Comments by "Rita Gameiro" (@puraLusa) on "ThePrint" channel.

  1.  @rishavkumar1250  that isn't even a question cause the narrative that the root cause is "ocupation" is already a false permisse. By asking it ur already legitimizing a false narrative. And the question on the other side is as stupid: where will the palest go? Palest will answer that jews should "go back" to europe Israelis will answer palest should "go back" to arabia or egipt. And both narratives have flaws and both permisses are erroneous. If u took a dna test u would see that both people have a somewhat same origin (cananites) with different admixture and that both are natives and non natives (at the same time) to that general territory. Conclusion, the narratives are lies - both sides.
    2
  2. ​ @georgesibley7152 so all those fake islands don't exist? And those "fishing boats" are non existant? And the ilegal police stations? I could go on 😂 Like observers don't see walking naked king!
    2
  3. Part of this is just inherited by ottoman non spoken policy: each province could have all the infighting for power as long as they payed taxes to the ottoman central power and didn't turn against ottoman central power. Ottomans also provoked internal fighting exactly to not allow them to turn v ottomans, something that eventually happened (arab revolt). Political culture helps to contextualize. Add to this, all the bad political philosophies spead during 20th century and the stupid cold war (soviets v usa) and voilá: u have a power keg exploding here and there and a bit everywhere.
    2
  4. Under that logic, palestine was legally created by the arab league 😂. Remember, ur logic not mine.
    1
  5. ​ @manjulashanmugasundaram706 wrong - both hamas and fatah can be traced back to muslim brotherhood who isn't neither left nor right. Fatah only presented itself as secular for political gain, arafat was MB afiliated not baath afiliated. And fatah isn't 1 political party, it's a coalition - with independance and power they would turn on each other pretty fast.
    1
  6. ​ @nilutpalmahanta9832 a new loan to pay the old loan and increse in taxes and tariffs to ensure payment of new loan. Generally that's how it goes in countries in need/ defaulting the IMF.
    1
  7. ​ @saimahaider685 that's one of the miths spread around to convince people to take a side. But incorect, there was no israel army in 1929 and u have hebron massacre who is as violent as 9 oct. Israel aren't the good guys, but palest aren't either. All the horrible policies u describe is a consequence and product within context not outside of it. No vacuum remember.
    1
  8. Those are doomed just like tibet - no one dares to go v china and the ccp has a well placed censorship foreign policy and "activists" in their pockets. Might not have been declared but china is waging a cold war for about 20 years.
    1
  9. ​ @georgesibley7152 tibet
    1
  10. ​@@MuhammadMalcomwrong, it did spread out, I have budists in my familly in europe. It just didn't spread out by the sword or political agreements.
    1
  11. If u go to local media u'll see that they do all the time. It just doesn't apply to foreign policy and big media.
    1
  12. Baath party "revolutions" is soviet made not usa 😂 Usa helps to protect jordanian monarchy cause all the other surrounding monarchies were topled by SOCIALISTS.
    1
  13. Around that time might be before the occurrence. We don't know as much as we think, and it's all estimates.
    1
  14. All that is proof of manipulation and indoctrination of the masses. They all protested v france but not one march v china when xi fully disrespected islam (and christianity and jewdaism) by declaring that it would re-write the quran and bible. Why? Cause all the activist leaders are no more than loyalists to party A or party B who has conections with the CCP, they just put on the mask islam/ ummah to convince the masses to aquire power and control. It's all a very dirty intern game.
    1
  15. Whatu fail to see is the level of manipulation by political actor disguized as "activists" who are in fact loyal to parties and the party loyalty is a question to follow the money - sometimes that funding is from non muslim big boys who fund manipulation of the masses for their own gain. It's so easy to see and everyone is deeply blind.
    1
  16. ​ @blacksnow129 neta is not the one who decides, he tried but failed to centralize power on himself.
    1
  17. Nationalism can very fast become toxic and deadly.
    1