Comments by "" (@psychcowboy1) on "Thomas Sowell to Levin on America today: 'Real danger'" video.

  1. ​ @ZENIGMATV Did Sowell say something intelligent?
    2
  2.  @ST-rj8iu  Does Peterson Sowell or Levin have any useful ideas?
    2
  3. We are searching for a profound useful idea by Levin or Sowell or Peterson. So far no one can find one.
    1
  4. One problem with Mark Levin is that he, like most conservatives, think Jordan Peterson is smart. Let's check out Sowell as another pretend intellectual: 'Social justice fallacies, is it stuff, these ambiguities...yes it did, I observed things and facts, it sounds good but it is horrible... what does social justice mean, if you agree with the leftists and the marxists, but if you support capitalism and private property and individuals then you are anti social justice... they assume that if everything isn't the same for everyone that someone has done something wrong...these radical autocrates do they mean centralized government, redistribution of wealth, a permanent government that undermines representative government ... it is... these intellectuals have a high opinion of themselves.. [Why are two guys who have no idea what social justice means pretending to have a high opinion of themselves as intellectuals, while bemoaning people who have a high opinion of themselves as intellectuals like Sowell and Jordan Peterson?] Let me help you two arrainge your toys. Social justice is at its core a movement to regulate greed, to limit the power of the wealthy to profit off the work of others. It has nothing to do with 'a permanent government that undermines representative government', it has nothing to do with 'if you support capitalism and private property and individuals then you are anti social justice.' You are welcome for a lecture in logic and facts from a liberal.
    1
  5. We are searching for a profound useful idea by Levin or Sowell or Peterson. So far no one can find one.
    1
  6. We are searching for a profound useful idea by Levin or Sowell or Peterson. So far no one can find one.
    1
  7. But God is pro choice.
    1
  8. We are searching for a profound useful idea by Levin or Sowell or Peterson. So far no one can find one.
    1
  9.  @philipanthony9596  We are searching for a profound useful idea by Peterson Sowell or Levin.
    1
  10.  @philipanthony9596  I couldn't find any useful ideas by Sowell either. So we agree. What is your solution for regulating greed?
    1
  11. One problem with Mark Levin is that he, like most conservatives, think Jordan Peterson is smart. Let's check out Sowell as another pretend intellectual: 'Social justice fallacies, is it stuff, these ambiguities...yes it did, I observed things and facts, it sounds good but it is horrible... what does social justice mean, if you agree with the leftists and the Marxists, but if you support capitalism and private property and individuals then you are anti-social justice... they assume that if everything isn't the same for everyone that someone has done something wrong...these radical autocrats do they mean centralized government, redistribution of wealth, a permanent government that undermines representative government ... it is... these intellectuals have a high opinion of themselves.. [Why are two guys who have no idea what social justice means pretending to have a high opinion of themselves as intellectuals, while bemoaning people who have a high opinion of themselves as intellectuals like Sowell and Jordan Peterson?] Let me help you two arrange your toys. Social justice is at its core a movement to regulate greed, to limit the power of the wealthy to profit off the work of others. It has nothing to do with 'a permanent government that undermines representative government', it has nothing to do with 'if you support capitalism and private property and individuals then you are anti-social justice.' You are welcome for a lecture in logic and facts from a liberal.
    1
  12.  @skybarwisdom  Did did Sowell have a useful intellectual idea about something? What, quote?
    1
  13.  @skybarwisdom  Economic Facts and Fallacies is a useful intellectual idea about something? That actually looks like a book title not an idea. If you find an actual idea LMK. BTW: What is your solution to regulating greed?
    1
  14.  @skybarwisdom  I didn't say to eliminate greed, I said to regulate greed, e.g. the wealthy via power profiting of the work of others via high rents and low wages. Here is my solution to regulate greed. Guaranteed federal housing program; you work 3 years at any job and you qualify to buy something, with a mortgage at 30% of your income. This is funded by a 70% marginal tax rate above $400,000 per year including capital gains. Get the working poor out from under the thumb of wealthy investors. 3 years even working at Target qualifies you for an affordable mortgage. You still have to pay that mortgage like anyone else or you default. List the benefits.
    1
  15.  @skybarwisdom  This is a marginal tax on all income ABOVE 400k. You couldn't figure out the benefits, no problem here they are: BENEFITS OF MY 70% MARGINAL TAX WORK FOR THREE YEARS HOME OWNERSHIP PLAN: 1. Stable housing costs of those crossing from renter to owner increases spending power for restaurants, vacations, better clothes and appliances etc, thus boosting the economy via demand. 2. Home ownership is hope; depression and crime reduce. 3. Above 400k there is little incentive for real estate investors to buy more property and little investment to keep raising rents. This opens up the market for smaller investors, and by reducing rent costs increases spending power and thus demand. 4. Above 400k there is little incentive for business to keep wages low, thus wages increase, and more employees move into higher management positions. 5. With little incentive to keep raising retail rents above 400k, retail rents stabilize thus helping small business. BTW has Sowell or anyone else offered a better solution to limit greed than mine?
    1
  16.  @foundationalstatesmen  Sowell has useful wisdom? this is exciting. can I see an example?
    1
  17.  @johnholliday5874  There is useful wisdom in that book? Quote please.
    1
  18.  @JeffTheGent  Sowell had wisdom? Where? Neither him nor Levin understand what social justice is.
    1
  19.  @gregshubert1785  Did Peterson Sowell or Levin have any useful ideas?
    1
  20.  @ST-rj8iu  Sowell has a useful idea about some world issue? Don't keep it a secret. What is it? Something in this video?
    1
  21.  @ST-rj8iu  cool, neither of us can find a useful intellectual idea by Sowell or Levin!
    1
  22.  @ST-rj8iu  What is your solution to regulating greed? The wealthy profiting off the work of others via high rents and low wages.
    1
  23.  @ST-rj8iu  INCOME EQUITY: Here is my solution to regulate greed.   Guaranteed federal housing program; you work 3 years at any job and you qualify to buy something, with a mortgage at 30% of your income.  This is funded by a 70% marginal tax rate above $400,000 per year including capital gains.  Get the working poor out from under the thumb of wealthy investors.  3 years even working at Target qualifies you for an affordable mortgage.  You still have to pay that mortgage like anyone else or you default.  List the benefits.
    1
  24.  @ST-rj8iu  Did you figure out the benefits of my home ownership plan yet?
    1
  25.  @Omni-King2099  Are you talking about Sowell or Peterson?
    1
  26.  @ST-rj8iu  In first five minutes: Helen: Patriarchy is a system of male dominance. JP: That isn't my definition of it. [Helen gives the dictionary definition and JP disagrees, score for Helen.] JP: In what way is society male dominated? Helen: Men have most of the money. JP: You are taking a tiny percentage of hyper successful males and using it to describe all of western culture, most men in prison are men, most people who commit suicide are men... [Helen gives a correct example of male dominance and JP switches the goal post to 'is society easier or more fair to men'. Score for Helen.] JP at 20:30 Helen: 'A female dominated office leaves men feeling left out. JP: How do we get to something that isn't a tyrannical patriarchy, if it is composed of mostly women and its a tyrannical patriarchy and if it is composed of mostly men it is a tyrannical patriarchy we are out of options.... [Jordan pulls a Cathy Newman, SO YOU ARE SAYING if is composed mostly of women it is a tyrannical patriarchy? No Jordan she didn't say anything like that. Helen said absolutely nothing about women dominated is a tyrannical patriarchy, she corrected your vocabulary problem, dominated by women is a matriarchy dude. Neither did she say we have a tyrannical patriarchy. She said the patriarchy was overthrown by the women's movement and women now have almost equal rights with men.] JP at 8:00: Helen; women were barred from professions until 1919. JP: Why would you blame men for that? [Jordan really, why would you blame men for barring women from professions? Score for Helen.] Around 44:00 Helen referring to equality of outcome: 'I don't think that is a widely held view.' JP Interrupting as usual: 20% of social scientists identify as Marxist. Look it up in Haidt's work, I studied it quite carefully, it is a perfectly valid statistical. [Heads up JP, in the survey you are referring to, 3% of college professors identify as Marxist, and you claim that universities are dominated by leftist ideology, thus 3% of a very Left leaning sample identify as Marxist... and you are disagreeing with Helen? Whoops. The study Prevalence of Marxism in Academia states that Marxism is 'A tiny minority faith', ie Peterson cited a study to prove Helen wrong, when it actually proved her right. SCORE: Helen 3, Jordan 0] --Peterson at 19:00: 'That's for sure it's purely not, when you define it as tyrannical patriarchy implies one-dimensional...' [Whoops Jordan, remember in the dave rubin john anderson interview when you said the West is an oppressive patriarchy but not purely that? Contradiction alert'] 'We take a patriarchal structure like the medical profession and we fill it with women, is it that it is mostly men that makes it a patriarchy, if it is a structure that is composed of women then it is also a tyrannical patriarchy, if it is composed of women and it is a tyrannical patriarchy... [She just corrected you that composed or dominated primarily of women is a matriarchy. So after denying that we have a patriarchy numerous times in this interview you are now admitting that the medical field is a patriarchy? Score for Helen.) Let's get our definitions straight on identity politics. [Helen gives a correct definition, JP gives no definition. Score for Helen.]
    1
  27.  @ST-rj8iu  I understand, you feel JP or Sowell are intellectuals, but you don't know where that happened. You also couldn't figure out the benefits of my home ownership plan. No problem, I probably know a lot more about economics than you; funny since you accused me of not understanding economics! BENEFITS OF MY 70% MARGINAL TAX WORK FOR THREE YEARS HOME OWNERSHIP PLAN: 1. Stable housing costs of those crossing from renter to owner increases spending power for restaurants, vacations, better clothes and appliances etc, thus boosting the economy via demand. 2. Home ownership is hope; depression and crime reduce. 3. Above 400k there is little incentive for real estate investors to buy more property and little investment to keep raising rents. This opens up the market for smaller investors, and by reducing rent costs increases spending power and thus demand. 4. Above 400k there is little incentive for business to keep wages low, thus wages increase, and more employees move into higher management positions. 5. With little incentive to keep raising retail rents above 400k, retail rents stabilize thus helping small business.
    1
  28.  @celiaflinn7737  We are looking for an intellectual idea by Sowell.
    1
  29.  @celiaflinn7737  You found an intellectual idea by Sowell? Don't keep it a secret, timestamp and quote?
    1
  30.  @celiaflinn7737  Did Levin say something intelligent?
    1
  31.  @celiaflinn7737  Harvard faculty and Cambridge Rindge and Latin School affiliates condemned a ban of the College Board’s Advanced Placement course “African American Studies” in Florida by the state’s Governor Ron DeSantis, who alleges the course puts “indoctrination” over education.
    1
  32.  @Deborahmarie1217  No one can find an intellectual idea by JP.
    1
  33.  @Deborahmarie1217  JP is a fake intellectual, I am a real intellectual since I realize that we do not understand pre-experimental thinking, so we try to explain it in terms that we do understand – which means that we explain it away, define it as nonsense. After all, we think scientifically – so we believe – and we think we know what that means (since scientific thinking can in principle be defined). We are familiar with scientific thinking, and value it highly – so we tend to presume that that is all there is to thinking (that all other “forms of thought” are approximations, at best, to the ideal of scientific thought). But this is not accurate. Thinking also and more fundamentally is specification of value – is specification of implication for behavior. This means that categorization, with regards to value –determination (or even perception) of what constitutes a single thing, or class of things – is the act of grouping together according to implication for behavior. Do you agree?
    1
  34.  @David-l6k3c  None what?
    1
  35. ​ @bloodmooncomix457 Did Sowell say something intelligent in this video? Him and Jordan Peterson are the world's leading fake intellectuals.
    1
  36. ​ @JenkinsPsych When Levin watches the news all he hears is propaganda surface level BS? I guess he has some compression problems.
    1
  37. ​ @NoPunches What Levin and Sowell dont understand is that greed allows the wealthy to profit off the work of others which is bad for the economy and mental health of the nation.
    1