Comments by "Paul Aiello" (@paul1979uk2000) on "Torvalds Speaks: Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Programming" video.

  1. The simple answer is yes, if the code improves on the current work, it will likely be accepted, but even if they didn't accept A.I. code, how would they know if it's human or A.I. code? Valve just recently got into a huff with A.I. on its store front, at first banning it, but I knew they would have to back track because it's going to be almost impossible to prove if work is done by humans or A.I. and considering that A.I. is going to be used everywhere, it would be crazy to not accept that work if it's better than what's already there. For the time being, A.I. code is likely to be worse than human code, especially from a pro, but that is likely to change overtime where A.I. code becomes better than most human code, if not better than the best, so for now, it's handy for people that are not good coders or are just learning, but eventually, I suspect it's going to code better then even the best.
    3