Comments by "PM" (@pm71241) on "This is the PROOF Climate Crisis is Man Made (Pt.1) | Michael Mann | ENVIRONMENT | Rubin Report" video.

  1. +PasOdMater "there are actually two sides in this anti-regressive movement. " Exactly ... For secular liberals to reject the regressive tendencies of the rest of the left, should not send us in bed with the anti-science conservatives. ... even though we might agree about that SJW and the regressive left are a problem.
    12
  2. PengyGoy: Here's some advice: Spend less time writing Youtube comments, more time reading the science and understanding how it works. There's just as little doubt about that humans are the cause of th current climate change as there is about whether evolution created the species. - and the information is readily available on the net if you have an honest interest in understanding.
    3
  3. +chefaopt Your argument would be so much more convincing if you didn't blatantly lie and claim your opponent "can only parrot "muh 97%" The IPCC has published 5 big reports filled with summery of scientific arguments. You chose to ignore it and strawman your opponent by claiming they can only "parrot 97%" ... You're a blatantly dishonest debater.
    3
  4. * sigh * http://ipcc.ch/report/ar5/ ... the ignorance... it hurts.
    3
  5. +chefaopt I addressed your ridiculous claim that there was no other argument than "97%". Nothing else. Regarding sea ice extend. Yeah, the Antartic sea ice expanded for a period. But not enough to make up for the loss of sea ice in the Arctic. Anyway... that's history now and your talking-point is obsolete. https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2017/sea-ice-extent-sinks-to-record-lows-at-both-poles And I don't think you would be wise to challenge whether I've read or understand the issue... that would be stupid. ""How does a change of 0,01% of the Earth's atmosphere composition be the sole or even the main culprit for the Earth warming?"" Appeal to emotion about small numbers. Try walk into a room with 300ppm HCN and spend a few minutes there arguing that small concentrations of gasses can't have an effect.
    2
  6. " How come I'm ridiculed and called a heretic for asking these questions specially after the 97% has been debunked?" For the exact same reason as people like Ken Ham and Kent Hovind are ridiculed for postulating nonsense and pulling straw men wrt. other fields of science. Some times people are just so deep in denial that they are absolutely immune to any rational arguments. It's not surprising that many people confronted with such dogmatic behavior just gives up explaining and leave it at the fact that there's almost unanimous consent between climate scientists that a) The Earth is warmning, b) It's due to man made increases in green house gasses, and c) It's very dangerous. "How come the climate has been warming way slowly since 98 yet the CO2 emissions kept increasing at pretty much the same rate? " Inertia, Internal variation, go look it up. ... and the climate has not been warning "slowly" the last 3 years.
    2
  7. +ThePaulCynic "Wait, Mann is responsible for..." Wait ... WTF... this nonsense again ????!!! When will humanity grow up ?
    1
  8. Dave ... I'm so glad you did this - after having two climate science deniers on.
    1
  9. Dave... you should have Bob Inglis on.
    1