Comments by "Old Guy Gaming Network" (@CRAZYHORSE19682003) on "Chinese skyscraper in flames after fire engulfs high-rise in Changsha city I Watch" video.

  1. Well if you flew a 350,000 pound object into it at 400 miles per hour the building would have collapsed. It is amazing how low the IQ of conspiracy theorists are.
    2
  2. It is only illogical to those with low IQ's. First NONE of the buildings on 9/11 collapsed into their own footprint. If they did WTC 3, 5, and 6 wouldn't have been destroyed from falling debris. Second this building was only dealing with a fire. Fly a 350,000 pound object into it at 400 miles per hour and see how well it would have held up.
    1
  3. There is an old phrase you should live by. It is better to remain silent and have people think you are a fool then to open your mouth and remove all doubt. WTC-7 did not collapse from fire it collapsed because it was struck by THOUSANDS of tons of debris from the WTC the compromised its internal structure and started a progressive internal collapse that lasted several hours. That building was coming down, the fires may have just hastened the timeline.
    1
  4. This building was only dealing with a fire. Fly a 350,000 pound object into it at 400 miles per hour and see how well it would have held up.
    1
  5.  @azmagaref  Actually WTC 7 collapsed because it was impacted by THOUSANDS of tons of falling debris from WTC 1 and 2. Lets look at what Firefighters who were there had to say about it. Captain Chris Boyle Engine 94 - 18 years Boyle: ...on the north and east side of 7 it didn’t look like there was any damage at all, but then you looked on the south side of 7 there had to be a hole 20 stories tall in the building, with fire on several floors. Debris was falling down on the building and it didn’t look good. Firehouse: When you looked at the south side, how close were you to the base of that side? Boyle: I was standing right next to the building, probably right next to it. Firehouse: When you had fire on the 20 floors, was it in one window or many? Boyle: There was a huge gaping hole and it was scattered throughout there. It was a huge hole. I would say it was probably about a third of it, right in the middle of it. And so after Visconti came down and said nobody goes in 7, we said all right, we’ll head back to the command post. We lost touch with him. I never saw him again that day. Captain Varriale told Chief Coloe and myself that 7 World Trade Center was badly damaged on the south side and definitely in danger of collapse. Chief Coloe said we were going to evacuate the collapse zone around 7 World Trade Center, which we did. Fire chief Daniel Nigro says further assessment of the damage indicated that it was severe: The biggest decision we had to make was to clear the area and create a collapse zone around the severely damaged [WTC Building 7]. A number of fire officers and companies assessed the damage to the building. The appraisals indicated that the building's integrity was in serious doubt. Deputy Chief Peter Hayden Division 1 - 33 years ...also we were pretty sure that 7 World Trade Center would collapse. Early on, we saw a bulge in the southwest corner between floors 10 and 13, and we had put a transit on that and we were pretty sure she was going to collapse. You actually could see there was a visible bulge, it ran up about three floors. It came down about 5 o’clock in the afternoon, but by about 2 o’clock in the afternoon we realized this thing was going to collapse. Firehouse: Was there heavy fire in there right away? Hayden: No, not right away, and that’s probably why it stood for so long because it took a while for that fire to develop. It was a heavy body of fire in there and then we didn’t make any attempt to fight it. That was just one of those wars we were just going to lose. We were concerned about the collapse of a 47-story building there. We were worried about additional collapse there of what was remaining standing of the towers and the Marriott, so we started pulling the people back after a couple of hours of surface removal and searches along the surface of the debris. We started to pull guys back because we were concerned for their safety. It is HILARIOUS when low IQ morons who have NO IDEA what they are talking about try and comment on WTC-7
    1
  6.  @azmagaref  And everything you said is wrong, first it did not fall symemetrically, most of the building ended up piled up against the Verizon Building across the street. The Verizon building was so heavily damaged from the collapse of WTC-7 that it had to be torn down as well. It did not fall in 6.5 seconds, for some reason conspiratards ALWAYS ignote the rooftop Penthouses collapsing into the building. The TRUTH is WTC-7 had been experiencing an internal prograssive collapse for hours, when it final collapse happened it WAS and empty shell most of the internal floors had already collapsed. I also bet you don't even know that WTC-7 was built AROUND another building, the Con/Ed power substation and EVERYTHING above the 7th floor was supported by only three columns. Below the seventh floor the building was supported by a seriec of complex trusses. If ONE of the three vertical load colums from the 7th floor and avobe was lost it would have led to a progressive collapse that could not have been stopped. AGAIN, According to Deputy Chief Peter Hayden, there is a bulge in the southwest corner of the building between floors 10 and 13. A bulge in the Southwest corner is an indication that the building is structurally compromised. Some of the internal vertical load capability had been compromised and the exterior walls were supporting more weight than they were designed to. The bulge indicates WTC-7 nearly collapsed from being struck by the debris from WTC 1&2 alone. I also LOVE how you take Larry Silversteins comment of "Pull It" 100% out of context. What he was talking about was the firefighting efforts. They had already cleared WTC-7 of people but it was decided to pull the firefighters out of the building because after it was inspected According to fire chief Daniel Nigro, A number of fire offices and engineers assessed the damage to the building. The appraisals indicated that the building's integrity was in serious doubt. I love how conspiratards cherry pick facts and take say three and ignore the other 97 to try and make it look like their argument is sound. It is also funny when they say things like defying physics, like they even have a basic knowledge of physics in the first place.
    1