Comments by "Rita Gameiro" (@puraLusa) on "laowhy86" channel.

It's a "look at brics" not our miss management kind of technique.
29
It's just one perfect hit to 1 dam and done and over. So yah they would have to be faster than that. Makes no sense even atenpting it.
6
@ChickenMcThiccken that would take more than 20 years, it's a lot of forest. Ur visioning an army that quantity is might, it isn't, history proves that might is a number of factors, size being the least important.
4
@tylerrobbins8311 u can't boom an economy without human capital, russia doesn't have it.
3
@daylepalmer6270 Nks and russians would be delt with by just average gun lover muricans, the army would deal with pla and they would laugh doing it. America isn't invadable due to a number of factors that include common americans imoredictable reaction, no army can counter this as there isn't tech to counter average armed civilian, it would be guerrilla warfare x2000 and no military even considers engaging that.
3
My guess is that the last thing ccp wants is for the whole world to know and understand whatever they are saying which makes chinese not the language of the future.
2
 @dkstudioart that reminds me of new zeeland that rewrote their whole building planing post earthquake. Lots of areas that building permission was permenantly removed.
2
@aaaaaaaard9586 that's a bad assessment. If they prepare every month or so for 2 years, observers get used to see it and won't spot the one intended.
2
@karenwang313 it won't fully starve them, they did a road and port in pak for that.
2
@aaaaaaaard9586 they thought and made a plan, not the best, but the possible one. Belt and road iniciative in pak is exactly that. U need to research about it, there are yt and articles of geopolitics that explain it all. They wouldn't be completely ok, but they wouldn't starve, it's just sufficient for not starving, at least theoretical, it's not a proved concept until used.
2
 @sriramprasannaarikapalli472 and rainbows and bufterflies. Utopias are great for movies but real life is something else altogether.
1
Usa would win with it. A devalue in the dollar would be a boost to usa industry. But brics doesn't have the ability to produce one, it's juat how it is.
1
@aaaaaaaard9586 when u have a autocratic totalitarian government which the ccp is with full territorial control u can. U make ur soldiers to the drill every month or every 2 months for a number of years. Money poorly spent but it's the ccp they aren't known for good management. So yeah, it's possible. My bet is that they know it isn't worth it cause there is a dam problem - if u get the joke. As a territory they made a big poop in the development area, cause u can't be aggressive and build a dam when broke floads ur main habitational and money making portion of territory, makes u weak as an opponent by ur own hands. They weren't smart and they know it.
1
China is not going to give up control of whatever, it's the model of centralized economy, everything must be under ccp control. Wether its currency or potatos.
1
@geektechpow4537 interesting position. Wouldn't the idea of let them figure it out translate to let china eat taiwan, cause that's the consequence.
1
@jingliu2660 ur presenting the excuse to invade as the objective. Hitler also used the "protect the ethnic" to invade. That's a 20 century excuse that even putina is using now.
1
@geektechpow4537 didn't even read till the end. The interest is simple, when china crashes, it crashes the second most populous country. The east vs west devision politically is a proposal and don't adhere, we are stuck in the same rock traveling around a ball of fire. Taiwan is the garantee there will be a china who can manage when it does crash (i think it's the plan). The amount of murder the ccp has comited is enough to know its eat not unify. No one will look away from the regime imposed by a group inspired on a wicked westerner named karl marx which is what u propose.
1
To go with the populist flow of preceding to point towards "the mean west" for their own incompetence. Also, shady biz of selling soviet stuff back to russia and not puting money sales in government coffers.
1
This was a bit superficial.
1