Comments by "Rita Gameiro" (@puraLusa) on "Anders Puck Nielsen" channel.

They'll also need to redeploy which means moving equipment and amunitions, which increases the chances of ukraine to know where the stocks are to kaboom. It's a dilema presented which is a good strategy.
94
And what organ is gonna judge what is and what isn't rus propaganda? How can we be sure it won't be abused to control or censor critics in general and not just the ones who propagate those lies? It's a slippery slope isn't it?
23
It's a snow ball. They lost more as their restock capability is 4 million short of workers. Their ability to transport resources around russia to produce military stuff is also deminished, due to lack of personnel and parts cost/ access. Finally, financing of all this endevour is shrinking.
19
@happydays4302 now do the same for palestine with all their political class conected to nazi germany and their choosing the talking stones hadith used in their speeches, etc. The truth is both sides have factions with that intent and those factions have power in their respective groups. Hence why there is an eternal conflict with lots of wars.
8
@jimmyolsenband there is a strong case to be made to acuse israel of genocide, there is also a strong case to be made of abuse of colateral damage, aka, disproportionate force. No need to make up new worlds. Notice I wrote "strong enough case" as opose to definite evidence. Same can be applied to palestinian authority be it by fatah, hamas or any other faction. They both definatelly comited war crimes and showed intent of genocide. Key word is BOTH
7
There is reason why there are way smaller countries in europe surrounded by big former empirial ones. 🤷‍♀️People seem to forget history so easy.
7
@bluemarlin8138 israel policy isn't well defined, and definatelly there is a lobby within who wants to make sure a 2 state solution doesn't happen (hence why an israeli prime minister was murdured). Same ideology is present in current israeli admn with its long lasting horrible policy of settlers. Finally, until the end of this invasion one cannot know the true intentions of israeli for gaza. (this from someone who see both sides negatively and remains somewhat neutral in the bigger picture).
7
 @2639theboss I have the exact same prespective, manipulation of the masses done by media and political actors calling themselves activists.
6
@Finnishguy777 so, u are the ultimate judge of peoples position. U just made my case. Not only I'm pro-ukraine, I've been steadily placing 300 euros monthly to the cause which is a lot for a citizen of a poor country like me. By now, I would have a new car and where I live there isn't a public transport alternative, so yes, I've abdicated basic confort for ukraine. But u very fast named me a rus bot - this phenomenon is called witch hunt and it's outcome is inocent being attacked. Something u just did. Makes one wonder how easily people defend fascism to combat fascism 🤔.
6
An army without a navy sinking boats is priceless.
4
 @harmless6813 that enters the definition of ethnical cleansing which is a form of genocide. It's not that hard to grasp.
4
Yes. The one thing I disagree is the idea of dismissing the acusation of genocide to palest side (factions) just cause their abilities to act are smaller. It's fairly easy to see that both sides are invested in this. Israeli is more polished and is more invested in denying the right of sovereignty (aka political power) than eliminating palest identity completely. Palestinian factions are invested in either anyhilating political power (end of israeli state) to just removing jewish identity completely, it has more variety of intentions.
3
This question will answer ur concern, research the right tecnical answer: how long does it take for iran to produce 1 drone?
3
@umjackd aa far as we know, ukraine having it's own army and intelligence services etc can resist occupation by military means (aka military targets), palest wasn't until recently a political entity nor had the organization to do so, hence why they called the neighbours arabs for that specific task, war was lost and they fell into the grey area without the ability to resist in the same manner. Organized crime loves gray areas, hence why criminal groups took the chance to be the palest resist and thus the strategy of terrorism as oposed to atacking military and political targets, they went for general public, aka, civilians. Not smart at all as now palestinians are under criminal rule (plo be it fatah, hamas or any other faction, are corrupt to the babby formula, an absolute criminal abuse of power, and under ocupation at the same time - in a loose loose situation.
3
@MoireFly that's cause public debate is so partisan invested that it's starts with bias. "i don't like israel therefore iarael is guilty" or "i don't like palestine therefore palestine is guilty" - procede with an accusation, whatever that acusation is and produce an oversimplification to sell a narrative. Thus, true debate gets lost in the intention of the debater.
3
Ur making a very good point. Just it needs to adress that the same intent (and most of the energy but with minor capabilities placed) from palest resistance factions is exactly the same. Both sides can easely be seen having the same kind of discourse, same kind of intent toward the other. What is discussing is the politically investment a bit everywhere around the world to dismiss this about one or the other. From an uninvested point of view they both awful and both suck as political entities.
3
Turkiye at that time menaced its own smo in syria, this is the country russia doesn't mess with since soviet times - why do u think that is?
2
Wasn't a false flag operation because the flag was very real. And it survived after the scare! 😂
2
They know, they are also trying to save their country industry and economy in a global market immensely conected to russia. It's very easy to criticize, niw try to be at the top of eu: a bunch of different countries and economies.
2
@umjackd here the difference lies (as far as we know cause fog of war and control inform): ukraine still is a country not in gray area as palestine is- it has an intern recogn governm, borders and territory, palest is gray as it lacks the definition of country albeit having the potencial: it has undefined territory, governm is split and lacks all sovereign powers traditionally given to a governm, and borders (palestine can be seen as a much bigger territory and some factions do claim that as the true borders of palestine the country). Conclusion, it's all false comparisson and intellectually dishonest to compate the 2, each is its owm unique conflict.
2
@thequestline2227 if u dismiss one side genocidal intent just by refering to capabilities u are being dishonest as it's a marxist point of view, it denies others prespective. Either it's a rule that fits all, aka both big and small fish, or it isn't a just law. Example, al qaeda at 1st glance would be seen as without capability but it didn't stop it from 9-11 potencial. Besides that, yes both sides are invested in denying the other claim, and both can be seen as genocidal by the intent (speeches etc).
2
@peterwebb8732 that's many points, quite impossible to summerise in 1 yt coment section. There is a dude who was an author in the x century (thats before my own identity group emerged) - so yes there was an identity called palestinian, albeit not ethnical. Ethno-centrism is a very racist point of view as it dismisses identity beyond ethnical groups and is incorrect in that assessment. Most identity groups didn't have a political entity, that's a very much modern time phenomenon. There is a story within 7 oct massacre where 1 of the groups were the beduins who lacked the same anti-bomb shelters near their encapments that other groups in israel - so those full civil rights are wonderful on papper but in reality much is to be done. Yes, ur very right, and some palestinian extreme factions agree with u, palestine is for some much more than just the country/ territory that is publicized by either pro-palest narratives or pro-israeli narratives. The fact some israeli factions/ parties do prefer the 2 state solution doesn't mean all do equally, and the ones who don't are currently in the coalition that forms present day isrseli gov. Actually, wasn't an israeli prime minister murdured exactly for refering the 2 state solution? Hamas is a criminal terrorist group, it represents the faction inside palestine society who doesn't want a 2 state solution (fatah to some extent also). All this is a google search away - none of this ends up with: israel is perfect and all other wrong which is the prespective u want all others to submit to. There is other prespectives and we, who have them, do not need the bullying to side with wither palest or israel - we have the right to keep our own neutrality and even more detailed, we have the right of looking at both negatively - cause they both horrible politically.
1
@peterwebb8732 my story about the bedoins was to show that israel has a lot of steps to achieve that civil rights equality u brag about (not reality, many many israelis have been active in this criticism) which includes the same bomb protection for everyone equally with no exceptions. Thanku for the schooling 😂 As for denying the palest identity as u are doing by implying israel isn't a product of mass migration to the territory (it was scarcely populated) and they all identify as palestinian (this includes a portion of lebanon, a portion of egipt and jordan) - the identity existed, the author I refered to was bourn and raised in that area, thus identify as such. One of the problems of the cheerleaders (that's what I call u) os exactly the level of indoctrination that denies the other identity, it's just another form of dehumanizing the other. Interesting that u gave the example of usa, and yes the 1st americans were exactly that and yes they also denied identity of all others and described them as foreigners when they themselves were a foreign identity - its exactly how usa came to be. The idea of plural-identity usa is actually something very recent that came with the civil rights movement, before that the identity american was completed gate keeped and given to only groups who could fit the description u just gave. The regime isn't what gives rights to a country - be it liberal or not-international law does, or if we wanna be cinical, big guns does, smart strategy does. So, ur last point makes no sense. There was an identity there whose political class didn't like the idea that a country would be configured in that territory called israel. One can criticize that political class, but denying the identity - that's dehumanizing and racist. Same goes for the narratives who deny the territory conection to the somewhat ethno group calles jews - that's also dehumanizing and that's also racist. Both wrong period.
1
@peterwebb8732 not even gonna read that, obama was agnostic at most that declared himself to be christian to get the american vote, he wasn't muslim at all. Also, that only applies post civil rights movement, 🤦‍♀️ And I'm the one who is being dishonest about usa 😂 Next u gonna tell me jimmy crow laws never existed Sorry, but I was wrong - ur too ignorant for any exchange of prespective. Not consenting any further intersection, not being payed and not ur teacher. Bye, read books!
1
@Fordmister u forgot 1 thing: usa strategy was retarded, usa is great at invasion terrible at occupation. Usa didn't control drug routes (borders) so taliban had a lot of money for explosives and new members. Usa in occupation strategy lacks the fascist view needed to actually defeat enemies. To change a bad idea u can't be democratic nor lax. Also, usa doesn't care for its own border.
1
@hedgehog3180 on the other hand if bigger countries had that much power than portugal wouldn't exist or the vikings wouldn't have dominated etc. U should go back and see how many times smaller armies won battles cause quality and brains always supercede quantity and brute force. Also, if the locals don't want to ur doomed to beguin with.
1
That's how lobby works: check who pays for adds and if they are component providers to gas drilling sites for example. Those narratives are also a comping mechanism of big corp loosing profits while competitors are thrilled with the high price and oppen market share in europe. It's so dirty and vile but money talks and it's all about the money.
1
@harmless6813 a portion of pro-israeli narratives are exactly doing that. Pro-palestinian narrative also does that - as they both deny the claim of the other. They both guilty of that definatelly.
1
 @bluemarlin8138 in the west it stems from a wrong translation of the comandments as they shall not kill should have been translated as thy shall not murder.
1
@clausmadsen6754 yup, its just the divergence of gas pipeline to ukrainian drilling sites and boom, eu has acess to cheap natural gas again. Also, investors are very interested in ukraine rebuilding to make up for the losses russia gave them. All that aside, I still consider eu economic plan terrible but that's another topic entirely.
1
Ur right, insted of a natural change in definition over time, one can see politically invested actors trying to authoritavely change definitions to suit political agendas.
1
It's the satanist gay west nazi islamist jew president dictatorship regime. 😂 Sorry if I miss one of the titles.
1
 @creepycrawlything good point.
1
Their aren't that much laser focussed unfortunatelly cause they are also spending ressources to fast self investigate of russian agents as they are infested with them.
1
Buying time to act, strategy of surviving winter etc.
1
Both ww2 and cold war were dangerous. Also, it isn't western civilization, no such thing exists.
1
@Finnishguy777 ur confusing me most definatelly. Ur also reacting emotionally. Someone needs to be the devils advocate. Have u ever read karl popper? He has a whole philosophy about tolerance and it's limits. The one thing that united the non existant colective west is the liberal democracy and freedom of speach tipe of society. If u incur in censorship, we are already failing in what makes our regimes more bereable than the totalitarians and authoritarians who surround us. Hell is full of great intentions - rough translation of a cultural saying. 9/11 and etc already took a portion of our freedoms and made us closer to a police state with all tipes ofb gov medeling in our private lives. Aproving censorship will probably be used to also censor well founded criticism of policy. It's just dangerous.
1
@evgeniya7853 I have 1 sentence for u: I do not seek ur aproval nor do I concent being judged by u. Bye bully.
1
@thequestline2227 that's a debate of foreign policy not a debate of who should be changed of genocide. Let's not conflate the 2. But yes, I agree - isolating the whole territory be it from west or east could possibly be a good way to make them reach an agreement. The fear is 1. That by denying them this conection, zero leverage to control actions could be more damaging and 2. They could as opose to reach a compromise go all out war and even more killing would incure, even if with sticks and stones due to said isolation. In conclusion, problem of outside interference (which made it 10x worst, see cold war) it's also a doble sword as its isn't west vs east - it's also west vs middle east (islamists) and their allies (iran, china, russia) who would be very pleased with genocide and have zero courts or intention to prossecute any genocidals who might represent their interests in the region. One of the biggest loosers in this case would be jordan, another would be lebanon where both would cease to exist or would be just vassal puppet states. This is why people often refer to this conflict as: it's complicated. Any position in this case is a bad position, it's a loose loose situation.
1