Comments by "" (@psychcowboy1) on "Warren Smith - Secret Scholar Society" channel.

  1. 1
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4.  @PaulMartin-n6m  46: I don't know how to tackle the fact that people range widely in cognitive ability. [Yes Jordan, we know you don't know how to make everyone equally smart.] 44: Plenty are arguing there should be no such thing as Marxism. [Plent of them JP? Find me one.] [JP cites a paper from Haidt work that proves Helen right.] 48: Animals organize themselves into hierarchies, [Hey 2nd grade class did dinosaurs compete to get to the top of the dinosaur hierarchy' Class-Yes, ooh impressive Jordy] How can you be skeptical about this? [Uh what was she skeptical about Jordy?] Hierarchies can't be claimed on hierarchies and the West. [Uh Jordy, no one is claiming that.] 41: Helen: Serotonin makes humans less aggressive, JP no that's not right, it makes humans less aggressive [Whoops JP] Hierarchies are a third of a billion years old. [Hey 3rd grade class did dinosaurs have hierarchies? Class; yes.] Lobsters say what you want about Marxism. How do lobsters say that? Jordy you just explained how lobsters say that two minutes ago. Remember 'I chose lobsters to put paid to the absurd Marxist supposition?] 20: What if it is composed mostly of women is it still a patriarchy? [Helen corrects JP vocabulary problem; no that is a matriarchy.] We take a patriarchal structure like the medical field. [Jh Jordy, after spending this entire interview denying we have a patriarchy, you are now admitting the medical field is a patriarchy?] 33: Lets get our definitions straight on identity politics. [Helen correctly defines it and gives a correct example, JP doesn't define it or give an example, score for Helen.] That's your theory, that's a foolish theory. No that's not right, I know my neurochemistry, Man alive how can you say that it is so painful and cliche to hear, you are not saying anything engaging in a narrative sense, thats for sure its purely not! 37: There are hardly any math geniuses. If you want to be successful you should be competent, you shouldn't pick an incompetent mate. I don't believe that our fundamental hierarchies are based on power. You don't move up a hierarchy via power, its competence. Most hierarchies are of competence not power. [Everyone on earth knows that power and competence help you move up a hierarchy, and no one on earth needs JP to explain hierarchies to us.]
    1
  5. 1
  6. 46: I don't know how to tackle the fact that people range widely in cognitive ability. [Yes Jordan, we know you don't know how to make everyone equally smart.] 44: Plenty are arguing there should be no such thing as Marxism. [Plent of them JP? Find me one.] [JP cites a paper from Haidt work that proves Helen right.] 48: Animals organize themselves into hierarchies, [Hey 2nd grade class did dinosaurs compete to get to the top of the dinosaur hierarchy' Class-Yes, ooh impressive Jordy] How can you be skeptical about this? [Uh what was she skeptical about Jordy?] Hierarchies can't be claimed on hierarchies and the West. [Uh Jordy, no one is claiming that.] 41: Helen: Serotonin makes humans less aggressive, JP no that's not right, it makes humans less aggressive [Whoops JP] Hierarchies are a third of a billion years old. [Hey 3rd grade class did dinosaurs have hierarchies? Class; yes.] Lobsters say what you want about Marxism. How do lobsters say that? Jordy you just explained how lobsters say that two minutes ago. Remember 'I chose lobsters to put paid to the absurd Marxist supposition?] 20: What if it is composed mostly of women is it still a patriarchy? [Helen corrects JP vocabulary problem; no that is a matriarchy.] We take a patriarchal structure like the medical field. [Jh Jordy, after spending this entire interview denying we have a patriarchy, you are now admitting the medical field is a patriarchy?] 33: Lets get our definitions straight on identity politics. [Helen correctly defines it and gives a correct example, JP doesn't define it or give an example, score for Helen.] That's your theory, that's a foolish theory. No that's not right, I know my neurochemistry, Man alive how can you say that it is so painful and cliche to hear, you are not saying anything engaging in a narrative sense, thats for sure its purely not! 37: There are hardly any math geniuses. If you want to be successful you should be competent, you shouldn't pick an incompetent mate. I don't believe that our fundamental hierarchies are based on power. You don't move up a hierarchy via power, its competence. Most hierarchies are of competence not power. [Everyone on earth knows that power and competence help you move up a hierarchy, and no one on earth needs JP to explain hierarchies to us.]
    1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17.  @chrisnotap  Try this concept, which is called 'using facts.' Timestamp and quote a place where JP or Warren have an intelligent point. Here is a lesson: Let's see if Warren Smith gives us a scholarly masterclass. 1. You have an outcome you believe to be true. [Helen was right, there are internet articles that have documented that alt right like JP.] 2. This was a goal of reputation destruction. [You mean like when JP called Helen foolish for crediting the women's movement for advances in women's rights?] 3. He maintains that for the rest of the interview. [Maintains what? Triggered arrogance? 'No that's not right, I know my neurochemistry'.] 4. Does that mean anyone on YouTube who is on the right is alt right? [Strawman, she said nothing like that.] 5. She is here with a mission to take you down. [You mean like when JP laughed at her and called her cliche when she said you get paid for your job? The most obvious mission in this video is JP mission to not let Helen be right about anything. Listen at the lobster section, you will get it. Or when he cites a paper on Marxism to prove Helen wrong that actually proves her right.] 6. He is trying to tell us that we have it better. [When he disagrees when Helen says a lot of people agree with him?] 7. They are under the weight of a belief that ambition is tyrannical. [That sounds made up, who teaches their kids that ambition is tyrannical?] 8. It's good to teach college kids to think and speak. [Ooh, Impressive conclusion.] 9. You can't see it occurring. [Actually, if you read the paper JP cited, you can see it occurring. Helen was right; not a widely held view equals tiny minority faith.] 10. I am not making a case for the patriarchal tyranny. [Like when Jordy said the West is an oppressive patriarchy?]
    1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27.  @korviscapetrova5269  He actively listens? Are you kidding? He interrupts her every other sentence. At 44: What do you think that the demand for equality of outcome is if not an attempt to flatten hierarchy, what else could it possibly be? [Do you see how stupid that comment is? Obviously equality of outcome is the same as flatten hierarchy. It is about as bright as saying: 'What do you think is the point of a haircut if not an attempt to make your hair shorter. What else could it possibly be?'] 46: I don't know how to tackle the fact that people range widely in cognitive ability. [Yes Jordan, we know you don't know how to make everyone equally smart.] 44: Plenty are arguing there should be no such thing as Marxism. [Plent of them JP? Find me one.] [JP cites a paper from Haidt work that proves Helen right.] 48: Animals organize themselves into hierarchies, [Hey 2nd grade class did dinosaurs compete to get to the top of the dinosaur hierarchy' Class-Yes, ooh impressive Jordy] How can you be skeptical about this? [Uh what was she skeptical about Jordy?] Hierarchies can't be claimed on hierarchies and the West. [Uh Jordy, no one is claiming that.] 41: Helen: Serotonin makes humans less aggressive, JP no that's not right, it makes humans less aggressive [Whoops JP] Hierarchies are a third of a billion years old. [Hey 3rd grade class did dinosaurs have hierarchies? Class; yes.] Lobsters say what you want about Marxism. How do lobsters say that? Jordy you just explained how lobsters say that two minutes ago. Remember 'I chose lobsters to put paid to the absurd Marxist supposition?] 20: What if it is composed mostly of women is it still a patriarchy? [Helen corrects JP vocabulary problem; no that is a matriarchy.] We take a patriarchal structure like the medical field. [Jh Jordy, after spending this entire interview denying we have a patriarchy, you are now admitting the medical field is a patriarchy?] 33: Lets get our definitions straight on identity politics. [Helen correctly defines it and gives a correct example, JP doesn't define it or give an example, score for Helen.] At about 45:00 Helen says that equality of outcome is 'not a widely held view'. JP as usual interrupts her to state that '20% of social science professors identify as Marxist, I read it quite carefully it is a perfectly valid statistic.' Problem is, the paper he is referring to Prevalence of Marxism in Academia, concluded that even in the left leaning environment of university, Marxism is a 'tiny minority faith'. So, JP interrupted Helen to brag about his reasoning and research skills, claiming he 'read it quite carefully', but he still didn't understand it; the paper proves Helen right.
    1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. At 44: What do you think that the demand for equality of outcome is if not an attempt to flatten hierarchy, what else could it possibly be? [Do you see how stupid that comment is? Obviously equality of outcome is the same as flatten hierarchy. It is about as bright as saying: 'What do you think is the point of a haircut if not an attempt to make your hair shorter. What else could it possibly be?'] 46: I don't know how to tackle the fact that people range widely in cognitive ability. [Yes Jordan, we know you don't know how to make everyone equally smart.] 44: Plenty are arguing there should be no such thing as Marxism. [Plent of them JP? Find me one.] [JP cites a paper from Haidt work that proves Helen right.] 48: Animals organize themselves into hierarchies, [Hey 2nd grade class did dinosaurs compete to get to the top of the dinosaur hierarchy' Class-Yes, ooh impressive Jordy] How can you be skeptical about this? [Uh what was she skeptical about Jordy?] Hierarchies can't be claimed on hierarchies and the West. [Uh Jordy, no one is claiming that.] 41: Helen: Serotonin makes humans less aggressive, JP no that's not right, it makes humans less aggressive [Whoops JP] Hierarchies are a third of a billion years old. [Hey 3rd grade class did dinosaurs have hierarchies? Class; yes.] Lobsters say what you want about Marxism. How do lobsters say that? Jordy you just explained how lobsters say that two minutes ago. Remember 'I chose lobsters to put paid to the absurd Marxist supposition?] 20: What if it is composed mostly of women is it still a patriarchy? [Helen corrects JP vocabulary problem; no that is a matriarchy.] We take a patriarchal structure like the medical field. [Jh Jordy, after spending this entire interview denying we have a patriarchy, you are now admitting the medical field is a patriarchy?] 33: Lets get our definitions straight on identity politics. [Helen correctly defines it and gives a correct example, JP doesn't define it or give an example, score for Helen.] At about 45:00 Helen says that equality of outcome is 'not a widely held view'. JP as usual interrupts her to state that '20% of social science professors identify as Marxist, I read it quite carefully it is a perfectly valid statistic.' Problem is, the paper he is referring to Prevalence of Marxism in Academia, concluded that even in the left leaning environment of university, Marxism is a 'tiny minority faith'. So, JP interrupted Helen to brag about his reasoning and research skills, claiming he 'read it quite carefully', but he still didn't understand it; the paper proves Helen right.
    1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1