Comments by "" (@psychcowboy1) on "Trump contends with LOSING Mar-a-Lago over fraud verdict" video.

  1.  @ki001  What exactly did Trump do supporting a 500 million penalty? This sounds vindictive by a power hungry judge. Did Trump do anything that isn't normal operations by real estate investors?
    1
  2.  @ki001  Try arguing with facts instead of emojis. You look smarter that way.
    1
  3.  @ki001  What I am asking for is facts showing that the penalty for alleged financial real estate fraud represents the norm. A real estate company exaggerated their earnings? Who is the victim of 500,000,000 in loss?
    1
  4.  @ki001  ok, if you find these alleged facts showing this penalty matches precedent, LMK.
    1
  5.  @ki001  This isn't complicated. Court rulings are meant to be consistent with comparable facts. Produce evidence that the ruling in this case applies a standard for similar realtor actions.
    1
  6.  @ki001  Here is a lesson in using facts regarding a civil case with no victim...In the Trump case, Ms. James accused the former president of inflating his net worth to obtain favorable loans and other financial benefits. Mr. Trump, she argued, defrauded his lenders and in doing so, undermined the integrity of New York’s business world. Mr. Trump’s conduct “distorts the market,” Kevin Wallace, a lawyer for Ms. James’s office, said during closing arguments in the civil fraud trial. “It prices out honest borrowers and can lead to more catastrophic results,” Mr. Wallace said, adding, “That’s why it’s important for the court to take the steps to protect the marketplace to prevent this from happening again.”
    1