Comments by "Newbie Prepper" (@newbieprepper8451) on "People Cling To Departing U.S. Plane As Taliban Take Afghanistan" video.

@skytrotter6144 we shouldnt have been in Syria in the first place, same as we shouldnt have been in Afghanistan either. the only thing is, Trump gave the Taliban a deal, and as long as we stuck to it they stuck to their end, Biden came in and altered the deal and said, "im altering the deal, pray i dont alter it any further". the last time someone said that they fomented more people to join the rebels and ultimately caused the loss of the death star. even movies know its a bad idea to go back on your word.
3
@oarguello i wouldnt let in any of the refugees, but for a different reason. its a teaching moment. when other countries see that we dont let in the refugees, their people will think twice about helping the US if it invades. the next warmongering administration will have a much harder time with any occupation when the locals refuse to help in any manner.
1
@oarguello yes you are exactly right. its sentiments like yours about caring for people who are suffering that cost us thousands of our own lives and trillions of our own dollars going off to other countries to set them straight. we should have never gone to Afghanistan in the first place. we should have never gone to Iraq in the first place. they were sold as necessary wars by evil elitists with their own agenda and then its was continued with the whole "think of the poor innocent people" sentimentality like yours. 9 out of 10 people coming to the southern border get denied asylum, ever wonder why? its not because they are fleeing political persecution or violence or whatever else BS reason they give, its simply because they are economic refugees coming here for the jobs and the welfare. maybe they should stay in their own country and make it better. perhaps if they realize that the US is a harsh mistress they wont be so eager to help when the US comes to invade, and the US will have a harder time invading. maybe end the constant cycle of the US getting involved in these pointless endless wars with no real objective. but noooo, your only solution is to help those poor innocent people, oh think of the children blah blah. if you are soooo worried about some dictator abusing his own people, then maybe strap a rifle to your back and YOU go help those people instead of insisting that the rest of us send our sons and daughters to die and spend trillions of our tax dollars to accomplish absolutely ZILCH.
1
@oarguello thats what i said, we shouldnt be in those places, but the politicians YOU vote for put us in those places and after a little while they play on your heartstrings about oh the poor people, the poor innocent people. WHO DID YOU VOTE FOR IN 2020? bet it was Biden, the guy who voted for the war while in the senate. WHO DID YOU VOTE FOR IN 2016? if you were old enough to vote i bet it was for Clinton the "we came we saw he died" warmonger. YOU are part of the problem, because you vote for and install politicians that push these wars and then you push for us to stay longer because "the poor innocent people wah wah"
1
@oarguello oh i see, so you voted for Bernie Sanders the guy who voted in favor of the invasion of Afghanistan because you are soooooo anti war huh? but at least he admitted he was wrong, so i guess that makes it all right? the last 2 elections, who did i vote for? 2016 i voted for Trump because i couldnt see myself voting for Clinton knowing she helped orchestrate the bombing of Libya into a slave market. 2020 i voted for Trump again because since Carter, Trump was the ONLY president to NOT START A NEW WAR. on top of that he helped broker 4 historic peace deals in the middle east between countries who have vehemently stated that they will NEVER EVER be friendly towards each other in any way. take your warmongering Bernie bullshit and shove it, you are about as antiwar as Hitler was kind to jews. bet you were crying about how we need to stay in Syria because of all the innocent people and our allies in there when Trump was pushing for us to get out.
1
@oarguello yea, i voted for Trump, the ONLY president who didnt start a new war since Carter. i cant fault the man for inheriting wars started by his predecessors, same way i cant fault Obama for fighting the wars in Afghanistan or Iraq, he inherited them. and yes, he at least tried to stop the wars he inherited. he put together the withdrawal from Afghanistan, that Biden completely disregarded, and he tried to pull us out of Syria, to which it has already been reported that the pentagon and officials LIED to him about how many troops we had there in order to keep troops there behind his back. and yes, Bernie is a warmonger, he voted in favor of the Afghanistan invasion, FOR WHAT? he voted in favor of at least a limited military operation in Iraq, FOR WHAT? yea, you are about as anti-war as Hitler was a humanitarian. you vote for the politicians that start these wars and then you whine and cry about the poor innocent children to keep us in these wars indefinitely.
1
im sure glad we dont have a racist mean tweeter in office.
1
@djtoxicdhg nothing to do with Joe? who is in charge of the military? who is the commander in chief? who broke the withdrawal deal that was already brokered by and signed by the US? THIS IS NOTHING BUT JOE ALL THE WAY. that pile of garbage even voted for this war while he was in the senate.
1
@ReplicatorFifth we spent 20 years trying to stabilize it, there is no stabilizing it, at least with Trumps deal we had an exit strategy. now we just bailed out of there leaving everything behind for anyone to pick up.
1
@Teremei actually no, they can go to their local flea market and pick one up. more AK-47 riffles are sold in that region of the country than are in the hands of the Russian military. civilians over there are pretty heavily armed, they just dont publicize it.
1
John-Paul Hunt i dont fear a man that has a nuke, i fear the man who wants one. the man who wants one will do unspeakable acts to get one, but a man who has one is rendered impotent by fear of retaliation both from his enemies AND even from his friends.
1
@sanjabegovic729 yes, nuke got dropped once, and then dropped once again, and that was when only 1 country had nukes because no one else could retaliate in such a way. and even then, nukes were under army control, after the second drop, the president issued a decree that the army was no longer in charge of using nukes, that authority had to come from the president himself, and the nukes stopped being dropped. right now, plenty of countries have nukes. you think a crazy dictator like UN in NK will use a nuke? you think the neighboring countries around him will allow him to use a nuke knowing that any retaliation would take him out and also hurt them too unintentionally? China, who is an ally of NK wont allow NK to use nukes because even if one NK gets retaliated against, it will be a full scale nuclear retaliation, and it will hurt China just as much from the fallout, and all the neighboring countries too. you think if the Taliban gets a nuke they will use it? no matter how crazy their leaders are, their neighbors will prevent it, even their own people in the Taliban government will prevent it, because its one thing to have a conventional war, but its a whole different ball of wax when it comes to nuclear war. once you have a nuke, you are prevented from using it by your own people and by your friends in other nations, because everyone understands that a nuke is a weapon of last resort, and it leads to open warefare where your enemies are justified in using nukes against you on any occasion and any target.
1
@sanjabegovic729 so as i said, i dont fear the man that has a nuke, i fear the man trying to get one.
1