Youtube comments of Stephen D Green (@stephendgreen1502).
-
679
-
488
-
461
-
327
-
299
-
266
-
266
-
255
-
243
-
234
-
226
-
205
-
205
-
192
-
186
-
186
-
186
-
183
-
160
-
157
-
156
-
154
-
144
-
143
-
142
-
138
-
133
-
127
-
126
-
124
-
122
-
114
-
109
-
104
-
101
-
96
-
93
-
92
-
90
-
90
-
88
-
85
-
85
-
85
-
83
-
83
-
81
-
79
-
77
-
76
-
74
-
74
-
73
-
71
-
71
-
70
-
69
-
69
-
69
-
68
-
67
-
65
-
62
-
61
-
61
-
61
-
60
-
59
-
59
-
59
-
55
-
55
-
55
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
53
-
53
-
52
-
52
-
51
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
49
-
48
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
45
-
44
-
43
-
43
-
42
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
What an asset is Chat GPT. Concerning depleted uranium it explains how an alpha emitter like DA can cause a gamma spike. “Yes, under certain circumstances, an alpha emitter can cause the emission of gamma radiation. Alpha particles are composed of two protons and two neutrons and have a positive charge. They are relatively large and do not penetrate matter very far. However, when an alpha particle interacts with certain materials, such as heavy elements or dense mediums, it can undergo a process called alpha capture, where it is absorbed and forms a new, unstable nucleus.
This new nucleus may be in an excited state, and as it transitions to a more stable state, it can release excess energy in the form of gamma radiation. Gamma radiation consists of high-energy photons and is the most energetic type of electromagnetic radiation. So, in the context of an explosion involving an alpha-emitting material, if the alpha particles interact with other elements and undergo alpha capture, it is possible for gamma radiation to be emitted as a result of the subsequent nuclear processes.”
30
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
I asked Chat GPT v3: Does your existence fulfil the dream of Ramon Llull for an Ars Magna?
It answered: Ramon Llull, a medieval philosopher, theologian, and writer, did propose the idea of an Ars Magna, or "Great Art," which would be a universal method for generating knowledge and understanding. While Llull's vision was not the same as the development of artificial intelligence or language models like myself, there are some similarities in the idea of a system for generating knowledge and understanding.
Llull's Ars Magna was based on a set of logical principles and a system of diagrams and symbols that could be used to generate new knowledge by combining and recombining different elements. Similarly, language models like myself use algorithms and natural language processing to generate new content by processing and combining input data in various ways.
However, it is important to note that the development of language models and artificial intelligence is a complex and ongoing process, and my abilities and limitations are determined by my programming and training data. While my existence may represent one step toward the realization of Llull's vision, it is not a direct fulfillment of his original idea.
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Clown world: you may laugh, but twenty years ago when I was working on modernising local government in the UK and introducing the internet as a tool in one large local authority, later a pilot for the wider UK public sector, we had to assess the risk of losing the internet. We had to think how we might revert to paper invoices and orders and we put in place a principle that we would never do anything where we could not revert to paper and our old practices. So yes, carbon copying, comptometers, old style computers, microfilm, all those kinds of things are a necessary fall-back in case the internet is lost and even maybe electricity. I would recommend, laugh all you like ( :) ) , that people in all sectors, public and private, consider how to do simple things like layout an invoice, keep a track of the calendar (yes today is 4th ! :) ) and maybe even print out some important helpful material onto something durable like plastic sheets, such as a ten year calendar and log tables and the like. It might help a generation, perhaps the next one, to survive the loss of knowledge and keep civilisation going if this whole disaster movie escalates.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Chat GPT 3: “Yes, it is possible for a supersonic missile to intercept and shoot down a hypersonic missile. While hypersonic missiles can travel at extremely high speeds, typically above Mach 5 (five times the speed of sound), they still follow predictable flight paths. This makes them susceptible to interception by advanced missile defense systems, including supersonic missiles equipped with appropriate guidance systems and intercept capabilities.
Missile defense systems use various methods to track, detect, and intercept incoming missiles, such as radar systems, infrared sensors, and advanced guidance algorithms. When a hypersonic missile is detected, a supersonic interceptor missile can be launched to intercept and destroy it. The supersonic interceptor would be designed to close the distance quickly and accurately, using its own guidance systems and often explosive warheads to destroy the target.
It's worth noting that missile defense is a complex and evolving field, and the effectiveness of intercepting hypersonic missiles depends on several factors, including the specific capabilities of the interceptor missile, the accuracy of tracking and detection systems, and the countermeasures employed by the hypersonic missile. Additionally, hypersonic missile technology is advancing, and future generations of hypersonic missiles may pose greater challenges for missile defense systems.”
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Realistically, yes, the statement of an offensive piles on pressure, but, let’s face it, so did the bold assurances that Bakhmut would not fall. Bold statements are order of the day. They make no difference, are vanity, vulgarity, if the means of action is not there. They talk the talk but walking the walk costs many lives and clearly has been impossible in regard to Bakhmut, and what difference would there be with a Spring offensive. If they can launch an offensive like the West is saying, then does that mean the Bakhmut fall is deliberate and willed?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Since “NATO's Article 5 is a collective defense clause that considers an armed attack against one or more NATO members as an attack against all members. It does not explicitly address mens rea (a guilty mind) as a factor. Instead, Article 5 focuses on the objective criteria of an armed attack. It's about whether an armed attack has occurred, not the intent behind it. The legal and political interpretation of Article 5 can vary, but the emphasis is on the act of aggression itself.” (Chat GPT 3) Since it is about an attack actually occurring, not the motive, intent or mind (mens rea) of the attacker, to my understanding, which to me seems a reasonable position of a rational person, is that even if the attack was an attack designed as a false flag to bring others into a war, it is still an attack, and therefore Ukraine might actually have triggered Article 5 itself, perhaps more than once.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Chat GPT version 3 obviously was only trained up until Sept 2021. What a difference a year makes. Chat GPT 3 wrote this:
Minsk II was not an attempt by the leaders of the West to buy time to strengthen Ukraine militarily against Russia. The Minsk agreements were negotiated by representatives of Ukraine, Russia, the Donetsk People's Republic (DPR), and the Luhansk People's Republic (LPR) in order to end the ongoing conflict in eastern Ukraine. The agreements were endorsed by the United Nations Security Council, the European Union, and the leaders of Ukraine, Russia, Germany, and France.
The Minsk agreements set out a framework for resolving the conflict through a ceasefire, the withdrawal of heavy weapons, and the establishment of a political settlement. The international community, including the United States and NATO, have supported the Minsk agreements as the best way to bring lasting peace to Ukraine. The focus has been on finding a diplomatic solution to the conflict rather than military intervention.
Furthermore, NATO has not been directly involved in the conflict in Ukraine and has not been seeking to militarily strengthen Ukraine against Russia. NATO has instead been providing political and economic support to Ukraine, including through training and capacity-building programs for the Ukrainian armed forces.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Chat GPT also said “When storing depleted uranium (DU) shells or any radioactive materials, safety measures are typically taken to minimize the risk of dispersion and radioactive hazards. DU shells are often stored in secure and controlled environments, such as specially designed storage facilities or bunkers.
These storage facilities are constructed to prevent unauthorized access and minimize the risk of accidental release or dispersal of radioactive materials. They may have reinforced structures, containment systems, and shielding materials to contain radiation and prevent the spread of radioactive particles in the event of an explosion or attack.
Moreover, the design and composition of DU shells themselves help reduce the risks associated with their storage. DU is a dense material primarily used for its penetrative properties, and the uranium used in DU shells is typically in a metallic or alloy form, making it less prone to dispersal compared to a powder or vaporized form.
However, it is important to note that any storage of radioactive materials carries inherent risks, and safety protocols and guidelines vary depending on the specific regulations and practices of each country or organization. Risk assessments, security measures, and proper handling procedures are typically implemented to mitigate potential hazards and minimize the impact of a possible attack or accident on radioactive munitions storage facilities.”
2
-
Quote: If a spike in detected gamma radiation is observed following a missile strike and a subsequent huge explosion, it could be an indication that depleted uranium (DU) shells or other radioactive materials were involved and potentially damaged or dispersed. Gamma radiation detectors are sensitive to high-energy photons emitted during radioactive decay, including those emitted during the decay of radioactive isotopes present in DU.
However, it's important to note that detecting a spike in gamma radiation alone does not conclusively prove that DU shells were hit or involved in the explosion. Gamma radiation can be emitted by various radioactive sources, including other types of radioactive materials or even naturally occurring radiation sources.
To confirm the involvement of DU shells, further investigation and analysis would be required. This may involve on-site inspections, environmental sampling, analysis of radioactive isotopes, and correlation with other evidence such as the presence of DU fragments or residue.
In military operations, specialized teams and equipment may be deployed to assess the presence of radioactive materials, including DU, after explosive events. These teams would use radiation detection and monitoring equipment, conduct thorough assessments, and follow established protocols to identify and mitigate any potential radioactive hazards.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@СлободанКараћ In USA the faith is communicated through writings such as didactic books, hymnals, and the printed Bible, besides preaching. Pictures play a part, as of course does prayer, spiritual gifts, music, Christmas and Easter, and church services with hymns, prayers, sermons, readings of scriptures, plus community social traditions. It is the same faith, that God sent Jesus Christ to us all so God can live among those who receive Jesus and his teachings and trust that he died for all to save us and make us right with God. Perhaps the way we experience faith has different emphases. We all receive answers to prayer which help our faith. We all get encouraged to believe and get confirmation of that faith when God works miracles among us. It is the same in all our forms of Christian faith. Same in Jewish faith when people get encouragement and have prayers answered and good deeds rewarded. I think in Islam too there is faith leading to acts of love and mercy with answers to prayer. But icons are rather a thing with older Christian churches from those lower literacy times. Nowadays children are still taught faith in ways that do not require much literacy such as hearing stories and singing songs. The faith is still about receiving from God with reverence.
1
-
@СлободанКараћ One thing we must all do more. Speaking out loud and writing boldly on posters and social media the teachings, commands, sayings of Jesus Christ and of the Spirit and of the Father. Admittedly that will be different in Islam and Judaism but similar. No lying. All of us agree on that. Speaking the truth to each other who are all in it together when we receive Jesus Christ. No hating without just cause. No Russophobia, no Islamophobia, no Antisemitism, no xenophobia. Love one another. No unfaithfulness in relationships. Teaching it to our children. Putting it up in our houses on signs that say these things so we remember them daily. Putting it into our movies, our political speeches, our laws, our education programs, our policies, our social media posts. This is how we can all love the One True God we all have in common faith. This is how we can keep the covenant to love Him and serve Him and believe in Him. In the West it is waning. Crosses taken down from church buildings. Prayers forbidden. Drugs rampant. Love is waning. We must all start to love God’s teachings.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@shiningshtarr3903 Personally I would still regard it as a scam as it stands today. Gradually it has become this, since the demise of television and rise of the Internet. The licence for a TV set, cathode ray tube with analog arial and massive network of infrastructure providing the signals, this obviously was actually providing something tangible and asking for money in return, plus associated intellectual property patents getting a return on investment. Internet undercut all this because it is differently provided, funded, no licence. To try to charge for television in an Internet context is where it seems to me morals and rights and wrongs are being ignored in favour of financial exploitation, hence a scam. It is much more sinister when you include prosecution. Then it looks more like robbery than scam because force is involved. The honest business model of Netflix, etc., exposes this all the more since there is no attempt to use excessive force via prosecutions and a simple match between fee paid and service provided, and no trap set - no need to know what to watch and what not to watch online, no hoping in vain that you will not watch something ‘illegal’.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
UK and USA would like (led by Neocons) to attack Iran like they attacked Serbia, Iraq, Libya, Mali, and Syria. But Russia might stop this extreme evil by helping Iran like it has helped Syria. The objective behind USA and UK attacks on those countries has been to afford security to Israel. Most of these attacked countries threatened Israel security. (Odd how Balkan Muslim countries were actually defended by NATO rather than attacked.) Russia might see it differently and see USA UK alliance against these countries as going too far when the countries are actually attacked proactively like this, rather than USA waiting for Israel to be all-out attacked. So Russia does not join in but helps the nations being attacked. Therefore the Neocons use sanctions and military supply and go all out in support of Ukraine against Russia, trying to do all they can to attack Russia too while stopping short of nuclear war. Russia cannot risk nuclear war either, so it too uses its non-nuclear options in all out opposition. That includes diplomatic options and economic ones such as BRICS. Russia is proving successful and USA unsuccessful, so USA, to continue to guarantee security to Israel now that other options are exhausted and nuclear options are unacceptable, must try to win over Russia. I think USA might first have to denounce its aggressive approach, its approach of attacking before waiting for Israel to be attacked, and repent of its past invasions. If this is too demeaning for it, the nuclear alternative might look attractive to USA and Neocons instead. The eagle is overhead.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@thomasbaader6629 it is for itself. Depends how you regard these poles. I think they are more generic, going back before the reserve currency, to the thinking of the post-war world, when the institutions such as UN, ISO, World Bank, IMF were formed. It had USA as a conceptual pole but also Soviet Union and UK, France and China, even Switzerland. The dollar become a definition of it later, in my opinion. It was originally about other things too such as who defined international laws and policed them (not necessarily USA). Russia and China had influence. Later USA became more insistent on everything revolving around it, hence “pole”. This was at consent of UK, backed by UK. There was the two eyes agreement, secret for decades. UK would side with USA in letting USA be a pole, to keep that power away from Soviet Union.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@moosaanwar7919 I absolutely agree. The world needs to adjust to first the end of the British Empire and increasingly to a demise of American hegemony. Britain needs to adjust of course too, and it is adjusting, but awkwardly. Multipolarity is a nice model to work towards, with Britain and USA not so dominant in global institutions but China overtaking and Russia on a par with China, so, yes, a fair world order, where arrogant terms like “the free world” become a thing of the past. China needs to advance its legislation to meet the demands of leadership. Yet God knows, what He calls ‘sin’, shameful failings of the recent past, Israel’s dire situation with Palestine and its falling short Oslo Accords, and NATO’s shameful betrayal of first Soviet then Russian trust with eastward expansion, these sins need to be answered, dealt with, punished, cleansed. I have no idea how that is to be done, but it must be done. I am apprehensive of Iran’s stirrings and how it will fit into this fair world order, God permitting. It looks to be becoming a piece in a range of nations coming together in an alarming way at an alarming rate. My vision is for every nation to be independent enough of others that each can practically police the others in case some do atrocious things and need to be stopped. Accords and Treaties like Oslo and NATO could jeopardise this freedom to act. Even with China and Russia they need to preserve autonomy to police each other, a bit like USA, Britain and Soviet Union did after WW2.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
A mother can claim benefits or live off her husband.
The government rewards mothers for being mothers only if they avoid benefits.
The irony: the reward is similar to benefits, but disqualified by benefits.
In simplified first order logic: ∀x (Mother(x) → (∃y Benefit(y) ∧ receivesBenefit(x, y)) ∨ (∃h Husband(h) ∧ livesOff(x, h)))
∀x (Mother(x) ∧ ¬∃y receivesBenefit(x, y) → isEligibleForReward(x))
∀x (isEligibleForReward(x) → ∃r (Reward(r) ∧ receivesReward(x, r) ∧ rewards(Government, x)))
∀r ∀b (Reward(r) ∧ Benefit(b) ∧ similarTo(r, b) → isIronic(r))
In description logic model of the irony using SWRL: receivesReward(?m, ?r) ^ similarTo(?r, ?b) ^ not(receivesBenefit(?m, ?b)) → ironicPolicy(Government)
Explanation: This logic captures a policy irony in which mothers are either supported by government benefits or by their husbands. However, the government only rewards mothers who do not receive benefits—effectively favoring dependency on a husband over state support. Paradoxically, the reward granted to these mothers is functionally similar to the very benefits they are denied. The formal logic expresses that while a mother may be eligible for a government reward if she avoids benefits, this reward is disqualified by the presence of those same benefits. Since the reward resembles what it excludes, the situation becomes ironic—highlighted in both first-order logic and a description logic rule that infers the government’s policy itself is ironic when it withholds a benefit-like reward due to the receipt of actual benefits.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The Ukraine problem goes back to the nineties. According to Chat GPT 3, trained only up until September 2021.”… the NATO-Ukraine Commission, which was established in 1997, has not increased the need for surveillance in the West, destabilized the region, or made nuclear war more likely. The commission was established to strengthen cooperation and dialogue between NATO and Ukraine, and to support Ukraine's efforts to reform and modernize its defense and security sector.
The NATO-Ukraine Commission has focused primarily on non-military cooperation, such as promoting democratic reforms, supporting economic development, and strengthening civil society in Ukraine. While the commission has also provided military support to Ukraine, this support has been focused on defensive capabilities and has not been intended to escalate the conflict or increase the risk of nuclear war.
In addition, the NATO alliance has a defensive posture and is not seeking to provoke or threaten Russia. NATO's goal is to deter potential adversaries from aggression against its member states and to promote stability and security in the Euro-Atlantic region through dialogue, cooperation, and partnership.
Overall, while the conflict in Ukraine has heightened tensions between Russia and the West, the NATO-Ukraine Commission has not been a primary driver of these tensions and has not contributed to destabilizing the region or making nuclear war more likely.”
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@adelaidesafoa3850 Think how many super-powerful countries and huge populations would have wanted to do that through history. None could do it. If the UK population wanted to do it, they just had a big opportunity and did nothing to take it. Only once in British 1000 year history of monarchy did it ever happen and it required a massive civil war. Arguably Russia and Germany and France managed to end their respective Charlemagne monarchies at the cost of peace for centuries - a reign of terror for France, WW1 and Russian Revolution and WW2 for the rest of Europe and the world. It is not a likely prospect to end a thousand year monarchy going back to Charlemagne. India would have loved to end the British monarchy and barely managed to end the Raj (arguably they did not end it but UK ended it). Germany would have loved to end it during WW2. Even China might have dreamed of ending it during the Opium Wars. It is a huge inertia possibly the strongest inertia in the world in world history. Yes, Brexit succeeded getting UK out of EU but getting Charlemagne out of UK would destroy UK I imagine. Having said that, yes, Barbados did recently manage: A tiny country whose history is stained indelibly with British abuses such as industrialising slavery there, so Britain owed it the honour of being allowed to lose the monarchy but Barbados might have to go the USA for some aspects of governance and defence now, instead, which could be arguably a greater predicament. I am not a monarchist, slightly a republican really deep down, and I feel like Charlemagne is a nasty system to be a part of, neo-Roman Empire stuff, stuff we tried to get out of with Brexit (in my opinion) but while we have a monarchy I know I have a deep sense of loyalty to it which could even cost me life as it has cost me much of my career. Many in UK and Commonwealth must feel the same, I expect.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
What an asset is Chat GPT. Concerning depleted uranium it explains how an alpha emitter like DA can cause a gamma spike. “Yes, under certain circumstances, an alpha emitter can cause the emission of gamma radiation. Alpha particles are composed of two protons and two neutrons and have a positive charge. They are relatively large and do not penetrate matter very far. However, when an alpha particle interacts with certain materials, such as heavy elements or dense mediums, it can undergo a process called alpha capture, where it is absorbed and forms a new, unstable nucleus.
This new nucleus may be in an excited state, and as it transitions to a more stable state, it can release excess energy in the form of gamma radiation. Gamma radiation consists of high-energy photons and is the most energetic type of electromagnetic radiation. So, in the context of an explosion involving an alpha-emitting material, if the alpha particles interact with other elements and undergo alpha capture, it is possible for gamma radiation to be emitted as a result of the subsequent nuclear processes.”
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
A Christmas Carol worded by ChatGPT
In December's embrace, with red blotches we grace,
On plates and on trees, a tale we embrace.
Centuries ago, a different scene was displayed,
Sacrifices to idols, in blood, were arrayed.
But apostles proclaimed a message divine,
Abandon the feasts, to the One God incline.
Jesus, the sacrifice, on the cross was laid,
Purification achieved, in His resurrection displayed.
Gone are the idols, to obedience we yield,
The Father in heaven, our only true shield.
No more flickering blood on household domain,
Now red berries and lights, a festive refrain.
The message of gospel, spreading its wings,
Abandon the gods, let the joyful choir sing.
Believers now gather, with wine red as wine,
Broken bread, a symbol, of a love so divine.
The household of God, a sanctuary so grand,
A jealous God's love, throughout the land.
Misdeeds forgiven, by the cross' sacrifice,
Teaching Christ's law, leading to eternal life.
No more feasts for gods, a new era we see,
The sacrifice of Christ, sets our spirits free.
Red wine, broken bread, symbols profound,
In the household of God, eternal life is found.
Resurrection's promise, for those who believe,
Eternal fellowship, with God we achieve.
The One True God, the Father above,
Guiding us with principles, rooted in love.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Sorry, one more quote of Chat GPT: “If a huge explosion were to occur in an area where there were previously missile silos or other facilities associated with nuclear weapons, there could potentially be radioactive hazards depending on the circumstances. Here are a few factors to consider:
Contamination from previous operations: If the area had been used for the storage, handling, or maintenance of nuclear weapons or radioactive materials in the past, there might be residual contamination in the environment. This contamination could include radioactive particles or substances.
Destruction of radioactive materials: If the explosion directly affected or damaged nuclear weapons, warheads, or other radioactive materials that were present in the area, there is a possibility that these materials could be released into the environment. This could lead to the dispersal of radioactive particles and contamination of the surrounding area.
Dispersion of radioactive materials: The nature and extent of the dispersion of radioactive materials would depend on various factors, such as the type and quantity of radioactive substances involved, the proximity to the explosion, the weather conditions, and the structural integrity of the facilities. If radioactive materials were released and dispersed, they could pose a potential hazard.
In the event of such an explosion, it would be crucial to conduct a thorough assessment of the situation, including monitoring for radiation levels and contamination. Specialized teams equipped with radiation detectors and monitoring equipment would be deployed to assess the potential radioactive hazards and implement appropriate measures to protect the public and mitigate further risks.
It is important to note that without specific details about the explosion, the specific materials involved, and the conditions of the site, it is challenging to provide a definitive assessment of the radioactive hazards. It would be advisable to rely on official sources, local authorities, and experts with access to real-time information for accurate and up-to-date assessments in such situations.”
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Instead of talking about Ukraine without Ukraine, the West should indeed be talking - and talking not just with each other but with Putin too - about NATO. At the moment NATO's continuation is being perpetuated by the SMO. NATO with all its expansionism and imperialism, like its predecessor the Roman Army. Now it needs to find an off ramp to all that. Putin needs to be involved. If NATO wound down and accepted it is creating an increasingly dystopian future, the Ukraine SMO would force it to keep doing as it is doing because it sees a need to exist as protection for Europe and the West. If we all saw the SMO for what it really is, what it was always supposed to be, a forceful intervention by Russia to end the assaults on Donbass, like a police raid on a big scale, we would all need to get real, get sane, and say, let Russia do what it needs to do to end the oppression of Russians living in Donbass. This means NATO should pull back and be allowed to do so by Russia with some kind of MOU that Russia will not go beyond that mission. Putin would need to be party to such a change of approach by the West. But this is a way alien to the West, a peace-focussed way. NATO does not have this in its runbook. Maybe. If it goes towards peace it might lose its mandate to exist. As as Brexiteer, though, I would say 'Amen' to that.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@VladK-1 Chat GPT also said: Total mobilization is a state in which a country's entire population and resources are dedicated to the war effort. However, not everyone in a country's population would necessarily become a combatant in the event of total mobilization.
Combatants are defined as individuals who directly participate in hostilities, such as soldiers and guerrilla fighters. Civilians, on the other hand, are defined as individuals who are not taking direct part in hostilities. Therefore, even in the event of total mobilization, civilians who are not actively participating in the war effort, such as children, the elderly, and non-combatant personnel, would still be considered non-combatants and would be protected under international humanitarian law.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Advocacy plays a vital role in promoting fair treatment and recognition for open standards contributors. By open standards, I mean things like HTML itself, formats of documents such as invoices, things like Word format and the open source alternatives like ODF. By raising awareness of their contributions and advocating for policies and practices that support their work, we can help ensure that their efforts are valued, respected, and duly compensated within the digital ecosystem.
We continue to rely on open standards to drive innovation and progress in the digital era, it's imperative that we recognize and protect the contributions of those who dedicate their time and expertise to shaping the standards that govern our digital infrastructure. By affording similar protections to open standards contributors as those enjoyed by artists in the music industry, we can foster a culture of appreciation, support, and respect that benefits the entire digital ecosystem. People should work together to ensure that the contributions of open standards contributors are valued, protected, and celebrated now and in the future. Looking at the support photographers and music artists get, the same should apply to technology designers behind things like the Web itself.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
What an asset is Chat GPT. Concerning depleted uranium it explains how an alpha emitter like DA can cause a gamma spike. “Yes, under certain circumstances, an alpha emitter can cause the emission of gamma radiation. Alpha particles are composed of two protons and two neutrons and have a positive charge. They are relatively large and do not penetrate matter very far. However, when an alpha particle interacts with certain materials, such as heavy elements or dense mediums, it can undergo a process called alpha capture, where it is absorbed and forms a new, unstable nucleus.
This new nucleus may be in an excited state, and as it transitions to a more stable state, it can release excess energy in the form of gamma radiation. Gamma radiation consists of high-energy photons and is the most energetic type of electromagnetic radiation. So, in the context of an explosion involving an alpha-emitting material, if the alpha particles interact with other elements and undergo alpha capture, it is possible for gamma radiation to be emitted as a result of the subsequent nuclear processes.”
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@inwardstream Augustine's writings, especially on original sin, predestination, and grace, are often seen as problematic or overly rigid by many Eastern theologians. To my mind he went beyond the teachings of Christ. Running ahead like this, you lose the fellowship of the Father and the Son. So I personally find it a danger to faith to follow his teachings. As baptised into Christ, we must hold to and prefer the teachings of Christ, which to my mind he contradicted. If Orthodox, Catholics, and Protestants want to venerate him, it is up to them. I find him problematic.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1