Comments by "Paul Aiello" (@paul1979uk2000) on "" video.

  1. No country is going to have any real advantage when it comes to A.I., the importance that A.I. will have on society, is already showing signs of decentralising A.I. so everyone can benefit from it, you only have to look at how rapid the open source A.I. is developing, simply to make sure no one person, corporation or country controls too much of it. As for jobs, well we have to be realistic, we've never had a situation, ever in human history of something that can take over so many jobs like A.I. can, we've had things like automation that takes over a lot of jobs, frees us to work on other jobs, but A.I. is very different, eventually, it will more or less be able to do any job we can do, cheaper, faster and better than we can do them, and the assumption that we'll create new jobs, that's true, but what makes us think that A.I. won't be able to do those new jobs better than we can do? The very nature of building A.I. is to have a broad intelligence, in other words, it will in time be able to do anything we can do, cheaper, better and faster than we can do. On the one hand, that's a major problem for the job market and society as we know it, but A.I. will be able to lift living standards in a massive way, personally, I don't think the capitalist system we have now will cope that well with what's on its way, it's design to get us all working, that's going to be difficult when A.I. can do all our jobs, and if there is one thing you can guarantee on, businesses will always try to reduce cost, human labour is a big cost for them, so they have a massive incentive to cut us out of the workforce with being cheaper, faster and not having to worry about all the workers benefits. Then we have consumers, well imagine this, one business uses A.I. and robotics, another uses human labour, who do you think is going to have the advantage in what they create and how cheap they could sell products for? Consumers will always shift towards products that are cheaper or better, A.I. and robotics can deliver on both, basically, the pressure on the human labour market is going to be immense over the coming decades, and it's going to be interesting to see how governments react and what unemployment numbers will be, once the avalanche start, it likely could end up being rapid, something we are likely going to see in our lives with how A.I. is developing.
    1
  2. If history is any indicator, any new tech can be used for good and bad, the problem with A.I. is that the broad term of use is basically in any area. I don't think A.I. its self will be the problem, but the people that want to abuse that tech, and there will be a lot of them. Personally, I think regulations will get a lot tougher on A.I. once negative things start happening around the world, especially if it's to the public.
    1
  3.  @edd9581  That changes nothing, tech regardless of where it's from, has to abide by the regulations set in a given market if they want to do business there, besides, this isn't to do with the EU, it was Italy that banned them, not the EU. In any case, privacy issues are going to be a far bigger problem for these online A.I. models as A.I. becomes more useful and integrated into our lives, so expect a lot more regulations on these things and from countless governments around the world, which could push more of us to use locally run A.I. models that won't have the issue of privacy and security, it could also be more useful without being as restricted.
    1