die, which side are you on Leftists?, are you going to sacrifice the poor, there is no consensus in science...people go to the bathroom so there is no zero pollution, it is not detailed solutions, copious energy for everyone, you should only care about cheap energy if you are on the Left, what is work, energy is everything...the US has cut CO2 14% because of fracking..." So Rubin describes this as: Looking for smart and honest conversations ...increase your critical thinking by listening to different perspectives on a variety of topics? If so, then you’re in the right place because ... the ideas of some of society's most interesting thought leaders, authors, politicians and comedians. Rubin is calling JP a critical thinking thought leader? How the hell did JP get from sacrifice for climate change to hierarchies and competence? Because he can't go more than a couple paragraphs without leaning on his go to phrases, competence hierarchies and tyrannical patriarchy. There is no consensus in science...from a non-scientist, please Jordan, stay in your lane. People don't have detailed solutions -- from a guy who never has a solution to anything. You should only care about cheap energy if you are on the Left? What a total idiot. Did he forget he is talking about reducing CO2 levels? Energy consumption is where CO2 comes from dork. Peterson's claim about CO2 reduction is also incorrect. The levels have stayed about the same since 1990, influenced more by cleaner burning cars than more fracking.
    1
  206. No one can find a profound intellectual idea by JP.
    1
  207.  @mrsqueakthecat.8061  I agree, you can't find a profound intellectual idea by JP.
    1
  208.  @mrsqueakthecat.8061  This will be tough for you since it requires competence in the use of facts, facts in this case would be quoting what JP said and presenting an analysis that it was something more than the most basic and obvious concepts wrapped in fake intellectual jargon. Try that.
    1
  209.  @mrsqueakthecat.8061  Again we agree, JP is the leading fake intellectual of this century!
    1
  210. Dave, I know triggering your gullible conservative fan base is kind of low hanging fruit, and of course being a sycophant for ideologues is a good money making gig, e.g. you and Shapiro, but wearing a tax the rich dress doesn't make AOC a hypocrite. She is pro tax the rich. I hope that helps. But lets try this, here is my solution to regulating greed, tell me you get the benefits. You might also review the Scientific American paper Income Inequity its worse than you think...the income inequity gap grew to 350x from 20x in the last 50 years. Here is my plan: List the benefits to the economic and mental health of the nation from my idea on income inequity and regulating greed: INCOME EQUITY: The most common political solution to the struggling poor in the US is raise the minimum wage. This has the flaw of harming some small businesses and increasing inflation, and places the burden equally on struggling small businesses and ultra wealthy mega corporations. Here is my solution. Guaranteed federal housing program; you work 3 years at any job and you qualify to buy something, with a mortgage at 30% of your income. This is funded by a 70% marginal tax rate above $400,000 per year including capital gains. Get the working poor out from under the thumb of wealthy investors. 3 years even working at Target qualifies you for an affordable mortgage. You still have to pay that mortgage like anyone else or you default.
    1
  211. ​ @bryanbenaway5411 no one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  212.  @michaelleahey7250  Our quest for an intellectual idea by Peterson continues.
    1
  213.  @sulista-consulting  Is Rubin joking? JP most important speech? Dave? Please timestamp and quote an important and useful idea by JP anywhere in this entire video. Good luck. Well the most important speech JP has ever made; not a very high bar. 'Identity is the proper union of faith and responsibility. It does that in a hierarchical subsidiary manner, if you have conflict, you need a counter position, that is subsidiary structure. Jacob's ladder the vine that unites the material and proximal realm of the earth with the eternal realm of heaven, how do we climb it, there is a vision of how we build ourselves, a glorious macro-vision; it is the proximal beginnings, we scaffold ourselves upward from the finite to the infinite, the scaffold constitutes our identity...'
    1
  214.  @chrishansen7104  No one can find an intellectual useful idea by JP.
    1
  215.  @tnerb830  No one can find an intellectual useful idea by JP.
    1
  216.  @sulista-consulting  We are searching for a useful idea by JP. No one has found one.
    1
  217.  @MrGheller  No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  218.  @davidmcgowan6119  No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  219.  @AlbertQian  No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  220.  @Domcel  No one can find a coherent useful idea by JP in this speech.
    1
  221.  @deonscott91  No one can find a useful coherent idea by JP.
    1
  222.  @CapoVito100  We continue our quest for an intellectual idea by JP, who feels he is the second coming and self appointed explainer of the world.
    1
  223.  @martin_swellfitness  Our quest for an intellectual idea by JP continues. An impressive amount of nonsense packed into 24:00 minutes. Important isn't the word I would use Dave. Easily the Most _______________ Speech JP has ever done. 'Sacrifice makes a difference, the hierarchy of identity, the lower to the higher, proximal hedonic whims, the payback is good, to escape from primordial narcissism, some things go wrong with children, having children can be rewarding, there is no technical difference between thinking about yourself and being miserable, serve a higher purpose, technically, think about a fork and a table and a plate as a microcosm of the universe, that is all real, we forgot responsibility...' Let's see what to put in the blank. Rambling Self Absorbed Nonsensical. Dave? Can you edit the title?
    1
  224.  @eugeniorey4565  No one can find a profound intellectual coherent idea by Peterson.
    1
  225.  @Terri19karen  JP is a fake intellectual, I am a real intellectual since I realize that we do not understand pre-experimental thinking, so we try to explain it in terms that we do understand – which means that we explain it away, define it as nonsense. After all, we think scientifically – so we believe – and we think we know what that means (since scientific thinking can in principle be defined). We are familiar with scientific thinking, and value it highly – so we tend to presume that that is all there is to thinking (that all other “forms of thought” are approximations, at best, to the ideal of scientific thought). But this is not accurate. Thinking also and more fundamentally is specification of value – is specification of implication for behavior. This means that categorization, with regards to value –determination (or even perception) of what constitutes a single thing, or class of things – is the act of grouping together according to implication for behavior.  Do you agree?
    1
  226.  @leopoldbourne8444  JP is a fake intellectual, I am a real intellectual since I realize that we do not understand pre-experimental thinking, so we try to explain it in terms that we do understand – which means that we explain it away, define it as nonsense. After all, we think scientifically – so we believe – and we think we know what that means (since scientific thinking can in principle be defined). We are familiar with scientific thinking, and value it highly – so we tend to presume that that is all there is to thinking (that all other “forms of thought” are approximations, at best, to the ideal of scientific thought). But this is not accurate. Thinking also and more fundamentally is specification of value – is specification of implication for behavior. This means that categorization, with regards to value –determination (or even perception) of what constitutes a single thing, or class of things – is the act of grouping together according to implication for behavior.  Do you agree?
    1
  227.  @foulplay99  JP is a fake intellectual, I am a real intellectual since I realize that we do not understand pre-experimental thinking, so we try to explain it in terms that we do understand – which means that we explain it away, define it as nonsense. After all, we think scientifically – so we believe – and we think we know what that means (since scientific thinking can in principle be defined). We are familiar with scientific thinking, and value it highly – so we tend to presume that that is all there is to thinking (that all other “forms of thought” are approximations, at best, to the ideal of scientific thought). But this is not accurate. Thinking also and more fundamentally is specification of value – is specification of implication for behavior. This means that categorization, with regards to value –determination (or even perception) of what constitutes a single thing, or class of things – is the act of grouping together according to implication for behavior.  Do you agree?
    1
  228.  @Super_Nova1234  No one can find a coherent intellectual idea by JP.
    1
  229.  @daouddenali8450  Be a monster... Sniffle... Jordan Peterson.
    1
  230.  @markbrown8937  We continue our quest for an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  231.  @markbrown8937  JP is a fake intellectual. I am a real intellectual since I realize things that JP does not, for example that characterization is a precondition for individual freedom, there is no technical difference between thinking about yourself and being miserable, cognitive systems have axiomatic levels, and compassion doesn't scale as you move up the hierarchy of complexity, and also that the biblical corpus is a collection of narratives that shine a different light on the hierarchy of perception. What faith means is that you act out the proposition that you can ride the wave as big as it comes, all together in good will. Canonical patterns of being for what we act out in the world, waves of behavioral patterns across time, no one in their right mind would argue that numbers are not true, there are stories about you and you and you and the human experience as such, the thing is the pattern of their being, the process has been occurring for thousands of years, a representation of the distillation of the process, fairy tales that are really old, cultures that don't change stay the same, while creatures with nervous systems watch each other. Jordan Peterson JP doesn't have the intellectual ability I have, since I realize that the future is unpredictable technically, you are not a clockwork machine, what does free will mean, you are not a deterministic clockwork machine, I move my arm in a complex way, I set it up in a deterministic way, as we implement our actions the horizon of possibility collapses into a deterministic actuality, the farther out into the future, the less deterministic our perceptions necessarily become, you are a visionary, you have to reconfigure how you think scientifically, you think there are objects and you react to those objects, and that is not true, you don't see objects, none of that is true, you don't see objects you see patterns that are functional.
    1
  232.  @petercullen1624  Mostly he spews ridiculous over simplifications and makes nuanced issues black and white; coupled with a monster but fragile ego spewing rambling nonsense with no coherent point. Why anyone considers him an intellectual or role model is a giant mystery.
    1
  233. Dave, you should interview me. I have better ideas than any of the democratic candidates at jgreene4prez2020 on FB. Here is one: As an improvement over the standard 'increase the minimum wage plan, Federal guaranteed home ownership program for anyone with a three year work history at any job who can keep up with an affordable mortgage, funded by a 70% tax bracket above $500,000 per year including capital gains, to get the working poor out from under the thumb of wealthy landlords, stabilize their housing costs thus increasing their spending power and mental health. Find the flaw if you can.
    1
  234. ​ @bobs8942 Peterson has figured out how to use a fork and a plate to organize the cosmos and climb Jacobs ladder. Tell me you are not impressed.
    1
  235.  @bobs8942  That is Peterson from this video.
    1
  236.  @bobs8942  Listen to like the last 5 minutes and have a good laugh.
    1
  237.  @bobs8942  Just remember next time you are setting the dinner table you are actually organizing the cosmos, and preparing to climb Jacobs ladder to the shining city on the hill. Not sure how Peterson being very careful to use precise words escapes you.
    1
  238. But conservatives think Dave Rubin and Jordan Peterson are smart.
    1
  239.  @bills5009  Rubin playbook: Show a tiny clip of a couple people talking about a political issue. Make up some stuff to make it look like liberals are dumb. Nothing Rubin claims in the title or in his commentary actually happened in the video, but his gullible conservative fan base swallow it any way.
    1
  240.  @Labadamier  Rubin playbook: Show a tiny clip of a couple people talking about a political issue. Make up some stuff to make it look like liberals are dumb. Nothing Rubin claims in the title or in his commentary actually happened in the video, but his gullible conservative fan base swallow it any way.
    1
  241.  @silverhammer7779  Prove that Rubin click bait is supported by the content. Watch Rubin Peterson greatest speech, and comment back after you stop laughing.
    1
  242.  @silverhammer7779  Thank you for your feelings. Try using facts. You look smarter that way. But if you think Rubin and Peterson are smart...
    1
  243.  @silverhammer7779  What I proved is you can't find a non Strawman by Rubin. You proved nothing.
    1
  244.  @silverhammer7779  ok we agree, Rubin isn't smart. That wasn't so hard was it? BTW, I vote by mail. You only get one ballot.
    1
  245.  @silverhammer7779  I correctly defined Rubin playbook. You can't prove me wrong. I win, you lose.
    1
  246.  @silverhammer7779  See the irony here? You claimed that it is easy to make liberals look dumb, but I as a liberal made you look dumb.!
    1
  247.  @bills5009  NOEM: What has he done, what has he done, he has done nothing with tools and policy, he doesn't let us do our job, he will not keep us safe. RUBIN: She is saying what everyone knows, no one believes the federal government is doing their job, border agents don't like to be a travel agent, you can go to Chicago. The democrat party, one of your few jobs dude. Dave, this alleged Host is stumped by question turned against her? Where did that happen exactly? Here is what happened, Noem shared her made up feelings that Biden has done nothing with tools and policy, and then Rubin shared his made up feelings that no one believes the federal government is doing their job and border agents are forced to act as travel agents. At somewhere around the 80th percentile for gullibility you become a Rubin believer.
    1
  248.  @bills5009  Rubin and his fans aren't fans of facts: WHAT TRUMP DID: In March 2020, at the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic, the Trump administration invoked Title 42, a controversial statute ostensibly meant as a public health measure. The policy allowed US authorities to swiftly expel migrants - including asylum seekers - at the border. Nearly 400,000 people were detained and expelled between its implementation and January 2021, when Mr Trump left the White House. WHAT BIDEN DID: He defended keeping Title 42 in place, using the pandemic as justification. Over 2.28 million people were expelled using Title 42 authority between January 2021 and March 2023, the last month for which data is available. But when the US ended its coronavirus public health emergency on May 11, Title 42 expired with it. To replace it, US immigration authorities unveiled a "carrot and stick" approach that encourages legal pathways, while also implementing strict penalties for those who cross illegally. They have opened regional processing centres in Latin America aimed at helping migrants apply to come to the US and expanded access to CBP One, an app migrants can use to schedule asylum appointments. People who cross illegally will be deported, barred from re-entering the US for at least five years, and be "presumed ineligible for asylum", according to Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
    1
  249.  @bills5009  NOEM: What has he done, what has he done, he has done nothing with tools and policy, he doesn't let us do our job, he will not keep us safe. RUBIN: She is saying what everyone knows, no one believes the federal government is doing their job, border agents don't like to be a travel agent, you can go to Chicago. The democrat party, one of your few jobs dude. Dave, this alleged Host is stumped by question turned against her? Where did that happen exactly? Here is what happened, Noem shared her made up feelings that Biden has done nothing with tools and policy, and then Rubin shared his made-up feelings that no one believes the federal government is doing their job and border agents are forced to act as travel agents. At somewhere around the 80th percentile for gullibility you become a Rubin believer. Rubin and his fans aren't really fans of facts, but: WHAT TRUMP DID: In March 2020, at the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic, the Trump administration invoked Title 42, a controversial statute ostensibly meant as a public health measure. The policy allowed US authorities to swiftly expel migrants - including asylum seekers - at the border. Nearly 400,000 people were detained and expelled between its implementation and January 2021, when Mr Trump left the White House. WHAT BIDEN DID: He defended keeping Title 42 in place, using the pandemic as justification. Over 2.28 million people were expelled using Title 42 authority between January 2021 and March 2023, the last month for which data is available. But when the US ended its coronavirus public health emergency on May 11, Title 42 expired with it. To replace it, US immigration authorities unveiled a "carrot and stick" approach that encourages legal pathways, while also implementing strict penalties for those who cross illegally. They have opened regional processing centres in Latin America aimed at helping migrants apply to come to the US and expanded access to CBP One, an app migrants can use to schedule asylum appointments. People who cross illegally will be deported, barred from re-entering the US for at least five years, and be "presumed ineligible for asylum", according to Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
    1
  250.  @bills5009  NOEM: What has he done, what has he done, he has done nothing with tools and policy, he doesn't let us do our job, he will not keep us safe. RUBIN: She is saying what everyone knows, no one believes the federal government is doing their job, border agents don't like to be a travel agent, you can go to Chicago. The democrat party, one of your few jobs dude. Dave, this alleged Host is stumped by question turned against her? Where did that happen exactly? Here is what happened, Noem shared her made up feelings that Biden has done nothing with tools and policy, and then Rubin shared his made-up feelings that no one believes the federal government is doing their job and border agents are forced to act as travel agents. At somewhere around the 80th percentile for gullibility you become a Rubin believer. Rubin and his fans aren't really fans of facts, but: WHAT TRUMP DID: In March 2020, at the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic, the Trump administration invoked Title 42, a controversial statute ostensibly meant as a public health measure. The policy allowed US authorities to swiftly expel migrants - including asylum seekers - at the border. Nearly 400,000 people were detained and expelled between its implementation and January 2021, when Mr Trump left the White House. WHAT BIDEN DID: He defended keeping Title 42 in place, using the pandemic as justification. Over 2.28 million people were expelled using Title 42 authority between January 2021 and March 2023, the last month for which data is available. But when the US ended its coronavirus public health emergency on May 11, Title 42 expired with it. To replace it, US immigration authorities unveiled a "carrot and stick" approach that encourages legal pathways, while also implementing strict penalties for those who cross illegally. They have opened regional processing centres in Latin America aimed at helping migrants apply to come to the US and expanded access to CBP One, an app migrants can use to schedule asylum appointments. People who cross illegally will be deported, barred from re-entering the US for at least five years, and be "presumed ineligible for asylum", according to Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
    1
  251.  @bills5009  I keep replying. It keeps getting deleted. I guess Rubin doesn't like free speech. NOEM: What has he done, what has he done, he has done nothing with tools and policy, he doesn't let us do our job, he will not keep us safe. RUBIN: She is saying what everyone knows, no one believes the federal government is doing their job, border agents don't like to be a travel agent, you can go to Chicago. The democrat party, one of your few jobs dude. Dave, this alleged Host is stumped by question turned against her? Where did that happen exactly? Here is what happened, Noem shared her made up feelings that Biden has done nothing with tools and policy, and then Rubin shared his made-up feelings that no one believes the federal government is doing their job and border agents are forced to act as travel agents. At somewhere around the 80th percentile for gullibility you become a Rubin believer. Rubin and his fans aren't really fans of facts, but: WHAT TRUMP DID: In March 2020, at the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic, the Trump administration invoked Title 42, a controversial statute ostensibly meant as a public health measure. The policy allowed US authorities to swiftly expel migrants - including asylum seekers - at the border. Nearly 400,000 people were detained and expelled between its implementation and January 2021, when Mr Trump left the White House. WHAT BIDEN DID: He defended keeping Title 42 in place, using the pandemic as justification. Over 2.28 million people were expelled using Title 42 authority between January 2021 and March 2023, the last month for which data is available. But when the US ended its coronavirus public health emergency on May 11, Title 42 expired with it. To replace it, US immigration authorities unveiled a "carrot and stick" approach that encourages legal pathways, while also implementing strict penalties for those who cross illegally. They have opened regional processing centres in Latin America aimed at helping migrants apply to come to the US and expanded access to CBP One, an app migrants can use to schedule asylum appointments. People who cross illegally will be deported, barred from re-entering the US for at least five years, and be "presumed ineligible for asylum", according to Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
    1
  252.  @badgeswedontneednostinking5571  NOEM: What has he done, what has he done, he has done nothing with tools and policy, he doesn't let us do our job, he will not keep us safe. RUBIN: She is saying what everyone knows, no one believes the federal government is doing their job, border agents don't like to be a travel agent, you can go to Chicago. The democrat party, one of your few jobs dude. Dave, this alleged Host is stumped by question turned against her? Where did that happen exactly? Here is what happened, Noem shared her made up feelings that Biden has done nothing with tools and policy, and then Rubin shared his made-up feelings that no one believes the federal government is doing their job and border agents are forced to act as travel agents. At somewhere around the 80th percentile for gullibility you become a Rubin believer. Rubin and his fans aren't really fans of facts, but: WHAT TRUMP DID: In March 2020, at the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic, the Trump administration invoked Title 42, a controversial statute ostensibly meant as a public health measure. The policy allowed US authorities to swiftly expel migrants - including asylum seekers - at the border. Nearly 400,000 people were detained and expelled between its implementation and January 2021, when Mr Trump left the White House. WHAT BIDEN DID: He defended keeping Title 42 in place, using the pandemic as justification. Over 2.28 million people were expelled using Title 42 authority between January 2021 and March 2023, the last month for which data is available. But when the US ended its coronavirus public health emergency on May 11, Title 42 expired with it. To replace it, US immigration authorities unveiled a "carrot and stick" approach that encourages legal pathways, while also implementing strict penalties for those who cross illegally. They have opened regional processing centres in Latin America aimed at helping migrants apply to come to the US and expanded access to CBP One, an app migrants can use to schedule asylum appointments. People who cross illegally will be deported, barred from re-entering the US for at least five years, and be "presumed ineligible for asylum", according to Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
    1
  253. Peterson at 21:00 'People go to the bathroom there is not Zero pollution, net zero is an empty talking point, it is not careful thinking that produces a solution...' [Heads up Jordan no one is suggesting we can get to zero pollution, the stated goal is NET ZERO CO2. You are welcome for the lesson in basic logic and science. Careful thinking that produces a solution? Dave, has Jordan ever done that himself?] 'How about copious energy for everyone as clean as possible, resilient stable systems, the only thing you should care about is cheap energy, work makes people prosperous and secure, what is work, it is the expenditure of energy, what is energy, work wealth, energy is everything, US has knocked CO2 down by 14% in the last couple of decades because of fracking, war is not good for the environment...' Jump to 34:00 'I rewrote sections of the document and my rewrites stuck, I did the work, they didn't have time to rewrite it, high end people are busy, they don't have time to analyze sustainable development goals...the only person trained to do it is Lomborg...' [So JP's solution is lots of cheap energy for everyone? Does he have a magic wand to make this happen? Does he not realize that many of our environmental problems are related to energy consumption funding consumerism? What is work? Work is energy? I think JP is confusing work by people with the concept of work and energy in pure physics. Whoops. He wants to brag that he wrote sections that stuck? Maybe that happened, I will check it out. The other people didn't have time to analyze sustainable development goals? He knows this how? Literally every sentence out of his mouth is total nonsense, including that CO2 levels have dropped by 14% and that is due to fracking. The only person trained to analyze sustainable goals is Lomborg? Like in the entire world Jordan. Dave, help me out here, why are you nodding your head to this nonsense?]
    1
  254. At 45:30 Rubin: 'I don't remember the last time I heard a new musician that I really love, because of what has happened with cancel culture the people that should be showing us things are not showing us them. What do we do about that? How do we make the artists brave again and give us creative achievement.' [This guy is so full of crap. Artists are not brave? Have you watched any Rap lately Dave? WAP? That is not brave to put that kind of content out there? Because you haven't found any music you like you are jumping the Great White to a conclusion that good music is being stifled? What absolute nonsense. I have been a musician and a dedicated listener since the Beatles, Hendrix, the Doors, there is a lot of fantastic stuff out there pushing the limits of creativity. My guess is Rubin listen's to country and soft jazz, and he thus hasn't noticed any evolution in music. Get out of you comfort zone Dave. Put aside your Kenny G and Garth Brooks CD's for a day; check out Eilish, Illenium, Phoebe Bridgers, Juice Wrld for starters.]
    1
  255.  @ninjagirl226  What is your solution to regulating greed?
    1
  256.  @ninjagirl226  I am talking about greed in the general population...the wealthy profiting off the work of others. How do you regulate that?
    1
  257.  @ninjagirl226  You are missing my question. What is your solution to regulating greed? This requires a policy that limits the ability of the wealthy profiting off the work of others, simply to become ridiculously rich, beyond the amount of money necessary to live a fruitful life.
    1
  258. No one can find a coherent intellectual useful idea by JP.
    1
  259. Peterson thinks our biggest environmental problem is over fishing in the ocean, he thinks we don't have an over-population problem, thinks the solution to India's environmental problems is to burn more coal, and the solution to our environmental problems is to make everyone rich...and Rubin thinks JP can have a logical theory about Covid and vaccines? Chuckle.
    1
  260. No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  261. Legalize drugs with controlled doses.
    1
  262. No one can find a coherent profound idea by JP.
    1
  263. JP is a fake intellectual, I am a real intellectual since I realize that Identity is the proper union of faith and responsibility. It does that in a hierarchical subsidiary manner, if you have conflict, you need a counter position, that is subsidiary structure. Jacob's ladder, the vine that unites the material and proximal realm of the earth with the eternal realm of heaven, how do we climb it, there is a vision of how we build ourselves, a glorious macro-vision; it is the proximal beginnings, we scaffold ourselves upward from the finite to the infinite, the scaffold constitutes our identity...also that you think so that your stupid thoughts can die instead of you. At the upper end of a hierarchy, you find people who know a lot, if you are stupid, smart people won't listen to you, so you can inform yourself with tools and you won't be an embarrassment, the careless self-evident axiom of human social interaction is that if I can force you to do something then I have the right to do it.
    1
  264.  @oakson3045  Did you find an intelligent coherent statement by JP? Please share. Pretenderson at 40:00 talking about antifa, 'how many people identifiable, who the hell are they, are they right or left, 800 antifa, then they don't exist, does it exist, they are agents of chaos, to sow discord, how to we protect ourselves, that is the endless question of the human race, men are less agreeable, women like disagreeable men, women chose their mates, the more disagreeable you are the less compassionate and generous you are, why do women pick disagreeable men, in one city they had a summer of love, so everyone is agreeable, do the psychopaths come out at night, agreeable people share, women have to protect their infants, they need men who can guard, if a man is too masculine they can't communicate, you have to hold the psychopaths down, they are at 3%, the Left says hierarchies are nothing but power, tough men are tougher than tough women, are we going to look at this straightforward and clearly?' [Holy crap Dave, did Peterson just claim he is looking at this straightforward and clearly, after a pointless, unstraightforward, unclear and chaotic rambling that goes from how many antifa there are to women are more agreeable to the summer of love? Help me out Dave, reply to this comment. What precisely is Peterson's point here? Antifa exists or it doesn't exist? Women are more agreeable? I don't think that is true and of course it has absolutely nothing to do with antifa. The Left says hierarchies are nothing but power? Not true. JP made that up. How many Peterson's does it take to unscrew a lightbulb? One, but he does it by rotating the entire house in the opposite direction.] Mr. Pretenderhead at 36:00. 'Tech companies are trying deliver something you will attend to, AI machines that will analyze your eye movements, to see what you are looking at, they are trying to figure out what you want and deliver it to you fast, Can we trust us, not if we are lying, that makes misinformation, the naked desire for power, the systems get contaminated, look what we are doing, you and I are having a conversation that will be distributed, its a miracle, translators work on my YT content, its very hard to translate YT to other languages, it hasn't been thought through, there is a real time translator, this is unbelievable...this over simplification and demonization has to stop... I talked to democrats who think antifa is illusory, but who think there is a conspiratory force on the right.' [The king of over simplification and demonizing thinks we need to stop that, and in the very next sentence he over simplifies and demonizes democrats who think antifa is illusory and right wing conspiracy is real? Whoops dude. And how did he get from tech companies trying to sell us stuff, duh, to antifa in three sentences? Peterson is amazed at YouTube? Hasn't it been around for like 20 years? If you are lying you are spreading misinformation? This guy's genius is seriously off the charts. It's very hard to translate other languages but there is a real time translator? This guys brain is such total chaos. Dave; a coherent point anywhere in this video? Give me a nudge when you find it.]
    1
  265.  @oakson3045  Let's check out Dr. Potaterson at 10:00: 'Climate change is the biggest health issue of our time, No, overreaching beaurocrats are, China is building nuclear reactors, we can't get our act together to build nuclear in the US, if you are concerned about the poor and the environment you make power as cheap as possible because there is no difference between energy and wealth, there is a bit of the problem getting rid of the waste, save the climate by making power as cheap as possible, as CO2 levels rise plants can grow more in drier environments, I read 200 books what I learned was things are way better than everyone thinks, the biggest environmental problem is over fishing in the ocean... [Help me out Dave, haven't you claimed that JP is some kind of intellectual? What is even remotely intellectual about any of this? There is a bit of a problem getting rid of nuclear waste? Sure Jordan, half life of cancer causing mineral of 50,000 years, a BIT of a problem? We can't get out act together for nuclear in the US? Wrong Jordan, we made an environmental and safety issue to limit new nuclear. You can help the poor by making energy as cheap as possible? Wrong, energy cost is not the biggest part of someone's budget. And making energy cheap helps the environment? Wrong again, cheap energy tends to result in more driving, more air conditioning, more manufacturing, and more consumerism; all at the bottom of the pyramid for environmental damage. Remember when you claim to use multi variate analysis? So why are you over simplifying to 'energy is everything' here? There is no difference between energy and wealth, and climate and everything are the same word? This guy seriously needs a vocabulary lesson and instruction in basic logic. Over reaching beaurocrats are the biggest health issue? Heads up Jordan, do a google search for Covid 19 and bring yourself up to speed with what everyone else in the world has known for the last two years.]
    1
  266. Randomly at 17:00 'Everyone should be able to capitalize on their strengths.' [duh] Strengths are relative. [duh] You offer to the world your strength in some domain. [You mean like an olympic swimmer offers their swimming skills? Thank you Jordan.] Where you are strong you have merit. [You mean like an expert scientist has merit in science? Thank you again Jordan.] The political situation seems unstable. [Unstable how Jordan? Are we at risk of loosing democracy? Don't you claim to use precise wording?] Rubin: 'If Jordan was around he would be fixing this stuff. [Really Dave? When has JP ever offered a solution to anything?]
    1
  267. Dave Rubin again presenting an argument so flimsy it is only swallowed by gullible conservatives. Imagine a world where Rubin has to use facts: 'The crazy people who watch that Maddow neck is thicker than her head?' Impressive Dave.
    1
  268. If you understood what he said I would be worried. Let's check out this allegedly important speech... a solution that beckons and is generous, we have odds about identity, to a psychological integration, and now I delve into what identity is, and also what social structure must and should be, faith and responsibility, faith is the courage to welcome the future, the future is the manifestation of possibility into actuality, the treasure house of the unknown possibility, with courageous faith, being and becoming are intrinsically good....Huh? Doesn't this guy claim to be precise in your speech?
    1
  269. ​ @canadianloon6433 No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  270.  @stevemeszaros5132  How is wearing a tax the rich dress hypocrisy? She believes in tax the rich.
    1
  271.  @alicepyne-jahneke8042  That isn't hypocrisy. It is spreading her message both to foe and friend alike. You go to their party and you tell them what you think they should do. If you go to their party and don't spread your message, then you are a hypocrite.
    1
  272.  @Thesavagesouls  AOC is pro tax the rich, she wore a tax the rich dress. Rubin is wrong, that is not hypocrisy.
    1
  273.  @irenec7665  She is wearing a dress that supports her belief, to share that belief among people of influence. It is the opposite of hypocrisy. Share me the link that wearing that slogan is an ethics violation.
    1
  274.  @lobo7361  What is your solution to regulating greed?
    1
  275.  @FilthyCasualVR  What is your solution to regulating greed?
    1
  276.  @FilthyCasualVR  Here is my solution: List the benefits to the economic and mental health of the nation from my idea on income inequity and regulating greed: INCOME EQUITY: The most common political solution to the struggling poor in the US is raise the minimum wage. This has the flaw of harming some small businesses and increasing inflation, and places the burden equally on struggling small businesses and ultra wealthy mega corporations. Here is my solution. Guaranteed federal housing program; you work 3 years at any job and you qualify to buy something, with a mortgage at 30% of your income. This is funded by a 70% marginal tax rate above $400,000 per year including capital gains. Get the working poor out from under the thumb of wealthy investors. 3 years even working at Target qualifies you for an affordable mortgage. You still have to pay that mortgage like anyone else or you default.
    1
  277.  @irenec7665  The homes are built or bought like normal. It doesn't effect the seller or builders. The federal government could buy homes or stockpile land for the program. List the benefits. It takes no time to find the answers but you can't find them? Weird theory.
    1
  278.  @MichaelWright-xq1iw  What is your solution to regulating greed?
    1
  279.  @MichaelWright-xq1iw  I repeat. What is your solution to regulating greed? The wealthy profiting off the work of others? A flat tax is the opposite of regulating greed. I gather you don't have one. So here is mine. List the benefits. 70% marginal tax on income above 400k including capital gains funding a home ownership program for anyone with a three year work history.
    1
  280. ​ @MichaelWright-xq1iw  I repeat. List the benefits to the economic and mental health of the nation of my home ownership plan: The most common political solution to the struggling poor in the US is raise the minimum wage. This has the flaw of harming some small businesses and increasing inflation, and places the burden equally on struggling small businesses and ultra wealthy mega corporations. Here is my solution. Guaranteed federal housing program; you work 3 years at any job and you qualify to buy something, with a mortgage at 30% of your income. This is funded by a 70% marginal tax rate above $400,000 per year including capital gains. Get the working poor out from under the thumb of wealthy investors. 3 years even working at Target qualifies you for an affordable mortgage. You still have to pay that mortgage like anyone else or you default. As for your 8-10% flat tax the result would be: 1. The federal government would go severely into debt. 2. Thousands or millions of federal employees would lose their jobs. 3. A collapse of social security, medicare, and the military. You gave me a long list of home ownership increase? Remind me. As for your 'the bottom 46% pay no taxes'...cool when did that happen? I don't have to pay taxes this year? BTW prior to Reagan the marginal tax for top earners was around 90%. Did all rich people move to China then? Get the greed out of DC and there will be trickle down? How does that happen? Less than 100th of a percent of US citizens are federal legislators; how much do I get from my share of this 100th of a percent of people who can't be greedy?
    1
  281.  @MichaelWright-xq1iw  Ok, you can't figure out the benefits of my home ownership plan. No problem. Here they are, if you dispute any benefit please specify: BENEFITS: 1. Stable housing costs of those crossing from renter to owner increases spending power for restaurants, vacations, better clothes and appliances etc, thus boosting the economy via demand. 2. Home ownership is hope; depression and crime reduce. 3. Above 400k there is little incentive for real estate investors to buy more property and little incentive to keep raising rents. This opens up the market for smaller investors, and by reducing rent costs increases spending power and thus demand. 4. Above 400k there is little incentive for business to keep wages low, thus wages increase and more employees move into higher management positions. My plan also reduces student loan debt. See if you can figure out how. 1 in 4 people work for the federal government? Can I see the stat? So if it 1 in 4 the immediate loss in jobs from cutting the federal budget would be something like 50 million jobs wouldn't it? The illegal base line budgeting of the federal government? Like the military? I agree cut military spending by at least 70% so we stop arming other countries and fighting their wars.
    1
  282.  @MichaelWright-xq1iw  ok we agree on the benefits of my plan. My plan also helps small business... See if you can figure out how.
    1
  283. But the Right think JP is intelligent.
    1
  284. The statement is total nonsense. Let's check out this allegedly important speech... a solution that beckons and is generous, we have odds about identity, to a psychological integration, and now I delve into what identity is, and also what social structure must and should be, faith and responsibility, faith is the courage to welcome the future, the future is the manifestation of possibility into actuality, the treasure house of the unknown possibility, with courageous faith, being and becoming are intrinsically good....Huh? Doesn't this guy claim to be precise in your speech?
    1
  285.  @jonathanfairchild  JP is a fake intellectual, I am a real intellectual since I realize that we do not understand pre-experimental thinking, so we try to explain it in terms that we do understand – which means that we explain it away, define it as nonsense. After all, we think scientifically – so we believe – and we think we know what that means (since scientific thinking can in principle be defined). We are familiar with scientific thinking, and value it highly – so we tend to presume that that is all there is to thinking (that all other “forms of thought” are approximations, at best, to the ideal of scientific thought). But this is not accurate. Thinking also and more fundamentally is specification of value – is specification of implication for behavior. This means that categorization, with regards to value –determination (or even perception) of what constitutes a single thing, or class of things – is the act of grouping together according to implication for behavior.  Do you agree?
    1
  286.  @aznstride4325  Peterson says simple stuff that for some reason helps people who need to hear it. If he help people, great, but he is widely known as the leading pseudo intellectual of this century.
    1
  287.  @jonathanfairchild  We are searching for an intellectual idea by Peterson, not his simple self help message to clean your room and stand up straight like a proud lobster.
    1
  288.  @andrewbradley3305  Wait, you found an intellectual idea by JP? this is exciting, what was it? JP is a fake intellectual, I am a real intellectual since I realize that we do not understand pre-experimental thinking, so we try to explain it in terms that we do understand – which means that we explain it away, define it as nonsense. After all, we think scientifically – so we believe – and we think we know what that means (since scientific thinking can in principle be defined). We are familiar with scientific thinking, and value it highly – so we tend to presume that that is all there is to thinking (that all other “forms of thought” are approximations, at best, to the ideal of scientific thought). But this is not accurate. Thinking also and more fundamentally is specification of value – is specification of implication for behavior. This means that categorization, with regards to value –determination (or even perception) of what constitutes a single thing, or class of things – is the act of grouping together according to implication for behavior. Do you agree?
    1
  289.  @andrewbradley3305  We continue our quest for an intellectual idea by JP....JP is a fake intellectual, I am a real intellectual since I realize that we do not understand pre-experimental thinking, so we try to explain it in terms that we do understand – which means that we explain it away, define it as nonsense. After all, we think scientifically – so we believe – and we think we know what that means (since scientific thinking can in principle be defined). We are familiar with scientific thinking, and value it highly – so we tend to presume that that is all there is to thinking (that all other “forms of thought” are approximations, at best, to the ideal of scientific thought). But this is not accurate. Thinking also and more fundamentally is specification of value – is specification of implication for behavior. This means that categorization, with regards to value –determination (or even perception) of what constitutes a single thing, or class of things – is the act of grouping together according to implication for behavior. Do you agree?
    1
  290.  @andrewbradley3305  You found an intellectual idea by Peterson? Exciting, what?
    1
  291. Absolute nonsense from start to finish.
    1
  292. ​ @jag92949 Dave Rubin is so totally full of crap. You don't think the native Americans thought European immigrants were illegally taking over their land? AOC said one solution is a wall. Her comment left the host aghast? Actually the title of this video leaves any intelligent person aghast at Rubin reasoning.
    1
  293.  @charlieturner8124  Rubin is full of crap. AOC was reasonable on all points. Any thinking person is aghast at Rubin stupidity.
    1
  294.  @digitalnomad9985  Dave Rubin doing an excellent job looking stupid, but then Rubin thinks Jordan Peterson is smart: AOC a big problem is an undocumented population that can be fixed with a wall or by giving them jobs and a path to documentation. [Claps and nod of approval by host. Conclusion by Rubin; the host was aghast.] AOC: Our public systems have to pay for undocumented, unless they have jobs, like our ancestors. Dave: AOC says our ancestors came here illegally. [Uh no she didn't Dave, immigration from Europe was legal because there were not laws against immigration. Do you think the native Americans would have outlawed Europe immigration if they could?] Dave: She says the solution is just document them. [No, she didn't say that Dave, she said a wall and green card jobs are two possible solutions.] Dave: She says their plan isn't about a wall, its just bring in as many illegal immigrants that we can. [Dave, do you have noise cancelling head phones on? She didn't say that either. Oh well, your fan base won't notice the strawman.]
    1
  295.  @digitalnomad9985  Dave Rubin doing an excellent job looking stupid: AOC a big problem is an undocumented population that can be fixed with a wall or by giving them jobs and a path to documentation. [Claps and nod of approval by host. Conclusion by Rubin; the host was aghast.] AOC: Our public systems have to pay for undocumented, unless they have jobs, like our ancestors. Dave: AOC says our ancestors came here illegally. [Uh no she didn't Dave, immigration from Europe was legal because there were not laws against immigration. Do you think the native Americans would have outlawed Europe immigration if they could?] Dave: She says the solution is just document them. [No, she didn't say that Dave, she said a wall and green card jobs are two possible solutions.] Dave: She says their plan isn't about a wall, its just bring in as many illegal immigrants that we can. [Dave, do you have noise cancelling head phones on? She didn't say that either. Oh well, your fan base won't notice the strawman.]
    1
  296.  @Paul-ue7fo  AOC was right. Rubin is full of crap.
    1
  297.  @anaschulz8084  AOC won, Rubin lost. Dave Rubin doing an excellent job looking stupid: AOC a big problem is an undocumented population that can be fixed with a wall or by giving them jobs and a path to documentation. [Claps and nod of approval by host. Conclusion by Rubin; the host was aghast.] AOC: Our public systems have to pay for undocumented, unless they have jobs, like our ancestors. Dave: AOC says our ancestors came here illegally. [Uh no she didn't Dave, immigration from Europe was legal because there were not laws against immigration. Do you think the native Americans would have outlawed Europe immigration if they could?] Dave: She says the solution is just document them. [No, she didn't say that Dave, she said a wall and green card jobs are two possible solutions.] Dave: She says their plan isn't about a wall, its just bring in as many illegal immigrants that we can. [Dave, do you have noise cancelling headphones on? She didn't say that either. Oh well, your fan base won't notice the strawman.]
    1
  298.  @johnparish1432  Dave Rubin doing an excellent job looking stupid: AOC a big problem is an undocumented population that can be fixed with a wall or by giving them jobs and a path to documentation. [Claps and nod of approval by host. Conclusion by Rubin; the host was aghast.] AOC: Our public systems have to pay for undocumented, unless they have jobs, like our ancestors. Dave: AOC says our ancestors came here illegally. [Uh no she didn't Dave, immigration from Europe was legal because there were not laws against immigration. Do you think the native Americans would have outlawed Europe immigration if they could?] Dave: She says the solution is just document them. [No, she didn't say that Dave, she said a wall and green card jobs are two possible solutions.] Dave: She says their plan isn't about a wall, its just bring in as many illegal immigrants that we can. [Dave, do you have noise cancelling head phones on? She didn't say that either. Oh well, your fan base won't notice the strawman.]
    1
  299.  @davidlafleche1142  True Jordan Peterson is a deceiver.
    1
  300.  @albertoavena  Dave Rubin doing an excellent job looking stupid: AOC a big problem is an undocumented population that can be fixed with a wall or by giving them jobs and a path to documentation. [Claps and nod of approval by host. Conclusion by Rubin; the host was aghast.] AOC: Our public systems have to pay for undocumented, unless they have jobs, like our ancestors. Dave: AOC says our ancestors came here illegally. [Uh no she didn't Dave, immigration from Europe was legal because there were not laws against immigration. Do you think the native Americans would have outlawed Europe immigration if they could?] Dave: She says the solution is just document them. [No, she didn't say that Dave, she said a wall and green card jobs are two possible solutions.] Dave: She says their plan isn't about a wall, its just bring in as many illegal immigrants that we can. [Dave, do you have noise cancelling head phones on? She didn't say that either. Oh well, your fan base won't notice the strawman.]
    1
  301.  @blucifer4865  Peterson is allergic to logic.
    1
  302. Peterson said something intelligent?
    1
  303.  @Birdracer22  When you find this alleged intelligent statement LMK.
    1
  304.  @Birdracer22 " There is something to us but cognitive systems have axiomatic levels." Uhm sure Jordan, there is something to us, a bit pointless and ambiguous however. A cognitive system? What is that actually?
    1
  305.  @Birdracer22  Pretenderson at 40:00 talking about antifa, 'how many people identifiable, who the hell are they, are they right or left, 800 antifa, then they don't exist, does it exist, they are agents of chaos, to sow discord, how to we protect ourselves, that is the endless question of the human race, men are less agreeable, women like disagreeable men, women chose their mates, the more disagreeable you are the less compassionate and generous you are, why do women pick disagreeable men, in one city they had a summer of love, so everyone is agreeable, do the psychopaths come out at night, agreeable people share, women have to protect their infants, they need men who can guard, if a man is too masculine they can't communicate, you have to hold the psychopaths down, they are at 3%, the Left says hierarchies are nothing but power, tough men are tougher than tough women, are we going to look at this straightforward and clearly?' [Holy crap Dave, did Peterson just claim he is looking at this straightforward and clearly, after a pointless, unstraightforward, unclear and chaotic rambling that goes from how many antifa there are to women are more agreeable to the summer of love? Help me out Dave, reply to this comment. What precisely is Peterson's point here? Antifa exists or it doesn't exist? Women are more agreeable? I don't think that is true and of course it has absolutely nothing to do with antifa. The Left says hierarchies are nothing but power? Not true. JP made that up. How many Peterson's does it take to unscrew a lightbulb? One, but he does it by rotating the entire house in the opposite direction.] Mr. Pretenderhead at 36:00. 'Tech companies are trying deliver something you will attend to, AI machines that will analyze your eye movements, to see what you are looking at, they are trying to figure out what you want and deliver it to you fast, Can we trust us, not if we are lying, that makes misinformation, the naked desire for power, the systems get contaminated, look what we are doing, you and I are having a conversation that will be distributed, its a miracle, translators work on my YT content, its very hard to translate YT to other languages, it hasn't been thought through, there is a real time translator, this is unbelievable...this over simplification and demonization has to stop... I talked to democrats who think antifa is illusory, but who think there is a conspiratory force on the right.' [The king of over simplification and demonizing thinks we need to stop that, and in the very next sentence he over simplifies and demonizes democrats who think antifa is illusory and right wing conspiracy is real? Whoops dude. And how did he get from tech companies trying to sell us stuff, duh, to antifa in three sentences? Peterson is amazed at YouTube? Hasn't it been around for like 20 years? If you are lying you are spreading misinformation? This guy's genius is seriously off the charts. It's very hard to translate other languages but there is a real time translator? This guys brain is such total chaos. Dave; a coherent point anywhere in this video? Give me a nudge when you find it.]
    1
  306.  @Birdracer22  What I did is quote Peterson from this very video. But you guys hate facts. Why bother proving Peterson is intelligent when you can just feel that is what happened?
    1
  307.  @PrairieWolff  I agree, you can't find a profound coherent idea by JP.
    1
  308. No one can find an intellectual idea by JP.
    1
  309.  @beverlywilliams7278  Dave Rubin doing an excellent job looking stupid: AOC a big problem is an undocumented population that can be fixed with a wall or by giving them jobs and a path to documentation. [Claps and nod of approval by host. Conclusion by Rubin; the host was aghast.] AOC: Our public systems have to pay for undocumented, unless they have jobs, like our ancestors. Dave: AOC says our ancestors came here illegally. [Uh no she didn't Dave, immigration from Europe was legal because there were not laws against immigration. Do you think the native Americans would have outlawed Europe immigration if they could?] Dave: She says the solution is just document them. [No, she didn't say that Dave, she said a wall and green card jobs are two possible solutions.] Dave: She says their plan isn't about a wall, its just bring in as many illegal immigrants that we can. [Dave, do you have noise cancelling head phones on? She didn't say that either. Oh well, your fan base won't notice the strawman.]
    1
  310.  @devorahacts  Dave Rubin doing an excellent job looking stupid: AOC a big problem is an undocumented population that can be fixed with a wall or by giving them jobs and a path to documentation. [Claps and nod of approval by host. Conclusion by Rubin; the host was aghast.] AOC: Our public systems have to pay for undocumented, unless they have jobs, like our ancestors. Dave: AOC says our ancestors came here illegally. [Uh no she didn't Dave, immigration from Europe was legal because there were not laws against immigration. Do you think the native Americans would have outlawed Europe immigration if they could?] Dave: She says the solution is just document them. [No, she didn't say that Dave, she said a wall and green card jobs are two possible solutions.] Dave: She says their plan isn't about a wall, its just bring in as many illegal immigrants that we can. [Dave, do you have noise cancelling head phones on? She didn't say that either. Oh well, your fan base won't notice the strawman.]
    1
  311.  @rt-uh6mt  Dave Rubin doing an excellent job looking stupid: AOC a big problem is an undocumented population that can be fixed with a wall or by giving them jobs and a path to documentation. [Claps and nod of approval by host. Conclusion by Rubin; the host was aghast.] AOC: Our public systems have to pay for undocumented, unless they have jobs, like our ancestors. Dave: AOC says our ancestors came here illegally. [Uh no she didn't Dave, immigration from Europe was legal because there were not laws against immigration. Do you think the native Americans would have outlawed Europe immigration if they could?] Dave: She says the solution is just document them. [No, she didn't say that Dave, she said a wall and green card jobs are two possible solutions.] Dave: She says their plan isn't about a wall, its just bring in as many illegal immigrants that we can. [Dave, do you have noise cancelling head phones on? She didn't say that either. Oh well, your fan base won't notice the strawman.]
    1
  312.  @johnmeckel2319  Rubin is a master at Strawman arguments.
    1
  313.  @scubasteve1555  AOC didn't say that.. Strawman by Rubin.
    1
  314.  @drivernjax  AOC won, Rubin lost.
    1
  315.  @drivernjax  AOC said she doesn't know about citizenship? Timestamp and quote? BTW, as usual Rubin commentary is pure Strawman bait.
    1
  316.  @drivernjax  You have shared your feelings that AOC obviously doesn't know the laws of our country. Prove it. Use facts. Obviously? Let's see it.
    1
  317.  @kerryrock9248  Dave Rubin doing an excellent job looking stupid: AOC a big problem is an undocumented population that can be fixed with a wall or by giving them jobs and a path to documentation. [Claps and nod of approval by host. Conclusion by Rubin; the host was aghast.] AOC: Our public systems have to pay for undocumented, unless they have jobs, like our ancestors. Dave: AOC says our ancestors came here illegally. [Uh no she didn't Dave, immigration from Europe was legal because there were not laws against immigration. Do you think the native Americans would have outlawed Europe immigration if they could?] Dave: She says the solution is just document them. [No, she didn't say that Dave, she said a wall and green card jobs are two possible solutions.] Dave: She says their plan isn't about a wall, its just bring in as many illegal immigrants that we can. [Dave, do you have noise cancelling head phones on? She didn't say that either. Oh well, your fan base won't notice the strawman.]
    1
  318.  @rossrobertson674  Not what she said.
    1
  319.  @rossrobertson674  She said the wall is a solution and a path to working rather than being a drain on the welfare system 8s a solution. The only statements leaving anyone aghast are the straw man statements by Rubin.
    1
  320.  @rossrobertson674  Dave Rubin doing an excellent job looking stupid: AOC a big problem is an undocumented population that can be fixed with a wall or by giving them jobs and a path to documentation. [Claps and nod of approval by host. Conclusion by Rubin; the host was aghast.] AOC: Our public systems have to pay for undocumented, unless they have jobs, like our ancestors. Dave: AOC says our ancestors came here illegally. [Uh no she didn't Dave, immigration from Europe was legal because there were not laws against immigration. Do you think the native Americans would have outlawed Europe immigration if they could?] Dave: She says the solution is just document them. [No, she didn't say that Dave, she said a wall and green card jobs are two possible solutions.] Dave: She says their plan isn't about a wall, its just bring in as many illegal immigrants that we can. [Dave, do you have noise cancelling head phones on? She didn't say that either. Oh well, your fan base won't notice the strawman.]
    1
  321.  @ericfrontczak8016  Just build work to stay there cabins at the border just inside Mexico. You arrive to the border, you can illegally cross and get arrested, or just move in to one of the cabins.
    1
  322.  @greylatern  Can I see an example? Mr. Pretenderhead at 36:00. 'Tech companies are trying deliver something you will attend to, AI machines that will analyze your eye movements, to see what you are looking at, they are trying to figure out what you want and deliver it to you fast, Can we trust us, not if we are lying, that makes misinformation, the naked desire for power, the systems get contaminated, look what we are doing, you and I are having a conversation that will be distributed, its a miracle, translators work on my YT content, its very hard to translate YT to other languages, it hasn't been thought through, there is a real time translator, this is unbelievable...this over simplification and demonization has to stop... I talked to democrats who think antifa is illusory, but who think there is a conspiratory force on the right.' [The king of over simplification and demonizing thinks we need to stop that, and in the very next sentence he over simplifies and demonizes democrats who think antifa is illusory and right wing conspiracy is real? Whoops dude. And how did he get from tech companies trying to sell us stuff, duh, to antifa in three sentences? Peterson is amazed at YouTube? Hasn't it been around for like 20 years? If you are lying you are spreading misinformation? This guy's genius is seriously off the charts. It's very hard to translate other languages but there is a real time translator? This guys brain is such total chaos. Dave; a coherent point anywhere in this video? Give me a nudge when you find it.]
    1
  323.  @greylatern  I understand that you feel Peterson is an expert in something and says 90% intelligent stuff... You just don't know where that happened. Feel free to timestamp evidence of your claims.
    1
  324.  @greylatern  Pretenderson at 40:00 talking about antifa, 'how many people identifiable, who the hell are they, are they right or left, 800 antifa, then they don't exist, does it exist, they are agents of chaos, to sow discord, how to we protect ourselves, that is the endless question of the human race, men are less agreeable, women like disagreeable men, women chose their mates, the more disagreeable you are the less compassionate and generous you are, why do women pick disagreeable men, in one city they had a summer of love, so everyone is agreeable, do the psychopaths come out at night, agreeable people share, women have to protect their infants, they need men who can guard, if a man is too masculine they can't communicate, you have to hold the psychopaths down, they are at 3%, the Left says hierarchies are nothing but power, tough men are tougher than tough women, are we going to look at this straightforward and clearly?' [Holy crap Dave, did Peterson just claim he is looking at this straightforward and clearly, after a pointless, unstraightforward, unclear and chaotic rambling that goes from how many antifa there are to women are more agreeable to the summer of love? Help me out Dave, reply to this comment. What precisely is Peterson's point here? Antifa exists or it doesn't exist? Women are more agreeable? I don't think that is true and of course it has absolutely nothing to do with antifa. The Left says hierarchies are nothing but power? Not true. JP made that up. How many Peterson's does it take to unscrew a lightbulb? One, but he does it by rotating the entire house in the opposite direction.]
    1
  325.  @greylatern  Peterson received a multi faceted question? What was it? Did he have a coherent answer?
    1
  326.  @greylatern  Apparently you feel JP is an expert in 90% of what he says here, you just aren't sure what it was, when you figure it out LMK. Let's check out Dr. Potaterson at 10:00: 'Climate change is the biggest health issue of our time, No, overreaching beaurocrats are, China is building nuclear reactors, we can't get our act together to build nuclear in the US, if you are concerned about the poor and the environment you make power as cheap as possible because there is no difference between energy and wealth, there is a bit of the problem getting rid of the waste, save the climate by making power as cheap as possible, as CO2 levels rise plants can grow more in drier environments, I read 200 books what I learned was things are way better than everyone thinks, the biggest environmental problem is over fishing in the ocean... [Help me out Dave, haven't you claimed that JP is some kind of intellectual? What is even remotely intellectual about any of this? There is a bit of a problem getting rid of nuclear waste? Sure Jordan, half life of cancer causing mineral of 50,000 years, a BIT of a problem? We can't get out act together for nuclear in the US? Wrong Jordan, we made an environmental and safety issue to limit new nuclear. You can help the poor by making energy as cheap as possible? Wrong, energy cost is not the biggest part of someone's budget. And making energy cheap helps the environment? Wrong again, cheap energy tends to result in more driving, more air conditioning, more manufacturing, and more consumerism; all at the bottom of the pyramid for environmental damage. Remember when you claim to use multi variate analysis? So why are you over simplifying to 'energy is everything' here? There is no difference between energy and wealth, and climate and everything are the same word? This guy seriously needs a vocabulary lesson and instruction in basic logic. Over reaching beaurocrats are the biggest health issue? Heads up Jordan, do a google search for Covid 19 and bring yourself up to speed with what everyone else in the world has known for the last two years.]
    1
  327.  @greylatern  Peterson had a good point and a thorough explanation? What was it? Peterson's lifetime of research lead him to a conclusion your average middle schooler couldn't figure out on their own? What was it? That we speak to share our thoughts? That if you set goals and strive for them you can reach them? That humans and animals share traits and behaviors? Peterson analyzed some complex data? You have shared your feelings. Start using facts like I do.
    1
  328.  @greylatern  I understand, you feel Peterson had expert points based on research etc. You just aren't sure what it was. LMK when you figure it out.
    1
  329.  @greylatern  I understand, you feel Peterson is intelligent, you aren't sure where that happened. You feel that 90% of what he says is intelligent, but you can't produce 1% of evidence. Facts typically are not the cup of tea for Peterson fans so I understand your fear of facts. We are on different wavelengths as you say. I base my opinion on facts.
    1
  330.  @billyhndrsn4542  Rubin playbook: Show a tiny clip of a couple people talking about a political issue. Make up some stuff to make it look like liberals are dumb. Nothing Rubin claims in the title or in his commentary actually happened in the video, but his gullible conservative fan base swallow it any way.
    1
  331.  @carmiethompson2676  Rubin playbook: Show a tiny clip of a couple people talking about a political issue. Make up some stuff to make it look like liberals are dumb. Nothing Rubin claims in the title or in his commentary actually happened in the video, but his gullible conservative fan base swallow it any way.
    1
  332.  @billyhndrsn4542  Prove Rubin click bait is supported by the content. Good luck. Watch Rubin Peterson greatest speech and tell me when you stop laughing.
    1
  333.  @billyhndrsn4542  Watch the Rubin one that claims that AOC leaves host aghast. Not. And Rubin to show how stupid AOC is points out that early US immigrants came here legally. Uh yeah Dave, they didn't have laws against immigration then. Sorry not impressed.
    1
  334.  @lanaevans7512  We are searching for a profound intellectual idea by Rubin. No one can find one.
    1
  335.  @lanaevans7512  Intellectual reasoning level of Dave Rubin... Look at how dumb her face looks. Dave, are you in the 4th grade?
    1
  336.  @mikestephens5346  Apex of Rubin intellect... Look at how dumb her face looks. Sorry Dave, not impressed.
    1
  337.  @lanaevans7512  NOEM: What has he done, what has he done, he has done nothing with tools and policy, he doesn't let us do our job, he will not keep us safe. RUBIN: She is saying what everyone knows, no one believes the federal government is doing their job, border agents don't like to be a travel agent, you can go to Chicago. The democrat party, one of your few jobs dude. Dave, this alleged Host is stumped by question turned against her? Where did that happen exactly? Here is what happened, Noem shared her made up feelings that Biden has done nothing with tools and policy, and then Rubin shared his made-up feelings that no one believes the federal government is doing their job and border agents are forced to act as travel agents. At somewhere around the 80th percentile for gullibility you become a Rubin believer. Rubin and his fans aren't really fans of facts, but: WHAT TRUMP DID: In March 2020, at the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic, the Trump administration invoked Title 42, a controversial statute ostensibly meant as a public health measure. The policy allowed US authorities to swiftly expel migrants - including asylum seekers - at the border. Nearly 400,000 people were detained and expelled between its implementation and January 2021, when Mr Trump left the White House. WHAT BIDEN DID: He defended keeping Title 42 in place, using the pandemic as justification. Over 2.28 million people were expelled using Title 42 authority between January 2021 and March 2023, the last month for which data is available. But when the US ended its coronavirus public health emergency on May 11, Title 42 expired with it. To replace it, US immigration authorities unveiled a "carrot and stick" approach that encourages legal pathways, while also implementing strict penalties for those who cross illegally. They have opened regional processing centres in Latin America aimed at helping migrants apply to come to the US and expanded access to CBP One, an app migrants can use to schedule asylum appointments. People who cross illegally will be deported, barred from re-entering the US for at least five years, and be "presumed ineligible for asylum", according to Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
    1
  338. Actually if you think JP has solutions you are brainwashed.
    1
  339.  @screamtoasigh9984  What is your solution to regulating greed?
    1
  340.  @alicepyne-jahneke8042  Here is my plan. List the benefits to the economic and mental health of the nation from my idea on income inequity and regulating greed: INCOME EQUITY: The most common political solution to the struggling poor in the US is raise the minimum wage. This has the flaw of harming some small businesses and increasing inflation, and places the burden equally on struggling small businesses and ultra wealthy mega corporations. Here is my solution. Guaranteed federal housing program; you work 3 years at any job and you qualify to buy something, with a mortgage at 30% of your income. This is funded by a 70% marginal tax rate above $400,000 per year including capital gains. Get the working poor out from under the thumb of wealthy investors. 3 years even working at Target qualifies you for an affordable mortgage. You still have to pay that mortgage like anyone else or you default.
    1
  341.  @DieselVR6  List the benefits to the economic and mental health of the nation from my idea on income inequity and regulating greed: INCOME EQUITY: The most common political solution to the struggling poor in the US is raise the minimum wage. This has the flaw of harming some small businesses and increasing inflation, and places the burden equally on struggling small businesses and ultra wealthy mega corporations. Here is my solution. Guaranteed federal housing program; you work 3 years at any job and you qualify to buy something, with a mortgage at 30% of your income. This is funded by a 70% marginal tax rate above $400,000 per year including capital gains. Get the working poor out from under the thumb of wealthy investors. 3 years even working at Target qualifies you for an affordable mortgage. You still have to pay that mortgage like anyone else or you default.
    1
  342. Pretenderson at 40:00 talking about antifa, 'how many people identifiable, who the hell are they, are they right or left, 800 antifa, then they don't exist, does it exist, they are agents of chaos, to sow discord, how to we protect ourselves, that is the endless question of the human race, men are less agreeable, women like disagreeable men, women chose their mates, the more disagreeable you are the less compassionate and generous you are, why do women pick disagreeable men, in one city they had a summer of love, so everyone is agreeable, do the psychopaths come out at night, agreeable people share, women have to protect their infants, they need men who can guard, if a man is too masculine they can't communicate, you have to hold the psychopaths down, they are at 3%, the Left says hierarchies are nothing but power, tough men are tougher than tough women, are we going to look at this straightforward and clearly?' [Holy crap Dave, did Peterson just claim he is looking at this straightforward and clearly, after a pointless, unstraightforward, unclear and chaotic rambling that goes from how many antifa there are to women are more agreeable to the summer of love? Help me out Dave, reply to this comment. What precisely is Peterson's point here? Antifa exists or it doesn't exist? Women are more agreeable? I don't think that is true and of course it has absolutely nothing to do with antifa. The Left says hierarchies are nothing but power? Not true. JP made that up. How many Peterson's does it take to unscrew a lightbulb? One, but he does it by rotating the entire house in the opposite direction.]
    1
  343. Also Dave, can you give Peterson a basic lesson in political ideology? Antifa is far Left in the same way Alt Right is far Right. Alt Right tend to like Peterson, antifa would hate him. I would classify Peterson here like a jellyfish bouncing around in a sea of words, producing random sentences, but with a pull doll string attached to it that periodically spews one of Peterson's safe words... Women are more agreeable, the Left says our hierarchies are of power...
    1
  344. Is Rubin joking? JP most important speech? Dave? Please timestamp and quote an important and useful idea by JP anywhere in this entire video. Good luck. Well the most important speech JP has ever made; not a very high bar. 'Identity is the proper union of faith and responsibility. It does that in a hierarchical subsidiary manner, if you have conflict, you need a counter position, that is subsidiary structure. Jacob's ladder the vine that unites the material and proximal realm of the earth with the eternal realm of heaven, how do we climb it, there is a vision of how we build ourselves, a glorious macro-vision; it is the proximal beginnings, we scaffold ourselves upward from the finite to the infinite, the scaffold constitutes our identity...' 'Sacrifice makes a difference, the hierarchy of identity, the lower to the higher, proximal hedonic whims, the payback is good, to escape from primordial narcissism, some things go wrong with children, having children can be rewarding, there is no technical difference between thinking about yourself and being miserable, serve a higher purpose, technically, think about a fork and a table and a plate as a microcosm of the universe, that is all real, we forgot responsibility...'
    1
  345. NOEM: What has he done, what has he done, he has done nothing with tools and policy, he doesn't let us do our job, he will not keep us safe. RUBIN: She is saying what everyone knows, no one believes the federal government is doing their job, border agents don't like to be a travel agent, you can go to Chicago. The democrat party, one of your few jobs dude. Dave, this alleged Host is stumped by question turned against her? Where did that happen exactly? Here is what happened, Noem shared her made up feelings that Biden has done nothing with tools and policy, and then Rubin shared his made-up feelings that no one believes the federal government is doing their job and border agents are forced to act as travel agents. At somewhere around the 80th percentile for gullibility you become a Rubin believer. Rubin and his fans aren't really fans of facts, but: WHAT TRUMP DID: In March 2020, at the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic, the Trump administration invoked Title 42, a controversial statute ostensibly meant as a public health measure. The policy allowed US authorities to swiftly expel migrants - including asylum seekers - at the border. Nearly 400,000 people were detained and expelled between its implementation and January 2021, when Mr Trump left the White House. WHAT BIDEN DID: He defended keeping Title 42 in place, using the pandemic as justification. Over 2.28 million people were expelled using Title 42 authority between January 2021 and March 2023, the last month for which data is available. But when the US ended its coronavirus public health emergency on May 11, Title 42 expired with it. To replace it, US immigration authorities unveiled a "carrot and stick" approach that encourages legal pathways, while also implementing strict penalties for those who cross illegally. They have opened regional processing centres in Latin America aimed at helping migrants apply to come to the US and expanded access to CBP One, an app migrants can use to schedule asylum appointments. People who cross illegally will be deported, barred from re-entering the US for at least five years, and be "presumed ineligible for asylum", according to Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
    1
  346.  @TT-uy5el  No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  347.  @mogstonks6250  JP is a fake intellectual, I am a real intellectual since I realize that we do not understand pre-experimental thinking, so we try to explain it in terms that we do understand – which means that we explain it away, define it as nonsense. After all, we think scientifically – so we believe – and we think we know what that means (since scientific thinking can in principle be defined). We are familiar with scientific thinking, and value it highly – so we tend to presume that that is all there is to thinking (that all other “forms of thought” are approximations, at best, to the ideal of scientific thought). But this is not accurate. Thinking also and more fundamentally is specification of value – is specification of implication for behavior. This means that categorization, with regards to value –determination (or even perception) of what constitutes a single thing, or class of things – is the act of grouping together according to implication for behavior.  Do you agree?
    1
  348.  @MatthewC137  JP is a fake intellectual, I am a real intellectual since I realize that we do not understand pre-experimental thinking, so we try to explain it in terms that we do understand – which means that we explain it away, define it as nonsense. After all, we think scientifically – so we believe – and we think we know what that means (since scientific thinking can in principle be defined). We are familiar with scientific thinking, and value it highly – so we tend to presume that that is all there is to thinking (that all other “forms of thought” are approximations, at best, to the ideal of scientific thought). But this is not accurate. Thinking also and more fundamentally is specification of value – is specification of implication for behavior. This means that categorization, with regards to value –determination (or even perception) of what constitutes a single thing, or class of things – is the act of grouping together according to implication for behavior.  Do you agree?
    1
  349.  @mogstonks6250  I shared some intellectual ideas.
    1
  350.  @MatthewC137  True, Peterson is not a real intellectual since he states that he is on the cover of his new book. And true, neither you or me can find an intellectual idea by Peterson. See, we actually agree!
    1
  351.  @MatthewC137  I think it is super cool that we agreed JP is not an intellectual. What else did you want to discuss?
    1
  352.  @MatthewC137  I agree, Peterson was infantile, like who on earth needs him to explain compassion or love? Moving past that... What do we disagree on?
    1
  353.  @MatthewC137  You... Real intellectuals never claim they are intellectual. Cover of Peterson new book... I am the West's leading intellectual. Conclusion... You agree Peterson is not an intellectual.
    1
  354.  @winstonsol8713  True, Peterson buffoonery is embarrassing... Compassion isn't a virtue, we shouldn't treat adults like infants. False statement followed by Strawman.
    1
  355.  @MatthewC137  It wasn't the new york times that said that, and if you are paying the slightest bit of attention, you realize that JP entire narcissist goal is to portray himself as an intellectual, the self-appointed explainer of the world, only comfortable when he attempts to be the smartest guy in the room. But we continue our quest for an intellectual idea by JP.
    1
  356.  @MatthewC137  Try this; quote a coherent, intellectual, profound, insightful, useful idea by JP on any subject anywhere. I am on the edge of my seat. Here are some non-examples: Jordan's 13th Rule; We don't understand consciousness, we don't know where it fits in the cosmos. [Jordan, how about not projecting your personal confusion about consciousness on to everyone else?] Jordan's 14th Rule; How do you arrange books? Using the axiomatic structure of your a priori perceptions manifesting as self evident fact to your ignorant mind. Jordan's 15 Rule; The best way for me to interact is individual to individual and as if they are part of the process by which things we don't understand can yet be explored and by things that aren't properly organized in our society can yet be set right. Jordan's 16th Rule; Free speech also is the mechanism by which we generate the conceptions that allow us to organize our experience in the world, it is the mechanism that allows us to reformulate and criticize those conceptions when they become outdated and sterile, to reanimate them in a new form so we can move into the future Jordan's 17th Rule; There is no evidence that women can create social organizations. Jordan's 18th Rule, Hard core clinical psychology research has determined that perception influences behavior. [Yes Jordan, when I perceive I am thirsty my behavior is to go to the fridge for a drink.] Jordan's 19th Rule; There is something to us. [Uh sure Jordan, a bit pointless and ambiguous however.] Jordan's 20th Rule; I realized psychologically that the future is in a sense actually unpredictable. [You needed psychology to figure that out Jordan? I figured it out without psychology.] Jordan's 21 Rule: It is hard to get in to Harvard and it takes good SAT scores. [Yes Jordan, everyone already knows that.] Jordan's 22 Rule: The world is not objects, it is the harmonious interplay of patterns, you dance with the world, you don't want a person who will dominate you sexually during the initial dance . Jordan's 23 Rule: If you have a functional identity, when you act it out in the world you get what you want and need. [I am pretty sure I have a function, and an identity, and I act out in the world, but merely wanting something is no promise that I will get it. Sorry Jordan If/Then logic failure on your part.] Jordan's 24 Rule: I highly recommend that you try and put yourself together. [Wow, I am totally going to do that now that you told me.] Jordan's 25th Rule: The biblical corpus is a collection of narratives that shine a different light of characterization on the spirit that occupies the pinnacle in the hierarchy of perception. [Huh?] Jordan's 26th Rule: I have been thinking for 40 years and I realized that you have to prioritize your perceptions. Prioritize means some things are more important than others in a hierarchy. Does that hierarchy have to be unified or not. There is an immediate existential consequence to not having a hierarchy of perceptual priority. You need a hierarchy to filter the world and what is at the highest point of the hierarchy. Jordan's 27th Rule: There are no models of animal industriousness, there is nothing random about dreams, no one advises a loved one to get an abortion, we don't have an overpopulation problem, the women's movement didn't advance women's rights, plenty of them are saying there should be no such thing as hierarchies, our hierarchies are of competence not power, no one knows that the world has improved in every way in the last 50 years including the environment, the West is an oppressive patriarchy but the West is not an oppressive patriarchy.... Jordan's 28th Rule: 'You want to fight the dragons that guard the gate to the treasure that you wish to attain, productivity requires aim and responsibility, discipline and willingness to work, it orients you solidly in the world and gives you a dragon to fight, do you want to be illiterate, you have to think, you can't build muscle at the gym unless you lift weights, face your being with the necessity of transformation, those are the dragons, you have to say to yourself 'I will do good.'
    1
  357.  @MatthewC137  The New York times said that? Which staff person? I agree, you can't find an intellectual idea by Peterson! JP is a fake intellectual. I am a real intellectual since I realize things that JP does not, for example that characterization is a precondition for individual freedom, there is no technical difference between thinking about yourself and being miserable, cognitive systems have axiomatic levels, and compassion doesn't scale as you move up the hierarchy of complexity, and also that the biblical corpus is a collection of narratives that shine a different light on the hierarchy of perception. What faith means is that you act out the proposition that you can ride the wave as big as it comes, all together in good will. Canonical patterns of being for what we act out in the world, waves of behavioral patterns across time, no one in their right mind would argue that numbers are not true, there are stories about you and you and you and the human experience as such, the thing is the pattern of their being, the process has been occurring for thousands of years, a representation of the distillation of the process, fairy tales that are really old, cultures that don't change stay the same, while creatures with nervous systems watch each other. Jordan Peterson JP doesn't have the intellectual ability I have, since I realize that the future is unpredictable technically, you are not a clockwork machine, what does free will mean, you are not a deterministic clockwork machine, I move my arm in a complex way, I set it up in a deterministic way, as we implement our actions the horizon of possibility collapses into a deterministic actuality, the farther out into the future, the less deterministic our perceptions necessarily become, you are a visionary, you have to reconfigure how you think scientifically, you think there are objects and you react to those objects, and that is not true, you don't see objects, none of that is true, you don't see objects you see patterns that are functional.
    1
  358.  @MatthewC137  JP is a fake intellectual.  I am a real intellectual since I realize things that JP does not, for example that characterization is a precondition for individual freedom, there is no technical difference between thinking about yourself and being miserable, cognitive systems have axiomatic levels, and compassion doesn't scale as you move up the hierarchy of complexity, and also that the biblical corpus is a collection of narratives that shine a different light on the hierarchy of perception.  What faith means is that you act out the proposition that you can ride the wave as big as it comes, all together in good will.  Canonical patterns of being for what we act out in the world, waves of behavioral patterns across time, no one in their right mind would argue that numbers are not true, there are stories about you and you and you and the human experience as such, the thing is the pattern of their being, the process has been occurring for thousands of years, a representation of the distillation of the process, fairy tales that are really old, cultures that don't change stay the same, while creatures with nervous systems watch each other. Jordan Peterson JP doesn't have the intellectual ability I have, since I realize that the future is unpredictable technically, you are not a clockwork machine, what does free will mean, you are not a deterministic clockwork machine, I move my arm in a complex way, I set it up in a deterministic way, as we implement our actions the horizon of possibility collapses into a deterministic actuality, the farther out into the future, the less deterministic our perceptions necessarily become, you are a visionary, you have to reconfigure how you think scientifically, you think there are objects and you react to those objects, and that is not true, you don't see objects, none of that is true, you don't see objects you see patterns that are functional.
    1
  359.  @MatthewC137  Which NYT staff person said that? Was it fact checked like they do for every thing their staff submit? Grow a pair, and produce an intellectual idea by JP on any subject anywhere. Any of these? Jordan's 13th Rule; We don't understand consciousness, we don't know where it fits in the cosmos. [Jordan, how about not projecting your personal confusion about consciousness on to everyone else?] Jordan's 14th Rule; How do you arrange books? Using the axiomatic structure of your a priori perceptions manifesting as self evident fact to your ignorant mind. Jordan's 15 Rule; The best way for me to interact is individual to individual and as if they are part of the process by which things we don't understand can yet be explored and by things that aren't properly organized in our society can yet be set right. Jordan's 16th Rule; Free speech also is the mechanism by which we generate the conceptions that allow us to organize our experience in the world, it is the mechanism that allows us to reformulate and criticize those conceptions when they become outdated and sterile, to reanimate them in a new form so we can move into the future Jordan's 17th Rule; There is no evidence that women can create social organizations. Jordan's 18th Rule, Hard core clinical psychology research has determined that perception influences behavior. [Yes Jordan, when I perceive I am thirsty my behavior is to go to the fridge for a drink.] Jordan's 19th Rule; There is something to us. [Uh sure Jordan, a bit pointless and ambiguous however.] Jordan's 20th Rule; I realized psychologically that the future is in a sense actually unpredictable. [You needed psychology to figure that out Jordan? I figured it out without psychology.] Jordan's 21 Rule: It is hard to get in to Harvard and it takes good SAT scores. [Yes Jordan, everyone already knows that.] Jordan's 22 Rule: The world is not objects, it is the harmonious interplay of patterns, you dance with the world, you don't want a person who will dominate you sexually during the initial dance . Jordan's 23 Rule: If you have a functional identity, when you act it out in the world you get what you want and need. [I am pretty sure I have a function, and an identity, and I act out in the world, but merely wanting something is no promise that I will get it. Sorry Jordan If/Then logic failure on your part.] Jordan's 24 Rule: I highly recommend that you try and put yourself together. [Wow, I am totally going to do that now that you told me.] Jordan's 25th Rule: The biblical corpus is a collection of narratives that shine a different light of characterization on the spirit that occupies the pinnacle in the hierarchy of perception. [Huh?] Jordan's 26th Rule: I have been thinking for 40 years and I realized that you have to prioritize your perceptions. Prioritize means some things are more important than others in a hierarchy. Does that hierarchy have to be unified or not. There is an immediate existential consequence to not having a hierarchy of perceptual priority. You need a hierarchy to filter the world and what is at the highest point of the hierarchy.
    1
  360.  @MatthewC137  Grow a pair and produce an intellectual idea by Peterson. BTW which nyt staff person said that?
    1
  361.  @MatthewC137  We agree again. Neither of us can find an intellectual idea by Peterson!
    1
  362.  @JK-uo3pd  Everyone on earth knows what love is, an no one needs JP to explain it to us. Love is complicated man? What a joke.
    1
  363.  @MatthewC137  we continue our quest for an intellectual idea by JP...JP is a fake intellectual, I am a real intellectual since I realize that we do not understand pre-experimental thinking, so we try to explain it in terms that we do understand – which means that we explain it away, define it as nonsense. After all, we think scientifically – so we believe – and we think we know what that means (since scientific thinking can in principle be defined). We are familiar with scientific thinking, and value it highly – so we tend to presume that that is all there is to thinking (that all other “forms of thought” are approximations, at best, to the ideal of scientific thought). But this is not accurate. Thinking also and more fundamentally is specification of value – is specification of implication for behavior. This means that categorization, with regards to value –determination (or even perception) of what constitutes a single thing, or class of things – is the act of grouping together according to implication for behavior. Do you agree?
    1
  364.  @IphigeniaAtAulis  No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  365.  @darrenstamm2857  Did Peterson say something intelligent in this video?
    1
  366.  @RunBayou  Did Peterson say something intelligent?
    1
  367.  @Birdracer22  One of them said something intelligent? Timestamp and quote please. Thanks.
    1
  368.  @Birdracer22  I made no counterarguments? False. Maybe you haven't seen any. BTW do you agree with Peterson when he says the West is an oppressive patriarchy? If you do stumble across an intelligent statement by Peterson LMK.
    1
  369.  @Kipperbob  Peterson fans have a hive mind and blind ideology....they hear his fancy words and feel he must be saying something intelligent, but they can't put their finger on what it is.
    1
  370.  @Kipperbob  Like I said I can predict that as a Peterson fan you will state that he intelligently tackles complex issues ... But you don't know where that happened. Typical of blind conservative ideology. Peterson calls the Left ignorant, and then you join his flock assuming he must have wisdom. You feel there is obvious evidence of his wisdom, but provide none.
    1
  371.  @Kipperbob  Timestamp and quote Peterson presenting an excellent analysis of a complex idea anywhere in this video, or in any video,if you can find one.
    1
  372.  @Kipperbob  Like I said, as a blind conservative JP ideologue I can predict what you say before you say it; You feel he has great skills at dissecting complex ideas...you just don't know where that happened. You feel you have read the JP literature but you can't quote a single idea by Peterson that supports your beliefs. I am the one with evidence and you have none...and you conclude I am the ignorant one? I can predict that response from you also. LMK if you have any evidence whatsoever. Watch how I do it. Let's check out Dr. Potaterson at 10:00: 'Climate change is the biggest health issue of our time, No, overreaching beaurocrats are, China is building nuclear reactors, we can't get our act together to build nuclear in the US, if you are concerned about the poor and the environment you make power as cheap as possible because there is no difference between energy and wealth, there is a bit of the problem getting rid of the waste, save the climate by making power as cheap as possible, as CO2 levels rise plants can grow more in drier environments, I read 200 books what I learned was things are way better than everyone thinks, the biggest environmental problem is over fishing in the ocean... [Help me out Dave, haven't you claimed that JP is some kind of intellectual? What is even remotely intellectual about any of this? There is a bit of a problem getting rid of nuclear waste? Sure Jordan, half life of cancer causing mineral of 50,000 years, a BIT of a problem? We can't get out act together for nuclear in the US? Wrong Jordan, we made an environmental and safety issue to limit new nuclear. You can help the poor by making energy as cheap as possible? Wrong, energy cost is not the biggest part of someone's budget. And making energy cheap helps the environment? Wrong again, cheap energy tends to result in more driving, more air conditioning, more manufacturing, and more consumerism; all at the bottom of the pyramid for environmental damage. Remember when you claim to use multi variate analysis? So why are you over simplifying to 'energy is everything' here? There is no difference between energy and wealth, and climate and everything are the same word? This guy seriously needs a vocabulary lesson and instruction in basic logic. Over reaching beaurocrats are the biggest health issue? Heads up Jordan, do a google search for Covid 19 and bring yourself up to speed with what everyone else in the world has known for the last two years.] Pretenderson at 40:00 talking about antifa, 'how many people identifiable, who the hell are they, are they right or left, 800 antifa, then they don't exist, does it exist, they are agents of chaos, to sow discord, how to we protect ourselves, that is the endless question of the human race, men are less agreeable, women like disagreeable men, women chose their mates, the more disagreeable you are the less compassionate and generous you are, why do women pick disagreeable men, in one city they had a summer of love, so everyone is agreeable, do the psychopaths come out at night, agreeable people share, women have to protect their infants, they need men who can guard, if a man is too masculine they can't communicate, you have to hold the psychopaths down, they are at 3%, the Left says hierarchies are nothing but power, tough men are tougher than tough women, are we going to look at this straightforward and clearly?' [Holy crap Dave, did Peterson just claim he is looking at this straightforward and clearly, after a pointless, unstraightforward, unclear and chaotic rambling that goes from how many antifa there are to women are more agreeable to the summer of love? Help me out Dave, reply to this comment. What precisely is Peterson's point here? Antifa exists or it doesn't exist? Women are more agreeable? I don't think that is true and of course it has absolutely nothing to do with antifa. The Left says hierarchies are nothing but power? Not true. JP made that up. How many Peterson's does it take to unscrew a lightbulb? One, but he does it by rotating the entire house in the opposite direction.]
    1
  373.  @Kipperbob  You: How is it that all I need to know is how you line up on one issue and I can more or less predict how you line up on everything? Me: Because you are a conservative JP fan I can predict you will state your feelings that JP has great wisdom but you don't know where that happened. You will conclude that I am ignorant simply because I use evidence to criticize JP. You: Conservative media they don't lie about their obvious Conservative bias, they separate their opinion from news broadcasting. Me: You are joking right? Have you watched Tucker Carlson lately? He expresses his conservative spin as news all the time.
    1
  374.  @Kipperbob  Ok, Tucker on Fox News is not of the opinion that he is presenting news.
    1
  375.  @Kipperbob  Like I said, as a conservative JP fan I can predict what you will say... 'Peterson is a great intellectual who is brilliant at explaining complex ideas', you just don't know where that happened, because you are driven by an ideology of feelings with no factual basis. If you figure what facts you are basing your feelings on, LMK, as an ideologue however this will be virtually impossible for you.
    1
  376.  @Kipperbob  You say --- he's really read stuff thoroughly and really questioned the text. [Can I see an example of JP reaching an insightful conclusion about any complex idea, in this video or anywhere else?]
    1
  377.  @Kipperbob  Thank you again for your feelings. Try using facts like I do. Quote and analyze. The fact that you have presented exactly zero facts while claiming you have presented no feelings is the reason you think Peterson is an intellectual...the incapacity for analytical thought. Once you cross into the realm of analytical reasoning, you lose the ideology required for Peterson fanship. You claim you can predict what liberals say while demonstrating that a liberal like me can predict your ideology. You...I feel Peterson is an expert intellectual with complex ideas... But I literally never use feelings... Whoops. I win.
    1
  378.  @Kipperbob  Thank you again for your feelings. Maybe you have some friends who can explain facts to you? One last question that may be within your cognitive grasp...How many abodiginals do you see modelling?
    1
  379. According to Peterson people are astounded at his revelation that responsibility is more important than happiness. Anyone astounded at that? Not me. What if responsibility brings you happiness? If responsibility brings you happiness wouldn't happiness be more important? Is Peterson telling people who are striving for happiness that they are wrong? According to Peterson if you try at your job you may be promoted? Uh Ok. And now on to hierarchies the Left and power...this guy reminds me of a string pull doll that has a battery of like 12 phrases that surface randomly. If Peterson ever has a solution to anything can someone wake me up.
    1
  380. No one can find an intellectual coherent useful idea by Peterson
    1
  381. No one can find an intellectual idea by JP.
    1
  382.  @SB-mw1bg  Rubin twists facts all the time.
    1
  383. Vote by mail or electronically prevents it.
    1
  384.  @bastidface  How do the mules get the ballots?
    1
  385.  @willittrue3856  How do the mules get the ballots?
    1
  386. Politicians don't listen to JP, for one thing he never has a solution to anything, and his theories are non science.
    1
  387. Both of them are fake intellectuals. Peterson is delusional and incoherent from start to finish in this.
    1
  388.  @Max-jl2ie  You found an intelligent coherent idea by Peterson? Where?
    1
  389.  @Max-jl2ie  Ok I can't find an intelligent statement by Peterson in this video either. If you find one LMK. So he was intelligent somewhere else? Where?
    1
  390.  @Max-jl2ie  20:00 We should have careful differentiated thoughtful thorough detail-oriented thinking that will produce solutions, there is no discussion about what are we aiming at here, how about copious energy that is clean for everyone, resilient stable systems...There is manure from cows, people go to the bathroom, there is not zero pollution...the only thing you should care about is cheap energy, what makes people prosperous and secure, work, what is work, it is the expenditure of energy, what is energy, work, what is work, wealth, [What an absolute idiot, he claims we need thoughtful detailed solutions and his unthoughtful, undetailed, uncareful idea is lots of cheap energy? You just said you need well thought out detailed plans, and your well thought out detailed plan is how about clean energy and stable systems? There is no discussion about what we are aiming at? You just mentioned the aim one sentence ago; Net Zero. Heads up dork brain, the concept is Net Zero, not Zero] [If you care about poor people, The only thing you should care about is cheap energy... Wrong. What makes people prosperous... work, wrong not if that work is at minimum wage. Work is the expenditure of energy - wrong. What is energy - work, wrong. What is work, wealth, wrong.] Dave, If JP says a single accurate useful statement about anything in this entire interview, can you let me know where that is?
    1
  391.  @NullParadigm  voting by mail is awesome.
    1
  392.  @mattp5991  Voting by mail is awesome.
    1
  393.  @mattp5991  How does the fraud occur? You get your ballot in the mail, you take your time to fill it out, you mail it back in. The more people who vote carefully the better wouldn't you say?
    1
  394.  @Boomslang55  How do the mules get the ballots? To vote you have to have an address and a social security number. That's pretty secure.
    1
  395. Did Rubin or Megyn say anything intelligent?
    1
  396.  @Mrimperfections777  We are searching for a coherent insightful idea by JP. No one can find one.
    1
  397.  @joshb6993  We are searching for an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  398.  @joshb6993  JP is a fake intellectual, I am a real intellectual since I realize that we do not understand pre-experimental thinking, so we try to explain it in terms that we do understand – which means that we explain it away, define it as nonsense. After all, we think scientifically – so we believe – and we think we know what that means (since scientific thinking can in principle be defined). We are familiar with scientific thinking, and value it highly – so we tend to presume that that is all there is to thinking (that all other “forms of thought” are approximations, at best, to the ideal of scientific thought). But this is not accurate. Thinking also and more fundamentally is specification of value – is specification of implication for behavior. This means that categorization, with regards to value –determination (or even perception) of what constitutes a single thing, or class of things – is the act of grouping together according to implication for behavior.  Do you agree?
    1
  399.  @joshb6993  I think you mean maps of gibberish, an assembly of chaos.
    1
  400. Let's randomly check in to these two guys at around 20:00: D: 'I was completely moved by the idea of having something to believe in beyond logic and reason. I know now that I can't control everything. I have a link to my ancestors. There is something that sits beneath our rationale.' J: 'We live in a story. To forge a path and gather what is valuable. That makes your life more meaningful. The Christians have an explanation. It is a deep idea.' [Apparently Dave is deeply moved at having something to believe in that sits beneath our rationale. Pretty low bar for being deeply moved Dave. Peterson astonishes us that forging a path, and gathering valuable things is meaningful. I am so totally impressed.]
    1
  401.  @michaelcolthart4006  We are searching for an intellectual idea by JP. No one can find one.
    1
  402.  @NiWdLES  Compassion is a virtue, no one is arguing for treating adults like infants, straw man by Peterson, encouragement requires judgement, duh, no one is arguing it doesn't, another straw man by Peterson, love is complicated man? Wow, Jordan that is a deeply intellectual idea. Your turn, a profound intellectual coherent useful idea by Peterson in this or any other video, go...
    1
  403.  @NiWdLES  If you note, Rubin has a habit of posting click bait and stating his analysis of something that isn't remotely supported by the content of his videos. Watch JP ARC speech that Rubin claims is his 'greatest speech'. It is absolute tearful rambling nonsense from start to finish, similar to this egomaniacal nonsense in this video. 'Compassion isn't a virtue, compassion is a reflex, treating adults like infants is not virtuous, love is a blend of compassion and encouragement and truth, it is complicated man, to foster growth requires judgement... [What an absolute load of crap. Who on earth needs JP to tell us what love is or how to treat adults or to explain encouragement and truth? Is Rubin trying to claim that JP is sharing something worthwhile?]
    1
  404.  @C.is.for.Classified  The rambling whimper where I quoted Peterson has no coherent thought? See we agree.
    1
  405.  @TheCompleteGuitarist  We continue our quest for an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  406.  @TheCompleteGuitarist  Try this. Quote JP having a profound useful idea anywhere in this video. I can't wait to see it. Or in any YT video for that matter. JP is a fake intellectual, I am a real intellectual since I realize that we do not understand pre-experimental thinking, so we try to explain it in terms that we do understand – which means that we explain it away, define it as nonsense. After all, we think scientifically – so we believe – and we think we know what that means (since scientific thinking can in principle be defined). We are familiar with scientific thinking, and value it highly – so we tend to presume that that is all there is to thinking (that all other “forms of thought” are approximations, at best, to the ideal of scientific thought). But this is not accurate. Thinking also and more fundamentally is specification of value – is specification of implication for behavior. This means that categorization, with regards to value –determination (or even perception) of what constitutes a single thing, or class of things – is the act of grouping together according to implication for behavior. Do you agree?
    1
  407.  @TheCompleteGuitarist  The world is filling up with adult children who are incapable of anything but video games? By filing up, what percent of 8 billion, and how do you or Peterson know this?
    1
  408.  @TheCompleteGuitarist  I agree. You can't find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  409.  @TheCompleteGuitarist  I am a credible scientist and evolutionary neuro biologist, and love is complicated man... Jordan Peterson.
    1
  410.  @bogdanpopescu1401  Has Peterson ever said anything that you didn't know already?
    1
  411.  @reubengwyn  Has Peterson ever offered a solution to anything?
    1
  412.  @reubengwyn  JP said something useful and logical in this video? timestamp and quote?
    1
  413.  @C.is.for.Classified  We are searching for a useful profound idea by JP, no one can find one. JP is a fake intellectual, I am a real intellectual since I realize that we do not understand pre-experimental thinking, so we try to explain it in terms that we do understand – which means that we explain it away, define it as nonsense. After all, we think scientifically – so we believe – and we think we know what that means (since scientific thinking can in principle be defined). We are familiar with scientific thinking, and value it highly – so we tend to presume that that is all there is to thinking (that all other “forms of thought” are approximations, at best, to the ideal of scientific thought). But this is not accurate. Thinking also and more fundamentally is specification of value – is specification of implication for behavior. This means that categorization, with regards to value –determination (or even perception) of what constitutes a single thing, or class of things – is the act of grouping together according to implication for behavior. Do you agree?
    1
  414.  @reubengwyn  JP has a simple self help message that helps people who need it. I fully support him helping people. My question is has he ever offered a solution to anything; by that I mean a solution to a world issue, not some advice most parents give their fourth graders.
    1
  415.  @C.is.for.Classified  We continue our quest for an intellectual idea by JP. JP is a fake intellectual, I am a real intellectual since I realize that we do not understand pre-experimental thinking, so we try to explain it in terms that we do understand – which means that we explain it away, define it as nonsense. After all, we think scientifically – so we believe – and we think we know what that means (since scientific thinking can in principle be defined). We are familiar with scientific thinking, and value it highly – so we tend to presume that that is all there is to thinking (that all other “forms of thought” are approximations, at best, to the ideal of scientific thought). But this is not accurate. Thinking also and more fundamentally is specification of value – is specification of implication for behavior. This means that categorization, with regards to value –determination (or even perception) of what constitutes a single thing, or class of things – is the act of grouping together according to implication for behavior. Do you agree?
    1
  416.  @Nonreligeousthiestic  We continue our quest for an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  417.  @C.is.for.Classified  Actually that psychobabble gibberish is from maps of meaning. See after all this time we agree Peterson is psychobabble gibberish!
    1
  418.  @C.is.for.Classified  I  am  pretty sure that the best way for me to interact is individual to individual and as if they are part of the process by which things we don't understand can yet be explored and by things that aren't properly organized in our society can yet be set right and free speech also is the mechanism by which we generate the conceptions that allow us to organize our experience in the world, it is the mechanism that allows us to reformulate and criticize those conceptions when they become outdated and sterile, to reanimate them in a new form so we can move into the future.  The principles are good, what is the underlying meta principle, orient to the highest good, towards good, and be nice to other people, the divine spirit that unites us with other people that is what the monotheistic tendency tilts towards portray psychologically, if your principles are coherent then there is a meta principle that unites them, what is that meta principle and how do you conduct yourself, there is a moral element that shapes your behavior.  [Do you agree?]
    1
  419.  @Nonreligeousthiestic  I  am  pretty sure that the best way for me to interact is individual to individual and as if they are part of the process by which things we don't understand can yet be explored and by things that aren't properly organized in our society can yet be set right and free speech also is the mechanism by which we generate the conceptions that allow us to organize our experience in the world, it is the mechanism that allows us to reformulate and criticize those conceptions when they become outdated and sterile, to reanimate them in a new form so we can move into the future.  The principles are good, what is the underlying meta principle, orient to the highest good, towards good, and be nice to other people, the divine spirit that unites us with other people that is what the monotheistic tendency tilts towards portray psychologically, if your principles are coherent then there is a meta principle that unites them, what is that meta principle and how do you conduct yourself, there is a moral element that shapes your behavior.  [Do you agree?]
    1
  420.  @pyros4333  JP advocates for humility and patience? Are you joking? Not traits he possesses.
    1
  421.  @hobojungle1  Improved title of this video: Dave Rubin Click Bait of Something that Didn't Happen.
    1
  422.  @clv603  True, lower minds find Peterson insightful.
    1
  423.  @bw2285  No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  424.  @lagarttemido  We are searching for an intellectual idea by JP.
    1
  425.  @lagarttemido  I am a credible scientist and evolutionary neuro biologist... And love is complicated man. Jordan Peterson.
    1
  426.  @pdavid000  Peterson said something intelligent?
    1
  427.  @onusgumboot5565  Sychophant is not the perfect word. More accurately people who automatically assume he is intelligent without actually paying attention to what he says.
    1
  428.  @annarodriguez9868  Did Peterson say something intelligent in this video?
    1
  429.  @annarodriguez9868  Cool we agree. Neither of us can find an intelligent coherent idea by Peterson.
    1
  430.  @pdavid000  Peterson said something intelligent?
    1
  431.  @annarodriguez9868  If you do stumble across this alleged intelligent coherent idea by Peterson or Rubin LMK. I promise to check it out.
    1
  432.  @annarodriguez9868  So clean your room before calling out others is your bar for intelligent? What I am asking you to do is timestamp and quote Peterson making an insightful coherent point anywhere in this video. Peterson said X at timestamp Y and it is intelligent and coherent because Z. So far like Peterson sheep as a rule, you feel he is intelligent, you just can't articulate where that happened.
    1
  433.  @annarodriguez9868  50:00 If you were oriented in the highest manner you could be oriented then the contents of your categories would be subservient to the good, and you have to be immensely cynical to think that will to power is a more powerful force than that, that cynicism devours the world and we dont want to do that... [The contents of your categories? We don't want to devour the world? They grow the best shrooms in Canada for sure.]
    1
  434.  @annarodriguez9868  We should have careful differentiated thoughtful detail-oriented thinking that will produce solutions, how about copious energy that is clean for everyone... [What an absolute idiot, he claims we need thoughtful detailed solutions and his unthoughtful, undetailed, uncareful idea is lots of cheap energy?]
    1
  435.  @annarodriguez9868  Everything Peterson says in this video is absolute nonsense.. prove me wrong.
    1
  436.  @annarodriguez9868  Let's plug into DR. Pretendhead at 7:00. 'There is nothing behind it but the most instrumentally and cowardly random polling, how do you get accurate polling data, how did you construct the questions... Let's jump to 30:00: 'Don't screw it up with facile criticism, you have to do a detailed analysis, where is it procedurally going wrong the whole thing needs to be burned to the ground, people don't want a detailed analysis of the problem, it is heuristics, you are not seeing me, I am not there, you don't see my cellular structure, what is the job, a heuristic turns into a bias, you don't know what you don't know, people who want to fix the power system they don't know how to do home wiring, I worked on a committee and they kept my changes... [OK so guy who complains about facile criticism spends an hour giving us facile criticism like people don't want a detailed analysis, there is cowardly random polling, and people can't see his cellular structure, and someone who can't install home wiring may have any idea to improve efficient and cleaner use of electricity? Dave, help me out here, why are you nodding at Peterson's heuristic nonsense from start to finish?]
    1
  437. Heads up you Dave and Rubin, who are so shocked and distressed at 'socialist' ideas. Here is a socialist idea. If you can find the economic flaw in it, please chime in: 1. Removing people from permanent renter rolls, and giving hope to anyone of buying a home, improves the mental and economic health of the nation. 2. We create a guaranteed federal home ownership program, for anyone with a 3 year work history who can keep up with an affordable mortgage, even those in the tacobell/target service industry. 3. This is funded by skimming from people who make most of their money profiting off the work of others, i.e. above $500k/year including capital gains you move into a 70% marginal tax bracket. Find the flaw if you can, good luck.
    1
  438. Dave Rubin doing an excellent job looking stupid: AOC a big problem is an undocumented population that can be fixed with a wall or by giving them jobs and a path to documentation. [Claps and nod of approval by host. Conclusion by Rubin; the host was aghast.] AOC: Our public systems have to pay for undocumented, unless they have jobs, like our ancestors. Dave: AOC says our ancestors came here illegally. [Uh no she didn't Dave, immigration from Europe was legal because there were not laws against immigration. Do you think the native Americans would have outlawed Europe immigration if they could?] Dave: She says the solution is just document them. [No, she didn't say that Dave, she said a wall and green card jobs are two possible solutions.] Dave: She says their plan isn't about a wall, its just bring in as many illegal immigrants that we can. [Dave, do you have noise cancelling head phones on? She didn't say that either. Oh well, your fan base won't notice the strawman.]
    1
  439. @Victor Block He was had a positive effect on my life, he is funny to watch.
    1
  440. Rand says that Democrats don't have a brain. The question then is does Rand have a brain? Let's see. Rand will get a vaccine if the data shows it works...uh Rand the data does show that. Question; is someone strongly pushing vaccines for recovered Covid survivors? This sounds like a strawman. Is Bassara pushing that? Let's jump to like 20:00: Inflation causes money to be worth less, duh. I wonder if Rand Paul has ever had a solution to anything? Apparently these guys are against a big federal deficit. Heads up dude the biggest per capita increase of federal debt was under Republicans, e.g. Reagan. Whoops. Dave or Rand, what is your solution to regulating greed?
    1
  441. No one can find a coherent intellectual useful idea by JP.
    1
  442.  @AtamMardes  If you rate 9.0 or above on the gullibility scale, you become a Peterson fan.
    1
  443. Let's check out this allegedly important speech... a solution that beckons and is generous, we have odds about identity, to a psychological integration, and now I delve into what identity is, and also what social structure must and should be, faith and responsibility, faith is the courage to welcome the future, the future is the manifestation of possibility into actuality, the treasure house of the unknown possibility, with courageous faith, being and becoming are intrinsically good....Huh? Doesn't this guy claim to be precise in your speech?
    1
  444. No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  445.  @ronjon5241  You can't find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  446.  @ronjon5241  JP is a fake intellectual, I am a real intellectual since I realize that Identity is the proper union of faith and responsibility. It does that in a hierarchical subsidiary manner, if you have conflict, you need a counter position, that is subsidiary structure. Jacob's ladder, the vine that unites the material and proximal realm of the earth with the eternal realm of heaven, how do we climb it, there is a vision of how we build ourselves, a glorious macro-vision; it is the proximal beginnings, we scaffold ourselves upward from the finite to the infinite, the scaffold constitutes our identity...also that you think so that your stupid thoughts can die instead of you. At the upper end of a hierarchy, you find people who know a lot, if you are stupid, smart people won't listen to you, so you can inform yourself with tools and you won't be an embarrassment, the careless self-evident axiom of human social interaction is that if I can force you to do something then I have the right to do it.
    1
  447.  @christinamerklin2166  No one can find a profound intellectual coherent useful idea by Peterson.
    1
  448.  @jennil7797  I agree. You can't find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  449.  @jennil7797  Our quest for an intellectual idea by Peterson continues.
    1
  450.  @jongillett9243  Does JP have any coherent useful ideas in this video?
    1
  451.  @jongillett9243  JP has a coherent useful idea? In this video or another one? What was it?
    1
  452.  @jongillett9243  Coherent yes. Profound no. Anything that Peterson has said that your average middle schooler couldn't figure out on their own. If you find it please share.
    1
  453.  @jongillett9243  This particular video is rambling incoherent gibberish from start to finish... With Peterson grandly deluded that ARC is a movement to fix world problems. Ending of course, with tears.
    1
  454.  @enightc  Peterson said something intelligent?
    1
  455.  @danabare7061  Peterson said something intelligent? Where?
    1
  456.  @sharonalbanese8084  Peterson said something intelligent? Where?
    1
  457.  @enightc  Timestamp and quote JP saying something you think is intelligent in this video. 50:00 If you were oriented in the highest manner you could be oriented then the contents of your categories would be subservient to the good, and you have to be immensely cynical to think that will to power is a more powerful force than that, that cynicism devours the world and we dont want to do that... [The contents of your categories? We don't want to devour the world? They grow the best shrooms in Canada for sure.]
    1
  458.  @nahtangreenberg2929  Peterson is an intellectual? Can I see an example?
    1
  459. Is Rubin joking? JP most important speech? Dave? Please timestamp and quote an important and useful idea by JP anywhere in this entire video. Good luck. Well, the most important speech JP has ever made; not a very high bar. 'Identity is the proper union of faith and responsibility. It does that in a hierarchical subsidiary manner, if you have conflict, you need a counter position, that is subsidiary structure. Jacob's ladder the vine that unites the material and proximal realm of the earth with the eternal realm of heaven, how do we climb it, there is a vision of how we build ourselves, a glorious macro-vision; it is the proximal beginnings, we scaffold ourselves upward from the finite to the infinite, the scaffold constitutes our identity...' 'Sacrifice makes a difference, the hierarchy of identity, the lower to the higher, proximal hedonic whims, the payback is good, to escape from primordial narcissism, some things go wrong with children, having children can be rewarding, there is no technical difference between thinking about yourself and being miserable, serve a higher purpose, technically, think about a fork and a table and a plate as a microcosm of the universe, that is all real, we forgot responsibility...'
    1
  460. Thank God for pro choice.
    1
  461. I would worry if you thought you actually understand this psychobabble.
    1
  462. For people who don't know how the internet works? Who are those people Dave? People talk about stuff and other people comment? We already know that Dave.
    1
  463. ​ @rrmackay But God is pro choice.
    1
  464.  @therealcirclea762  Thou shalt choose when thou shalt deliver thy progeny.
    1
  465.  @rrmackay  if you don't believe in abortion, don't get one.
    1
  466.  @donaldreason5664  But God is pro choice.
    1
  467.  @chuckgoodman3828  Thou shalt choose when thou shalt deliver thy progeny.
    1
  468.  @theallknowingburrito6000  The world is a better place if all children are born to caring prepared parents.
    1
  469.  @chuckgoodman3828  Do you want children born to caring and prepared parents? Or the random meeting of two cells.?
    1
  470. Did Peterson or Rubin say something smart?
    1
  471. 20:00 We should have careful differentiated thoughtful thorough detail-oriented thinking that will produce solutions, there is no discussion about what are we aiming at here, how about copious energy that is clean for everyone, resilient stable systems...There is manure from cows, people go to the bathroom, there is not zero pollution...the only thing you should care about is cheap energy, what makes people prosperous and secure, work, what is work, it is the expenditure of energy, what is energy, work, what is work, wealth, [What an absolute idiot, he claims we need thoughtful detailed solutions and his unthoughtful, undetailed, uncareful idea is lots of cheap energy? You just said you need well thought out detailed plans, and your well thought out detailed plan is how about clean energy and stable systems? There is no discussion about what we are aiming at? You just mentioned the aim one sentence ago; Net Zero. Heads up dork brain, the concept is Net Zero, not Zero] [If you care about poor people, The only thing you should care about is cheap energy... Wrong. What makes people prosperous... work, wrong not if that work is at minimum wage. Work is the expenditure of energy - wrong. What is energy - work, wrong. What is work, wealth, wrong.] Dave, If JP says a single accurate useful statement about anything in this entire interview, can you let me know where that is?
    1
  472.  @robynsmith4164  Did Peterson say something intelligent?
    1
  473.  @Birdracer22  Cool neither of us can find an intelligent statement by Peterson.
    1
  474. Peterson said something wise and logical? Where?
    1
  475. Rubin wants to make a connection between COVID restrictions and Hitler and the Nazi Holocaust? Rubin is calling JP prescient? I would say if Rubin's goal as a conservative pundit is to label the entire conservative party as absolute lunatics, I give him high snaps. 9.3 likes, read total idiots, in one day? You just can't make this stuff up. Thanks for the chuckle Dave.
    1
  476.  @keithallsebrook2797  Why? Peterson has never offered a solution to anything.
    1
  477. ​ @willardlentz3044 Rubin as usual is full of crap. Nothing Rubin claims happened.
    1
  478.  @j.z.598  Kamala and Biden got elected. Rubin didn't notice that Kamala was asked to break it down to simple terms. But Rubin likes to spin things for the gullible.
    1
  479. You conservatives are so gullible. She was asked to break it into simple terms. Rubin appeals to the gullible.
    1
  480.  @profvonshredder2563  I don't know the total context, but she was asked to explain it in most simple terms. Rubin characterizes it as childish and the OP here is; 'She explained it.too the best of her ability. She didn’t dumb it down... she was straining to sound that smart.' This is standard for Rubin fans; they fall for his twisted cherry picked partisan reality. In his recent video on the Whoopi thing he claimed that the View were denying the holocaust. They weren't of course, but Rubin's gullible fan base fall for it anyway. If you have a link to where the Kamala clip came from we can check the full context and verify to what ridiculous lengths that Rubin spun it.
    1
  481.  @otisspunkmeyer9339  More stupid is Trump praising Putin.
    1
  482.  @NegativeMass85  She wasn't trying her hardest to sound intelligent. She was dumbing down the issue intentionally to simplest explanation. Conservative Rubin fans swallow his distorted partisan spin blindly.
    1
  483.  @NegativeMass85  You said she was trying her hardest to sound intelligent. That is false. She was upon request simplifying the issue.
    1
  484.  @Naku-n4ku  She was asked to make it elementary. Take off your partisan goggles for a minute. Rubin posts stuff like this because he knows his gullible fan base will swallow it. The stupidest comment on the Ukraine thing by far was made by Trump... Calling Putin a strategic genius who was amassing a peace keeping force on Ukraine border. Someone is violating basic human rights? Who? Mind numbing stupidity? Something more mind numbing than Trump's statement? Please share. There are 378 likes on the op here claiming that Kamala was struggling to explain it to the best of her ability. That is the typical cognitive ability of Rubin fans.
    1
  485. Absolute nonsense from start to finish.
    1
  486. An impressive amount of nonsense packed into 24:00 minutes. Important isn't the word I would use Dave. Easily the Most _________________ Speech JP has ever done. 'Sacrifice makes a difference, the hierarchy of identity, the lower to the higher, proximal hedonic whims, the payback is good, to escape from primordial narcissism, some things go wrong with children, having children can be rewarding, there is no technical difference between thinking about yourself and being miserable, serve a higher purpose, technically, think about a fork and a table and a plate as a microcosm of the universe, that is all real, we forgot responsibility...' Let's see what to put in the blank. Rambling Self Absorbed Nonsensical. Dave? Can you edit the title?
    1
  487.  @seanthomas85  Peterson said something intelligent?
    1
  488.  @gregorytoews8316  Someone doesn't know the likely things we may die from? Who? Peterson? He wonders why thinking is important, so he may be confused on actuarial stats also.
    1
  489.  @joesther8058  Peterson has wisdom? Where?
    1
  490.  @patricktimbs8788  No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  491.  @tanyatodorovic7710  You found a profound insightful useful idea by JP? In this video? Timestamp and quote?
    1
  492.  @janetlawson4482  We are searching for an intellectual useful idea by Peterson. No one can find one.
    1
  493.  @candaniel2  Does JP have a sensible coherent idea in this video?
    1
  494.  @candaniel2  You found a coherent sensible idea? Cool, can I see one? Consciousness is a world engendering force, without it the cosmos as such would not exist....you become what you practice...to be out of concordance with reality you think of the totalitarian impulse underneath....a journey outside of language outside of linguistic certainty...an over emphasis on certainty puts you in a prison that bars you from a well...sacred implies deep...no one disputes the proposition that some stories are deeper than others...movement in a direction that is better than what you know, is there is anything that could possibly more fervently hoped for than that, the amount of evil that is a result of our moral insufficiency is indeterminate.   Winning a championship and winning a game are not the same thing.  We don't know how we manage the active perception, perceiving the world turns out to be way more complicated than anyone ever imagined, we think there are objects out there and we just see them. Clinical psychology research has determined that if you set goals and strive for goals you may achieve them... Jordan Peterson. [Doesn't this guy claim to be some sort of intellectual?  Perceiving the world is complicated for us?  It's complicated for you Jordan, but don't project your personal confusion on to everyone else.] [Apparently people hope to move towards something better.  Wow. Put some big words in a blender, pour them onto a spinning fan, walla, a Peterson speech.]
    1
  495.  @Rich.L-J_KZN  Did Peterson say something intelligent in this video?
    1
  496.  @Rich.L-J_KZN  You found an intelligent statement by Peterson or Rubin? Cool, where? That there can't be net zero pollution because people go to the bathroom?
    1
  497.  @Rich.L-J_KZN  20:00 We should have careful differentiated thoughtful thorough detail-oriented thinking that will produce solutions, there is no discussion about what are we aiming at here, how about copious energy that is clean for everyone, resilient stable systems...There is manure from cows, people go to the bathroom, there is not zero pollution...the only thing you should care about is cheap energy, what makes people prosperous and secure, work, what is work, it is the expenditure of energy, what is energy, work, what is work, wealth, [What an absolute idiot, he claims we need thoughtful detailed solutions and his unthoughtful, undetailed, uncareful idea is lots of cheap energy? You just said you need well thought out detailed plans, and your well thought out detailed plan is how about clean energy and stable systems? There is no discussion about what we are aiming at? You just mentioned the aim one sentence ago; Net Zero. Heads up dork brain, the concept is Net Zero, not Zero] [If you care about poor people, The only thing you should care about is cheap energy... Wrong. What makes people prosperous... work, wrong not if that work is at minimum wage. Work is the expenditure of energy - wrong. What is energy - work, wrong. What is work, wealth, wrong.] Dave, If JP says a single accurate useful statement about anything in this entire interview, can you let me know where that is?
    1
  498.  @thomasridley8675  There is something to us... Jordan Peterson. Uh sure Jordan, pretty ambiguous and pointless though.
    1
  499. JP said something brilliant? Timestamp and quote?
    1
  500. An impressive amount of nonsense packed into 24:00 minutes. Important isn't the word I would use Dave. Easily the Most _________________ Speech JP has ever done. 'Sacrifice makes a difference, the hierarchy of identity, the lower to the higher, proximal hedonic whims, the payback is good, to escape from primordial narcissism, some things go wrong with children, having children can be rewarding, there is no technical difference between thinking about yourself and being miserable, serve a higher purpose, technically, think about a fork and a table and a plate as a microcosm of the universe, that is all real, we forgot responsibility...' Let's see what to put in the blank. Rambling Self Absorbed Nonsensical. Dave? Can you edit the title?
    1
  501. Peterson said something intelligent?
    1
  502.  @generica1  Read the title created by Dave Rubin, then timestamp and quote where that happened in the video. Rubin is the king of making up click bait Strawman arguments that don't happen in the video. What fact do Democrats hate as established in the video?
    1
  503.  @generica1  You will note that Rubin cuts Maher mid sentence so no information undermining Rubin extremely weak point will be heard. Gullible conservatives fall for Rubin. No one else does.
    1
  504.  @everett8811  So who is telling Rubin what to say?
    1
  505.  @generica1  Conservatives fall for Rubin nonsense, thus yes gullible. If you find where Rubin point and click bait is proved in this video, lmk.
    1
  506.  @generica1  Conservatives think Rubin and Jordan Peterson are smart. That should help.
    1
  507.  @generica1  Did you find an intellectual idea by Peterson or Rubin yet?
    1
  508. @Matterhorn55844 I know. Rubin is the king of just making stuff up.
    1
  509.  @Nephilim-81  Peterson said something intelligent?
    1
  510. No one can find an intellectual idea by JP.
    1
  511. Welcome to the strawman nonsense of Dave Rubin. You can tell she is dumb by the look on her face? Precisely how Dave?
    1
  512. Wisdom, by Rubin? Are you joking? No one can find a profound analysis by Rubin. His argument is 'look at her face and you can see I am right'. Pretty wimpy Dave.
    1
  513.  @rleriche5044  No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  514. Pay attention Dave. We are releasing billions of years of stored carbon back into the atmosphere in a few hundred years. That will effect the climate. Your pal Peterson doesn't even think we have an overpopulation problem. 'If you just gave these people enough power, if you use a different bag at whole foods, or that a bunch of these people who have never accomplished anything who are not thought leaders, nonsensical bureaucrats who can't tie their shoes...' Heads up Dave, try not arguing like a third grader OK? Thought leader? But you consider Peterson a thought leader. Who are these unspecified people who have never accomplished anything? Since Behar made a joke about the Eifel Tower you are trying to convince your super gullible fan base that she can't tie her shoes? Are you trying to talk people into not bringing their own grocery bag? Are you unconcerned with masses of plastic floating around in the ocean? If you just give these people enough power? So you are alleging that the eco movement is the result of a power motivation by someone? Weird theory.
    1
  515. JP is a fake intellectual, I am a real intellectual since I realize that Identity is the proper union of faith and responsibility. It does that in a hierarchical subsidiary manner, if you have conflict, you need a counter position, that is subsidiary structure. Jacob's ladder, the vine that unites the material and proximal realm of the earth with the eternal realm of heaven, how do we climb it, there is a vision of how we build ourselves, a glorious macro-vision; it is the proximal beginnings, we scaffold ourselves upward from the finite to the infinite, the scaffold constitutes our identity...also that you think so that your stupid thoughts can die instead of you. At the upper end of a hierarchy, you find people who know a lot, if you are stupid, smart people won't listen to you, so you can inform yourself with tools and you won't be an embarrassment, the careless self-evident axiom of human social interaction is that if I can force you to do something then I have the right to do it.
    1
  516. No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  517.  @maddscientist1050  I agree JP is arrogant, and Rubin is ignorant that this is 'easily the most important speech by JP'; however JP most important speech is a pretty low bar to clear; has JP ever made an important comment on anything?
    1
  518.  @Mag_W_  I agree, you can't find a coherent useful idea by JP in this video: Let's check out this allegedly important speech... a solution that beckons and is generous, we have odds about identity, to a psychological integration, and now I delve into what identity is, and also what social structure must and should be, faith and responsibility, faith is the courage to welcome the future, the future is the manifestation of possibility into actuality, the treasure house of the unknown possibility, with courageous faith, being and becoming are intrinsically good....Huh? Doesn't this guy claim to be precise in your speech?
    1
  519.  @Mag_W_  Wait, you found a coherent profound intellectual idea by Peterson in this video or any other? This is super exciting. What was it?
    1
  520. Rubin's YT page describes himself as 'Each week Dave Rubin uses logic and reason to have honest conversations... goes one on one with thought leaders..' The implication Dave is trying to make is that Conservatives are the smart ones and Liberals are the dumb ones. The problem is, listen to any two minute section of this video and and Rubin and Peterson are proving the precise opposite. How about taking on a smart liberal [like me] and lets watch where that goes. Dave? "Looking for smart and honest conversations about current events, political news and the culture war? Want to increase your critical thinking by listening to different perspectives on a variety of topics? If so, then you’re in the right place because on The Rubin Report Dave Rubin engages the ideas of some of society's most interesting thought leaders, authors, politicians and comedians." How about we discuss solutions rather than 'enlightenment theories, technology assaulting everything, and reverting to the individual', whatever that all means. I have better ideas than any of the recent round of presidential candidates on every issue. Pick an issue and I will tell you a solution.
    1
  521.  @danielevans5864  Peterson said something intelligent and coherent? What?
    1
  522.  @danielevans5864  Pretenderson at 40:00 talking about antifa, 'how many people identifiable, who the hell are they, are they right or left, 800 antifa, then they don't exist, does it exist, they are agents of chaos, to sow discord, how to we protect ourselves, that is the endless question of the human race, men are less agreeable, women like disagreeable men, women chose their mates, the more disagreeable you are the less compassionate and generous you are, why do women pick disagreeable men, in one city they had a summer of love, so everyone is agreeable, do the psychopaths come out at night, agreeable people share, women have to protect their infants, they need men who can guard, if a man is too masculine they can't communicate, you have to hold the psychopaths down, they are at 3%, the Left says hierarchies are nothing but power, tough men are tougher than tough women, are we going to look at this straightforward and clearly?' [Holy crap Dave, did Peterson just claim he is looking at this straightforward and clearly, after a pointless, unstraightforward, unclear and chaotic rambling that goes from how many antifa there are to women are more agreeable to the summer of love? Help me out Dave, reply to this comment. What precisely is Peterson's point here? Antifa exists or it doesn't exist? Women are more agreeable? I don't think that is true and of course it has absolutely nothing to do with antifa. The Left says hierarchies are nothing but power? Not true. JP made that up. How many Peterson's does it take to unscrew a lightbulb? One, but he does it by rotating the entire house in the opposite direction.]
    1
  523.  @Birdracer22  Cool neither of us can find an intelligent statement by Peterson.
    1
  524. Dave Rubin doing an excellent job looking stupid: AOC a big problem is an undocumented population that can be fixed with a wall or by giving them jobs and a path to documentation. [Claps and nod of approval by host. Conclusion by Rubin; the host was aghast.] AOC: Our public systems have to pay for undocumented, unless they have jobs, like our ancestors. Dave: AOC says our ancestors came here illegally. [Uh no she didn't Dave, immigration from Europe was legal because there were not laws against immigration. Do you think the native Americans would have outlawed Europe immigration if they could?] Dave: She says the solution is just document them. [No, she didn't say that Dave, she said a wall and green card jobs are two possible solutions.] Dave: She says their plan isn't about a wall, its just bring in as many illegal immigrants that we can. [Dave, do you have noise cancelling head phones on? She didn't say that either. Oh well, your fan base won't notice the strawman.]
    1
  525. No one can find a profound coherent idea by JP in this video.
    1
  526. You know get the Rubin playbook. Severely edit some tiny clip and then pretend it proves something. He relies on the gullibility of his audience.
    1
  527. No one can find a profound coherent idea by JP in this video.
    1
  528. Peterson at 13:00 'The best way to save the planet is to make poor people rich as fast as we can...the biggest environmental issue facing us is over fishing...what does sustainable mean?...why should we care, how should we care? you have to prioritize, 200 goals is chaos, do you have a better idea, then what good is your criticism...' [Wait, is Peterson, a guy who never has a solution to anything trying to rip on people who criticize with no better ideas? Pretty funny. The biggest environmental issue facing us is over fishing? No it isn't. The only result of over fishing is there are too few fish, who will of course replenish within a generation. The best way to save the planet is to make everyone rich? This guy is so totally full of crap. Environmental problems are caused by consumerism, which is a direct byproduct of wealth. What does sustainable mean? It means Jordan that the rate of consumption equals the rate of replacement. In another section Jordan says that the best way to solve pollution in India is to burn more coal. What is a guy who claims we don't have an over population problem doing projecting to solve problems in India when their entire problem is over population? How about this Dave, lets do a debate with me, Jordan, and you and discuss actual solutions. HMU, anytime.]
    1
  529.  @x-mess  One review of Lomborg: But when Friel began checking Lomborg's sources, "I found problems," he says. "As an experiment, I looked up one of his footnotes, found that it didn't support what he said, and then did another, and kept going, finding the same pattern." He therefore took on the Augean stables undertaking of checking every one of the hundreds of citations in Cool It. Friel's conclusion, as per his book's title, is that Lomborg is "a performance artist disguised as an academic."
    1
  530.  Joel Plank  Our population will peak at about 9 billion in fifty years and then decrease rapidly, and we will squeeze out mammals of our size.
    1
  531.  @donaldgrappo4526  That this video is on YouTube is proof that even lunacy is not filtered out. In Rubin's most recent he tries to compare COVID restrictions to Hitler and the Nazi Holocaust. Even apparent attempts to pass off the stupidest ideas imaginable....
    1
  532.  @braamhechter5053  Did either of them say something intelligent?
    1
  533.  @x-mess  Consciousness and attention are isomorphic, consciousness is the mechanism that generates proximal solutions, proximal solutions have to be made subordinate to respect for the process, in psychotherapy you let people talk, it is curative, you circulate around what bothers you, if you confront fears you become courageous....if you are speaking freely you are trying to investigate, if you desire the truth, is that the super ordinate value?
    1
  534.  @bridiesmith5110  Where did Taylor complain about the patriarchy, and did Dave Rubin say something intelligent in this video?
    1
  535.  @jasontodd8071  Where did Taylor complain about the patriarchy, and did Dave Rubin say something intelligent in this video?
    1
  536.  @craigwall9536  We are looking for an intelligent statement by Dave Rubin. No one can find one.
    1
  537. Peterson said something intelligent? What? We should have careful differentiated thoughtful thorough detail-oriented thinking that will produce solutions, there is no discussion about what are we aiming at here, how about copious energy that is clean for everyone, resilient stable systems...There is manure from cows, people go to the bathroom, there is not zero pollution [What an absolute idiot, he claims we need thoughtful detailed solutions and his unthoughtful, undetailed, uncareful idea is lots of cheap energy? You just said you need well thought out detailed plans, and your well thought out detailed plan is how about clean energy and stable systems? There is no discussion about what we are aiming at? You just mentioned the aim one sentence ago; Net Zero. Heads up dork brain, the concept is Net Zero, not Zero]
    1
  538. Alternate title: JP goes off the rails with incoherent ramblings about setting the dinner table and climbing Jacob's ladder.
    1
  539. Mr. Pretenderhead at 36:00. 'Tech companies are trying deliver something you will attend to, AI machines that will analyze your eye movements, to see what you are looking at, they are trying to figure out what you want and deliver it to you fast, Can we trust us, not if we are lying, that makes misinformation, the naked desire for power, the systems get contaminated, look what we are doing, you and I are having a conversation that will be distributed, its a miracle, translators work on my YT content, its very hard to translate YT to other languages, it hasn't been thought through, there is a real time translator, this is unbelievable...this over simplification and demonization has to stop... I talked to democrats who think antifa is illusory, but who think there is a conspiratory force on the right.' [The king of over simplification and demonizing thinks we need to stop that, and in the very next sentence he over simplifies and demonizes democrats who think antifa is illusory and right wing conspiracy is real? Whoops dude. And how did he get from tech companies trying to sell us stuff, duh, to antifa in three sentences? Peterson is amazed at YouTube? Hasn't it been around for like 20 years? If you are lying you are spreading misinformation? This guy's genius is seriously off the charts. It's very hard to translate other languages but there is a real time translator? This guys brain is such total chaos. Dave; a coherent point anywhere in this video? Give me a nudge when you find it.]
    1
  540. Rubin complaining about people who hate facts? Funny.
    1
  541. Did Rubin or Megyn say anything intelligent?
    1
  542. Peterson said something intelligent?
    1
  543. Peterson is a joke. Peterson thinks our biggest environmental problem is over fishing in the ocean, he thinks we don't have an over-population problem, thinks the solution to India's environmental problems is to burn more coal, and the solution to our environmental problems is to make everyone rich...and Rubin thinks JP can have a logical theory about Covid and vaccines? Chuckle.
    1
  544. 'Compassion isn't a virtue, compassion is a reflex, treating adults like infants is not virtuous, love is a blend of compassion and encouragement and truth, it is complicated man, to foster growth requires judgement... [What an absolute load of crap. Who on earth needs JP to tell us what love is or how to treat adults or to explain encouragement and truth? Is Rubin trying to claim that JP is sharing something worthwhile?] Compassion isn't a virtue, but judicious compassion is a virtue? Huh? Treating adults like infants is not virtuous? OK sure, who is doing that exactly? Love is a blend of compassion and truth and encouragement? The growth element requires judgement. You can be more than you are... Dave: We can use a little judgement. Uh Dave, did you use any judgement putting together this video?
    1
  545.  @ronaldmorgan7632  True, the Op here lied also stating it was the least secure.
    1
  546.  @Mightiflier  Many more Democrats voted by mail so ballot stuffing would have been by republicans. Describe how fraud took place, and state how 2000 mules doesn't Argue in favor of vote by mail?
    1
  547.  @kevinburke6055  If Trump had pulled us out of Afghanistan how would the results be different and how do you know that?
    1
  548.  @kevinburke6055  BTW, there is global inflation influenced by COVID and Ukraine... Biden doesn't have the power to cause global inflation, thus other factors are in play.
    1
  549.  @Mightiflier  Google the 2020 election. Democrats voted far more by mail. Republicans are against vote by mail even though it is more secure. Describe to me how box stuffing could have changed the election. Person A gets their ballot in the mail. Then what happens?
    1
  550.  @23wtb  I didn't say it was the most secure election, although our technology to improve election security has improved. Since Democrats prefer to vote by mail, wouldn't the box stuffing more likely be Republicans?
    1
  551.  @minniemaeshufflebutt116  2000 mules proves what exactly? Be specific. Someone somehow got ballots mailed to individuals and filled out democrat or Republican candidates....? What exactly do we know? With proof.
    1
  552.  @Charlie_Davidson  Actually you are arguing with feelings not evidence, and assuming falsely that I can't be swayed with evidence. With that sort of agenda driven twist of the truth, you might like another guy who routinely does the same thing... His name is Dave Rubin. Find some evidence and present it. I have presented the evidence that Democrats prefer vote by mail. More evidence is in the YouTube review of 2000 mules .... An empty documentary. Your turn to provide evidence.
    1
  553.  @Mightiflier  Watch the review called the empty documentary on 2000 mules.
    1
  554.  @Charlie_Davidson  "The journal Public Choice goes the way of Lancet and publishes a paper that is “riddled with errors” but comes to a political conclusion that they want to support.". A review of the article you referenced.
    1
  555.  @Charlie_Davidson  Lott (2022) introduces ‘simple tests’ of voter fraud and applies them to measure the extent of fraud in the 2020 election. Using the tests, Lott (2022) claims to have discovered 10,000 extra votes for Biden in Pennsylvania and Georgia based on mishandling of absentee votes, 6,700 extra votes for Biden in Pennsylvania from inappropriate allowances for provisional votes, and 255,000 excess votes due to artificially large turnout across several counties in six key states. All three claims are demonstrably false:. So much for your source.
    1
  556. @jon dough Republicans did the ballot stuffing.
    1
  557.  @alanjm1234  How is someone going to get my mail in ballot? How is that less secure than dropping it in a drop box? Answer this, 100,000s of ballots were filled out by not the person they were mailed to? How? Step by step what happened? Anyone can't fill out and drop in a drop box?
    1
  558.  Jac Daniels  How do the mules get the ballots? Voting by mail is awesome.
    1
  559.  @markbarger1791  45,000 people are indicted for what?
    1
  560.  @laattardo  Did you fill them out for Biden?
    1
  561.  @markbarger1791  Ok you don't know what 45,000 people were indicted for what. Open your computer and Google 2000 mules hoax to find all the reviews calling it nonsense. Missing pieces in the puzzle.. how do the mules get the ballots and who filled the ballots out. But if you trust Dave Rubin to give you facts....
    1
  562.  @rythe24  Mail in ballots is not far less secure. The ballots are mailed to individuals. Is it easier to obtain a mass of unfilled in ballots than to use a fake ID at a polling booth? Most reviews of 2000 mules call it a hoax. Considering how often Rubin stretches the truth to support a conservative agenda, not surprising. I am confident we have the most secure elections in the world. Some fraud can happen, but enough to turn an election is as flimsy as saying Russia caused Trump to win. They made that bold claim? Who is they?
    1
  563.  @markbarger1791  What indictments?
    1
  564.  @michaelroosa9815  Russia wanted Trump and there was an internet campaign to discredit Hillary.
    1
  565.  @markbarger1791  Jordan's 13th Rule; We don't understand consciousness, we don't know where it fits in the cosmos. [Jordan, how about not projecting your personal confusion about consciousness on to everyone else?] Jordan's 14th Rule; How do you arrange books? Using the axiomatic structure of your a priori perceptions manifesting as self evident fact to your ignorant mind. Jordan's 15 Rule; The best way to interact is individual to individual and as if they are part of the process by which things we don't understand can yet be explored and by things that aren't properly organized in our society can yet be set right. Jordan's 16th Rule; Free speech also is the mechanism by which we generate the conceptions that allow us to organize our experience in the world, it is the mechanism that allows us to reformulate and criticize those conceptions when they become outdated and sterile, to reanimate them in a new form so we can move into the future. Jordan's 17th Rule; Good relationships have a high percentage of positive interactions. Jordan's 18th Rule, Hard core clinical psychology research has determined that perception influences behavior. [Yes Jordan, when I perceive I am thirsty my behavior is to go to the fridge for a drink.] Jordan's 19th Rule; There is something to us. [Uh sure Jordan, a bit pointless and ambiguous however.] Jordan's 20th Rule; I realized psychologically that the future is in a sense actually unpredictable. [You needed psychology to figure that out Jordan? I figured it out without psychology.] Jordan's 21 Rule: It is hard to get in to Harvard and it takes good SAT scores. [Yes Jordan, everyone already knows that.] Jordan's 22 Rule: The world is not objects, it is the harmonious interplay of patterns, you dance with the world, you don't want a person who will dominate you sexually during the initial dance . Jordan's 23 Rule: If you have a functional identity, when you act it out in the world you get what you want and need.
    1
  566.  @markbarger1791  Actually when there is some kind of inappropriate sexual or underage power thing, Democrats are often with the opposite sex and Republicans with the same sex, sort of like the Catholic priest thing?
    1
  567.  @markbarger1791  The West is an oppressive patriarchy... Jordan Peterson.
    1
  568.  @markbarger1791  What is your solution to regulating greed, the wealthy profiting off the work of others?
    1
  569.  @leeadickes7235  You think Biden got a kickback from the sale of military equipment? You should check out this other guy who likes to put a ridiculous partisan spin on things. His name is Dave Rubin.
    1
  570.  @ronaldmorgan7632  How do the mules get the ballots?
    1
  571.  @ronaldmorgan7632  What leftist building had how many ballots?
    1
  572.  @Timmyblue-rf4es  No one can find a profound intellectual idea by JP.
    1
  573.  @roganroberts8789  Agreed, JP has no profound intellectual ideas.
    1
  574.  @ald1144  Agreed, no one can find a profound intellectual idea by JP.
    1
  575.  @guydegroof2217  We continue our quest for a profound idea by JP.
    1
  576. Wait did Rubin just say solutions is his driving force? Great, can we hear one? Peterson never has a solution to anything.
    1
  577.  @Rosieblue111  Did Peterson say something intelligent here?
    1
  578. Improved title of this video: Dave Rubin Click Bait of Something that Didn't Happen.
    1
  579.  @thafunktapus  If you find a spot where JP outsmarted Lex, timestamp and quote.
    1
  580. What is the cut off day or week for the anti-choice group?
    1
  581. Dave, do you or Shapiro have a solution to the school shootings? I know Jordan doesn't.
    1
  582. You misspelled Nonsense.
    1
  583.  @milanstojic3304  No one can find an intellectual idea by JP.
    1
  584.  @demetriuscooksey7147  We are searching for an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  585. @smacktard6051 No one is afraid of whatever warning Rubin or Peterson have about anything.
    1
  586. No one can find a profound coherent idea by JP in this video.
    1
  587. We aren't turned off by his middle politics. We are just laughing at his comical attempts to have valid scientific and political ideas.
    1
  588. No one can find a profound coherent idea by JP in this video.
    1
  589. What is your solution to regulating greed?
    1
  590.  @tomharrison6607  Here is my solution. 70% marginal tax above 400k including capital gains, funding a home ownership program for anyone with a three year work history. List the benefits.
    1
  591.  @tomharrison6607  Again; List the benefits to the economic and mental health of the nation. My plan doesn't penalize achievement; it penalizes greed. Above 400k/yr most money is made by investing in high rents and low wages, profiting off the work of others via power, not achievement. The most common political solution to the struggling poor in the US is raise the minimum wage. This has the flaw of harming some small businesses and increasing inflation, and places the burden equally on struggling small businesses and ultra wealthy mega corporations. Here is my solution. Guaranteed federal housing program; you work 3 years at any job and you qualify to buy something, with a mortgage at 30% of your income. This is funded by a 70% marginal tax rate above $400,000 per year including capital gains. Get the working poor out from under the thumb of wealthy investors. 3 years even working at Target qualifies you for an affordable mortgage. You still have to pay that mortgage like anyone else or you default.
    1
  592.  @bassboostwoof6123  Based? Do you mean biased? What did I say that was not based in facts?
    1
  593.  @bassboostwoof6123  Rubin/Shapiro fans don't get how strongly these two guys spin stuff to the right. It isn't about objective analysis, it is pandering to their conservative gullible fan base. In a recent Rubin report he calls some democrat reporter a partisan clown; without noticing that he is describing himself.
    1
  594. Peterson said something intelligent?
    1
  595.  @Wooptidoodoo  Maybe JP's self appointed explainer of the world ego is actually a cry for help. But again, any spot in this interview where JP is trying to learn rather than acting like we need him to explain the world to the rest of us. Randomly at 16:00 with these two pretend smart guys; The climate conferences, we have to sacrifice, Obama bought a 15 million house. "There are hierarchies of competence and corrupted by power, how much, we should clean them up, to fix them, illness and death climb from the bottom up, psycho-physiologically easer at the top, we double energy cost old poor people die, which side are you on Leftists?, are you going to sacrifice the poor, there is no consensus in science...people go to the bathroom so there is no zero pollution, it is not detailed solutions, copious energy for everyone, you should only care about cheap energy if you are on the Left, what is work, energy is everything...the US has cut CO2 14% because of fracking..." So Rubin describes this as: Looking for smart and honest conversations ...increase your critical thinking by listening to different perspectives on a variety of topics? If so, then you’re in the right place because ... the ideas of some of society's most interesting thought leaders, authors, politicians and comedians. Rubin is calling JP a critical thinking thought leader? How the hell did JP get from sacrifice for climate change to hierarchies and competence? Because he can't go more than a couple paragraphs without leaning on his go to phrases, competence hierarchies and tyrannical patriarchy. ]There is no consensus in science...from a non-scientist, please Jordan, stay in your lane. People don't have detailed solutions -- from a guy who never has a solution to anything. You should only care about cheap energy if you are on the Left? What a total idiot. Did he forget he is talking about reducing CO2 levels? Energy consumption is where CO2 comes from dork. Peterson's claim about CO2 reduction is also incorrect. The levels have stayed about the same since 1990, influenced more by cleaner burning cars than more fracking.]
    1
  596.  @Wooptidoodoo  Thanks for the detailed reply. JP is not a scientist, and thus his theories only appeal to those who have no ability to understand basic science. We are releasing billions of years of stored carbon back into the atmosphere in a few hundred. This will increase CO2 and effect the climate. Renewable sources work; I get 100% of my home electricity off the wind/solar grid. Peterson states that we can't get emissions to zero. This is a monster strawman. No one is claiming we can reduce CO2 emissions to zero; the goal is NET ZERO, absorption by plant processes equals release by animal processes. Try this if you want. Timestamp and quote what you think is an accurate intelligent idea by JP, and I will tell you why it is complete nonsense. Thanks.
    1
  597.  @Wooptidoodoo  A lot of people blindly assume that Peterson is intelligent, without actually knowing where that happened. He never has a solution to anything, and he is notorious for just making stuff up. He claims that our biggest environmental problem is over fishing in the ocean and he claims we don't have an over population problem and he claims the solution to India's problems is burn more coal. He couldn't be more wrong if he tried. If you feel like it, quote an alleged intellectual statement by Peterson and I will debunk it. We are causing climate change, how soon and how much is speculative.
    1
  598.  @Wooptidoodoo  ok how soon and by how many degrees will the temperature raise. By 2050? By 2100? And impact on species and ocean levels and damage to equatorial humans?
    1
  599.  @Wooptidoodoo  ok you contradicted yourself. If you find an intelligent idea by Peterson LMK.
    1
  600.  @Aeneas-aojb  'Jordan Peterson has changed many lives….many people have found their way out depression and general hoplessness because of his ideas.' I am glad that JP's self help stuff helps the lost get their lives together. More power to them. I am just pointing out that JP is not an intellectual, outside of his self help stuff almost everything is total nonsense, and that for JP, a guy routinely focused on winning, projecting himself as the sole holder of world truths, and never focused on learning...you get my point.
    1
  601.  @Wooptidoodoo  His ideas are intelligent? Can I see an example? Has JP ever offered a solution to anything?
    1
  602.  @Wooptidoodoo  You say 'He asks questions that should be asked that aren't being asked.' Can I see an example? When he asks 'why is thinking important, why listen, what is speech, do transcendent values actually exist, what is our consciousness for'? Does anyone in the world think these are questions that need to be asked?
    1
  603.  @Aeneas-aojb  I am not claiming he is dishonest, just never expressing a coherent insightful idea about anything. Try this. Timestamp and quote a spot in this video where Peterson states an accurate and useful idea where he is not attempting to show that he has things figured out better than everyone else, i.e. self appointed explainer of the world. I promise to check it out. Here is a sample on Peterson arguing against a quest for net zero emissions... People go to the bathroom so there can't be zero emissions. The argument is NET zero Jordan, not zero. Strawman much? "There is no consensus in science.". Jordan you aren't a scientist, so don't project you know what scientists do. BTW consensus, i.e. reproducibility is a core tenant of the scientific method. BTW, I know what his motivation is, besides making money to project himself as an important intellectual...it is even on the cover of his new book, falsely claiming that the New York times calls him one of the most influential public intellectuals. He is influential, just not an intellectual.
    1
  604.  @faceplants2  True he is a PhD in psychology, but psychology is fake academia. No famous psychologist has ever expressed a revelation that a smart person couldn't figure out during commercial breaks of an NFL game. Psychology, compared to actual science, is a joke.
    1
  605.  @faceplants2  Peterson made a smart clear intellectual point? In this video? Can you timestamp it? Thanks. Randomly at 16:00 with these two pretend smart guys; The climate conferences, we have to sacrifice, Obama bought a 15 million house. "There are hierarchies of competence and corrupted by power, how much, we should clean them up, to fix them, illness and death climb from the bottom up, psycho-physiologically easer at the top, we double energy cost old poor people die, which side are you on Leftists?, are you going to sacrifice the poor, there is no consensus in science...people go to the bathroom so there is no zero pollution, it is not detailed solutions, copious energy for everyone, you should only care about cheap energy if you are on the Left, what is work, energy is everything...the US has cut CO2 14% because of fracking..." So Rubin describes this as: Looking for smart and honest conversations ...increase your critical thinking by listening to different perspectives on a variety of topics? If so, then you’re in the right place because ... the ideas of some of society's most interesting thought leaders, authors, politicians and comedians. Rubin is calling JP a critical thinking thought leader? How the hell did JP get from sacrifice for climate change to hierarchies and competence? Because he can't go more than a couple paragraphs without leaning on his go to phrases, competence hierarchies and tyrannical patriarchy. There is no consensus in science...from a non-scientist, please Jordan, stay in your lane. People don't have detailed solutions -- from a guy who never has a solution to anything. You should only care about cheap energy if you are on the Left? What a total idiot. Did he forget he is talking about reducing CO2 levels? Energy consumption is where CO2 comes from dork. Peterson's claim about CO2 reduction is also incorrect. The levels have stayed about the same since 1990, influenced more by cleaner burning cars than more fracking.
    1
  606.  @Aeneas-aojb  Peterson has a climate change idea? What? BTW that I criticize his ideas is absolutely irrelevant to the fact that he routinely appoints himself to explain the world to us. I repeat: Timestamp and quote a spot in this video where Peterson states an accurate and useful idea where he is not attempting to show that he has things figured out better than everyone else, i.e. self appointed explainer of the world. Use evidence, like this: Randomly at 16:00 with these two pretend smart guys; The climate conferences, we have to sacrifice, Obama bought a 15 million house. "There are hierarchies of competence and corrupted by power, how much, we should clean them up, to fix them, illness and death climb from the bottom up, psycho-physiologically easer at the top, we double energy cost old poor people die, which side are you on Leftists?, are you going to sacrifice the poor, there is no consensus in science...people go to the bathroom so there is no zero pollution, it is not detailed solutions, copious energy for everyone, you should only care about cheap energy if you are on the Left, what is work, energy is everything...the US has cut CO2 14% because of fracking..." So Rubin describes this as: Looking for smart and honest conversations ...increase your critical thinking by listening to different perspectives on a variety of topics? If so, then you’re in the right place because ... the ideas of some of society's most interesting thought leaders, authors, politicians and comedians. Rubin is calling JP a critical thinking thought leader? How the hell did JP get from sacrifice for climate change to hierarchies and competence? Because he can't go more than a couple paragraphs without leaning on his go to phrases, competence hierarchies and tyrannical patriarchy. There is no consensus in science...from a non-scientist, please Jordan, stay in your lane. People don't have detailed solutions -- from a guy who never has a solution to anything. You should only care about cheap energy if you are on the Left? What a total idiot. Did he forget he is talking about reducing CO2 levels? Energy consumption is where CO2 comes from dork. Peterson's claim about CO2 reduction is also incorrect. The levels have stayed about the same since 1990, influenced more by cleaner burning cars than more fracking.
    1
  607.  @Aeneas-aojb  If you do stumble across this alleged accurate insightful and useful theory by JP, please share. Timestamp and quote. It is called using evidence. Thanks. You have thrown some things at me, just no evidence.
    1
  608.  @Aeneas-aojb  Ok. We may agree that JP has not insightful useful theory. A. I am simply saying that you cannot use your disagreement to infer that he has appointed himself as a self-explainer of the world. [non sequitir, the two concepts are unrelated.] B. I am saying that your criticisms of his motivations specifically are misguided. You are claiming to have some insight on his character and you clearly do not....I’ve watched enough of his content to see that this is not his motivation. He has not only said that he is interested in learning and speaking the truth about what he thinks, but he also acts that out as far as I’ve seen, and I’ve seen quite a bit of his content. [So you know his motivation and I do not? ] C. Every thing I have ever heard JP is him explaining the world to us. Find a spot that supports your OP, he wants to learn not win. Consciousness is a world engendering force, without it the cosmos as such would not exist....you become what you practice...to be out of concordance with reality you think of the totalitarian impulse underneath....a journey outside of language outside of linguistic certainty...an over emphasis on certainty puts you in a prison that bars you from a well...sacred implies deep...no one disputes the proposition that some stories are deeper than others...movement in a direction that is better than what you know, is there is anything that could possibly more fervently hoped for than that, the amount of evil that is a result of our moral insufficiency is indeterminate. Agreeableness negatively predicts success in the workplace. It is foolish to credit the woman's movement for advances in women's rights. Our hierarchies are of competence not power. Winning a championship and winning a game are not the same thing. We don't know how we manage the active perception, perceiving the world turns out to be way more complicated than anyone ever imagined, we think there are objects out there and we just see them. Clinical psychology research has determined that if you set goals and strive for goals you may achieve them... Jordan Peterson, self appointed explainer of the world.
    1
  609.  @faceplants2  I gather you are trying to prove me wrong on something, regarding JP's false claim that US CO2 emissions have dropped 14% since 1990. They have stayed about the same. I think you are confusing rates of emissions with levels in the atmosphere which have clearly increased. Peterson, a non scientist, is trying to debunk science. It is kind of funny. But sure, prove me wrong on anything if you can.
    1
  610.  @faceplants2  Note JP's strawman argument against zero emissions. Heads up Jordan, no one is arguing for zero emissions, the issue is NET ZERO. See the difference? "There are hierarchies of competence and corrupted by power, how much, we should clean them up, to fix them, illness and death climb from the bottom up, psycho-physiologically easer at the top, we double energy cost old poor people die, which side are you on Leftists?, are you going to sacrifice the poor, there is no consensus in science...people go to the bathroom so there is no zero pollution, it is not detailed solutions, copious energy for everyone, you should only care about cheap energy if you are on the Left, what is work, energy is everything...the US has cut CO2 14% because of fracking..." So Rubin describes this as: Looking for smart and honest conversations ...increase your critical thinking by listening to different perspectives on a variety of topics? If so, then you’re in the right place because ... the ideas of some of society's most interesting thought leaders, authors, politicians and comedians. Rubin is calling JP a critical thinking thought leader? How the hell did JP get from sacrifice for climate change to hierarchies and competence? Because he can't go more than a couple paragraphs without leaning on his go to phrases, competence hierarchies and tyrannical patriarchy.
    1
  611.  @faceplants2  Depends on which source you are looking at, key point is contrary to Peterson they are about the same now as 1990. Peterson's environmental theories are nonsense and pander to those who think we don't have an environmental or over population problem.
    1
  612.  @afuzzycreature8387  Everything Peterson says in this video is absolute nonsense.
    1
  613. Dave Rubin doing an excellent job looking stupid: AOC a big problem is an undocumented population that can be fixed with a wall or by giving them jobs and a path to documentation. [Claps and nod of approval by host. Conclusion by Rubin; the host was aghast.] AOC: Our public systems have to pay for undocumented, unless they have jobs, like our ancestors. Dave: AOC says our ancestors came here illegally. [Uh no she didn't Dave, immigration from Europe was legal because there were not laws against immigration. Do you think the native Americans would have outlawed Europe immigration if they could?] Dave: She says the solution is just document them. [No, she didn't say that Dave, she said a wall and green card jobs are two possible solutions.] Dave: She says their plan isn't about a wall, its just bring in as many illegal immigrants that we can. [Dave, do you have noise cancelling head phones on? She didn't say that either. Oh well, your fan base won't notice the strawman.]
    1
  614.  @Fenkibbs  No one can find an intellectual idea by JP.
    1
  615.  @Fenkibbs  We are searching for an intellectual idea by Peterson in this video. Did you find one?
    1
  616.  @Fenkibbs  Peterson provided good reasons to why compassion can't be held as virtue? Quote please. BTW, he is totally full of crap as usual. Compassion is a virtue. It's like him saying 'agreeableness negatively predicts success in the workplace'. So according to JP, if I am disagreeable at work I will get promoted and I am virtuous if I am not compassionate. He also never advises men to be nice. Fortunately he is widely known as the biggest fake intellectual of this century.
    1
  617.  @davidlafleche1142  Rubin has a hard time understanding nuance. The core problem is housing costs, caused by wealthy real estate investors profiting off the work of others. What is your solution to regulating greed? The Molecule FX boulder
    1
  618.  @darylfoster7944  What is your solution to regulating greed?
    1
  619.  @darylfoster7944  MY HOME OWNERSHIP, REGULATION OF GREED PLAN Work three years at any job, even minimum wage, you qualify for a mortgage at 30% of your income, funded by a 70% marginal tax on all income above 300k, about the top 3% of earners. At that level you are not earning from work. You are investing in the work of others. List the benefits.
    1
  620.  @darylfoster7944  MY HOME OWNERSHIP, REGULATION OF GREED PLAN Work three years at any job, even minimum wage, you qualify for a mortgage at 30% of your income, funded by a 70% marginal tax on all income above 300k, about the top 3% of earners.  At that level you are not earning from work.  You are investing in the work of others.
    1
  621.  @darylfoster7944  MY HOME OWNERSHIP, REGULATION OF GREED PLAN Work three years at any job, even minimum wage, you qualify for a mortgage at 30% of your income, funded by a 70% marginal tax on all income above 300k, about the top 3% of earners. At that level you are not earning from work. You are investing in the work of others. List the benefits.
    1
  622.  @darylfoster7944  MY HOME OWNERSHIP, REGULATION OF GREED PLAN Work three years at any job, even minimum wage, you qualify for a mortgage at 30% of your income, funded by a 70% marginal tax on all income above 300k, about the top 3% of earners. At that level you are not earning from work. You are investing in the work of others. List the benefits.
    1
  623. @Hugh Mongous Peterson thinks our biggest environmental problem is over fishing in the ocean, and that the best environmental solution is to make everyone rich... And you are going to trust his conclusions about COVID? Chuckle.
    1
  624.  @dreamingmusic3299  Peterson fans are a cult of zombies.
    1
  625.  @dreamingmusic3299  Peterson says our main environmental problem is over fishing in the ocean, and the solution to our environmental problems is making everyone rich....and Rubin thinks Peterson could have a logical idea about COVID? Chuckle. Has Peterson ever made a statement that could be described as intellectual? Surprise me.
    1
  626.  @matthewrawlings1284  I think Simon's point is that JP, known for just making stuff up and pretending it is a fact only he has figured out, is hardly the guy to be lecturing on a topic of science.
    1
  627.  @dreamingmusic3299  See you feel JP is an intellectual but you have no evidence that he is. That makes you one of those blind zombie cult fans. If you stumble across an intellectual statement by JP, lmk. SKALVAN INTERVIEW: At 13:55 JP 'Chaos is the uncertainty of the meaning of life and how people feel about their position in the world...we have an instinct for meaning, when what we are doing is working, we are advancing ourselves, good athletes have practiced and they try to get better.. [So Peterson has realized that good athletes have practiced a lot to get good, and they are still trying to get better? Thank you Jordan.] I am trying to help people understand that this meaning is a true phenomena, and meaning comes with responsibility, people don't understand... [People don't understand that meaning and responsibility are good things? What people? Apparently JP thinks that People wander through life with no meaning and no responsibility, and by simply telling them that there is meaning in responsibility will awaken them? I personally am not that confused, nor can a fortune cookie platitude inspire me to get my life together. But I guess there are people like that, in a blind zombie cult who think a guy who tells them that Olympic and NBA/NFL athletes actually practice is a form of wisdom. Whatever.]
    1
  628.  @dreamingmusic3299  4:00 JP: Our culture confuses men's desire for achievement and competence with the patriarchal desire for tyrannical power. Our social hierarchy structures are fundamentally masculine...Helen: 'My idea of the patriarchy is a system of male dominance.' JP: But that's not my sense of the patriarchy. JP: What you are doing is taking a tiny substrata of hyper successful men and using that to represent the entire structure of Western society. Helen: 7:30 'Saying it is the least tyrannical society is not the same as saying it is a not tyrannical society.' Helen: 'Women were barred from professions'. Jordan: 'Why would you blame men for that'? [Less take a brief look at how much nonsense JP can fit in before the 10 minute mark. Our culture confuses the desire for competence with tyrannical power? Seriously Jordan, you are lumping our entire culture into one single thought concept? No one is confusing competence with tyrannical power. Our hierarchies are masculine but not male dominated? Contradict yourself much Jordan? Helen correctly defines patriarchy and JP disagrees? What a complete dork. Helen is taking a tiny substrata of men? No she didn't. Try listening before you speak, you will make less foolish errors. Why would you blame men for barring women from professions? Gee I don't know Jordan, because men were the one's doing the barring?]
    1
  629.  @dreamingmusic3299  Hard evidence? Let's see it. An intellectual statement by Peterson. Something useful that your average middle schooler couldn't figure out on their own.
    1
  630. Thousands of people want to live in a pluralistic society with a free exchange of ideas except the Left Dave? Are you sure? Read the comments here. How many conservatives are acting like everything the Left says is just some more libtard crap? Just randomly grabbing a recent one: "Democrats use minorities the same way terrorists use human shields." Sure this is conservatives arguing for a pluralistic exchange of ideas, while the liberal libtards don't. Your argument Dave appears to be that conservatives are more bipartisan that liberals. I have watched enough Fox and PragerU to know that is not the case.
    1
  631. Compassion isn't a virtue? Peterson is so full of crap. Truth will set you free? Figure that one out on your own Dave? Pretty sure I already heard that somewhere. Truth compassion are good traits? Holy crap Dave you are really going deep. But you just disagreed with Peterson.
    1
  632. I know, Rubin dramatically exaggerates everything for his gullible conservative fan base.
    1
  633.  @gunsandpoker7432  Dave Rubin thinks that Joy Behar joking about the Eiffel Tower to melt earns him rolling his eyes at liberals. Pretty weak Dave. Your gullible conservative fan base will fall for it but get above 100 IQ, not bloody likely.
    1
  634. Let's plug into DR. Pretendhead at 7:00. 'There is nothing behind it but the most instrumentally and cowardly random polling, how do you get accurate polling data, how did you construct the questions... Let's jump to 30:00: 'Don't screw it up with facile criticism, you have to do a detailed analysis, where is it procedurally going wrong the whole thing needs to be burned to the ground, people don't want a detailed analysis of the problem, it is heuristics, you are not seeing me, I am not there, you don't see my cellular structure, what is the job, a heuristic turns into a bias, you don't know what you don't know, people who want to fix the power system they don't know how to do home wiring, I worked on a committee and they kept my changes... [OK so guy who complains about facile criticism spends an hour giving us facile criticism like people don't want a detailed analysis, there is cowardly random polling, and people can't see his cellular structure, and someone who can't install home wiring may have any idea to improve efficient and cleaner use of electricity? Dave, help me out here, why are you nodding at Peterson's heuristic nonsense from start to finish?]
    1
  635. But God is pro choice.
    1
  636.  GR Reed  Most reviews call 2000 mules a hoax. Answer this. How do the mules get the ballots and why does the film never show the same mule at different drop boxes? The gloves? Worn to not get COVID from ballots.
    1
  637. We are searching for a coherent insightful idea by JP. No one can find one.
    1
  638.  @kp8381  But God is pro choice.
    1
  639. Let's plug in to JP at 5:00; I don't like a bill of rights, my father isn't vaccinated, there is nothing behind it except cowardly random polling, do you poll every minute, if you are not vaccinated you can't leave Canada, I have to get tested, I think that vaccinated are less contagious, the least trusted institutions include big pharma, the Left is now trust big pharma, for health and safety is good, climate change is not a big challenge.... then Rubin says he has honest conversation and not on stop yelling...uh wait didn't we just listen to non stop yelling by JP? JP doesn't like the Bill of Rights? Like free speech and freedom of religion? A core question though is why is JP lecturing on science, medicine. and the environment? The guy isn't a scientist. He claims our biggest environmental challenge is over fishing in the ocean. No it isn't Jordan, not even close. Apparently Peterson is trying to make the claim that big pharma are the ones mandating the restrictions. Only the ultra gullible fall for that argument.
    1
  640. ​ @pauldobell But God is pro choice and Rubin is the master of Strawman arguments. Note that Rubin thinks that Peterson ARC video is impressive.
    1
  641.  @laurienorton7422  Thou shalt choose when thou shalt deliver thy progeny.
    1
  642.  @laurienorton7422  Raise all thy progeny in the arms of the love and intentions of the man and the woman. Let no child arrive to the earth without thy love and intent.
    1
  643.  @Dustwitch  But people clap for Jordan Peterson word salad.
    1
  644.  @YourPersonalBoogeymanDJT  What am I wrong about?
    1
  645.  @YourPersonalBoogeymanDJT  JP is a fake intellectual. I am a real intellectual since I realize things that JP does not, for example that characterization is a precondition for individual freedom, there is no technical difference between thinking about yourself and being miserable, cognitive systems have axiomatic levels, and compassion doesn't scale as you move up the hierarchy of complexity, and also that the biblical corpus is a collection of narratives that shine a different light on the hierarchy of perception. What faith means is that you act out the proposition that you can ride the wave as big as it comes, all together in good will. Canonical patterns of being for what we act out in the world, waves of behavioral patterns across time, no one in their right mind would argue that numbers are not true, there are stories about you and you and you and the human experience as such, the thing is the pattern of their being, the process has been occurring for thousands of years, a representation of the distillation of the process, and now about fairy tales that are really old, cultures that don't change stay the same, while creatures with nervous systems watch each other.
    1
  646. One of them said we something intelligent? Where?
    1
  647.  @cynthiajohnson9412  True, all Peterson does is complain. The guy never has a solution to anything.
    1
  648.  @cynthiajohnson9412  It isn't the whole point of everything he does, otherwise he wouldn't be continually expressing his thoughts on society. 'Our hierarchies are a third of a billion years old, you can't blame them on capitalism and the West.' He whines about non-existent things, proclaims ideas that everyone already knows, without ever having a solution to anything.
    1
  649.  @cynthiajohnson9412  95% of what I say is rubbish, just to impress people... Jordan Peterson.
    1
  650.  @mr4nders0n  No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  651.  Reactive Forever  BFM, black fetus matter.
    1
  652.  @hotrodbod1  Best to let parents choose when to become parents.
    1
  653.  @ashdav9980  If amnio detects a defect and you want to abort, you should be able to. I am advocating that the world is a better place if all children are born healthy to two caring and prepared parents. This requires choice.
    1
  654.  @hotrodbod1  Any male not trying to procreate should use the withdrawal method also. As for taxpayers, the cost of unwanted children far exceeds the cost of abortion.
    1
  655.  @davidcole1475  No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  656.  @mariannefaulkner3445  No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  657.  @leesa3140  'Sacrifice makes a difference, the hierarchy of identity, the lower to the higher, proximal hedonic whims, the payback is good, to escape from primordial narcissism, some things go wrong with children, having children can be rewarding, there is no technical difference between thinking about yourself and being miserable, serve a higher purpose, technically, think about a fork and a table and a plate as a microcosm of the universe, that is all real, we forgot responsibility...' Let's see what to put in the blank. 'Rambling Self Absorbed Nonsensical.' Dave? Can you edit the title?
    1
  658.  @leesa3140  I know you love listening to him. That isn't my question. Timestamp and quote a profound intellectual coherent useful idea by Peterson anywhere in this video.
    1
  659.  @leesa3140  What you are missing is the video is supposed to be a plan to save the world, the ARC. Where Peterson rambles incoherently about ideas everyone on earth already knows. Neither you or me can find anything Peterson said that you didn't know already. You heard him state there is meaning in responsibility to others, duh, and pretending that is a world plan.
    1
  660.  @leesa3140  JP is a fake intellectual, I am a real intellectual since I realize that we do not understand pre-experimental thinking, so we try to explain it in terms that we do understand – which means that we explain it away, define it as nonsense. After all, we think scientifically – so we believe – and we think we know what that means (since scientific thinking can in principle be defined). We are familiar with scientific thinking, and value it highly – so we tend to presume that that is all there is to thinking (that all other “forms of thought” are approximations, at best, to the ideal of scientific thought). But this is not accurate. Thinking also and more fundamentally is specification of value – is specification of implication for behavior. This means that categorization, with regards to value –determination (or even perception) of what constitutes a single thing, or class of things – is the act of grouping together according to implication for behavior.  Do you agree?
    1
  661.  @Mudpathmamma  We are searching for an intellectual idea by Peterson. Did you find one?
    1
  662.  @Paul-sj5db  I am addressing what he said. It is complete nonsense. Bureaucrats cause a health crisis? Like when Trump banned travel from China in the early COVID days? Peterson appeals to gullible conservatives while never having a useful idea about anything. He is a fake intellectual whiner. Peterson is claiming that a COVID test for international travel is causing the biggest health crisis of our time? What a total idiot. He makes these totally flawed logic claims, realizing that his gullible conservative fan base won't see through it. Like him saying he is the only person on earth who has discussed responsibility and meaning for the last fifty years.
    1
  663.  @rngd0875  Depression suicide opioids are primarily the result of tax policies that push people into poverty at the mercy of wealthy landlords and investors. Do you have a solution to regulating greed?
    1
  664.  @tlraffaele  Peterson said something intelligent in this video? I promise to check it out.
    1
  665.  @rngd0875  I didn't say tax policies are greedy corporations. Fifty years ago the income inequity gap was 20x, now it is 350x due to tax cuts to the rich. That reduces hope in the bottom third of the population leading to depression and drug use, infinitely more than government response to COVID. Thus Peterson is full of crap. Again, what is your solution to regulating greed?
    1
  666.  @rebeccamccord6136  If you identity with yourself then you are a tyrant.. Jordan Peterson.
    1
  667. Did Peterson say something intelligent?
    1
  668.  @ghettotrout2011  You found an insightful idea by Peterson?
    1
  669.  @ghettotrout2011  Speech is the most social form of thought... Jordan Peterson.
    1
  670.  @ghettotrout2011  Outside of self help stuff has he had an intellectual idea?
    1
  671.  @ghettotrout2011  Did he say anything coherent and intellectual in this video?
    1
  672.  @ghettotrout2011  Ok neither of us can find an intelligent coherent useful idea in this interview. Glad we agree.
    1
  673.  @ghettotrout2011  I was asking for something beyond what every fourth grader already knows. Listen doesn't qualify.
    1
  674.  @ghettotrout2011  If you do stumble across this alleged smart statement by Peterson LMK.
    1
  675.  @ghettotrout2011  I understand you feel he is smart you just don't know where that happened. BTW you have no idea how much I know about Peterson.
    1
  676. ​ @FunkMaster_J But Tucker Carlson totally makes stuff up.
    1
  677.  @j.m.8618  Almost everything Tucker says. "Could it be that the Ukraine war was planned to enrich democratic coffers?". Sure Tucker, could it be that the moon is made of cheese? Pick a recent Tucker Carlson video and I will rip it to pieces.
    1
  678.  @Grizzly_Adams.  What is the title of that video? 'Could it be that Ukraine is a plan to enrich democrat coffers?' Seriously Tucker? The democrats told Putin to invade Ukraine?
    1
  679.  @j.m.8618  Thank you for your feelings. Point me to a Tucker video where he uses facts. Good luck. In legal proceedings Tucker is described as entertainment, no one takes his opinions as news.
    1
  680.  @j.m.8618  Low resolution thinking by JP Poor Jordan got totally destroyed in this debate. 'All along hardly anyone had any opportunities, the idea that the West is a tyrannical patriarchy is rapidly that young men who strive forward are to be regarded as suspicion...that narrative is appalling, failing to encourage men to be strong does no good, less than one dollar today in today's money, very very very very very difficult, we are rife with stupidity and malevolance, the data indicate that egalitarian policies have maximized the differences by men and women, technology allowed women to step forward like plumbing and tampons, that is not what the evidence suggests...
    1
  681.  @Grizzly_Adams.  Review this video and I will itemize why it is routine Tucker, pandering to his gullible fan base, 'Tucker Carlson: This lie could get millions of Americans killed'
    1
  682.  @j.m.8618  Review this video and copy a news element from it: Tucker Carlson: This lie could get millions of Americans killed
    1
  683.  @silentnot4812  You need the Ukraine war explained? Ego maniac power hungry Putin authorized an invasion.
    1
  684.  @388easymoney5  What is satire?
    1
  685. ​ @thatdude4571 Lots of Americans think Dave Rubin is news also.
    1
  686.  @thatdude4571  You are asking who Dave Rubin is on a video posted by Dave Rubin?
    1
  687.  @alyssaburgos6673  True, DAve Rubin lies to fit his narrative.
    1
  688. Dave Rubin doing an excellent job looking stupid: AOC a big problem is an undocumented population that can be fixed with a wall or by giving them jobs and a path to documentation. [Claps and nod of approval by host. Conclusion by Rubin; the host was aghast.] AOC: Our public systems have to pay for undocumented, unless they have jobs, like our ancestors. Dave: AOC says our ancestors came here illegally. [Uh no she didn't Dave, immigration from Europe was legal because there were not laws against immigration. Do you think the native Americans would have outlawed Europe immigration if they could?] Dave: She says the solution is just document them. [No, she didn't say that Dave, she said a wall and green card jobs are two possible solutions.] Dave: She says their plan isn't about a wall, its just bring in as many illegal immigrants that we can. [Dave, do you have noise cancelling head phones on? She didn't say that either. Oh well, your fan base won't notice the strawman.]
    1
  689. Alternate title: JP goes off the rails with incoherent ramblings about setting the dinner table and climbing Jacob's ladder.
    1
  690. Peterson said something intelligent? What?
    1
  691. No one can find a profound coherent idea by JP in this video.
    1
  692. But conservatives think Jordan Peterson is smart. Score for Leftists.
    1
  693.  @torjones1701  His PhD is in psychology, a subject that doesn't even belong in academia. Do you have an example of Peterson saying something intellectual?
    1
  694.  @torjones1701  1. Psychology is common sense. No famous psychologist has ever 'discovered' anything I couldn't figure out sitting on my couch. If I can figure it out sitting on my couch, why do you need a college degree to understand it? 2. Peterson has a medical degree? Which one? 3. Peterson said something intellectual, complex, intelligent and weighty? Can I see an example? 4. You know I have developed my opinion by reviewing snippets by other people? How do you know this? 5. Peterson demonstrated a quality of thought process? Can I see an example? Rubin considers JP intelligent, but Rubin appeals to the gullible. He is trying to make fun of Behar for saying 'until the Eiffel Tower melts'? Talk about fishing for scraps. He has also stated the View are Holocaust deniers. They aren't but Rubin knows at the cognitive level of his fans, they just swallow whatever he says.
    1
  695.  @torjones1701  Pay attention Dave. We are releasing billions of years of stored carbon back into the atmosphere in a few hundred years. That will effect the climate. Your pal Peterson doesn't even think we have an overpopulation problem. 'If you just gave these people enough power, if you use a different bag at whole foods, or that a bunch of these people who have never accomplished anything who are not thought leaders, nonsensical bureaucrats who can't tie their shoes...' Heads up Dave, try not arguing like a third grader OK? Thought leader? But you consider Peterson a thought leader. Who are these unspecified people who have never accomplished anything? Since Behar made a joke about the Eifel Tower you are trying to convince your super gullible fan base that she can't tie her shoes? Are you trying to talk people into not bringing their own grocery bag? Are you unconcerned with masses of plastic floating around in the ocean?
    1
  696.  @torjones1701  Just a pro tip. Try using facts and examples rather than your feelings. It's somewhere in Canada requirements and somewhere in Peterson videos...those are your feelings. You have no idea where I got my criticism of Peterson and you have exactly zero evidence that the View are holocaust deniers. Read my questions again and provide some evidence. Shapiro says leftists hate facts. You seem to hate facts, are you a Leftist?
    1
  697.  @torjones1701  Peterson has a medical degree, it's somewhere in Canada requirements... But I am not doing your research for you. See the problem? Destroying conservatives who think they are intellectually superior to a smart liberal is low hanging fruit, but still fun. Let's just simplify this to one. Rubin thinks Peterson is a thought leader. A profound intellectual coherent insightful useful idea on any subject anywhere by Peterson... Let's see it. "Certainly" isn't an answer. Likewise any psychology discovery by any famous psychologist that I couldn't figure out sitting on my couch... Let's see it. You are giving me your personal opinions on a variety of things... But you don't debate personal opinions? Wow. The basic issue is this. To fall for Rubin Peterson Shapiro and Carlsen you have to have the tendency to invent a reality that fits your agenda and then think you are right about it and that conservatives are smarter than liberals. Evidence facts and logical reasoning not your comfort zone. Rubin's argument is at third grade level... They can't accomplish anything and can't tie their shoes. Dunning Kruger exemplified.
    1
  698.  @torjones1701  Thank you again for your feelings. Using facts isn't really the strong suit of Rubin Peterson fans. BTW you misused the term low hanging fruit. The correct term for the Eiffel Tower thing would be grasping at straws. Do you need me to explain that further? YOU...he talks authority about weighty complex issues. ME... Can I see an example? YOU... It's on YouTube.
    1
  699.  @patd2765  Dave Rubin doing an excellent job looking stupid: AOC a big problem is an undocumented population that can be fixed with a wall or by giving them jobs and a path to documentation. [Claps and nod of approval by host. Conclusion by Rubin; the host was aghast.] AOC: Our public systems have to pay for undocumented, unless they have jobs, like our ancestors. Dave: AOC says our ancestors came here illegally. [Uh no she didn't Dave, immigration from Europe was legal because there were not laws against immigration. Do you think the native Americans would have outlawed Europe immigration if they could?] Dave: She says the solution is just document them. [No, she didn't say that Dave, she said a wall and green card jobs are two possible solutions.] Dave: She says their plan isn't about a wall, its just bring in as many illegal immigrants that we can. [Dave, do you have noise cancelling head phones on? She didn't say that either. Oh well, your fan base won't notice the strawman.]
    1
  700. How do the mules get the by ballots? Wouldn't this argue for vote by mail?
    1
  701.  @BM-fz9yc  But government shouldn't control our bodies.
    1
  702. JP is a fake intellectual, I am a real intellectual since I realize that Identity is the proper union of faith and responsibility. It does that in a hierarchical subsidiary manner, if you have conflict, you need a counter position, that is subsidiary structure. Jacob's ladder, the vine that unites the material and proximal realm of the earth with the eternal realm of heaven, how do we climb it, there is a vision of how we build ourselves, a glorious macro-vision; it is the proximal beginnings, we scaffold ourselves upward from the finite to the infinite, the scaffold constitutes our identity...also that you think so that your stupid thoughts can die instead of you. At the upper end of a hierarchy, you find people who know a lot, if you are stupid, smart people won't listen to you, so you can inform yourself with tools and you won't be an embarrassment, the careless self-evident axiom of human social interaction is that if I can force you to do something then I have the right to do it.
    1
  703. Dave Rubin doing an excellent job looking stupid: AOC a big problem is an undocumented population that can be fixed with a wall or by giving them jobs and a path to documentation. [Claps and nod of approval by host. Conclusion by Rubin; the host was aghast.] AOC: Our public systems have to pay for undocumented, unless they have jobs, like our ancestors. Dave: AOC says our ancestors came here illegally. [Uh no she didn't Dave, immigration from Europe was legal because there were not laws against immigration. Do you think the native Americans would have outlawed Europe immigration if they could?] Dave: She says the solution is just document them. [No, she didn't say that Dave, she said a wall and green card jobs are two possible solutions.] Dave: She says their plan isn't about a wall, its just bring in as many illegal immigrants that we can. [Dave, do you have noise cancelling head phones on? She didn't say that either. Oh well, your fan base won't notice the strawman.]
    1
  704.  @greebo7857  Did Peterson say something intelligent? Timestamp and quote?
    1
  705.  @MarkMcDaniel  Did Peterson say something intelligent and useful?
    1
  706.  @MarkMcDaniel  Did Peterson say something intelligent?
    1
  707.  weneedangels1632  Peterson said something brilliant? In this video? What?
    1
  708.  weneedangels1632  You can tell by the way he moves his walk Jordan is a woman's man.
    1
  709. More accurate title of this video: JP didn't convince anyone of anything, except of his own arrogant nonsense.
    1
  710. At 10:20 to 10:40 Peterson actually seems reasonably logical; he is bored talking about his problems. As for the apparent irony of a guy with serious emotional/mental problems giving life advice, that doesn't bother me. Give all the productive life advice you want. It is the advice that matters; not who is giving it.
    1
  711.  @upvotecomment2110  If you find a profound intellectual idea by Peterson LMK. I promise to check it out.
    1
  712.  @upvotecomment2110  If you find a profound intellectual idea by Peterson LMK. I promise to check it out.
    1
  713.  @upvotecomment2110  There are multiple ways to respond to people and using judgement is good? Didn't we already learn that in 4th grade? If you find a profound intellectual idea by Peterson LMK.
    1
  714.  @yt.damian  Apparently Peterson has some simple self help advice that works for people that need it. But he has never said anything that you didn't know already.
    1
  715.  @yt.damian  Millions think Peterson is an intellectual, but no one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson. Kind of weird wouldn't you say?
    1
  716.  @newfreenayshaun6651  No one can find an intellectual or useful idea by JP.
    1
  717.  @forzatuner3916  I have invited Peterson to debate. He is afraid of me.
    1
  718.  @mylesg7278  We are searching for an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  719.  @mylesg7278  We are searching for an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  720.  @yt.damian  Peterson had an intellectual idea? Can I see it, like in a YT video?
    1
  721.  @yt.damian  Has Peterson ever said anything that you didn't know already?
    1
  722.  @yt.damian  Again, has Peterson ever said anything that you didn't know already? What was it? Was it intellectual?
    1
  723.  @yt.damian  Google the word intellectual or use your own definition. Peterson had an insight you didn't already know? What? JP is a fake intellectual.  I am a real intellectual since I realize things that JP does not, for example that characterization is a precondition for individual freedom, there is no technical difference between thinking about yourself and being miserable, cognitive systems have axiomatic levels, and compassion doesn't scale as you move up the hierarchy of complexity, and also that the biblical corpus is a collection of narratives that shine a different light on the hierarchy of perception.  What faith means is that you act out the proposition that you can ride the wave as big as it comes, all together in good will.  Canonical patterns of being for what we act out in the world, waves of behavioral patterns across time, no one in their right mind would argue that numbers are not true, there are stories about you and you and you and the human experience as such, the thing is the pattern of their being, the process has been occurring for thousands of years, a representation of the distillation of the process, fairy tales that are really old, cultures that don't change stay the same, while creatures with nervous systems watch each other. Jordan Peterson JP doesn't have the intellectual ability I have, since I realize that the future is unpredictable technically, you are not a clockwork machine, what does free will mean, you are not a deterministic clockwork machine, I move my arm in a complex way, I set it up in a deterministic way, as we implement our actions the horizon of possibility collapses into a deterministic actuality, the farther out into the future, the less deterministic our perceptions necessarily become, you are a visionary, you have to reconfigure how you think scientifically, you think there are objects and you react to those objects, and that is not true, you don't see objects, none of that is true, you don't see objects you see patterns that are functional.
    1
  724.  @mylesg7278  We are searching for an intellectual idea by JP, no one can find one.
    1
  725.  @mylesg7278  We are searching for an intellectual idea by JP.
    1
  726.  @wstavis3135  I agree. You can't find an intellectual idea by Peterson. Did you know that highly trained affective neuroscientists recognize that there is biological and behavioral continuity between humans and animals? Uh thanks Jordan, but third graders know that also. I thought about it psychologically and realized that the future is technically unpredictable. You needed psychology to figure out that the future is unpredictable Jordan? JP is a fake intellectual.  I am a real intellectual since I realize things that JP does not, for example that characterization is a precondition for individual freedom, there is no technical difference between thinking about yourself and being miserable, cognitive systems have axiomatic levels, and compassion doesn't scale as you move up the hierarchy of complexity, and also that the biblical corpus is a collection of narratives that shine a different light on the hierarchy of perception.  What faith means is that you act out the proposition that you can ride the wave as big as it comes, all together in good will.  Canonical patterns of being for what we act out in the world, waves of behavioral patterns across time, no one in their right mind would argue that numbers are not true, there are stories about you and you and you and the human experience as such, the thing is the pattern of their being, the process has been occurring for thousands of years, a representation of the distillation of the process, fairy tales that are really old, cultures that don't change stay the same, while creatures with nervous systems watch each other. Jordan Peterson JP doesn't have the intellectual ability I have, since I realize that the future is unpredictable technically, you are not a clockwork machine, what does free will mean, you are not a deterministic clockwork machine, I move my arm in a complex way, I set it up in a deterministic way, as we implement our actions the horizon of possibility collapses into a deterministic actuality, the farther out into the future, the less deterministic our perceptions necessarily become, you are a visionary, you have to reconfigure how you think scientifically, you think there are objects and you react to those objects, and that is not true, you don't see objects, none of that is true, you don't see objects you see patterns that are functional.
    1
  727.  @wstavis3135  JP is a fake intellectual. I am a real intellectual since I realize things that JP does not, for example that characterization is a precondition for individual freedom, there is no technical difference between thinking about yourself and being miserable, cognitive systems have axiomatic levels, and compassion doesn't scale as you move up the hierarchy of complexity, and also that the biblical corpus is a collection of narratives that shine a different light on the hierarchy of perception. What faith means is that you act out the proposition that you can ride the wave as big as it comes, all together in good will. Canonical patterns of being for what we act out in the world, waves of behavioral patterns across time, no one in their right mind would argue that numbers are not true, there are stories about you and you and you and the human experience as such, the thing is the pattern of their being, the process has been occurring for thousands of years, a representation of the distillation of the process, fairy tales that are really old, cultures that don't change stay the same, while creatures with nervous systems watch each other. Jordan Peterson JP doesn't have the intellectual ability I have, since I realize that the future is unpredictable technically, you are not a clockwork machine, what does free will mean, you are not a deterministic clockwork machine, I move my arm in a complex way, I set it up in a deterministic way, as we implement our actions the horizon of possibility collapses into a deterministic actuality, the farther out into the future, the less deterministic our perceptions necessarily become, you are a visionary, you have to reconfigure how you think scientifically, you think there are objects and you react to those objects, and that is not true, you don't see objects, none of that is true, you don't see objects you see patterns that are functional.
    1
  728.  @wstavis3135  JP is a fake intellectual.  I am a real intellectual since I realize things that JP does not, for example that characterization is a precondition for individual freedom, there is no technical difference between thinking about yourself and being miserable, cognitive systems have axiomatic levels, and compassion doesn't scale as you move up the hierarchy of complexity, and also that the biblical corpus is a collection of narratives that shine a different light on the hierarchy of perception.  What faith means is that you act out the proposition that you can ride the wave as big as it comes, all together in good will.  Canonical patterns of being for what we act out in the world, waves of behavioral patterns across time, no one in their right mind would argue that numbers are not true, there are stories about you and you and you and the human experience as such, the thing is the pattern of their being, the process has been occurring for thousands of years, a representation of the distillation of the process, fairy tales that are really old, cultures that don't change stay the same, while creatures with nervous systems watch each other. Jordan Peterson JP doesn't have the intellectual ability I have, since I realize that the future is unpredictable technically, you are not a clockwork machine, what does free will mean, you are not a deterministic clockwork machine, I move my arm in a complex way, I set it up in a deterministic way, as we implement our actions the horizon of possibility collapses into a deterministic actuality, the farther out into the future, the less deterministic our perceptions necessarily become, you are a visionary, you have to reconfigure how you think scientifically, you think there are objects and you react to those objects, and that is not true, you don't see objects, none of that is true, you don't see objects you see patterns that are functional.
    1
  729.  @wstavis3135  I agree, you can't find an intellectual idea by JP, however: JP is a fake intellectual. I am a real intellectual since I realize things that JP does not, for example that characterization is a precondition for individual freedom, there is no technical difference between thinking about yourself and being miserable, cognitive systems have axiomatic levels, and compassion doesn't scale as you move up the hierarchy of complexity, and also that the biblical corpus is a collection of narratives that shine a different light on the hierarchy of perception. What faith means is that you act out the proposition that you can ride the wave as big as it comes, all together in good will. Canonical patterns of being for what we act out in the world, waves of behavioral patterns across time, no one in their right mind would argue that numbers are not true, there are stories about you and you and you and the human experience as such, the thing is the pattern of their being, the process has been occurring for thousands of years, a representation of the distillation of the process, fairy tales that are really old, cultures that don't change stay the same, while creatures with nervous systems watch each other. Jordan Peterson JP doesn't have the intellectual ability I have, since I realize that the future is unpredictable technically, you are not a clockwork machine, what does free will mean, you are not a deterministic clockwork machine, I move my arm in a complex way, I set it up in a deterministic way, as we implement our actions the horizon of possibility collapses into a deterministic actuality, the farther out into the future, the less deterministic our perceptions necessarily become, you are a visionary, you have to reconfigure how you think scientifically, you think there are objects and you react to those objects, and that is not true, you don't see objects, none of that is true, you don't see objects you see patterns that are functional.
    1
  730.  @wstavis3135  JP is a fake intellectual.  I am a real intellectual since I realize things that JP does not, for example that characterization is a precondition for individual freedom, there is no technical difference between thinking about yourself and being miserable, cognitive systems have axiomatic levels, and compassion doesn't scale as you move up the hierarchy of complexity, and also that the biblical corpus is a collection of narratives that shine a different light on the hierarchy of perception.  What faith means is that you act out the proposition that you can ride the wave as big as it comes, all together in good will.  Canonical patterns of being for what we act out in the world, waves of behavioral patterns across time, no one in their right mind would argue that numbers are not true, there are stories about you and you and you and the human experience as such, the thing is the pattern of their being, the process has been occurring for thousands of years, a representation of the distillation of the process, fairy tales that are really old, cultures that don't change stay the same, while creatures with nervous systems watch each other. Jordan Peterson JP doesn't have the intellectual ability I have, since I realize that the future is unpredictable technically, you are not a clockwork machine, what does free will mean, you are not a deterministic clockwork machine, I move my arm in a complex way, I set it up in a deterministic way, as we implement our actions the horizon of possibility collapses into a deterministic actuality, the farther out into the future, the less deterministic our perceptions necessarily become, you are a visionary, you have to reconfigure how you think scientifically, you think there are objects and you react to those objects, and that is not true, you don't see objects, none of that is true, you don't see objects you see patterns that are functional.
    1
  731.  @wstavis3135  Peterson has simple self help advice that helps some people. That is great, but that isn't my question. I am just pointing out that neither of us can find an intellectual idea by Peterson. I need to prove what your definition of intellectual is? Strange theory. ''Compassion isn't a virtue, compassion is a reflex, treating adults like infants is not virtuous, love is a blend of compassion and encouragement and truth, it is complicated man, to foster growth requires judgement...' [What an absolute load of crap. Who on earth needs JP to tell us what love is or how to treat adults or to explain encouragement and truth? Is Rubin trying to claim that JP is sharing something worthwhile?] Compassion isn't a virtue, but judicious compassion is a virtue? Huh? Treating adults like infants is not virtuous? OK sure, who is doing that exactly? Love is a blend of compassion and truth and encouragement? The growth element requires judgement. You can be more than you are... Dave: We can use a little judgement. Uh Dave, did you use any judgement putting together this video?
    1
  732.  @p8196  Agreed. Peterson didn't say anything intellectual or get Friedman to see the error of his ways. Just some weird arrogant rambling about how compassion isn't a virtue but compassion is a virtue and you shouldn't treat adults as infants.
    1
  733.  @p8196  'if you love someone or at least care about their well being then you’ll tell them the truth, which may not be what they want to hear.'? That is what JP is saying? Sorry not impressed with the depth of his message or his clarity in expressing it.
    1
  734.  @iridium8341  No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  735.  @bencoonen6652  If you note, JP mission is to always been seen as the smartest person in the room, the self appointed explainer of the world, 'look what I figured out that no one else knows'. Problem is, he has never stated a profound, useful, coherent idea about anything. Basic ideas wrapped in self important vocabulary and ambiguous structure. In this video he is rude and dismissive with nonsense points about how compassion isn't a virtue, but it is a virtue, and parents should use judgement. Try this; produce a single statement by JP that doesn't fit the mold I described. Is it wrong to point out that you shouldn't give sugar to a diabetic? Of course not. But what kind of idiot goes on YT to tell us that like we need that explained to us? I can give you one name. Millions of fans claim his ideas have helped them. I fully support him on that. Millions of fans also claim he is a brilliant intellectual but can't think of a single brilliant intellectual thing he has ever said. As a sociology experiment in mass delusion, it is unparalleled.
    1
  736.  @bencoonen6652  As for humans in general and world issues, have you ever heard Peterson offer a solution to anything?
    1
  737. Rubin appeals to the gullible who don't realize that releasing billions of years of stored carbon back into the atmosphere in a few hundred years will change the climate.
    1
  738. Peterson had an intelligent idea?
    1
  739. No one can find a profound analysis by Rubin. His argument is 'look at her face and you can see I am right'. Pretty wimpy Dave.
    1
  740.  @djjazzyjeff1232  Rubin shows something to me and lets me see it in context? Where did that happen?
    1
  741.  @djjazzyjeff1232  Rubin generally presents such astonishing evidence as... You can see how stupid she is by the look on her face. Facts and evidence, not Rubin cup of tea.
    1
  742.  @artificialintelligence143  Tucker always makes stuff up. Watch the video this lie will get many killed. Tucker thinks the Ukraine war was invented by democrats.
    1
  743.  @artificialintelligence143  Where did Tucker show us that?
    1
  744.  @ChineseBandits  You have some facts? Can I see some. Here is one fact. Tucker is not a journalist. He is a guy looking for news bits that he can distort and manufacture into his mission: Democrats are evil liars.
    1
  745.  @mark_downunder  Is Rubin joking? JP most important speech? Dave? Please timestamp and quote an important and useful idea by JP anywhere in this entire video. Good luck. Well the most important speech JP has ever made; not a very high bar. 'Identity is the proper union of faith and responsibility. It does that in a hierarchical subsidiary manner, if you have conflict, you need a counter position, that is subsidiary structure. Jacob's ladder the vine that unites the material and proximal realm of the earth with the eternal realm of heaven, how do we climb it, there is a vision of how we build ourselves, a glorious macro-vision; it is the proximal beginnings, we scaffold ourselves upward from the finite to the infinite, the scaffold constitutes our identity...'
    1
  746.  @bobbygene8274  No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  747.  @johnobrien1528  Rubin accusing the View of being not intelligent? Funny. The pot calling the kettle black.
    1
  748.  @johnobrien1528  Thank you for your third grade level argument. You should check out this guy called Dave Rubin, he has the same style.
    1
  749.  @johnobrien1528  Rubin with his playground level insults attracts the like kind. Kind of a conservative pundit phenomena. You have a question? What? Here is mine, does Rubin have an intellectual fact based statement in this video?
    1
  750.  @johnobrien1528  You have some facts to present? Sure let's see them. Here are some facts: Pay attention Dave. We are releasing billions of years of stored carbon back into the atmosphere in a few hundred years. That will effect the climate. Your pal Peterson doesn't even think we have an overpopulation problem. 'If you just gave these people enough power, if you use a different bag at whole foods, or that a bunch of these people who have never accomplished anything who are not thought leaders, nonsensical bureaucrats who can't tie their shoes...' Heads up Dave, try not arguing like a third grader OK? Thought leader? But you consider Peterson a thought leader. Who are these unspecified people who have never accomplished anything? Since Behar made a joke about the Eifel Tower you are trying to convince your super gullible fan base that she can't tie her shoes? Are you trying to talk people into not bringing their own grocery bag? Are you unconcerned with masses of plastic floating around in the ocean? If you just give these people enough power? So you are alleging that the eco movement is the result of a power motivation by someone? Weird theory.
    1
  751.  @johnobrien1528  I feel that The best way to interact is individual to individual and as if they are part of the process by which things we don't understand can yet be explored and by things that aren't properly organized in our society can yet be set right. And that Free speech also is the mechanism by which we generate the conceptions that allow us to organize our experience in the world, it is the mechanism that allows us to reformulate and criticize those conceptions when they become outdated and sterile, to reanimate them in a new form so we can move into the future.
    1
  752. Hey Candace, what is your solution to regulating greed? The majority of Democrats are scumbags who want to destroy this country? Not a very diplomatic proposal. Russell generally believes what he is saying? Pretty sure a lot of people do that Candace. You want to discover the truth? Most democrats are scumbags who want to destroy the country is a form of truth? People on the Left don't want to sit down with people on the Right? I will do that. LMK when, lets talk regulating greed, path to peace, protecting the environment, and health care. Dave, want to set this up?
    1
  753.  @josephgaviota  Rubin has a hard time understanding nuance. The core problem is housing costs, caused by wealthy real estate investors profiting off the work of others. What is your solution to regulating greed?
    1
  754.  @jmac463  Rubin has a hard time understanding nuance. The core problem is housing costs, caused by wealthy real estate investors profiting off the work of others. What is your solution to regulating greed?
    1
  755. I think you mean JP's mind is an adolescent, while his body is an adult.
    1
  756.  @marybethmiranda3037  Peterson said something intelligent and coherent? What?
    1
  757. No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  758.  @andreamerciar3779  What I mean is that you, me, and everyone else can't find a profound intellectual coherent useful idea by Peterson in this video or any other. Everything he has ever said that is coherent, you already knew.
    1
  759.  @house0paine535  True, JP has no useful insightful ideas in this video that Dave Rubin calls his most important.
    1
  760.  @house0paine535  Let's check out this allegedly important speech... a solution that beckons and is generous, we have odds about identity, to a psychological integration, and now I delve into what identity is, and also what social structure must and should be, faith and responsibility, faith is the courage to welcome the future, the future is the manifestation of possibility into actuality, the treasure house of the unknown possibility, with courageous faith, being and becoming are intrinsically good....Huh? Doesn't this guy claim to be precise in your speech?
    1
  761. No one can find a profound intellectual idea by Rubin.
    1
  762. At 29:00 JP: 'It is proving very difficult for defenders of enlightenment values to put up an effective fight against this assault on the idea of ompotence. There is nothing solid enough there for some reason'. [I bet even Rubin doesn't know what Peterson is talking about here. Dave? Is ompotence even a word?]
    1
  763. JP is a fake intellectual, I am a real intellectual since I realize that Identity is the proper union of faith and responsibility. It does that in a hierarchical subsidiary manner, if you have conflict, you need a counter position, that is subsidiary structure. Jacob's ladder, the vine that unites the material and proximal realm of the earth with the eternal realm of heaven, how do we climb it, there is a vision of how we build ourselves, a glorious macro-vision; it is the proximal beginnings, we scaffold ourselves upward from the finite to the infinite, the scaffold constitutes our identity...also that you think so that your stupid thoughts can die instead of you. At the upper end of a hierarchy, you find people who know a lot, if you are stupid, smart people won't listen to you, so you can inform yourself with tools and you won't be an embarrassment, the careless self-evident axiom of human social interaction is that if I can force you to do something then I have the right to do it.
    1
  764.  @darwinhughey3861  Peterson used AI to generate his speech? Now that is believable considering it is basically words but no meaning.
    1
  765. Peterson at 21:00 'People go to the bathroom there is not Zero pollution, net zero is an empty talking point, it is not careful thinking that produces a solution...' [Heads up Jordan no one is suggesting we can get to zero pollution, the stated goal is NET ZERO CO2. You are welcome for the lesson in basic logic and science. Careful thinking that produces a solution? Dave, has Jordan ever done that himself?] 'How about copious energy for everyone as clean as possible, resilient stable systems, the only thing you should care about is cheap energy, work makes people prosperous and secure, what is work, it is the expenditure of energy, what is energy, work wealth, energy is everything, US has knocked CO2 down by 14% in the last couple of decades because of fracking, war is not good for the environment...' Jump to 34:00 'I rewrote sections of the document and my rewrites stuck, I did the work, they didn't have time to rewrite it, high end people are busy, they don't have time to analyze sustainable development goals...the only person trained to do it is Lomborg...' [So JP's solution is lots of cheap energy for everyone? Does he have a magic wand to make this happen? Does he not realize that many of our environmental problems are related to energy consumption funding consumerism? What is work? Work is energy? I think JP is confusing work by people with the concept of work and energy in pure physics. Whoops. He wants to brag that he wrote sections that stuck? Maybe that happened, I will check it out. The other people didn't have time to analyze sustainable development goals? He knows this how? Literally every sentence out of his mouth is total nonsense, including that CO2 levels have dropped by 14% and that is due to fracking. The only person trained to analyze sustainable goals is Lomborg? Like in the entire world Jordan. Dave, help me out here, why are you nodding your head to this nonsense?]
    1
  766.  @koroglurustem1722  Has Peterson ever offered a solution to anything? I have never heard one. Pick a problem and I will tell you the solution. Is Peterson just waving his hands and spouting whatever illogical idea that pops into his head? Yes. If he expressed a logical idea here please point me to it.
    1
  767.  @koroglurustem1722  As to Peterson's claim that he successfully edited UN papers I found the below. His claim that the upper end people don't have time to develop goals is absolute delusional nonsense. " I checked it out, and it seems that when he says "worked for," he means that he was "an advisor" to former RIM CEO and Member of the UN High-level Panel on Global Sustainability, Jim Balsille, who is now Chair of the Board of Directors for Sustainable Development Technology Canada. Balsille was Chair of the Board of Centre for International Governance Innovation when Peterson was his advisor and Balsille's title at this time may have been what put him on the UN Secretary-General's High-Level Panel on Global Sustainability. Peterson is credited on page 92 of the UNSG's Panel report alongside Balsille's sherpas. This work experience is also mentioned, though with no details about the nature of the work, on Peterson's About page.
    1
  768.  @koroglurustem1722  My solution is federal infrastructure assistance to cities who submit transit friendly growth plans and free in mass transit in all urban areas both funded by a ten percent decrease in military budget. Widespread dissemination on the effectiveness of the withdrawal method, incentives for one child families, and mandatory birth control if you are on welfare.
    1
  769.  @koroglurustem1722  Does lomborg have a solution?
    1
  770.  @koroglurustem1722  I don't read books. If you find his solution LMK.
    1
  771. Peterson is a genius? Can I see an example?
    1
  772.  @koroglurustem1722  Peterson made a genius statement? Something your average middle schooler couldn't figure out on their own? What was it?
    1
  773.  @koroglurustem1722  If you were oriented in the highest manner you could be oriented then the contents of your categories would be subservient to the good...Consciousness is a world engendering force, without it the cosmos as such would not exist....the purpose of memory is not to remember things but why is thinking important...I am trying to determine if transcendent values genuinely exist but I have determined that speech is the most social form of thought and we use language to describe stuff...to be out of concordance with reality you think of the totalitarian impulse underneath....a journey outside of language outside of linguistic certainty...an over emphasis on certainty puts you in a prison that bars you from a well...sacred implies deep...no one disputes the proposition that some stories are deeper than others...movement in a direction that is better than what you know, is there is anything that could possibly more fervently hoped for than that, the amount of evil that is a result of our moral insufficiency is indeterminate. Agreeableness negatively predicts success in the workplace. It is foolish to credit the woman's movement for advances in women's rights. Our hierarchies are of competence not power but they are also of power, the West is not an oppressive patriarchy but the West is an oppressive patriarchy, our hierarchies are masculine but not male dominated, some pole vaulters are better than others....Winning a championship and winning a game are not the same thing. We don't know how we manage the active perception, perceiving the world turns out to be way more complicated than anyone ever imagined, we think there are objects out there and we just see them. Clinical psychology research has determined that if you set goals and strive for goals you may achieve them... Jordan Peterson.
    1
  774.  @koroglurustem1722  1. morality is something embedded in human nature, not a mere cultural construction. This statement is of absolutely no use to anyone anywhere and also a straw man; no one is arguing that morality is a mere cultural construction. 2. we have that "depth perception" about stories and we can tell which story is shallow from which is "deep". True, but everyone in the world has a sense of determining some shallow revelation in a movie or book to a deep one. Again, an insightful coherent and useful idea by JP anywhere if you can find it.
    1
  775.  @koroglurustem1722  You say that JP blows your mind in such incredibly articulate way, but you can't find anything coherent that JP has said that any middle schooler couldn't figure out on their own. JP is followed by blind ideologues. They feel he is smart, they just don't know where that happened.
    1
  776.  @mark_downunder  Is Rubin joking? JP most important speech? Dave? Please timestamp and quote an important and useful idea by JP anywhere in this entire video. Good luck. Well the most important speech JP has ever made; not a very high bar. 'Identity is the proper union of faith and responsibility. It does that in a hierarchical subsidiary manner, if you have conflict, you need a counter position, that is subsidiary structure. Jacob's ladder the vine that unites the material and proximal realm of the earth with the eternal realm of heaven, how do we climb it, there is a vision of how we build ourselves, a glorious macro-vision; it is the proximal beginnings, we scaffold ourselves upward from the finite to the infinite, the scaffold constitutes our identity...'
    1
  777.  @smartbart80  An impressive amount of nonsense packed into 24:00 minutes. Important isn't the word I would use Dave. Easily the Most _______________ Speech JP has ever done. 'Sacrifice makes a difference, the hierarchy of identity, the lower to the higher, proximal hedonic whims, the payback is good, to escape from primordial narcissism, some things go wrong with children, having children can be rewarding, there is no technical difference between thinking about yourself and being miserable, serve a higher purpose, technically, think about a fork and a table and a plate as a microcosm of the universe, that is all real, we forgot responsibility...' Let's see what to put in the blank. Rambling Self Absorbed Nonsensical. Dave? Can you edit the title?
    1
  778.  @thereignofthezero225  We are searching for an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  779.  @DonDezz  No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  780.  @DonDezz  No, I mean you also.
    1
  781.  @DonDezz  I oppose the training and silencing of Peterson. He has every right to be a pseudo intellectual on YouTube.
    1
  782.  @DonDezz  I did learn something from this video. If you climb Jacobs ladder with a fork and a plate you can organize the cosmos and ascend to the shining city on the hill.
    1
  783.  @billhair9552  No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  784. An impressive amount of nonsense packed into 24:00 minutes. Important isn't the word I would use Dave. Easily the Most _________________ Speech JP has ever done. 'Sacrifice makes a difference, the hierarchy of identity, the lower to the higher, proximal hedonic whims, the payback is good, to escape from primordial narcissism, some things go wrong with children, having children can be rewarding, there is no technical difference between thinking about yourself and being miserable, serve a higher purpose, technically, think about a fork and a table and a plate as a microcosm of the universe, that is all real, we forgot responsibility...' Let's see what to put in the blank. Rambling Self Absorbed Nonsensical. Dave? Can you edit the title?
    1
  785.  @ragingnalgas  Peterson's comment is stupid and useless. He is throwing out these phrases so someday he will be considered a modern day philosopher. What is his point, you can't be a wise cynic?
    1
  786.  @martinloney6322  Peterson as the routine whining cynic attempts to approximate wisdom.
    1
  787.  @reahthorolund8373  Peterson said something that isn't rude nonsense? Where?
    1
  788.  @reahthorolund8373  Timestamp and quote Peterson having a useful coherent idea about anything somewhere in this video. I promise to check it out. The rude thing was a typo. He wasn't rude in this one, he was rude in the gq interview.
    1
  789.  @reahthorolund8373  Ok neither of us can find an intelligent coherent useful idea by Peterson in this video. Glad we agree.
    1
  790.  @reahthorolund8373  Peterson fans love to use the term straw man but they typically don't know what it means. I am simply commenting correctly that neither of us can find an intelligent coherent idea by Peterson anywhere in this video. Straw man would be me knocking down an argument you didn't present in attempt to defeat an argument you did present.
    1
  791.  @reahthorolund8373  Incorrect. You stated it is absurd to claim everything Peterson said here is nonsense, i.e. according to you something he said isn't nonsense. So this statement by Peterson that isn't nonsense, let's see it. And by saying it isn't nonsense are you implying it is in some way insightful? There are two possibilities... Peterson expresses insightful ideas earning him the title of intellectual, or Peterson fanship is a cult of blind ideologues worshipping the leading fake intellectual of our time. I am interested in actual evidence on either side of that issue.
    1
  792.  @reahthorolund8373  True when he said his name it wasn't nonsense. Anything else? Anything you would qualify as insightful? Stop dinking around. Provide an example of an intelligent statement or admit you can't find one.
    1
  793.  @reahthorolund8373  Like I said neither of us can find an intelligent statement by Peterson, thus you effectively agree with me, all nonsense. Question though, why didn't you just admit that at the outset?
    1
  794.  @reahthorolund8373  Useful solutions and out of the box insight on common beliefs. BTW, Peterson's schtick is to use big words to make banal ideas look academic, e.g. highly trained affective neuroscientists recognize that there is biological and behavioral continuity between humans and animals... Jordan Peterson. Yes Jordan but third graders know that also. Hard core clinical psychology research has determined that our behavior is influenced by our perception... Yes Jordan if you see and hear a car coming at you, you jump out of the way, but what is your point?
    1
  795.  @reahthorolund8373  Pretenderson at 40:00 talking about antifa, 'how many people identifiable, who the hell are they, are they right or left, 800 antifa, then they don't exist, does it exist, they are agents of chaos, to sow discord, how to we protect ourselves, that is the endless question of the human race, men are less agreeable, women like disagreeable men, women chose their mates, the more disagreeable you are the less compassionate and generous you are, why do women pick disagreeable men, in one city they had a summer of love, so everyone is agreeable, do the psychopaths come out at night, agreeable people share, women have to protect their infants, they need men who can guard, if a man is too masculine they can't communicate, you have to hold the psychopaths down, they are at 3%, the Left says hierarchies are nothing but power, tough men are tougher than tough women, are we going to look at this straightforward and clearly?' [Holy crap Dave, did Peterson just claim he is looking at this straightforward and clearly, after a pointless and chaotic rambling that goes from how many antifa there are to women are more agreeable to the summer of love? Help me out Dave, reply to this comment. What precisely is Peterson's point here? Antifa exists or it doesn't exist? Women are more agreeable? I don't think that is true and of course it has absolutely nothing to do with antifa. The Left says hierarchies are nothing but power? Not true. JP made that up. How many Peterson's does it take to unscrew a lightbulb? One, but he does it by rotating the entire house in the opposite direction.]
    1
  796. ​ @Eyes-of-Horus Joe Rogan thinks Kamala will win.
    1
  797.  @napalmwarfare740  Peterson demonstrated critical thinking? Where?
    1
  798.  @Chef_Alpo  Dave Rubin doing an excellent job looking stupid: AOC a big problem is an undocumented population that can be fixed with a wall or by giving them jobs and a path to documentation. [Claps and nod of approval by host. Conclusion by Rubin; the host was aghast.] AOC: Our public systems have to pay for undocumented, unless they have jobs, like our ancestors. Dave: AOC says our ancestors came here illegally. [Uh no she didn't Dave, immigration from Europe was legal because there were not laws against immigration. Do you think the native Americans would have outlawed Europe immigration if they could?] Dave: She says the solution is just document them. [No, she didn't say that Dave, she said a wall and green card jobs are two possible solutions.] Dave: She says their plan isn't about a wall, its just bring in as many illegal immigrants that we can. [Dave, do you have noise cancelling head phones on? She didn't say that either. Oh well, your fan base won't notice the strawman.]
    1
  799.  @Chef_Alpo  We are aghast at Rubin stupidity.
    1
  800.  @testicletanning4453  Did Peterson or Rubin say something intelligent?
    1
  801.  @PeteMachini6732  The West is an oppressive patriarchy but the West is not an oppressive patriarchy -- Jordan Peterson.
    1
  802. The statement is total nonsense. There is no technical difference between Peterson and Joel Osteen.
    1
  803. Did Peterson say something intelligent and coherent?
    1
  804. Does Tony Heller have a fact based idea about climate change?
    1
  805.  @patriciasnyder6915  My dog is smarter than Peterson or Rubin.
    1
  806.  @timwhiting6721  Peterson shrooms up before these lectures.
    1
  807. No one can find an intellectual idea by JP.
    1
  808. @secondchance6603 The world is a better place if all children are by choice by prepared and caring parents.
    1
  809.  @liannemarie2504  Thou shalt choose when thou shalt deliver thy progeny.
    1
  810.  @liannemarie2504  God gaves us the skills and techniques for abortion because he wants all children by choice, not by the random meeting of two cells.
    1
  811. @@ChristopherHoch But God is pro choice.
    1
  812. Did JP have a profound useful idea? Quote please.
    1
  813. Let's see how easy it is to see through Pirro and Rubin as they label the Left as stupid. Pirro 'We have had our views censored for several years now.' [Anyone see the irony? Rubin has 1.3 million subscribers, and this video has 32k views in one day...and Pirro is complaining about her views being censored? Uh, Ok, Jeanine.] RUBIN: 'Free speech is good, lefty liberals have been silent as the mob has come for the Right, they do this with Tucker...' [So Dave, the mob has come to silence Tucker? Isn't Tucker on every night? I guess this alleged mob is not too successful.] The mob is coming to my house, people have tried to cancel me. PIRRO: 'They wouldn't attempt to join forces with the Right.' RUBIN: The Left fails on free speech, conservatives we believe in free speech, they are afraid of being called conservative...' [So Rubin's assertion here is if Left leaders stand up for free speech, then they will be called conservative? Where the heck are you getting this stuff Dave. Show me one Left leader who is arguing against free speech for fear of being labeled a conservative? And Dave and Jeanine: can you list a couple of recent examples of you trying to join forces with the Left? How exactly Dave is 150 liberals publishing a letter for free speech 'the Left fails on free speech'?] My guess is Dave realizes as long as he labels the Left as bad, no one will notice what complete nonsense his argument is. I swear these Right wing Vlog's really preach to the gullible. Jordan Peterson and Stephen Hicks being two great examples. Why people consider Peterson as smart is just plain mind boggling. Every time Peterson calls the ignorant Left he gets a free pass for a couple weeks to say whatever he dreams up without challenge, figuratively. Looks like Rubin is an apt pupil of this trick. Pretty much the same for Hicks. PIRRO says the Left doesn't want to hear from the Right. RUBIN: 'The woke condition is a mind virus, once you accept those ideas....' Doesn't this letter from lefty liberals actually advocate for free speech? So what are Rubin and Pirro complaining about? Why did 150 leaders sign a letter for free speech if they are afraid of being called conservatives? Unless I am missing something this video is phenomenal at internal contradictions and complaining about libtards agreeing with Pirro and Rubin. (The letter expressed alarm over the “intolerance of opposing views” and “public shaming and ostracism” aimed at those who challenge liberal ideas. The authors said this phenomenon has “steadily narrowed the boundaries of what can be said without the threat of reprisal.” “It is now all too common to hear calls for swift and severe retribution in response to perceived transgressions of speech and thought,” the letter states.)
    1
  814. 'Compassion isn't a virtue, compassion is a reflex, treating adults like infants is not virtuous, love is a blend of compassion and encouragement and truth, it is complicated man, to foster growth requires judgement... [What an absolute load of crap. Who on earth needs JP to tell us what love is or how to treat adults or to explain encouragement and truth? Is Rubin trying to claim that JP is sharing something worthwhile?]
    1
  815. JP is a fake intellectual, I am a real intellectual since I realize that Identity is the proper union of faith and responsibility. It does that in a hierarchical subsidiary manner, if you have conflict, you need a counter position, that is subsidiary structure. Jacob's ladder, the vine that unites the material and proximal realm of the earth with the eternal realm of heaven, how do we climb it, there is a vision of how we build ourselves, a glorious macro-vision; it is the proximal beginnings, we scaffold ourselves upward from the finite to the infinite, the scaffold constitutes our identity...also that you think so that your stupid thoughts can die instead of you. At the upper end of a hierarchy, you find people who know a lot, if you are stupid, smart people won't listen to you, so you can inform yourself with tools and you won't be an embarrassment, the careless self-evident axiom of human social interaction is that if I can force you to do something then I have the right to do it.
    1
  816. Dave, basic lesson in logic. If you don't believe in abortion, don't get one. BTW she didn't compare a baby to a lump of coal. Oh well your intellectual fan base will fall for it.
    1
  817. Peterson thinks our biggest environmental problem is over fishing in the ocean, he thinks we don't have an over-population problem, thinks the solution to India's environmental problems is to burn more coal, and the solution to our environmental problems is to make everyone rich...and something thinks JP can have a logical theory about Covid and vaccines? Chuckle.
    1
  818. But God is pro choice.
    1
  819.  @elessarstrider5210  Thou shalt choose when thou shalt deliver thy progeny. God wants all life born to caring parents. Not just the random meeting of two cells.
    1
  820.  @elessarstrider5210  I agree with you. Freedom is important, especially for important life choices.
    1
  821.  @trumpbellend6717  Thou shalt choose when thou shalt deliver thy progeny.
    1
  822.  @elessarstrider5210  The world is a better place if all children are born to caring and prepared parents. We don't need more people simply on the random meeting of two cells. We need more children with all conditions in their favor; two parents who are qualified to be parents. Higher goal: protecting all human life, or making the world a better place for all good people. Logic score by me!
    1
  823.  @elessarstrider5210  Plus if you make someone bear the lifetime consequence for something they didn't choose voluntarily, that is evil, to both parties, another score by me!
    1
  824. But God is pro choice.
    1
  825.  @Wren1  Correct. Rubin playbook is videos that don't prove his point. Only gullible conservatives fall for it. Glad you got it.
    1
  826.  @johnbeckwith1361  NOEM: What has he done, what has he done, he has done nothing with tools and policy, he doesn't let us do our job, he will not keep us safe. RUBIN: She is saying what everyone knows, no one believes the federal government is doing their job, border agents don't like to be a travel agent, you can go to Chicago. The democrat party, one of your few jobs dude. Dave, this alleged Host is stumped by question turned against her? Where did that happen exactly? Here is what happened, Noem shared her made up feelings that Biden has done nothing with tools and policy, and then Rubin shared his made up feelings that no one believes the federal government is doing their job and border agents are forced to act as travel agents. At somewhere aroung the 80th percentile for gullibility you become a Rubin believer.
    1
  827.  @Wren1  Critical thinking? By Rubin? Are you joking?
    1
  828. Did Peterson say something intelligent?
    1
  829.  @olderuglierandwiser  Is Rubin joking? JP most important speech? Dave? Please timestamp and quote an important and useful idea by JP anywhere in this entire video. Good luck. Well the most important speech JP has ever made; not a very high bar. 'Identity is the proper union of faith and responsibility. It does that in a hierarchical subsidiary manner, if you have conflict, you need a counter position, that is subsidiary structure. Jacob's ladder the vine that unites the material and proximal realm of the earth with the eternal realm of heaven, how do we climb it, there is a vision of how we build ourselves, a glorious macro-vision; it is the proximal beginnings, we scaffold ourselves upward from the finite to the infinite, the scaffold constitutes our identity...' 'Sacrifice makes a difference, the hierarchy of identity, the lower to the higher, proximal hedonic whims, the payback is good, to escape from primordial narcissism, some things go wrong with children, having children can be rewarding, there is no technical difference between thinking about yourself and being miserable, serve a higher purpose, technically, think about a fork and a table and a plate as a microcosm of the universe, that is all real, we forgot responsibility...'
    1
  830.  @sambowe8288  I agree, you can't find a profound intellectual coherent idea by Peterson.
    1
  831.  @sambowe8288  Let's check out this allegedly important speech... a solution that beckons and is generous, we have odds about identity, to a psychological integration, and now I delve into what identity is, and also what social structure must and should be, faith and responsibility, faith is the courage to welcome the future, the future is the manifestation of possibility into actuality, the treasure house of the unknown possibility, with courageous faith, being and becoming are intrinsically good....Huh? Doesn't this guy claim to be precise in your speech?
    1
  832.  @silviaquesada2499  I have asked that question to over 1000 JP fans. No one has an answer, and despite 250,000 comments on the GQ interview, not a single person claiming that JP won, can actually find a JP win. Try this; timestamp and quote a coherent, profound, and useful idea by JP from this video. Good luck.
    1
  833.  @silviaquesada2499  Did you know that good people are not naive, they are tough and have seen things, and that there is no technical difference between thinking about yourself and being miserable?
    1
  834.  @silviaquesada2499  JP is a fake intellectual, I am a real intellectual since I realize that we do not understand pre-experimental thinking, so we try to explain it in terms that we do understand – which means that we explain it away, define it as nonsense. After all, we think scientifically – so we believe – and we think we know what that means (since scientific thinking can in principle be defined). We are familiar with scientific thinking, and value it highly – so we tend to presume that that is all there is to thinking (that all other “forms of thought” are approximations, at best, to the ideal of scientific thought). But this is not accurate. Thinking also and more fundamentally is specification of value – is specification of implication for behavior. This means that categorization, with regards to value –determination (or even perception) of what constitutes a single thing, or class of things – is the act of grouping together according to implication for behavior. Do you agree?
    1
  835.  @silviaquesada2499  If you find a coherent intellectual useful idea by Peterson in this or any other video LMK.
    1
  836.  @silviaquesada2499  I agree, you can't find a profound useful coherent idea by Peterson.
    1
  837.  @silviaquesada2499  We continue our quest for an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  838.  @oliveoil7642  No one can find an intellectual coherent useful idea by Peterson.
    1
  839.  @davidblack4426  No one can find an intellectual coherent useful idea by Peterson.
    1
  840.  @riseupac5779  No one can find an intellectual coherent useful idea by Peterson.
    1
  841.  @Emloch  No one can find an intellectual coherent useful idea by Peterson.
    1
  842.  @Emloch  You found a profound intellectual coherent useful idea by Peterson? Please share.
    1
  843.  @riseupac5779  No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  844.  @davidblack4426  JP is the leading fake intellectual of this century.
    1
  845.  @Emloch  I agree, you can't find a profound intellectual coherent idea by Peterson!
    1
  846. Peterson had a precise meaningful idea? Where?
    1
  847.  @ashdav9980  Let's develop an amnio technique that detects autism.
    1
  848. Is Rubin joking? JP most important speech? Dave? Please timestamp and quote an important and useful idea by JP anywhere in this entire video. Good luck. Well the most important speech JP has ever made; not a very high bar. 'Identity is the proper union of faith and responsibility. It does that in a hierarchical subsidiary manner, if you have conflict, you need a counter position, that is subsidiary structure. Jacob's ladder the vine that unites the material and proximal realm of the earth with the eternal realm of heaven, how do we climb it, there is a vision of how we build ourselves, a glorious macro-vision; it is the proximal beginnings, we scaffold ourselves upward from the finite to the infinite, the scaffold constitutes our identity...' 'Sacrifice makes a difference, the hierarchy of identity, the lower to the higher, proximal hedonic whims, the payback is good, to escape from primordial narcissism, some things go wrong with children, having children can be rewarding, there is no technical difference between thinking about yourself and being miserable, serve a higher purpose, technically, think about a fork and a table and a plate as a microcosm of the universe, that is all real, we forgot responsibility...'
    1
  849. Alternate title: JP goes off the rails with incoherent ramblings about setting the dinner table and climbing Jacob's ladder.
    1
  850.  @jeffpowell8308  Pro choice is the pursuit of happiness.
    1
  851.  @jeffpowell8308  A wanted child has way more potential. Pro choice is pro pursuit of happiness.
    1
  852.  @jeffpowell8308  Child born to committed prepared parents v. Child born to uncommitted unprepared parents. That is the choice. Choice of pregnant female v. Choice of the government and other people. That is the choice.
    1
  853.  @jeffpowell8308  Life is capable of improving the human experience? I guess that makes sense. But what does that have to do with the irrefutable benefits from having the choice to become a parent? We certainly don't need more people. So those additional people should be a process of choice. God is pro choice.
    1
  854.  @jeffpowell8308  Thou shalt choose when thou shalt deliver thy progeny. Thou shalt not force thy beliefs upon others. If you are telling other people that they need to become parents, then you are filling his shoes.
    1
  855. ​ @ephilbin No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  856.  @georgevindo  No one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  857.  @ephilbin  Yes that is word salad also. Here is a real intellectual idea... Characterization is a precondition for individual freedom.
    1
  858.  @ephilbin  1. '"Objective value is necessary to the very idea of a rule which is not tyranny, or an obedience that is not slavery." 2. If there's no such thing as objectively right or wrong, then everything is enacted by force. No, neither statement make any sense. If they are from JP, then this is not surprising. Lots of rules are legally determined to be objectively right or wrong, and they are enforced via force. Is there any culture where there is no such thing as objectively right or wrong? Not that I am aware of, thus the statement as attempting to explain a nonexistent phenomenon is a straw man. BTW: Did you find a coherent useful idea by JP?
    1
  859.  @BP-ge9sj  no one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  860.  @ephilbin  Yep that is word salad. Try explaining what it means.
    1
  861.  @simonwurtzburg5540  Basically describes all of Peterson sound bytes. Sounds smart until you analyze it.
    1
  862.  @sexdrugsandeverythingelsew6748  JP is a fake intellectual.  I am a real intellectual since I realize things that JP does not, for example that characterization is a precondition for individual freedom, there is no technical difference between thinking about yourself and being miserable, cognitive systems have axiomatic levels, and compassion doesn't scale as you move up the hierarchy of complexity, and also that the biblical corpus is a collection of narratives that shine a different light on the hierarchy of perception.  What faith means is that you act out the proposition that you can ride the wave as big as it comes, all together in good will.
    1
  863.  @slagebobs4109  I supplied an excellent quote out of context? What? JP goal is to help people? Maybe, and I gather his simple self-help message helps some people which I fully support him on. His at least equally obvious mission is to always be seen as the smartest person in the room who can't stand to have his opinions challenged. I am just addressing the strange sociological phenomenon of a guy with no useful intellectual ideas about anything seen as an intellectual role model. I invite you to produce a useful, coherent, intellectual statement by JP on any subject anywhere to prove me wrong. Here are some non-examples: Jordan's 16th Rule; Free speech also is the mechanism by which we generate the conceptions that allow us to organize our experience in the world, it is the mechanism that allows us to reformulate and criticize those conceptions when they become outdated and sterile, to reanimate them in a new form so we can move into the future. Jordan's 17th Rule; There is no evidence that women can create social organizations. Jordan's 18th Rule, Hard core clinical psychology research has determined that perception influences behavior. [Yes Jordan, when I perceive I am thirsty my behavior is to go to the fridge for a drink.] Jordan's 19th Rule; There is something to us. [Uh sure Jordan, a bit pointless and ambiguous however.] Jordan's 20th Rule; I realized psychologically that the future is in a sense actually unpredictable. [You needed psychology to figure that out Jordan? I figured it out without psychology.] Jordan's 21 Rule: It is hard to get in to Harvard and it takes good SAT scores. [Yes Jordan, everyone already knows that.] Jordan's 22 Rule: The world is not objects, it is the harmonious interplay of patterns, you dance with the world, you don't want a person who will dominate you sexually during the initial dance . Jordan's 23 Rule: If you have a functional identity, when you act it out in the world you get what you want and need. [I am pretty sure I have a function, and an identity, and I act out in the world, but merely wanting something is no promise that I will get it. Sorry Jordan If/Then logic failure on your part.] Jordan's 24 Rule: I highly recommend that you try and put yourself together. [Wow, I am totally going to do that now that you told me.] Jordan's 25th Rule: The biblical corpus is a collection of narratives that shine a different light of characterization on the spirit that occupies the pinnacle in the hierarchy of perception. [Huh?] Jordan's 26th Rule: I have been thinking for 40 years and I realized that you have to prioritize your perceptions. Prioritize means some things are more important than others in a hierarchy. Does that hierarchy have to be unified or not. There is an immediate existential consequence to not having a hierarchy of perceptual priority. You need a hierarchy to filter the world and what is at the highest point of the hierarchy.
    1
  864.  @georgevindo  The JP quote is about as deep as messages on Mr. Rogers Neighborhood and the Lion King.
    1
  865.  @King_Anime528  JP told you something you didn't know already? What?
    1
  866.  @King_Anime528  Let's check out this allegedly important speech... a solution that beckons and is generous, we have odds about identity, to a psychological integration, and now I delve into what identity is, and also what social structure must and should be, faith and responsibility, faith is the courage to welcome the future, the future is the manifestation of possibility into actuality, the treasure house of the unknown possibility, with courageous faith, being and becoming are intrinsically good....Huh? Doesn't this guy claim to be precise in your speech?
    1
  867.  @micheleinacharles-hazellem1968  No one can find a profound coherent useful idea by JP in this speech.
    1
  868. Dave your gullible fan base will fall for your made up straw man statements, but try to at least display some connection to reality. No one on the view denied the Holocaust. Whoppi made the far more intelligent than you here by observing that a white on white crime isn't racism.
    1
  869.  @shelleyhoward-davies3579  We are searching for an intellectual idea by Peterson.
    1
  870. NOEM: What has he done, what has he done, he has done nothing with tools and policy, he doesn't let us do our job, he will not keep us safe. RUBIN: She is saying what everyone knows, no one believes the federal government is doing their job, border agents don't like to be a travel agent, you can go to Chicago. The democrat party, one of your few jobs dude. Dave, this alleged Host is stumped by question turned against her? Where did that happen exactly? Here is what happened, Noem shared her made up feelings that Biden has done nothing with tools and policy, and then Rubin shared his made-up feelings that no one believes the federal government is doing their job and border agents are forced to act as travel agents. At somewhere around the 80th percentile for gullibility you become a Rubin believer. Rubin and his fans aren't really fans of facts, but: WHAT TRUMP DID: In March 2020, at the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic, the Trump administration invoked Title 42, a controversial statute ostensibly meant as a public health measure. The policy allowed US authorities to swiftly expel migrants - including asylum seekers - at the border. Nearly 400,000 people were detained and expelled between its implementation and January 2021, when Mr Trump left the White House. WHAT BIDEN DID: He defended keeping Title 42 in place, using the pandemic as justification. Over 2.28 million people were expelled using Title 42 authority between January 2021 and March 2023, the last month for which data is available. But when the US ended its coronavirus public health emergency on May 11, Title 42 expired with it. To replace it, US immigration authorities unveiled a "carrot and stick" approach that encourages legal pathways, while also implementing strict penalties for those who cross illegally. They have opened regional processing centres in Latin America aimed at helping migrants apply to come to the US and expanded access to CBP One, an app migrants can use to schedule asylum appointments. People who cross illegally will be deported, barred from re-entering the US for at least five years, and be "presumed ineligible for asylum", according to Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
    1
  871. Translation: Be strong so you don't become dominated: 'Thomas the Train, Mr. Rogers, Jordan Peterson.'
    1
  872. No one can find a coherent useful idea by JP: Let's check out this allegedly important speech... a solution that beckons and is generous, we have odds about identity, to a psychological integration, and now I delve into what identity is, and also what social structure must and should be, faith and responsibility, faith is the courage to welcome the future, the future is the manifestation of possibility into actuality, the treasure house of the unknown possibility, with courageous faith, being and becoming are intrinsically good....Huh? Doesn't this guy claim to be precise in your speech?
    1
  873.  @adamgates1142  US has way more mass shootings than other countries, and our shootings are for no reason.
    1
  874. Did Peterson say something intelligent?
    1
  875. We are searching for a coherent insightful idea by JP. No one can find one.
    1
  876. NOEM: What has he done, what has he done, he has done nothing with tools and policy, he doesn't let us do our job, he will not keep us safe. RUBIN: She is saying what everyone knows, no one believes the federal government is doing their job, border agents don't like to be a travel agent, you can go to Chicago. The democrat party, one of your few jobs dude. Dave, this alleged Host is stumped by question turned against her? Where did that happen exactly? Here is what happened, Noem shared her made up feelings that Biden has done nothing with tools and policy, and then Rubin shared his made-up feelings that no one believes the federal government is doing their job and border agents are forced to act as travel agents. At somewhere around the 80th percentile for gullibility you become a Rubin believer. Rubin and his fans aren't really fans of facts, but: WHAT TRUMP DID: In March 2020, at the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic, the Trump administration invoked Title 42, a controversial statute ostensibly meant as a public health measure. The policy allowed US authorities to swiftly expel migrants - including asylum seekers - at the border. Nearly 400,000 people were detained and expelled between its implementation and January 2021, when Mr Trump left the White House. WHAT BIDEN DID: He defended keeping Title 42 in place, using the pandemic as justification. Over 2.28 million people were expelled using Title 42 authority between January 2021 and March 2023, the last month for which data is available. But when the US ended its coronavirus public health emergency on May 11, Title 42 expired with it. To replace it, US immigration authorities unveiled a "carrot and stick" approach that encourages legal pathways, while also implementing strict penalties for those who cross illegally. They have opened regional processing centres in Latin America aimed at helping migrants apply to come to the US and expanded access to CBP One, an app migrants can use to schedule asylum appointments. People who cross illegally will be deported, barred from re-entering the US for at least five years, and be "presumed ineligible for asylum", according to Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
    1
  877.  @migatocomeoscuridad  I am glad you learned those things, however the OP is that Peterson is a great intellectual mind. All the things you mentioned came from Everything I need to know I learned in kindergarten.
    1
  878.  @FireinTheBowl  Peterson had wisdom? Where?
    1
  879.  @FireinTheBowl  So he didn't have wisdom in this video? If so we agree.
    1
  880.  @FireinTheBowl  Can I see an example of this alleged wisdom?
    1
  881. @Soulfulways If you find one of these alleged intelligent statements by Peterson LMK.
    1
  882.  @shannonpendergrass7206  Peterson is full of crap. Besides, what is a guy who never has a solution to anything passing himself off as some kind of expert in world or health issues?
    1
  883. Let's see what JP is up to...make energy cheap, there is no difference between energy and wealth, there is a problem with nuclear waste, if you want to save the climate you want to make power as cheap as possible to make people rich, China has greened totally, as CO2 rises plants can grow better in drier environments, I learned that things are better than we think the best way to save the planet is to make poor people rich as fast as we can....the biggest environmental problem isn't global warming it is over fishing, we know how to stop it... [This guy is so totally full of crap every time he opens his mouth. We should make poor people rich? Uh ok, Jordan, how do we do that exactly? If you make power cheap you save the environment? What an absolute idiot. The cheaper power gets the more people use of it, and what is the biggest problem we have? Emissions from power use, and pollution from products made with energy. And then there is the lame brained argument that gullible conservatives fall for; since plants breathe CO2, the more CO2 we produce, the better. There is no difference between energy and wealth? Really? Everyone who has enough energy to heat their house and fill up their gas tank is automatically wealthy? How does that work exactly?]
    1
  884. Let's throw a dart on the timeline and see if Rubin or Ross has something useful to say, at 2:30. Ross "Hillary lost because she focused only on big city voters." "She should have spread out her base of appeal, she probably would have won." "It's not productive or efficient to try and bring in people from different parts of the country." "What is strategic is to just go to where people already like you." [Wait, didn't Ross contradict herself? She said Hillary should have spread out her base of appeal to more rural areas where people didn't already like her, and now she is saying she should have just focused on areas where people already like her? Anyway if Rubin or Ross say anything smart or useful in this interview, please point it out to me.] Ross "It is a big diverse country, and if you don't give candidates a reason to care, they won't." "I think we should create a society that is just." "Why do we think we can change the system." [Wow]
    1
  885.  @jasonwatterson5739  Peterson said something brilliant?
    1
  886.  @jonnyharris7  Has JP ever had a solution to anything?
    1
  887.  @jonnyharris7  Peterson said something brilliant?
    1
  888.  @GaedelHvn  Peterson said something intelligent? What?
    1
  889. Beyond childish Dave? She was asked to explain it as simple as possible...but your gullible ideologues won't notice your cheap spin.
    1
  890. Vaccines aren't working? Trudeau is a horrible human being? Try using some facts rather than your partisan feelings Dave. Just a suggestion.
    1
  891. But God is pro choice.
    1
  892.  @Rob-lj3kf  Peterson said something intelligent?
    1
  893. This looks like two pretend intellectuals talking to me. If either of them says some smart point in this video, can someone point it out to me? Lets punch it to Benny Johnson: "Every state is different, every state is supposed to be their own government, we are watching that wash away horribly, every state votes... Bernie has been a communist his whole life, and old crusty communist..." Benny or Dave: When has Bernie ever been a communist? If he as made any 'I am a communist' type statement in like the last 6 years, can you point me to it? If you guys want to see some real presidential style ideas, check jgreene4prez2020 on FB. 'People want to know where there information is coming from, they are Leftist propagandist, there is no such thing as objectivity any more...I have a firm pulse on DC...' Anyway, waiting for anything smart either of these guys say. Remember Dave Rubin decided that Jordan Peterson was the real deal when JP petted a cat. Conservatives think JP is a smart guy. JP is an idiot. Do the math.
    1