Comments by "Old Guy Gaming Network" (@CRAZYHORSE19682003) on "UsefulCharts" channel.

  1. 2
  2. 2
  3. 2
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8.  @thomaskennedy5728  It is HILARIOUS when room temperature IQ people like yourself make ignorant statements as if you knew what you were talking about in the first place. First the Carbon 14 dating done on the shroud FORTY years ago has been scientifically proven to be wrong. Do you think that MAYBE some new information MIGHT have come out in the last forty years. Well I used the word think and you in the same sentence so I know the answer is no. A new X-Ray dating technique has been discovered and it has been shown that it is far more accurate and reliable than Carbon-14 dating. The X-ray dating technique used by Italian scientists is a completely different and much more precise process. It involves analyzing the Shroud at the level of atoms. The researcher will measure the natural ageing of the linen cellulose using X-rays, and then convert it into the time elapsed since manufacture. The results obtained from the Shroud were compared with those of other authenticated linen fabric samples, ranging in age from 3000 BC to 2000 AD. The measurements of the shroud were found to be particularly close to those of a linen fabric that historical records date back to the siege of Masada in Israel, between 55 and 74 AD. These results are therefore far from the medieval hypothesis put forward in 1988. The X-ray technique offers a number of additional guarantees of reliability, explains Liberato De Caro, member of the research team, in an interview with the National Catholic Register. First, the sample required for the analysis is much smaller than that used for carbon-14 dating: 0.5 x 1 mm. The risk of finding exogenous particles is therefore considerably reduced. In addition, X-ray analysis can be carried out several times without damaging the support, whereas carbon-14 dating can only be done once per sample, which prevents any cross-checking in the event of doubt or error in the protocol. Turns out the only thing not authentic is your argument!
    1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1