Comments by "Stephen D Green" (@stephendgreen1502) on "Mainstream Media FINALLY Covers Excess Deaths!" video.

  1. We all are not surprised because we foresaw that flattening the curve would prolong the curve. We all know the expression “you cannot cheat death”.
    3
  2. Say: Overall 70 % took vaccine. Excess deaths was 20%. How many of those dying overall would be expected to have taken vaccine? If say 100% excess deaths were due to vaccine: normal deaths with vaccine would be 70%. If say there are 120 overall deaths, 20 of which are excess. That means the normal 70 of the deaths would be with vaccine. 30 no vaccine. Now there are 20 more. Of those 100% took vaccine. So overall number of deaths with vaccine equals 70 plus 20. That means 90 out of 120 deaths overall would be expected to have had vaccine. Now if the percentage correlation decreases by 5. So 95 percent correlation. 95% of the excess deaths relates to vaccine and 5% unknown factor. Now 70 still have vaccine among normal deaths but now only 19 of excess die having had vaccine. 1 dies of unknown cause. Overall 89 out of 120 of those dying expected to have been vaccinated. Draw it as a chart or model it with, say, partial differential equations. If the latter it might feed a computer modelling system like that used for the pandemic by Imperial College. Then compare with actuals to see possible correlation with vaccine. Can the professionals not do this and do it better than my undergraduate maths can do?
    2
  3. Can they tell anything from how many were vaccinated out of deaths and work out how to relate that to excess deaths? Surely they can do this.
    1
  4.  @Sammackk7  the answers might be scarier - going even beyond the grave
    1
  5. Final Destination in real life. Flattening the curve prolongs the curve.
    1
  6. Flattening the curve prolongs the curve
    1