Comments by "Newbie Prepper" (@newbieprepper8451) on "Vaush Takes Tim Pool's Audience To School" video.

  1. so i watched your video and and have a few points to put in. 1. the argument of being anti-establishment, you and Vaush both may have a different definition of what the establishment is, i define the establishment as a "career" politician that has spent many terms in office in an "established" political career. Trump does not fit that definition, considering that he hasnt even finished a term in a job that would not alow enough terms to set up an established career. 2. Tim pool attacks Pelosi plenty of times? no, most of Tim Pools vids are reporting on news stories about Pelosi. 3. Criticizing Trump for the Pandemic response is possible, but you have to look at certain factors. Vaush claims that Trump did poorly in his response to the pandemic. i ask, poorly compared to what? was Trumps effort to respond hampered by anything? sabotaged by other elements of the government? does Trump have the power and authority to respond in the same manner as other countries? you compare the US to countries like Germany and Japan. a. Germany right now is under a harsh lockdown to where ALL non essential people are to stay at home and are allowed only 1 hour per day to be outside to complete any tasks such as exercise or shopping, on no visitors allowed at anyones home, its comparable to a US supermax prison except our prisoners get to have visitors. do you or Vaush believe teh president has the authority to implement su measures? b. Japan - their societal structure and cultural norms are comparatively different than the US, they have been wearing masks since 2003 and is considered as a courtesy and a sign of respect. they have a more homogenous (misspelled word) society than the US and have a more subservient disposition towards people that we dont have here in the states. for example, in the states its not uncommon to see on the news a thug beat up an old woman and steal her walker, but if you attempt to do that in Japan, a band on magic ninjas appear from the void of oblivion and commit Hara-Kiri on you for simply thinking about doing such a thing (thats a joke). either way, comparing several countries that have different norms and different societal structures is disengenuos (misspelled word) at best, its like comparing a Chevy beater truck to a Ferrari and a Porsche and complaining that the Chevy didnt beat them even though it has wheels and an engine just like the others do 4. Critical race theory - Vaush did an excellent job of defending this ideology and sidestepping and excusing it, that does not make him right. i did a bit of reading on critical race theory, and yes, it is racist at its core by definition. its teaching push racism or sow the seeds of racism at its base, in the same way that Nazis in Germany pushed their anti Jewish ideology. CRT teaches that white supremacy and racial power are maintained over time and the law plays a role in that. it is not that different from when the Nazis in Germany were teaching their kids that Jews were bad and maintained their power to keep the German people down. i tell you, Hitler is smiling right now in the great beyond. should an ideology that sows the seeds of racial hatred be taught in our schools or implemented in our government institutions? in the same way that i dont believe that creationism or Klan teachings should be taught in our schools or implemented in our government institutions is the same way i feel about CRT. Vaush looses credibility points with me when he supports such an ideology and makes excuses for it. 5. your statement that the right wingers want to deplatform Vaush in the same way they "claim" that the left is doing to them. while i am no fan of deplatforming anyone because i am a staunch believer in the old rule of "if you dont like whats on TV then turn it off" it is NOT a "claim" that the right is making, it is fact. i would point you to Stephan Molenue's YouTube channel but it seems he got banned and kicked off Twitter and facebook also, so then i would point you to Alex Jones's channel but it seems like the same fate befell him, maybe Milo Younopolis (i know i butchered that name) but nope, and a whole slew of others. its funny how during the senate hearings where the CEO's of Facebook and Twitter and Youtube/google were unable to name even a single left wing individual who has been banned from their platforms. 6 USPS sending masks? and what exactly would 5 masks sent to every household accomplish? on average, there are 2-4 people living in each household in the US, some have only 1 while there are others that have 7 people in a household. sending each household 5 masks is at best a bandaid cure for a gunshot wound where in most cases that supply of masks would last for at most a week. for the record, yes, i am a Trump supporter, i guess that puts me on the right, and i dont care for Vaush, during that whole 4 hour debate there were several points that Vaush lost credibility in my eyes, the biggest point was on the discussion for for the Russia probe, where Vaush claims that the Russia probe netted numerous high level convictions, while omitting what those convictions were for. to me thats a lie of omission that paints a completely different narrative than the truth. when Vaush claims that the Russia probe was successful because it resulted in high level convictions, it paints a narative that there WAS Russia collusion, but what he omits from his point is that the high level conviction was for an unrelated crime of money laundering committed a decade before, and he omits the fact that the other convictions were of such low level as lying to FBI agents and some of those convictions were actually guilty please that were coerced out of the convicted. he also omits to point out that most of the Russia probe was flawed by FISA court abuses which is a fact based on a lawyer that worked on the probe being charged with tampering with evidence and numerous intelligence personnel stating on the record that multiple FISA warrants had erroneous information and multiple errors and were improper. a lie of omission is still a lie, and Vaush lied in portraying the Russia probe, in the same context as if a child molestation investigation against an individual was successful while because there was a conviction while neglecting to mention that the conviction was against the individuals neighbor for car theft 10 years ago. while i consider that for the most part, both Tim and Vaush were on point, and they kept a cool demeanor except for one spicy part, i would not consider listening to Vaush since i do not hold him as a credible individual, i view him as an apologist for the left pushing leftist ideology while making excuses for its existence, if the same manner that he tried to excuse and redefine CRT into something that it is not. as for you Mr. Rational Nation, you seem cool and collected, so i think i will subscribe to your channel and listen in from time to time to some of your musings.
    1