Comments by "Paul Aiello" (@paul1979uk2000) on "Finland u0026 Sweden: Why Aren't They in NATO? - TLDR News" video.

  1. 23
  2. It's one thing to attack a poor country like Ukraine, it's a very different story to attack a rich country like Sweden or Finland which are both EU members, that would compel the EU to get involved in a more forceful way which could escalate the problem and could even lead to a world war and unlike NATO which is just a bunch of countries together that say they'll come to the aid of each other, EU members likely will have to do so because of how integrated they are, in other words, an attack on any EU member would have negative ripple effects on other members, that would likely force the other EU members to come to the aid of the one being attacked and do so in a more forceful way whereas NATO is just an alliance that says they'll come to the aid of said country, so I think the EU is far more valuable for them then NATO is, but with that said, I think they should also join NATO as well. Now unless Putin has really lost the plot, it's just an idle threat that he can't carry out, after all, no modern country has been invaded since the second world war and it's always been rich countries attacking poor countries or poor countries against poor countries. Still, the Russian people need to wake up and depose Putin before things do get out of hand because Putin is dragging all the Russian people down with him and sadly, this is going to impact a lot of innocent Russian people that didn't want any of this mess in the first place and they are likely the best chance of pushing Putin and his cronies out of power. I also think the EU and US needs to get tougher on Putin than they have done, you can't give mercy to these kinds of leaders because they always see it as weakness and clearly Putin needs to go whatever way the outcome of this mess goes.
    2
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1