Comments by "" (@psychcowboy1) on "Fox News"
channel.
-
18
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Tucker I know facts aren't really your friend but for DACA you had to be in the US since 2007... You came to the United States before reaching your 16th birthday
You have continuously resided in the United States since June 15, 2007, up to the present time
You were under the age of 31 as of June 15, 2012
You entered without inspection before June 15, 2012, or your lawful immigration status expired as of June 15, 2012
You are currently in school, have graduated or obtained your certificate of completion from high school, have obtained your general educational development certification, or you are an honorably discharged veteran of the Coast Guard or Armed Forces of the United States
You have not been convicted of a felony, significant misdemeanor, or three or more misdemeanors, and do not otherwise pose a threat
You were present in the United States on June 15, 2012, and at the time of making your request for consideration of deferred action with USCIS
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I don't hate him. Rather I have no idea why anyone looks to him as any sort of intellectual. Giving clean your room advice, fine. In science and politics however the guy is a joke. If you disagree with my comments in brackets please elaborate:
1. 'The ignorant Left says you can place the responsibility for hierarchy and inequality at the feet of western civilization and capitalism...that is unbelievably wrong.'
[Who is saying that, and how did you get that from reading a paper on lobsters?]
2. "It is inevitable that there will be continuity in how humans and animals organize their structures."
[What is an animal structure, and how does an animal organize it?]
3. "The post modern ideology of the toxic Left characterizes the sociological landscape as an idiom of responsibility for protracting the hierarchy inequality and genocidal ideology of western civilization". [Huh?]
4. "The more likely problem in 100 years, assuming there are even creatures like us in 100 years, is that there will be too few people rather than too many."
[Huh? Humans have not evolved biologically substantially in the last 20,000 or so years, but you are projecting some radical evolution in the next 100? Many of the current world problems are population related, but you are projecting somehow there will be too few people in 100 years? Too few to do what exactly?]
5. "I don’t think that the Caucasians should revert to being white. I think that is a bad idea. It is a dangerous idea, and it is coming fast …I think that is reprehensible. It is devastating. It is genocidal in its ultimate expression."
[What is Caucasians reverting to white, and how is that, whatever it is, more genocidal than say dropping an A-bomb?]
2
-
2
-
2
-
Jordan's 13th Rule; We don't understand consciousness, we don't know where it fits in the cosmos.
[Jordan, how about not projecting your personal confusion about consciousness on to everyone else?]
Jordan's 14th Rule; How do you arrange books? Using the axiomatic structure of your a priori perceptions manifesting as self evident fact to your ignorant mind.
Jordan's 15 Rule; The best way for me to interact is individual to individual and as if they are part of the process by which things we don't understand can yet be explored and by things that aren't properly organized in our society can yet be set right.
Jordan's 16th Rule; Free speech also is the mechanism by which we generate the conceptions that allow us to organize our experience in the world, it is the mechanism that allows us to reformulate and criticize those conceptions when they become outdated and sterile, to reanimate them in a new form so we can move into the future.
Jordan's 17th Rule; There is no evidence that women can create social organizations.
Jordan's 18th Rule, Hard core clinical psychology research has determined that perception influences behavior.
[Yes Jordan, when I perceive I am thirsty my behavior is to go to the fridge for a drink.]
Jordan's 19th Rule; There is something to us. [Uh sure Jordan, a bit pointless and ambiguous however.]
Jordan's 20th Rule; I realized psychologically that the future is in a sense actually unpredictable.
[You needed psychology to figure that out Jordan? I figured it out without psychology.]
Jordan's 21 Rule: It is hard to get in to Harvard and it takes good SAT scores. [Yes Jordan, everyone already knows that.]
Jordan's 22 Rule: The world is not objects, it is the harmonious interplay of patterns, you dance with the world, you don't want a person who will dominate you sexually during the initial dance .
Jordan's 23 Rule: If you have a functional identity, when you act it out in the world you get what you want and need.
[I am pretty sure I have a function, and an identity, and I act out in the world, but merely wanting something is no promise that I will get it. Sorry Jordan If/Then logic failure on your part.]
Jordan's 24 Rule: I highly recommend that you try and put yourself together.
[Wow, I am totally going to do that now that you told me.]
Jordan's 25th Rule: The biblical corpus is a collection of narratives that shine a different light of characterization on the spirit that occupies the pinnacle in the hierarchy of perception. [Huh?]
Jordan's 26th Rule: I have been thinking for 40 years and I realized that you have to prioritize your perceptions. Prioritize means some things are more important than others in a hierarchy. Does that hierarchy have to be unified or not. There is an immediate existential consequence to not having a hierarchy of perceptual priority. You need a hierarchy to filter the world and what is at the highest point of the hierarchy.
Jordan's 27th Rule: There are no models of animal industriousness, there is nothing random about dreams, no one advises a loved one to get an abortion, we don't have an overpopulation problem, the women's movement didn't advance women's rights, plenty of them are saying there should be no such thing as hierarchies, our hierarchies are of competence not power, no one knows that the world has improved in every way in the last 50 years including the environment, the West is an oppressive patriarchy but the West is not an oppressive patriarchy....
Jordan's 28th Rule: 'You want to fight the dragons that guard the gate to the treasure that you wish to attain, productivity requires aim and responsibility, discipline and willingness to work, it orients you solidly in the world and gives you a dragon to fight, do you want to be illiterate, you have to think, you can't build muscle at the gym unless you lift weights, face your being with the necessity of transformation, those are the dragons, you have to say to yourself 'I will do good.' @AmbietsRato
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
One problem with Mark Levin is that he, like most conservatives, think Jordan Peterson is smart. Let's check out Sowell as another pretend intellectual: 'Social justice fallacies, is it stuff, these ambiguities...yes it did, I observed things and facts, it sounds good but it is horrible... what does social justice mean, if you agree with the leftists and the marxists, but if you support capitalism and private property and individuals then you are anti social justice... they assume that if everything isn't the same for everyone that someone has done something wrong...these radical autocrates do they mean centralized government, redistribution of wealth, a permanent government that undermines representative government ... it is... these intellectuals have a high opinion of themselves..
[Why are two guys who have no idea what social justice means pretending to have a high opinion of themselves as intellectuals, while bemoaning people who have a high opinion of themselves as intellectuals like Sowell and Jordan Peterson?]
Let me help you two arrainge your toys. Social justice is at its core a movement to regulate greed, to limit the power of the wealthy to profit off the work of others. It has nothing to do with 'a permanent government that undermines representative government', it has nothing to do with 'if you support capitalism and private property and individuals then you are anti social justice.' You are welcome for a lecture in logic and facts from a liberal.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@susandanner496 Here is a lesson on using facts: The news is always wrong in the first draft? Always? They are lying on purpose. So how do we know when Tucker is lying on purpose? Is he always wrong in the first draft? We don't know who launched the bombs Tucker, and Zelinski didn't say the us should start a world war. Are you lying on purpose right now? He said he believed it was a Russian missile Tucker, that isn't a lie. The security guy said the evidence suggests. Not a lie either. Also Tucker it's not the Biden administration, it is bipartisan votes by Congress to send defense supplies to Ukraine. I agree sometimes the news is inaccurate, but you complaining about that?
Tucker at 7:45 'Why as long as it takes, Ukraine is not a democracy, what is our security interest, could it be that this entire effort is a choreographed scam to enrich the democratic party and it's allies, to achieve Left wing ideology and BLM goals, it is possible, because that is how DC works.....'
[Wait didn't Tucker start this by lamenting the dangers of dishonesty by the media? And now he is trying to link Putin attacking Ukraine with some left-wing ideology to enrich the democratic party? No wonder some of his colleagues quit because of Tucker's indifference to the truth in favor of inciting angst among gullible conservatives?]
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rfbedell347 1:30 'SBF Anything I make I am going to give away, money from FTX backdoored to another company, it disappeared, he donated $38 million to democrat elections, a denial is not proof, American government donated to Ukraine with crypto FTX, how much of that went backdoor to SBF and then to democrats, was money to Ukraine going back to the people who were voting to fund the war....'
[Sorry Will, SBF donated about 1% of his networth to election campaigns, not 'anything I make'. A denial is not proof? True, your allegation is not proof either as much as Fox viewers will probably believe it is. The US government donated to Ukraine with FTX crypto? Any proof of that? What the US is doing is supplying security infrastructure for Ukraine defense not 'here is a stake in our crypto account' pal. 'how much money to Ukraine going back to the people who were voting to fund the war.' The US isn't funding a war, it is trying to stop a war invasion by psycho Putin, that Trump and Fox like to excuse. To establish your wild allegations we need to know: A. The US government was giving Ukraine money. B. This was in the form of FTX crypto currency. C. Instead of using this alleged crypto money to fight the Russia invasion, someone in Ukraine simply decided to give it back someone in the US. Here is my suggestion Will and Fox. For your next post, how about addressing those issues with some form of evidence rather than wild inflammatory theories. This would require Fox to be an actual news channel however.]
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@susandanner496 The news is always wrong in the first draft? Always? They are lying on purpose. So how do we know when Tucker is lying on purpose? Is he always wrong in the first draft? We don't know who launched the bombs Tucker, and Zelinski didn't say the us should start a world war. Are you lying on purpose right now? He said he believed it was a Russian missile Tucker, that isn't a lie. The security guy said the evidence suggests. Not a lie either. Also Tucker it's not the Biden administration, it is bipartisan votes by Congress to send defense supplies to Ukraine. I agree sometimes the news is inaccurate, but you complaining about that?
Tucker at 7:45 'Why as long as it takes, Ukraine is not a democracy, what is our security interest, could it be that this entire effort is a choreographed scam to enrich the democratic party and it's allies, to achieve Left wing ideology and BLM goals, it is possible, because that is how DC works.....'
[Wait didn't Tucker start this by lamenting the dangers of dishonesty by the media? And now he is trying to link Putin attacking Ukraine with some left-wing ideology to enrich the democratic party? No wonder some of his colleagues quit because of Tucker's indifference to the truth in favor of inciting angst among gullible conservatives?]
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@debd7631 My opinion is what you should realize however is that We don't understand consciousness, we don't know where it fits in the cosmos. How do you arrange books? Using the axiomatic structure of your a priori perceptions manifesting as self-evident fact to your ignorant mind. The best way for me to interact is individual to individual and as if they are part of the process by which things we don't understand can yet be explored and by things that aren't properly organized in our society can yet be set right. Free speech also is the mechanism by which we generate the conceptions that allow us to organize our experience in the world, it is the mechanism that allows us to reformulate and criticize those conceptions when they become outdated and sterile, to reanimate them in a new form so we can move into the future. You want to fight the dragons that guard the gate to the treasure that you wish to attain, productivity requires aim and responsibility, discipline and willingness to work, it orients you solidly in the world and gives you a dragon to fight, do you want to be illiterate, you have to think, you can't build muscle at the gym unless you lift weights, face your being with the necessity of transformation, those are the dragons, you have to say to yourself 'I will do good.' And most importantly, the biblical corpus is a collection of narratives that shine a different light of characterization on the spirit that occupies the pinnacle in the hierarchy of perception.
1
-
1
-
@@jackmillward5936 If you can't prioritize your goals you can't move forward on jacob's ladder, the macrocosm of the heavenly hierarchy, any system is a structure of values, consciousness is a narrow channel, we can only act one thing at a time, you have to do the first thing first, a hierarchy is an ethic, we cannot see the world except through an ethic, literally, or act in it, you cannot see the world through a hierarchical structure of value which is an ethic, you should chew on for twenty years that a story is a verbal description of a hierarchy of perceptual and and action prioritization.
1
-
@@jackmillward5936 I learned that also, but in third grade. If you can't prioritize your goals you can't move forward on jacob's ladder, the macrocosm of the heavenly hierarchy, any system is a structure of values, consciousness is a narrow channel, we can only act one thing at a time, you have to do the first thing first, a hierarchy is an ethic, we cannot see the world except through an ethic, literally, or act in it, you cannot see the world through a hierarchical structure of value which is an ethic, you should chew on for twenty years that a story is a verbal description of a hierarchy of perceptual and and action prioritization.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jameswheeler1610 1:30 'SBF Anything I make I am going to give away, money from FTX backdoored to another company, it disappeared, he donated $38 million to democrat elections, a denial is not proof, American government donated to Ukraine with crypto FTX, how much of that went backdoor to SBF and then to democrats, was money to Ukraine going back to the people who were voting to fund the war....'
[Sorry Will, SBF donated about 1% of his networth to election campaigns, not 'anything I make'. A denial is not proof? True, your allegation is not proof either as much as Fox viewers will probably believe it is. The US government donated to Ukraine with FTX crypto? Any proof of that? What the US is doing is supplying security infrastructure for Ukraine defense not 'here is a stake in our crypto account' pal. 'how much money to Ukraine going back to the people who were voting to fund the war.' The US isn't funding a war, it is trying to stop a war invasion by psycho Putin, that Trump and Fox like to excuse. To establish your wild allegations we need to know: A. The US government was giving Ukraine money. B. This was in the form of FTX crypto currency. C. Instead of using this alleged crypto money to fight the Russia invasion, someone in Ukraine simply decided to give it back someone in the US. Here is my suggestion Will and Fox. For your next post, how about addressing those issues with some form of evidence rather than wild inflammatory theories. This would require Fox to be an actual news channel however.]
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@angelshalo06 Fox generally not that trustworthy, basically appealing to gullible conservatives, so let's check in to Will Cain here:
1:30 'SBF Anything I make I am going to give away, money from FTX backdoored to another company, it disappeared, he donated $38 million to democrat elections, a denial is not proof, American government donated to Ukraine with crypto FTX, how much of that went backdoor to SBF and then to democrats, was money to Ukraine going back to the people who were voting to fund the war....'
[Sorry Will, SBF donated about 1% of his networth to election campaigns, not 'anything I make'. A denial is not proof? True, your allegation is not proof either as much as Fox viewers will probably believe it is. The US government donated to Ukraine with FTX crypto? Any proof of that? What the US is doing is supplying security infrastructure for Ukraine defense not 'here is a stake in our crypto account' pal. 'how much money to Ukraine going back to the people who were voting to fund the war.' The US isn't funding a war, it is trying to stop a war invasion by psycho Putin, that Trump and Fox like to excuse. To establish your wild allegations we need to know: A. The US government was giving Ukraine money. B. This was in the form of FTX crypto currency. C. Instead of using this alleged crypto money to fight the Russia invasion, someone in Ukraine simply decided to give it back someone in the US. Here is my suggestion Will and Fox. For your next post, how about addressing those issues with some form of evidence rather than wild inflammatory theories. This would require Fox to be an actual news channel however.]
Tucker: "The news media is horrible, it is often intentionally wrong, the first draft is always wrong, laughably untrue, they are lying on purpose, to manipulate you, if Russia attacked NATO by definition that would be world war 3 hundreds of people would die, intel official said Russia had launched a strike on Poland by definition it was time for the US to begin a total war on Putin Russia, and now for a Zelinski clip who is a friend of Sean Penn commanded the US to start a world war, the missle had a s300 ukrainian symbol, Ukraine bombed Poland and Zelinski was lying...is it time to stop backing Zelinski getting rich from US handouts, a ukraine missle killed two Poles..."
[Wait, Tucker is complaining about news media being always wrong and they are lying on purpose? They are always wrong? Sorry Tucker,
1
-
1
-
1
-
Better title, WE who wrestle with our own ego.... hehe. 'The confusion of the nature of the story that should orient us in the world, the problem with hedonism and power, you need a different pattern to have meaning, the biblical library, those stories are scientifically credible, there is scientific evidence that we see the world through a story, identity politics is confusion about our orientation in the world, the orientation poles have not been superseded, we have stories encapsulated but what is the right story, we are arranged to act out patterns, purpose and accomplishment, to be significant, a good person, and meaning....'
[Hey Jesse, did you notice a single coherent useful idea by JP somewhere, I couldn't find one.]
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
One problem with Mark Levin is that he, like most conservatives, think Jordan Peterson is smart. Let's check out Sowell as another pretend intellectual: 'Social justice fallacies, is it stuff, these ambiguities...yes it did, I observed things and facts, it sounds good but it is horrible... what does social justice mean, if you agree with the leftists and the Marxists, but if you support capitalism and private property and individuals then you are anti-social justice... they assume that if everything isn't the same for everyone that someone has done something wrong...these radical autocrats do they mean centralized government, redistribution of wealth, a permanent government that undermines representative government ... it is... these intellectuals have a high opinion of themselves..
[Why are two guys who have no idea what social justice means pretending to have a high opinion of themselves as intellectuals, while bemoaning people who have a high opinion of themselves as intellectuals like Sowell and Jordan Peterson?]
Let me help you two arrange your toys. Social justice is at its core a movement to regulate greed, to limit the power of the wealthy to profit off the work of others. It has nothing to do with 'a permanent government that undermines representative government', it has nothing to do with 'if you support capitalism and private property and individuals then you are anti-social justice.' You are welcome for a lecture in logic and facts from a liberal.
1
-
@dark3031 I cleaned JP's room, found scraps of paper all over the floor. I decided that My opinion is what you should realize however is that We don't understand consciousness, we don't know where it fits in the cosmos. How do you arrange books? Using the axiomatic structure of your a priori perceptions manifesting as self-evident fact to your ignorant mind. The best way for me to interact is individual to individual and as if they are part of the process by which things we don't understand can yet be explored and by things that aren't properly organized in our society can yet be set right. Free speech also is the mechanism by which we generate the conceptions that allow us to organize our experience in the world, it is the mechanism that allows us to reformulate and criticize those conceptions when they become outdated and sterile, to reanimate them in a new form so we can move into the future. You want to fight the dragons that guard the gate to the treasure that you wish to attain, productivity requires aim and responsibility, discipline and willingness to work, it orients you solidly in the world and gives you a dragon to fight, do you want to be illiterate, you have to think, you can't build muscle at the gym unless you lift weights, face your being with the necessity of transformation, those are the dragons, you have to say to yourself 'I will do good.' And most importantly, the biblical corpus is a collection of narratives that shine a different light of characterization on the spirit that occupies the pinnacle in the hierarchy of perception.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@LeapingBlackman The transcendent is what we bump up against when we realize our ignorance. It is an implacable fact. We can think can about it technically, you tend to represent the world in the simplest manner that you can that works for what you are doing, you don't actually see the world, you see useful low-resolution representations of the world, sometimes you have a misapprehension about someone, the conversation goes sideways, the thing that you thought you are conversing with is not the thing you are conversing with, that manifests itself as error, what is revealing itself is the reality that is outside and beneath your perceptions, what you see is a sense of animated cartoons, that is you seeing nothing but your memory, the thing is richer, God only knows there is more there than meets the eye, you can determine this scientifically with chemicals that disrupt the inhibition of perception by memory and then the transcendent reveals itself'.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Tucker: I have better presidential ideas that Trump, Biden, Bernie, and all the prior Dem candidates at jgreene4prez2020 on FB. If you want to interview me, HMU. On income inequity and limiting greed, improving the mental and economic health of the nation, the environment, health care, student loans, housing, and the military. Check them out, ask me any question about any of them. On the police issue, the toxic cop syndrome needs a paradigm shift, but I do not support vandalism or looting, nor do I support defunding police. We need them, there are a lot of good ones, but clearly the 'shoot first ask questions later' mentality requires a message of firing for some and criminal charges for others. Thx.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
He has some simple self help advice that helps some people. He is also widely known as the biggest fake intellecctual of this century. 90% of what he says is total nonsense...Jordan's 13th Rule; We don't understand consciousness, we don't know where it fits in the cosmos.
[Jordan, how about not projecting your personal confusion about consciousness on to everyone else?]
Jordan's 14th Rule; How do you arrange books? Using the axiomatic structure of your a priori perceptions manifesting as self evident fact to your ignorant mind.
Jordan's 15 Rule; The best way for me to interact is individual to individual and as if they are part of the process by which things we don't understand can yet be explored and by things that aren't properly organized in our society can yet be set right.
Jordan's 16th Rule; Free speech also is the mechanism by which we generate the conceptions that allow us to organize our experience in the world, it is the mechanism that allows us to reformulate and criticize those conceptions when they become outdated and sterile, to reanimate them in a new form so we can move into the future.
Jordan's 17th Rule; There is no evidence that women can create social organizations.
Jordan's 18th Rule, Hard core clinical psychology research has determined that perception influences behavior.
[Yes Jordan, when I perceive I am thirsty my behavior is to go to the fridge for a drink.]
Jordan's 19th Rule; There is something to us. [Uh sure Jordan, a bit pointless and ambiguous however.]
Jordan's 20th Rule; I realized psychologically that the future is in a sense actually unpredictable.
[You needed psychology to figure that out Jordan? I figured it out without psychology.]
Jordan's 21 Rule: It is hard to get in to Harvard and it takes good SAT scores. [Yes Jordan, everyone already knows that.]
Jordan's 22 Rule: The world is not objects, it is the harmonious interplay of patterns, you dance with the world, you don't want a person who will dominate you sexually during the initial dance .
Jordan's 23 Rule: If you have a functional identity, when you act it out in the world you get what you want and need.
[I am pretty sure I have a function, and an identity, and I act out in the world, but merely wanting something is no promise that I will get it. Sorry Jordan If/Then logic failure on your part.]
Jordan's 24 Rule: I highly recommend that you try and put yourself together.
[Wow, I am totally going to do that now that you told me.]
Jordan's 25th Rule: The biblical corpus is a collection of narratives that shine a different light of characterization on the spirit that occupies the pinnacle in the hierarchy of perception. [Huh?]
Jordan's 26th Rule: I have been thinking for 40 years and I realized that you have to prioritize your perceptions. Prioritize means some things are more important than others in a hierarchy. Does that hierarchy have to be unified or not. There is an immediate existential consequence to not having a hierarchy of perceptual priority. You need a hierarchy to filter the world and what is at the highest point of the hierarchy.
Jordan's 27th Rule: There are no models of animal industriousness, there is nothing random about dreams, no one advises a loved one to get an abortion, we don't have an overpopulation problem, the women's movement didn't advance women's rights, plenty of them are saying there should be no such thing as hierarchies, our hierarchies are of competence not power, no one knows that the world has improved in every way in the last 50 years including the environment, the West is an oppressive patriarchy but the West is not an oppressive patriarchy....
Jordan's 28th Rule: 'You want to fight the dragons that guard the gate to the treasure that you wish to attain, productivity requires aim and responsibility, discipline and willingness to work, it orients you solidly in the world and gives you a dragon to fight, do you want to be illiterate, you have to think, you can't build muscle at the gym unless you lift weights, face your being with the necessity of transformation, those are the dragons, you have to say to yourself 'I will do good.'
@neologian1783
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@etchediniron4249 Did you know that There are no models of animal industriousness, there is nothing random about dreams, no one advises a loved one to get an abortion, we don't have an overpopulation problem, the women's movement didn't advance women's rights, plenty of them are saying there should be no such thing as hierarchies, our hierarchies are of competence not power, no one knows that the world has improved in every way in the last 50 years including the environment, the West is an oppressive patriarchy but the West is not an oppressive patriarchy....
Jordan's 28th Rule: 'You want to fight the dragons that guard the gate to the treasure that you wish to attain, productivity requires aim and responsibility, discipline and willingness to work, it orients you solidly in the world and gives you a dragon to fight, do you want to be illiterate, you have to think, you can't build muscle at the gym unless you lift weights, face your being with the necessity of transformation, those are the dragons, you have to say to yourself 'I will do good.'?
1
-
1
-
My opinion is what you should realize however is that We don't understand consciousness, we don't know where it fits in the cosmos. How do you arrange books? Using the axiomatic structure of your a priori perceptions manifesting as self-evident fact to your ignorant mind. The best way for me to interact is individual to individual and as if they are part of the process by which things we don't understand can yet be explored and by things that aren't properly organized in our society can yet be set right. Free speech also is the mechanism by which we generate the conceptions that allow us to organize our experience in the world, it is the mechanism that allows us to reformulate and criticize those conceptions when they become outdated and sterile, to reanimate them in a new form so we can move into the future. You want to fight the dragons that guard the gate to the treasure that you wish to attain, productivity requires aim and responsibility, discipline and willingness to work, it orients you solidly in the world and gives you a dragon to fight, do you want to be illiterate, you have to think, you can't build muscle at the gym unless you lift weights, face your being with the necessity of transformation, those are the dragons, you have to say to yourself 'I will do good.' And most importantly, the biblical corpus is a collection of narratives that shine a different light of characterization on the spirit that occupies the pinnacle in the hierarchy of perception. @kephjs
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@justincenters2762 The GQ interview 'There was plenty of motivation...? You found a JP win in that video? Cool, Please share what it was.
In first five minutes:
Helen: Patriarchy is a system of male dominance.
JP: That isn't my definition of it.
[Helen gives the dictionary definition and JP disagrees, score for Helen.]
JP: In what way is society male dominated?
Helen: Men have most of the money.
JP: You are taking a tiny percentage of hyper successful males and using it to describe all of western culture, most men in prison are men, most people who commit suicide are men...
[Helen gives a correct example of male dominance and JP switches the goal post to 'is society easier or more fair to men'. Score for Helen.]
JP at 20:30 Helen: 'A female dominated office leaves men feeling left out. JP: How do we get to something that isn't a tyrannical patriarchy, if it is composed of mostly women and its a tyrannical patriarchy and if it is composed of mostly men it is a tyrannical patriarchy we are out of options....
[Jordan pulls a Cathy Newman, SO YOU ARE SAYING if is composed mostly of women it is a tyrannical patriarchy? No Jordan she didn't say anything like that.
Helen said absolutely nothing about women dominated is a tyrannical patriarchy, she corrected your vocabulary problem, dominated by women is a matriarchy dude. Neither did she say we have a tyrannical patriarchy. She said the patriarchy was overthrown by the women's movement and women now have almost equal rights with men.]
JP at 8:00: Helen; women were barred from professions until 1919. JP: Why would you blame men for that?
[Jordan really, why would you blame men for barring women from professions? Score for Helen.]
Around 44:00 Helen referring to equality of outcome: 'I don't think that is a widely held view.'
JP Interrupting as usual: 20% of social scientists identify as Marxist. Look it up in Haidt's work, I studied it quite carefully, it is a perfectly valid statistical.
[Heads up JP, in the survey you are referring to, 3% of college professors identify as Marxist, and you claim that universities are dominated by leftist ideology, thus 3% of a very Left leaning sample identify as Marxist... and you are disagreeing with Helen? Whoops. The study Prevalence of Marxism in Academia states that Marxism is 'A tiny minority faith', ie Peterson cited a study to prove Helen wrong, when it actually proved her right. SCORE: Helen 3, Jordan 0]
--Peterson at 19:00: 'That's for sure it's purely not, when you define it as tyrannical patriarchy implies one-dimensional...'
[Whoops Jordan, remember in the dave rubin john anderson interview when you said the West is an oppressive patriarchy but not purely that? Contradiction alert']
'We take a patriarchal structure like the medical profession and we fill it with women, is it that it is mostly men that makes it a patriarchy, if it is a structure that is composed of women then it is also a tyrannical patriarchy, if it is composed of women and it is a tyrannical patriarchy...
[She just corrected you that composed or dominated primarily of women is a matriarchy. So after denying that we have a patriarchy numerous times in this interview you are now admitting that the medical field is a patriarchy? Score for Helen.)
Let's get our definitions straight on identity politics. [Helen gives a correct definition, JP gives no definition. Score for Helen.]
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@pierreb6860 JP is a fake intellectual, I am a real intellectual since I realize that Identity is the proper union of faith and responsibility. It does that in a hierarchical subsidiary manner, if you have conflict, you need a counter position, that is subsidiary structure. Jacob's ladder, the vine that unites the material and proximal realm of the earth with the eternal realm of heaven, how do we climb it, there is a vision of how we build ourselves, a glorious macro-vision; it is the proximal beginnings, we scaffold ourselves upward from the finite to the infinite, the scaffold constitutes our identity...also that you think so that your stupid thoughts can die instead of you. At the upper end of a hierarchy, you find people who know a lot, if you are stupid, smart people won't listen to you, so you can inform yourself with tools and you won't be an embarrassment, the careless self-evident axiom of human social interaction is that if I can force you to do something then I have the right to do it. Do you agree?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@russianbot4418 My opinion is what you should realize however is that We don't understand consciousness, we don't know where it fits in the cosmos. How do you arrange books? Using the axiomatic structure of your a priori perceptions manifesting as self-evident fact to your ignorant mind. The best way for me to interact is individual to individual and as if they are part of the process by which things we don't understand can yet be explored and by things that aren't properly organized in our society can yet be set right. Free speech also is the mechanism by which we generate the conceptions that allow us to organize our experience in the world, it is the mechanism that allows us to reformulate and criticize those conceptions when they become outdated and sterile, to reanimate them in a new form so we can move into the future. You want to fight the dragons that guard the gate to the treasure that you wish to attain, productivity requires aim and responsibility, discipline and willingness to work, it orients you solidly in the world and gives you a dragon to fight, do you want to be illiterate, you have to think, you can't build muscle at the gym unless you lift weights, face your being with the necessity of transformation, those are the dragons, you have to say to yourself 'I will do good.' And most importantly, the biblical corpus is a collection of narratives that shine a different light of characterization on the spirit that occupies the pinnacle in the hierarchy of perception.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
JP is generally triggered and insecure. My opinion is what you should realize however is that We don't understand consciousness, we don't know where it fits in the cosmos. How do you arrange books? Using the axiomatic structure of your a priori perceptions manifesting as self-evident fact to your ignorant mind. The best way for me to interact is individual to individual and as if they are part of the process by which things we don't understand can yet be explored and by things that aren't properly organized in our society can yet be set right. Free speech also is the mechanism by which we generate the conceptions that allow us to organize our experience in the world, it is the mechanism that allows us to reformulate and criticize those conceptions when they become outdated and sterile, to reanimate them in a new form so we can move into the future. You want to fight the dragons that guard the gate to the treasure that you wish to attain, productivity requires aim and responsibility, discipline and willingness to work, it orients you solidly in the world and gives you a dragon to fight, do you want to be illiterate, you have to think, you can't build muscle at the gym unless you lift weights, face your being with the necessity of transformation, those are the dragons, you have to say to yourself 'I will do good.' And most importantly, the biblical corpus is a collection of narratives that shine a different light of characterization on the spirit that occupies the pinnacle in the hierarchy of perception. @deathrodamus9608
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TranscendentSol Better title, WE who wrestle with our own ego.... hehe. 'The confusion of the nature of the story that should orient us in the world, the problem with hedonism and power, you need a different pattern to have meaning, the biblical library, those stories are scientifically credible, there is scientific evidence that we see the world through a story, identity politics is confusion about our orientation in the world, the orientation poles have not been superseded, we have stories encapsulated but what is the right story, we are arranged to act out patterns, purpose and accomplishment, to be significant, a good person, and meaning....'
[Hey Jesse, did you notice a single coherent useful idea by JP somewhere, I couldn't find one.]
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You found a profound intellectual idea by JP? Timestamp and quote from some YT video? My opinion is what you should realize however is that We don't understand consciousness, we don't know where it fits in the cosmos. How do you arrange books? Using the axiomatic structure of your a priori perceptions manifesting as self-evident fact to your ignorant mind. The best way for me to interact is individual to individual and as if they are part of the process by which things we don't understand can yet be explored and by things that aren't properly organized in our society can yet be set right. Free speech also is the mechanism by which we generate the conceptions that allow us to organize our experience in the world, it is the mechanism that allows us to reformulate and criticize those conceptions when they become outdated and sterile, to reanimate them in a new form so we can move into the future. You want to fight the dragons that guard the gate to the treasure that you wish to attain, productivity requires aim and responsibility, discipline and willingness to work, it orients you solidly in the world and gives you a dragon to fight, do you want to be illiterate, you have to think, you can't build muscle at the gym unless you lift weights, face your being with the necessity of transformation, those are the dragons, you have to say to yourself 'I will do good.' And most importantly, the biblical corpus is a collection of narratives that shine a different light of characterization on the spirit that occupies the pinnacle in the hierarchy of perception.
@sovl2659
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I don't consider JP an enemy of the Left. I consider him an enemy of logic, more accurately a pseudo intellectual who is more suited to selling holy water on the 700 club. Change my mind, if you disagree with my comments in brackets:
1. 'The ignorant Left says you can place the responsibility for hierarchy and inequality at the feet of western civilization and capitalism...that is unbelievably wrong.'
[Who is saying that, and how did you get that from reading a paper on lobsters?]
2. "It is inevitable that there will be continuity in how humans and animals organize their structures."
[What is an animal structure, and how does an animal organize it?]
3. "The post modern ideology of the toxic Left characterizes the sociological landscape as an idiom of responsibility for protracting the hierarchy inequality and genocidal ideology of western civilization". [Huh?]
4. "The more likely problem in 100 years, assuming there are even creatures like us in 100 years, is that there will be too few people rather than too many."
[Huh? Humans have not evolved biologically substantially in the last 20,000 or so years, but you are projecting some radical evolution in the next 100? Many of the current world problems are population related, but you are projecting somehow there will be too few people in 100 years? Too few to do what exactly?]
5. "I don’t think that the Caucasians should revert to being white. I think that is a bad idea. It is a dangerous idea, and it is coming fast …I think that is reprehensible. It is devastating. It is genocidal in its ultimate expression."
[What is Caucasians reverting to white, and how is that, whatever it is, more genocidal than say dropping an A-bomb?]
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ST-rj8iu In first five minutes:
Helen: Patriarchy is a system of male dominance.
JP: That isn't my definition of it.
[Helen gives the dictionary definition and JP disagrees, score for Helen.]
JP: In what way is society male dominated?
Helen: Men have most of the money.
JP: You are taking a tiny percentage of hyper successful males and using it to describe all of western culture, most men in prison are men, most people who commit suicide are men...
[Helen gives a correct example of male dominance and JP switches the goal post to 'is society easier or more fair to men'. Score for Helen.]
JP at 20:30 Helen: 'A female dominated office leaves men feeling left out. JP: How do we get to something that isn't a tyrannical patriarchy, if it is composed of mostly women and its a tyrannical patriarchy and if it is composed of mostly men it is a tyrannical patriarchy we are out of options....
[Jordan pulls a Cathy Newman, SO YOU ARE SAYING if is composed mostly of women it is a tyrannical patriarchy? No Jordan she didn't say anything like that.
Helen said absolutely nothing about women dominated is a tyrannical patriarchy, she corrected your vocabulary problem, dominated by women is a matriarchy dude. Neither did she say we have a tyrannical patriarchy. She said the patriarchy was overthrown by the women's movement and women now have almost equal rights with men.]
JP at 8:00: Helen; women were barred from professions until 1919. JP: Why would you blame men for that?
[Jordan really, why would you blame men for barring women from professions? Score for Helen.]
Around 44:00 Helen referring to equality of outcome: 'I don't think that is a widely held view.'
JP Interrupting as usual: 20% of social scientists identify as Marxist. Look it up in Haidt's work, I studied it quite carefully, it is a perfectly valid statistical.
[Heads up JP, in the survey you are referring to, 3% of college professors identify as Marxist, and you claim that universities are dominated by leftist ideology, thus 3% of a very Left leaning sample identify as Marxist... and you are disagreeing with Helen? Whoops. The study Prevalence of Marxism in Academia states that Marxism is 'A tiny minority faith', ie Peterson cited a study to prove Helen wrong, when it actually proved her right. SCORE: Helen 3, Jordan 0]
--Peterson at 19:00: 'That's for sure it's purely not, when you define it as tyrannical patriarchy implies one-dimensional...'
[Whoops Jordan, remember in the dave rubin john anderson interview when you said the West is an oppressive patriarchy but not purely that? Contradiction alert']
'We take a patriarchal structure like the medical profession and we fill it with women, is it that it is mostly men that makes it a patriarchy, if it is a structure that is composed of women then it is also a tyrannical patriarchy, if it is composed of women and it is a tyrannical patriarchy...
[She just corrected you that composed or dominated primarily of women is a matriarchy. So after denying that we have a patriarchy numerous times in this interview you are now admitting that the medical field is a patriarchy? Score for Helen.)
Let's get our definitions straight on identity politics. [Helen gives a correct definition, JP gives no definition. Score for Helen.]
1
-
@ST-rj8iu I understand, you feel JP or Sowell are intellectuals, but you don't know where that happened.
You also couldn't figure out the benefits of my home ownership plan. No problem, I probably know a lot more about economics than you; funny since you accused me of not understanding economics!
BENEFITS OF MY 70% MARGINAL TAX WORK FOR THREE YEARS HOME OWNERSHIP PLAN:
1. Stable housing costs of those crossing from renter to owner increases spending power for restaurants, vacations, better clothes and appliances etc, thus boosting the economy via demand.
2. Home ownership is hope; depression and crime reduce.
3. Above 400k there is little incentive for real estate investors to buy more property and little investment to keep raising rents. This opens up the market for smaller investors, and by reducing rent costs increases spending power and thus demand.
4. Above 400k there is little incentive for business to keep wages low, thus wages increase, and more employees move into higher management positions.
5. With little incentive to keep raising retail rents above 400k, retail rents stabilize thus helping small business.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Hey I know everyone thinks JP is an intellectual hero, I am seeking feedback on the 'intellectual hero-ness' of a couple quotes, all hero caliber, some hero caliber, any of them junk, or...? Here they are:
1. JP on Trump: "Trump is a strange person. He is impulsive, he is disagreeable. What I am hoping for is normative incompetence, stupidity, foolishness among politicians. Just exactly what we need is for Trump to be normally incompetent for the next 4 years."
2. 'I don’t think that the Caucasians should revert to being white. I think that is a bad idea. It is a dangerous idea, and it is coming fast … I think the whole group identity thing is seriously pathological … Where we’re making your group identity the most important thing about you. I think that is reprehensible. It is devastating. It is genocidal in its ultimate expression.'
3. "The post modern ideology of the toxic Left characterizes the sociological landscape as an idiom of responsibility for protracting the hierarchy inequality and genocidal ideology of western civilization."
4. "'Agreeableness negatively predicts success in the workplace."
5. "''As you flatten out the sociological landscape you maximize the biological differences, no one saw that coming."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@raneads1458 Better title, WE who wrestle with our own ego.... hehe. 'The confusion of the nature of the story that should orient us in the world, the problem with hedonism and power, you need a different pattern to have meaning, the biblical library, those stories are scientifically credible, there is scientific evidence that we see the world through a story, identity politics is confusion about our orientation in the world, the orientation poles have not been superseded, we have stories encapsulated but what is the right story, we are arranged to act out patterns, purpose and accomplishment, to be significant, a good person, and meaning....'
[Hey Jesse, did you notice a single coherent useful idea by JP somewhere, I couldn't find one.]
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1