Comments by "Newbie Prepper" (@newbieprepper8451) on "Eric Swalwell Spills The Beans On How Fake Lawmakers Are" video.

@beezusHrist i think the last thing she said was she made a comment about how her company is run as a socialist company because even though its run on a capitalist (for profit) system, she gives the profits away to some organization. or some such thing, to where lots of people started pointing out that its not socialism if she runs it like capitalism.
2
@beezusHrist oh i forgot, she also did say that a lot of her colegues dont read the bills they vote on.
2
very few people in politics are genuine, very few. i can name a handful, Rand Paul, Trey Gowdy, maybe Trump, Obama (although Obama seemed genuine until he got elected, and either he got bought out or scared into falling in line with what the elites wanted.
2
@beezusHrist oh i see, so its socialist if you consider more than the profit and capitalist if you consider only the profit? great way to redefine socialism and equate it with something it is not.
1
@beezusHrist yea, and im positively sure the employees got a say in where the profits went, im sure all of them said "hey, i dont want any part of those profits the company makes reflected on my paycheck, give it away to someone else." ive lived under socialism, not just read it in a book like you, i think i know more about it through experience than you ever will reading about it. socialists dont care about "other costs", they only care about making a profit for the cheapest amount possible. you trying to redefine it to make it fit your narrative is BS.
1
@beezusHrist oh i'll agree with you, constant growth year over year is unsustainable, but dont delude yourself or anyone else thinking that its a problem only in capitalism, every major company out there is run like that, as long as they are listed on any stock market. thats not capitalism, and its not socialism, thats just corporatism. you think companies in China are run different in a socialist regime? no they are not, they are run the same, the only difference is that the government decides who is in charge of that company, and some of the profits get funneled to that person as a reward, the rest of the profits go to the government, the workers dont get a say in anything. that is true in every socialist regime in the world. the only thing socialist dont stick their fingers in is small businesses to a point, for the most part because they dont make enough for the government to waste their time with them.
1
@beezusHrist i read your first sentence and decided you are an IDIOT. no socialist society has ever existed? RUSSIA was a socialist country, 134 million RUSSIANS will tell you it was socialism, it was in their name that they used for their empire called the USSR (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics), US politicians have called it socialism. and here you are like an IDIOT redefining it because it doenst fit your personal narrative thinking the rest of us are dumb and will accept your new definition. let me guess, "it wasnt real socialism blah blah because it wasnt implemented right and we need to do it right wah wah"??? you are a dunce.
1