Comments by "Newbie Prepper" (@newbieprepper8451) on "The Rational National"
channel.
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@pcnoad well, interesting topic, but see, youtube and other platforms are recognized and protected under section 230 as public spaces and free speech does apply or should apply to them, but at the same time, youtube and other platforms and ISP providers are not required to give you any service. just like in the old days long before youtube and the internet and electricity, you had the right to speak publicly in the public square, but no one sent a carriage or a horse to escort you to that public square, its on you to get there.
let's look at the 2A, you have the right to keep and bare arms, it says nothing about buying them or making them yourselves, same as freedom of the press did not require you to build your own printing press in order to print leaflets or pamphlets and utilize your right to freedom of the press, same as freedom of religion does not require you to build your own church in order to worship. the thing with freedom of speech is that no one is allowed to block you, at the same time, no one is required to listen to you.
the right to a jury trial, the government sets and administers the laws, and therefore, it is the government that ultimately accuses you of breaking that law, and therefore it is incumbent on the government to prove your guilt, through a trial that they have to administer, a fair trial, meaning that you have to have adequate legal counsel and defense, a trial by a jury of your peers, meaning the government cant simply pound a gavel and claim without any evidence that you are guilty and lock you up for life, they have to convince 12 common people that you are guilty.
now, lets take this example. if you have the right to housing, but you dont have a house, should you be provided a house? and who provides that house? do the taxpayers pay to build that house? if so, are the taxpayers paying more taxes in order to provide you with your right to housing? lets say that every taxpayer has to pay an extra $15 per month in taxes to provide housing, for a lot of people that is an hour or more of work, work that they dont get paid for since the government takes that money and taxes that they dont benefit from since the house goes to you specifically, would that not be akin to slavery? working to provide something to someone else without reimbursement?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@Gezira yea, its proven that repressive measures do not work. i forget which Scandanavian country did it, but they took a whole new approach to criminal rehabilitation, i personally dont like it for my own reasons, but i admit their numbers and data are very compelling, and i would not be against implementing such tactics here in the states, but again, its a criminal rehabilitation problem, they still have a police force to drag away the criminals. so when you say cops are the problem, you are wrong.
and yes, i would agree with you that a lot of crime is caused by social problems, the biggest one being poverty, but that not a cop problem either. so yea, start working on fixing some of the social ills to solve some of these social problems that result in crime, but dont sit there and blame cops.
3
-
3
-
@kellywills5852 i actually can do the math. out of the 600,000 + deaths in the US from Covid, 94% had co-morbidities, making only about 36,000 dead from Covid alone.
worldwide, 214M cases with 4.44M deaths that is 2% of case resulted in fatality.
in the US, 38M cases with 630k deaths, thats is 1.6% of cases resulted in death. of those 630k deaths, 94% had co-morbidities, so that leaves 37.8K fatalities with no co-morbidities, i will be nice and round it up. out of 38million cases in the US, 40k deaths is 0.1% of cases resulted in healthy people dying. those are slim to very very slim chances of dying from COVID. these numbers do NOT convince me to take the risk of an experimental new vax, especially a GMO vax.
now for a little bit of science.
AIDS patients are counted when an aids infected patient dies from a complication. in effect, the AIDS runs its course and does the damage to the body allowing other diseases to come in and kill the patient, and its counted as an aids death.
COVID patients are counted when COVID kills a person or is suspected in killing a person. in efect, obesity and diabetes and heart and lung disease runs its course and does the damage to the body allowing COVID to come in and kill the patient and its counted as a COVID death.
the way deaths are counted is completely reversed, AIDS is counted because it does the damage and not the killing blow, COVID is counted because it does NOT do the damage and inflicts the killing blow.
this is also an experimental vaccine created using mRNA re-sequencing technology, the same kind of technology in a sense that brings you frankenfoods that most countries in Europe and some in Asia have banned.
the mRNA sequencing takes only one part of the virus DNA, which is the protein "hook" that allows it to latch onto a cell to begin its process of replication, a virus literally hooks onto a cell and injects that cell with its own DNA subverting that cell and causing that cell to turn into a reproduction factory for more virus particles. now, this vax uses just the protein "hook" from the COVID virus and genetically spliced onto another virus to trick your body and your cells to change their metobolism and cell structure to eliminate the protein "keyhole" receptor that this virus could "hook" onto.
now a bit of the red flags.
1. the manufacturers are protected from any criminal and civil liability in connection to this particular vaccine. i dont know of any company in the world that is protected from liability in such a way for anything.
2. the government actively working with mas media to suppress any dissent or questioning of the vax or its efficiency or side effects.
3. the 180 degree flip on reporting stats on deaths from one norm to an exact opposite, as exampled by AIDS.
4. the government pushing in a facistic way for vax mandates. there is NO government mandate for the public to be vaxed against small pox or measles or yellow fever or even the FLU.
5. democrat leadership has turned this into a political agenda from the very beginning with prominent democrats going on public record making public statements that they would NOT take the vax simply because Trump is responsible for its creation.
6. the lack of data on effects of a GMO drug being injected directly into person past 1 or 5 or 10 years does not mean it is safe simply because you didnt die right away. thats like saying that 400 to 450 rem (4 to 5 sieverts) received over a very short period of time is not lethal because you are fine on the next day while not having the data to show that 50% of the exposed people will die from it within 30 days. or a better example would be to say that smoking isnt bad because no one has died from smoking only 1 pack, or smoking for 5 years.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3