Comments by "" (@psychcowboy1) on "Jordan Peterson: The Left's new public enemy No. 1" video.

  1. I don't hate him. Rather I have no idea why anyone looks to him as any sort of intellectual. Giving clean your room advice, fine. In science and politics however the guy is a joke. If you disagree with my comments in brackets please elaborate: 1. 'The ignorant Left says you can place the responsibility for hierarchy and inequality at the feet of western civilization and capitalism...that is unbelievably wrong.' [Who is saying that, and how did you get that from reading a paper on lobsters?] 2. "It is inevitable that there will be continuity in how humans and animals organize their structures." [What is an animal structure, and how does an animal organize it?] 3. "The post modern ideology of the toxic Left characterizes the sociological landscape as an idiom of responsibility for protracting the hierarchy inequality and genocidal ideology of western civilization". [Huh?] 4. "The more likely problem in 100 years, assuming there are even creatures like us in 100 years, is that there will be too few people rather than too many." [Huh? Humans have not evolved biologically substantially in the last 20,000 or so years, but you are projecting some radical evolution in the next 100? Many of the current world problems are population related, but you are projecting somehow there will be too few people in 100 years? Too few to do what exactly?] 5. "I don’t think that the Caucasians should revert to being white. I think that is a bad idea. It is a dangerous idea, and it is coming fast …I think that is reprehensible. It is devastating. It is genocidal in its ultimate expression." [What is Caucasians reverting to white, and how is that, whatever it is, more genocidal than say dropping an A-bomb?]
    2
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. I don't consider JP an enemy of the Left. I consider him an enemy of logic, more accurately a pseudo intellectual who is more suited to selling holy water on the 700 club. Change my mind, if you disagree with my comments in brackets: 1.  'The ignorant Left says you can place the responsibility for hierarchy and inequality at the feet of western civilization and capitalism...that is unbelievably wrong.' [Who is saying that, and how did you get that from reading a paper on lobsters?] 2. "It is inevitable that there will be continuity in how humans and animals organize their structures." [What is an animal structure, and how does an animal organize it?] 3.  "The post modern ideology of the toxic Left characterizes the sociological landscape as an idiom of responsibility for protracting the hierarchy inequality and genocidal ideology of western civilization". [Huh?] 4.  "The more likely problem in 100 years, assuming there are even creatures like us in 100 years, is that there will be too few people rather than too many." [Huh?  Humans have not evolved biologically substantially in the last 20,000 or so years, but you are projecting some radical evolution in the next 100?  Many of the current world problems are population related, but you are projecting somehow there will be too few people in 100 years?  Too few to do what exactly?] 5.  "I don’t think that the Caucasians should revert to being white. I think that is a bad idea. It is a dangerous idea, and it is coming fast …I think that is reprehensible. It is devastating. It is genocidal in its ultimate expression." [What is Caucasians reverting to white, and how is that, whatever it is, more genocidal than say dropping an A-bomb?]
    1
  13. 1