Comments by "Rita Gameiro" (@puraLusa) on "T-SPLY"
channel.
-
38
-
11
-
9
-
9
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ghostpiratelechuck2259 no, the moto is cause usa is willing to kill the civilians themselves if that means a future deterant for any organization to use american citizens/ nobodies as hostages.
Same shit in police protocol.
If it's possible to save them, they do. If it isn't, usa makes sure to kill as many abducters as possible even if it means to kill hostages jn the process- just to send the message of "don't mess with usa".
In the 70s and 80s it actually worked, there were instances with hostage situations where americans were released with an I'm sorry note and no demands, meanwhile others were kept.
Miitias, criminal orgs, terrorists and separatists were actually very afraid of usa army due to this policy.
The change started in the 90s and completely fell apart with 9-11.
Still - usa policy is the same cause it's the only one that works in the long term.
My country had 1 single hostage situation due to bank robbery - it was the last one, cause special police just shot to kill and didn't even talk to them, not carrying about the hostages at all - this worked.
Same sh it with russia and chechen terrorists when they atacked a school. Russians went in, shot students and terrorists alike - chechens never again thought about targeting a school.
It's just how the world is.
1