Comments by "August Hayek" (@hayek218) on "Metatron" channel.

  1. Metatron I don't think Japan copied Korean armors. Gogryeo is not Korean. They are Tungus and belongs to Manchuria, which belongs to China today. However, it gives a wrong impression to say they belong to China as the Han Chinese never ruled these regions in history. Whenever this norther part belonged to "China," they were always run by these Northern races.
    3
  2. The Emperor of China The family of 李淵 also has family name of 大野 which is a 胡 name. They are not the Hans. According to you, Tibetans peacefully mixed with the Hans. That is a big lie. Today, even Manchurians cannot say they are Manchuria because if they say that, they will be forced not to or get arrested. But there are still there, even though the Hans tried to demolish all of them. 鮮卑 as a distinctive race disappeared but did not mix with the Hans. That is why the part of the present day China was never ruled by the Hans. 40% of the Japanese belong to haplogroup D2 which is an Ainu and other Jomon people, so the Ainu issue has nothing to do with this. No. Back in the ancient time, 中国 means the central place, and it was simply referring geologically, not as a country.
    3
  3. There were some wars but not many. All the arrowheads found in Jomon Period are too small to kill humans. They were exclusively for killing relatively small animals like mice and deers. And in fact, very little human bones damaged by arrowheads in wars are excavated. About 40% of present Japanese belong to Haplogroup D2, which were predominant in Ainu and presumably Jomon people. So whoever new came in, more or less blended in peacefully.
    3
  4. The last Japanese mission to China was in 9th Century. After that, Japan did not have much connection with China, which is one of the reasons that Japanese culture is so different. This is in stalk contract to Korea which continued to be influenced, ruled, and has been dependency of China until 19th Century. This is why Korea culture is more or less a copy of Chinese culture.
    3
  5. None of the dynasties you mentioned were ruled by the Han Chinese except for Han, Cao Wei, and Min. But neither of them ruled the entire Manchuria or norther part of present China, though Han and Cao Wei took only small part of it.
    2
  6. The Emperor Of China The world Manchuria was since 12th Century. But whatever you call it, my arguments hold. The concept and word, China, was invented recently by the Japanese anyway....
    2
  7. Also, nobody knows if Ainu was the first people, occupying which parts, from when to when. A lot of these racial segregation issues are deliberately promoted for political reasons, and you will see the people behind them are the same people in the Okinawa issue funded by China.
    2
  8. Good video, but one small mistake I noticed is that guns were introduced to Japan in 16th Century, not 15th.
    1
  9. Metatron Please take a look at this: https://www.google.co.jp/search?client=firefox-b&dcr=0&biw=1237&bih=638&tbm=isch&sa=1&ei=suUcWrjHOsf98QXa36OAAQ&q=%E8%8A%9D%E5%B1%B1%E5%8F%A4%E5%A2%B3%E3%80%80%E5%9F%B4%E8%BC%AA&oq=%E8%8A%9D%E5%B1%B1%E5%8F%A4%E5%A2%B3%E3%80%80%E5%9F%B4%E8%BC%AA&gs_l=psy-ab.3...4718.5926.0.6553.8.6.0.2.2.0.165.606.4j2.6.0....0...1c..64.psy-ab..2.5.283...0i24k1j0i4i24k1.0.uL3YFmM8GAc These Haniwa are from Shibayama Kofun in Chiba prefecture between 5th to 8th Century AD. Would you say the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel came to Japan? Who would they be?
    1
  10. Kusanagi? In Atsuta Shine?
    1
  11. wic wong What was that?
    1
  12. Yes, which dynasty?
    1
  13. Definitely not, they are Xianbei.
    1
  14. They are the same as Sui. 李 is not an original Han's name.
    1
  15. The Emperor Of China I missed out some points: NO. 満州, Manchu or however pronounce it, was first written as 満洲, and it was the name of their race around 12th Century. Then the became the name of the country as 満州. >then I guess it’s also ok for Chinese to do that? No, you cannot in the same way that what the Hans are doing today to Tibet, Uighur and others are wrong. There are International Laws today. >japan never invented their country’s name, China did for them twice No. Wa, was a country name of its own. China only assigned the character 倭, according to their shameful practice of assigning derogatory characters on other countries. On the other hand, both the name and the characters for Nippon, or 日本, were given by the Japanese themselves. That is why it does not sound Chinese, and nor are the characters derogatory.
    1
  16. wic wong No, I hate lies. That is all. I even have Han Chinese relatives.
    1
  17. wic wong ??????????? >you hate Han Chinese anyways. How can anybody decide what I like? I hate lies, liars and idiots. Your comment shows you are one of .....
    1
  18. wic wong ?????????? So state how you know I hate the Hans.
    1
  19. August Hayek >It doesn't really matter to me anyways Yes, the only thing you can do is to dodge as you are a liar.
    1
  20. The Emperor Of China Wrong. Han Chinese never gave non-derogatory characters for names of "barbarian countries." Then state how empress wu or whoever gave the name 日本. I see no record. They did not use Chinese characters first. Their race was called Manju, and the characters 満洲 were later applied. Their formerly Jurchen and Tungus, different from the Hans. 満州 became the name of the place when the west call the place Manchuria. 渤海 is further to the east or north east, though the border kept on moving.
    1
  21. wic wong >What did I dodge? State how you know I hate the Hans.
    1
  22. The Emperor Of China No. That is why they were never ruled by the Hans in history. They have different cultures; speak different language; different race; and eat buns instead of rice. They remained separate from the Hans. Mongols, 鮮卑, 女真, Uighur, Bohei..... they are all brothers, sisters and relatives. They like Tibet as they are Buddhists, and that is why they were together under Qing.
    1
  23. The Emperor Of China No way. They are Tungus. That is why the Hans never ruled these regions in history.
    1
  24. Definitely not, and cannot be right EVEN if he said so.
    1
  25. Nicholas Hilling "Bushi" and "Samurai" are the same. "Bushi" is written as 武士, and it literally means fighter or warrior. But you would not call a gladiator or Mongol fighter a Bushi, and it always refers to Japanese Samurai. The word "Samurai" is relatively a new word that appeared in the 16th Century. The first Bushi probably appeared in 8th Century when the Yamato Imperial Court permitted private land ownership if cultivated by himself. They became land lords for the first time. Before this, all the fighters served for aristocrats and they were called "Mononofu."
    1
  26. The Emperor Of China So?
    1
  27. The Emperor Of China I agree with you there AFTER 10th Century.
    1
  28. doggy5 The most of the similar cultures you see today between Korea and Japanese are from the time of annexation and after the War, though the Korean Peninsula's history was more or less started by the Japanese at the southern part of the Peninsula. The surnames are coincidence. Jomon people have nothing to do with Koreans. They are D2 haplogroup. All the upper class of Joseon was all learning Chinese characters and write in Chinese characters. Hangul was invented in 15th century, but it was for lower class. That is why there is no official documents in Hangul. They all learned Confucianism, and everything good came from China. That is why there is almost nothing original of Korea today. >Chinese influence did continue to trickle into Japan even into the Ming Dynasty. "trickle into Japan." Yes, though there was no official diplomatic relation, some domains or clans were dealing with China. But you are wrong about Geisha and Kisaeng. Geisha started and has always been art performers. Prostitution was banned in Japan after the WWII, so clients could have gone to prostitution afterwords but Geisha performed dances and music in "tea houses" although you cannot deny that prostitution could have happened in some instances. But the main was always art performing. That is why even today, their dances and music performances remains as a strong and living cultural heritage. On the other hand, Kiesaeng. There is no art involved, and that's why you do not see any today. Korea has long history of prostitution and human trafficking. Prostitution was only banned in 2004 and there was a very strong protests. Even this year, there was a huge protest demonstration. There were 30,000 Korean prostitutes in US and 50,000 in Japan, in both cases the highest number by country.
    1