Comments by "Newbie Prepper" (@newbieprepper8451) on "The Rational National"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@toomuchinfo6487 Clinton raided social security to give a false impression of a surplus .
i agree, Clinton & Bush & Reagan helped foster policies that led to the crash that Obama inherited, suck for him i know and it was unfair.
Obamas deficit spending really didnt bring anything noteworthy that helped the economy, maybe it staved off a larger depresion, maybe not, that is debatable.
Trumps tax cuts did not help only the wealthy, the majority of Trumps tax cuts went to middle class and poor, and with the deficit spending under Trump we at least had something tangable, such as lowest unemployment in decades and in some cases since 1950, higher wage rises in decades, larger small business ownership and participation in decades, and economic numbers that the previous administration claimed were unachievable without a magic wand. an excerpt from a bloomberg article "While the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 was far from perfect, it did cut taxes on the middle class and fueled the economic growth that brought unemployment rates to half-century lows before the pandemic."
now about those 4 recent republicans.
1. Reagan - didnt help the deficit or curb the spending, started the Trickle down economics craze.
2. Bush Sr. didnt do much except bomn some countried and gave assylum to illegals and gave some tax cuts, thats why he lasted only 4 years.
3. Bush JR. screwed the country up with unfunded wars and raised the debt and deficit.
4. Trump. lower taxes and oversaw a booming economy and unemployment numbers unheard of since 1950's. so on that note, i can forgive deficit spending if there is some tangible benefit to it.
1. Clinton. signed the Glass-Steagel repeal that later led to the 2008 crash. also signed NAFTA that saw millions of jobs leave the country.
2. Obama. inherited a garbage economy that saw a lackluster recovery compared to other countries while at the same time NOT ending the unfunded bush wars that helped fuel the deficit and then starting a few more of his own wars helping add to the deficit. the only tangible result from his deficit spending would be that the economy didnt completely crash, but that is debated in various economic circles, but i'll still give him a thumbs up on that.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
yea, socialism is nothing to fear, in the beginning, it looks great on paper and right when it first starts, but then it gets really scary, thats why so many people flee socialist countries. our history is littered with moments of people fleeing socialist countries for democratic ones, or less socialist ones, because socialism is soooo great.
as for her being a socialist, who cares, socialist / communist / democrat / republican, they are all the same, ESPECIALLY when they use the same lines that have been used since the 70's, "a government that works for you", im surprised people are still stupid enough to fall for that line, it gives nothing and is meaningless. look at AOC, super duper great socialist, working for the people, driving around in a Tesla living in her luxury highrise sitting by her infinity pool while destroying job creation in NY. look at Bernie Sanders, back in the day he was a great socialist, railing against open borders as a Koch brothers proposal to lower working wages, now all of a sudden since he is worth over a million and has several houses, open borders are a great idea and millionaires are not bad, only the billionaires are bad.
which leads me to this question, which workers is this new socialist mayor wanna be protecting by pushing elements of a Koch brothers proposal such as sanctuary city so that illegals can flood into the city and drive down the wages of the working people that are living there. certainly she isnt pushing anything for driving down prices. so yea, great protecting the workers there, by pushing various ideas that will raise taxes on the workers and at the same time driving the workers wages down.
i fully endorse this candidate 100% for mayor of Buffalo, that city will go to ruin in a few years
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Usmcpb yea, those are tragic events, and i dont excuse them.
Philando Castile - the officer involved was brought up on charges, but somehow aqcuitted, i dont know exactly how the jury aqcuitted him, im not familiar with the case.
Sandra Bland - hung herself in a jail cell after being arrested. not really any cops fault if someone commits suicide. as far as i know, the arrest was unwarranted, at which point you file a civil riot violation suit against the department instead of trying to argue your case on the street.
as for this BS is happening everywhere? you post 2 cases. i can post 2 cases too.
female cop comes home and shoots a man who she thinks is in her house and kills him, only to find out she is on the wrong floor. she gets charged and convicted and sentenced.
Breonna Taylor - shot and killed by police who were returning fire after being fired upon by Taylors boyfriend. charges for Taylors boyfriend for firing through a door were dropped with prejudice but charges against one of the officers were filed for shooting through the door.
Jason Van Dyke - Chicago cop convicted of second degree murder and 16 counts of agravated assault (1 count for each bullet he fired).
im not going to say that our system is perfect, its not, but to claim that this is happening everywhere constantly all the time is a cop out too.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@AngerIsAGift-vv9zd you see, i will admit that Trump lost, it happens, nothing in life is guaranteed. but i also look at the elections and what goes on, and i notice that there was impropriety in this election and i would want it investigated, same way i supported the Mueller investigation, even though i felt it was without merit i supported it because i wanted to know if what our leader was being accused of was true or not. the same way i supported the investigation into the whole hanging chad fiasco.
you see, i care enough about our democracy to actually be interested in preserving it, not just simply dismissing claims and accusations because they come from the other side, can you say the same? did you support the democrats push to investigate the 2016 election? if yes, then why wont you support an investigation into the allegations in this ellection?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@goldilox369 i agree with you to a point, im not anti vax, ive had most vaccines, but this is not a vaccine and that is the point that i have to dissagre with you on. vaccines DO stop the spread, and inherently stop the mutation of a disease. look at the diseases we have virtually wiped out with nothing more than vaccinations. a vaccine trains your body to fight a specific disease by introducing a weakened strain of that virus into your body so that your immune system can learn to fight it, that way if you run into it in the world, your immune system attacks it and destroys it before the disease has a chance to grab hold and multiply and spread. thats what a vaccine does. this covid vaccine seems to do none of these things, because somehow the virus infects even vaccinated people, and multiplies and spreads to other people. and that is also how a virus mutates, over multiple generations of a virus replicating and spreading, it mutates / evolves, kind of like humans evolved from apes which evolved from lower primates which evolved from lower mammals and so on, the difference is that viruses live a much shorter span and so generations pas by much more quickly.
the thing is, this vaccine doesnt train the human body to kill it fast and effective enough for it to stop spreading, the only thing it does is it masks the symptoms so you dont suffer as much under it. that not a vaccine, in the same way that an aspirin is not a vaccine for a broken leg. on top of that, this vaccine IS built on brand new technology, mRNA, which in effect is used to rewrite genetic sequences in organisms, so this "vaccine" is nothing more than a genetic sequencing tool that introduces a brand new gene sequence into your body, and its not that it introduces a new sequence, it literally rewrites part of your genetic code.
with that being said, are you even still human? or are you an experiment in genetic splicing pushed by big pharma?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@coolioso808 12,000 years ago, our societies were grouped into smaller groups where money wasnt needed because everyone had skills that contributed to the group, but as population grew, and as villages and tribes grew in size, it became more feasible to convert your skills and labor into a more convenient medium of exchange. but hey, you want to abolish money and live like our ancestors did 12,000 years ago? go for it, get up at the crack of dawn and work till sunset, on the verge of starvation with a life expectancy of somewhere in the mid 30's. go live on a regular farm for 1 week, then you will see what its like.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2