Comments by "Rita Gameiro" (@puraLusa) on "Pyotr Kurzin | Geopolitics" channel.

@bilic8094 yes sir mr propagandist. Anything else about the superior russia for us the inferior race?
3
@UmbraWeiss well the big reason for rus presence might be to block any gas pipeline going thru syria into either turkiye or med sea into any european country. There were 3 propositions and the 3 failed, and the qatari one assad straight said no cause russia interests. So, if assad falls, the new gov in need of money will probably say yes to any and all pipes, cause those pay rent.
2
@kristiankruse3964 there are african regimes who are democracies and hold elections but still corrupt and the people are in destitute poverty. What is needed is transparency and less corruption no matter the regime.
2
Guterres base is socialism, his party spent the last 20 years under successive corruption scandals, one of his party members ended up in preventive prison. He does whatever who pays better tells him to do. Besides his political ideology blames usa for the fall of socialism international.
1
@UmbraWeiss ukraine has a nat gas deposit big enough that as a eu member could act as a stratigic reserve and control prices.
1
@surajs5913 actually there is a romanian author who wrote a book explaining how the soviets financed civil unrest to devide pak. So, soviets made the problem to then appear as the problem solvers. Have u ever heard that playbook? Dombas anyone?
1
 @surajs5913 it was the soviets who financed the civil unrest.
1
@surajs5913 yes ur correct. But seldom those descriminations result in the emergence of a new country without eternal interference. And it goes spot on in soviet/ russia playbook. So, the claim that russia/ soviets came to the aid of india is incomplete, I just completed it. Not so fun fact: soviets were doing the same thing in turkiye and iran with kurdish separatist that started as a marxist movement, and polyssario in western sahara, and... long list. What a coincidence that soviets were doing it all over the world as a cold war strategy.
1
@surajs5913 tell me where did I refer to that topic in this coment section? I referred to the topic about bangladesh and no other, thus ur introduction being a deflection on the topic I referred to.
1
@surajs5913 sorry stand corrected then, didn't notice u had. Internet is full of people engaging deflecting and I overreacted insted of paying attention of ur writing. As for removing or increasing, removing always comes with a price, increasing is adding. But anyway UN has been useless when it comes to the big players with or without veto power. Sad really, un could have tackled issues that are universal valued insted of squeming against one another. Also, even without veto the blocks that are formed make it quite impossible a positive improvement, members vote not the issue but by aligience.
1
@theglobalgambit if being nuclear is enough to keep a seat, than other nuclear should have a seat, like india and pak. The gate keeping is what makes that council less believable in it's intentions. Anyway UN is useless, it didn't prevent escalation and war.
1
Yes, skin shade is the most important thing in politics 😂😂😂. Not a racist statement at all!
1
ofcourse must be us fault. Everyone else must be pure and perfect and good 😂😂😂
1
Maronites are under the pope but aren't catholic, they have their own independant theology.
1
It is and many countries have intent or have done this. UN is incompetent and useless and hasn't prevent any of it from happening (among other events).
1
I fully agree. UN is also useless and corrupt. Example: un mission in lebanon hasn't impose (by force if necessary) it's own resolution. This lead to more war.
1
@kristiankruse3964 u placed the "true" title just to red hering? All democracies are flawed democracies, there is no perfect or true regime of governance. Botswana, south africa, angola, mozambique, kenya, nigeria etc do hold elections and elect their head of state. If ur looking for perfection or "true" u'll find it nowhere on planet earth.
1
@kristiankruse3964 1st response deleted, trying again. U placed the title "true", is it an attempt of red hering? Botswana, mozambique, south africa, angola, kenya, nigeria, green cape among others do hold elections with universal vote and do elect their heads of state. All democracies are flawed democracies as there is no perfect regime. U'll find "fake" democracy anywhere in the world with a democracy.
1
No, and usa empire isn't even an empire, it's just influence due to its big military and the dollar as the intern currency. And post wwii, the world was devided into 4 blocks: commies, the other commies, usa plus allies, neutrals.
1