Comments by "Newbie Prepper" (@newbieprepper8451) on "Geraldo Explodes On Unvaccinated People During Fox News Panel" video.

spoken like a true nazi, no more voluntary medical procedures, now we move onto the forced medical procedures. perhaps history may judge you less harshly than the nazis who performed forced sterilizations on groups of people, or perhaps history will nickname you Dr. Mengele Jr.
3
@aethionr4478 do you know the definition of vaccine? please explain to me how this covid vaccine fits the definition of vaccine. it doesnt, its the equivalent of a flu shot at best, an experimental flu shot even, so yea, making mandatory experimental medical procedures seems a bit nazi like to me.
2
normalcy? you expect normalcy? how so? you think if everyone got vaccinated the disease would dissapear? people who get vaccinated still get the disease, the only thing the vax does is lessen the symptoms. so even with 100% of the population vaccinated the disease would still spread around, and most people wouldnt realize it because the symptoms would be reduced, and while spreading around the disease would mutate anyway, and we would get a new mutation that would be immune to the current vaccine anyway. 10 years ago the medical community was already talking about superbugs and antibiotic resistant bugs that have adapted to the use of antibiotics. diseases have a way of evolving if they are not erradicated, and this vaccine doesnt erradicate it, it just lessens the symptoms so you think you got a cold when you actually got covid, and so you go around spreading it to other people.
2
ok, you seem like a serious person with an ACTUAL serious question because you are searching for an answer. so i will tell you. i am an adult, i am NOT vaccinated, and i dont plan on getting a vax for this corona, and here are my reasons. 1. there is no available data on side effects of the vaxine past 1 year, i would like to see what those side effects are 2 and 5 and 10 years down the line. 2. why is it called a vaccine when it is NOT and it is only equivalent to a flu shot. a vaccine vaccinates you against a disease, but with this, you can still get it. why must this be done but flu shots are not mandatory even though the flu kills people? 3. is it safe? plenty of people have gotten sick from it and even died. if you want to convince me to take the vax, then guarantee my safety from ill effects of it.
2
i dont have to wear a seatbelt. i havent worn a seatbelt in years, and absolutely NO cop has said a single word to me about it.
1
@kionnakelly2918 oh i am not getting away with it, i simply dont do it, and absolutely no cop has ever told me to put on a seatbelt or even tried to give me a ticket.
1
@unreasonable-man.bsky.social privilege? what privilege? how am i stupid?
1
@kionnakelly2918 yea, getting away with it. i would even flaunt it in front of the cops and bag to them that im not wearing a seatbelt right in front of them.
1
@Aaron_Hayman yea, all you have to do is lots of things. i dont have to wear a seatbelt if i choose not to drive. i dont have to wear a seatbelt if i ride a motorcycle. i dont have to wear a seatbelt if my car is manufactured before a certain year. i dont have to wear a seatbelt if i am a passenger in the rear seat of a car. i dont have to wear a seatbelt if i am a passenger on a bus. the OPs comment of "seatbelts are mandatory" is a childish argument that is at its base faulty and hinges on being a lie of omission since there are plenty of examples of not being required to wear those mandatory seatbelts, but implying that its mandatory and so a vaccine like this should be mandatory too. i can make plenty of choices right now where those MANDATORY seatbelt laws do not apply, what possible choices would you give to where a MANDATORY vaccine would not apply to me if i make some choices that would not greatly impact my life.??? if you want to get the vaccine then get one, but dont demand others get one, thats not your right.
1
@Toywins doesn't matter where I live, or where you live, you have a choice to use other forms of transportation or other means to where a seat belt law will NOT apply to you.
1
@Kaidona directly from the CDC, "The smallpox vaccine protects people from smallpox by helping their bodies develop immunity to smallpox." so, if you get a smallpox vaccine, you are protected from getting smallpox. i think the CDC just sunk your argument about getting sick with things you are vaccinated for.
1
@Hugh_I ok, so i asked you a serious question. 1. what are the side effects of the vaccine past 1 year, past 2 years, past 5 years, past 10 years. instead of answering that question, you want to talk about the "side effects" of COVID-19. i already know the "side effects of COVID-19, those range anywhere from absolutely no symptoms, to a mild fever to aches to harsh fever to breathing complications all the way up to death. i didnt ask for COVID-19 side effects, but i like the way you ended point 1 with a simple "probably has none". meaning you have absolutely no idea. so let me restate the question. 1. there is no available data on side effects of the "VACCINE" past 1 year, i would like to see what those side effects are 2 and 5 and 10 years down the line. 2. you claim it IS a vaccine, it is NOT. a CDC statement "The smallpox VACCINE protects people from smallpox by helping their bodies develop IMMUNITY to smallpox." THAT is a vaccine, it helps your body develop an IMMUNITY, and since this vaccine only lessens the symptoms, but does not give you immunity, then its NOT a vaccine. even if it only gave a small percentage of people immunity i would consider it a vaccine maybe, but NO manufacturer will make that claim and even the CDC wont make that claim. as far as it working like a vaccine, the flu shot works like a vaccine too, but yet its not called a flu vaccine, its called a flu SHOT. 2a. as for the flu being way deadlier, that would be an argument of semantics and how corona deaths are counted, none the less, the flu is still pretty deadly. 3. you managed to answer that question within its context at least, is it safe, for now, yea, i'll agree, it is safe. but you also said "see point 1" so lets look at point 1. is this vaccine safe 5 years or 10 years down the line. the reason why i ask this is simple. unlike most vaccines that have been produced using tried and true methods, this new vaccine was produced using new experimental techniques in DNA and RmNA sequencing, and so that makes me hesitant. regular vaccines are made by taking a virus and weakening it so it cant reproduce, and then exposing the body to that weakened form in a dose that is not enough to make a person sick, but enough to make the immune system develop antibodies. 3a. what if this vaccine causes the body to develop a side effect 5 years down the line that requires you to to be medicated for the rest of your life, kind of like too much sugar consumption can lead your body to develop diabetes to the point where you require insulin injections for the rest of your life. considering that this vaccine is being developed using new experimental RmNA technology that the manufacturers are being very secretive about and guarding closely, it is a possibility. now, as for your guaranteeing me anything, would you be willing to formalize that guarantee in a legal document? would you be so willing to mage guarantees on something that you dont know the effects of down the line? you could guarantee that a new vaccine made using tried and true tested old techniques wont have ill effects, but you cant guarantee that this vaccine wont kill you in 5 years.
1
@NeilTruick well stated nicely put comment, i appreciate it. physician Edward Jenner pioneered vaccination processes in 1793, and his processes went on to be used to develop vaccination regimens all over the world. the Polio vaccine was developed in the 1930's using techniques that have been developed and refined over a period of 140 years. these new RmNA vaccines are being produced using techniques that had been refined over a couple of decades for completely different purposes not making injectable vaccines, and so they are called experimental. now, im not a medical profesional either, and i have NOT done research simply because there is NO data available to do any research on. i can easy look up data on GMO foods that have been produced over the past 10 or more years, because there IS data going back that far, but there is NO data on GMO vaccines going back farther than 12 months at most. making the claim that you have done research on something that barely came into existence is faulty, you decided to get informed up to current news. but if you did your research, then please, tell me what your research shows on the possible effects of the Phizer vaccine 5 years and 3 months after dose? you cant, understandable. can your research tell me the projected possible effects of the Phizer Vaccine 5 years and 3 months after dose? you cant do that either. if the J&J vaccine was made using standard techniques and NOT mRNA sequencing, then you could safely say that research would show that there should be no serious side effects 5 years and 3 months after dose. but dont tell me that injecting frankendrugs directly into my bloodstream that were developed with genetic manipulation is perfectly safe. (that statement is a generalizations and not aimed directly at you). now, for your last sentence, you are tired of trying to tell anyone what to do? which god on what plane of existance granted you the power and authority to tell others what to do? im being fasecious, and yes, i misspelled that word like i misspelled other words here. my point is, you are no one to tell anyone else what to do, same as i am no one to tell anyone what to do. the funny thing is, there are more people piled on the "telling people to take the vax" side than the side that is telling people not to take the vax, where do they get the authority or right to tell anyone what to do? i find it amusing that the "my body my choice" crowd is the loudest proponent of violating the "my body, my choice" stance when it suits them. i wear a mask when i go out, i consider it a minor inconvenience on the same level of wearing shoes or a shirt. but i dont feel i should be compelled to undergo a medical procedure simply for someone elses benefit, especially when that medical procedure is experimental to the point that no one can even guess to its possible outcomes.
1
@tyrellcapers2224 i already had this conversation with my doctor, and i got all the answers i needed, which were pretty much "we dont know, there is no data." perhaps you are confused about my post, if you read it carefully you might understand it as my original post is to the OP of this exact thread and his question of how to convince people to take their health seriously. which my response is, here are my concerns, convince ME. then you butt in telling me to go talk to a doctor because you dont know what the conversation is about.
1