Comments by "Old Guy Gaming Network" (@CRAZYHORSE19682003) on "Covert Cabal" channel.

  1. The "Old" tanks being sent are first sent to the tank plant at Lima, OH. They are stripped down and brought up to the mose advanced standard. When they leave they are in effect new build tanks.
    17
  2. It is hilarious when a Oliver Class Perry Frigate with no crew taking more hits lasts longer than the Moskva.
    10
  3. I subscribed to the channel strictly because you actually voice over your content. As a veteran and a military tech nerd I follow defense news every day. I enjoyed your video sir.
    5
  4. LOL Their military is a JOKE. What sort of propaganda are you listening to?
    3
  5. What is funny is that the equipment stored at the ppe sites is probably in better shape than their daily driver stuff.
    2
  6. China can develop all the weapons it wants, it won't make a difference because they will still have to FIGHT on the battlefield and Chinese armies have been virtually worthless on the battlefield for a thousand years or more. They are not called the sick man of Asia for nothing.
    2
  7. Did you know Aluminum actually burns and it requires a special chemical to put it out.
    2
  8. A couple of quick corrections. The F-35 does NOT have a much lower thrust to weight ratio than most modern 4th gen aircraft. Let me clarify what I am saying, the F-35 was designed to carry a MASSIVE internal fuel load. Around 3x more than the F-16. If you load a F-16 and a F-35 with IDENTICAL fuel and weapons, the F-35 has a slightly higher thrust to weight ratio than the F-16. As far as the payload goes, the F-35 will not always need stealth. The reason they invested in Stealth is so the F-35 can operate on day one against a near peer adversary without massive amounts of support. Once the AA threat has been reduced it will be carrying ordinance on external pylons just like a F-15, 16, or 18. The price point is a bit misleading. True the program has experienced massive cost overruns however keeping 30 year old aircraft like the F-15, 16's, Legacy Hornets, and AV8B's flying is massivly expensive. Every legacy aircraft that is replaced by a F-35 is actually saving the military in annual operating costs.
    1
  9. The AIM-260 a secret program will enter service in the next year or so. It has between two to two and a half times the range of the AIM 120D
    1
  10.  @Zx17OPv57i  Not really I am a disabled vet so I have a lot of time on my hands. I read defense news from six or seven different sources. I have read bits and pieces about the AIM-260 for at least five years and it is like a puzzel, putting together all the snippets you have read. I freely admit I could be way off, my opinion is just that an opinion it does not make me right or wrong.
    1
  11.  @Zx17OPv57i  Also I like trying to predict what future systems will be like. For example NGAD the 6th gen fighter coming much sooner than people think. From what I read there are going to be two versions, one a fighter much like the F-22 in speed, range and payload and another specifically designed for the long ranges in the Pacific. My prediction is it will be a 2/3 scale B-21. It will have a massive fuel and air to air payload. I expect unrefuled ranges of at least 3000-4000 miles and a payload of at least 20 air to air missiles. It won't be able to turn and burn but it will rely on being the most stealthy fighter ever built along with a generation leap in sensor fusion from the F-35 to dominate huge swaths of sky. Like I said it is just an opinion based of what little information has been publically available.
    1
  12. Funny how things come full circle. Anti aircraft guns fell out of fashion with advances in surface to air missiles. Now I believe we will see anti drone guns specifically designed to deal with drone swarms in a low cost way. Laser defense systems will also be used.
    1
  13. Correction to the video, China has a larger Navy than the USN.
    1
  14. Two or Three BCT's would be enough to beat Russia.
    1
  15. Stealth is a myth, only to ignorant morons who don't understand the technology.
    1
  16.  @lolollolol1436  I guess that would be you. Even in Korea where the Chinese were on an even technological base with the US they had to resort to 100-1 numerical advantage in troops to accomplish anything.
    1
  17.  @lolollolol1436  Really? China was supplied by the Russians so in infantry weapons it was dead even. In tanks the Russian T-34/85 was superior to the Shermans which made up the bulk of the allied armored core. The MIG-15 was on par with the F-86, superior in some aspects.
    1
  18.  @mommydonkey3642  True but those weapons are next to worthless just as the United States nuclear arsenal is next to worthless because of mutually assured destruction.
    1
  19.  @mommydonkey3642  I doubt they would since it would immediately lead to their country being vaporized.
    1
  20. A massive amount of incompetence, corruption and waste ensure 60 percent of our budget is wasted.
    1
  21. Well about 150 Abrams is all that is needed to destroy every single Russian tank, both active and refurbished from storage.
    1
  22. The only people who think stealth is useless are morons who have no idea what they are talking about. The only people who think Stealth mean aircraft are invisible are morons who have no idea what Stealth means.
    1