Comments by "PM" (@pm71241) on "Fox News" channel.

  1. HA! ... So, we're going to hold people doing cover-up's about COVID-19 responsible, are we? ...Sure you want to promote that idea?
    19
  2. Surreal ... Even while claiming she would not lie, she lies.
    18
  3. As someone who have followed the science for decades now... It's really sad to see a major media-house propagate so misleading information as this. Patrick Michaels is grossly misrepresenting the science.
    8
  4. The dishonesty from Graham and Hannity... it's really appalling.
    6
  5. Are you thinking of the bribery or the emoluments? ... or the tax fraud? Or the violation of campaign financing laws?
    4
  6. If you want to do your best to make peoples lives better Charles, ... then pay for fixing the harm you've done to the climate by working to delaying action. Then maybe our grand children can foregive you.
    3
  7. Pence is impressively thorough in his lying.
    3
  8. Actually we're not. The way Republicans are willing to fabricate an alternate reality and claim up is down is immoral and appalling and threatening the future of the entire free world. This is not in any way funny.
    3
  9. Pence is a liar. Just like his boss. America is no longer a beacon for the free world. It's can't be when ruled by fact-free ideology.
    2
  10. +Alan Hartstein yep
    2
  11. The whole system (including all the GOP voter suppression) spells "banana republic".
    2
  12. DokktorDeth  - so, given all this "credibility" on the behalf of Kavanaugh... why did he feel the urge to fabricate stories about drinking games and farts? ... and more importantly, why didn't he just say that he would wish for an FBI investigation?
    2
  13. DokktorDeth  Ok... I don't get what was drivel. Anyhow ... I had the same feeling. Dershowitz must have watched a different hearing. Come on ... the repeated refusals to say whether he would request for an FBI investigation, - instead answering with attacks and questions back at the senators, going into tirades about how unfairly he felt - coupled with the strange answers to Sen. Whitehouse about "devils triangle" being a "drinking game" and "boof" being farts. ... not to mention the idea that you get to be president of the "Ralph" club for having a "weak stomach" (how many members with weak stomach did that club have?) ... and I almost forgot, that everybody in the "republican side" seemed to totally ignore the fact that Dr. Ford started this BEFORE he was nominated. None of the conspiracy theory makes sense, yet he started out with a tirade about them being bitter on behalf the Clintons. Are we really supposed to believe that Dr. Ford started planning this in 2012 to derail a nomination 6 years later? I call BS. I'm perfectly prepared to believe that "sober Brett" is a different man now don't feel responsible for or remembers what "drunk Brett" did, but some people just switch personality when they are drunk and I'm not going to buy the shameless partisan lying which has plagued this nomination to conceal any problem in his past.
    2
  14. Yeah... Lindsey... Muller spend a lot of time investigating the crimes Trump had commited BEFORE he finished his report. ... then Trump went out and committed ANOTHER crime the DAY AFTER Muller had testified. You got a weird idea of law enforcement if you think the time Muller took makes it ok to commit more crimes.
    2
  15. Ha ... A Devin Nunes aid. ... making popcorn.
    2
  16. It's strange how republicans think that if you just say "I'm not doing anything wrong" while committing a crime, then you are automatically innocent.
    2
  17. It's not hard to figure out why there's a difference. The difference is abuse of the office. Neither Hunter Biden or Joe Biden abused the office. Trump did. And no... it's not the phone call. It's also the overwhelming evidence from witnesses.
    2
  18. "If you disagree with the president's policies, run for president" That's good advice. Except... of course. George Conway should not take this advice. I would not want Kellyanne as first lady.
    2
  19. So... what is "the other side of this story"???? I didn't hear a single argument that Trump didn't extort a foreign government with US tax payer money for personal gains.
    2
  20.  @paul.vulcon  ok... yes... I wouldn't have been surprised if Devin Nunes had mentioned Benghazi at the hearing either.
    2
  21. I'll happily believe Broaddrick ... but this absurd idea of Bill's daughter being responsible for his actions... that calls her sanity at present time into question.
    2
  22. Except ... Why did Turley not say anything about that the REASON there's not the evidence he wanted is because of blatant obstruction of Congress from the president.
    2
  23.  @asregdor3386  Yeah ... There's is no defense of the substance. There's only whining about the process. And even that is silly. The trial is in the Senate. This is not the trial. This is the investigation. Nobody gets to dictate the terms of their own investigation.
    2
  24.  @diggocombs4548  I don't know Sregor.
    2
  25. Hearsay can be good evidence, depending on circumstances. That should not be controversial. What should be controversial, though is the claim of the host that you are not a first hand witness to a conversation which you can clearly hear in it's entirety, just because you are not the one having the conversation. It seems to me many people here have already decided which conclusion they want to arrive at, and that prevents them for accepting fact, understanding arguments and general objectivity.
    2
  26.  @chitarra0302  I'll be happy to answer serious questions.
    2
  27. No ... but then... it's a good thing I don't do my own conclusions here. That's what we have the actual scientists for. All I can say here is that I'm pretty sure that if there had been an actual climate scientist in the studio they would have taken serious issue with the claims Patrick Michaels is making.
    2
  28. Strange how all this Trump people become "shady" as soon as they get indicted.
    2
  29. It's really pretty simple. The founders worried about foreign influence, so they explicitly put in the constitution that a president could (and should) be removed if he abused the office, by taking something of value from a foreign power in exchange for official acts. In this case the president actually pressured the foreign power in question into this bribe at the expense of US national security. Anyone thinking that is a trivial thing should stop lecturing others about the constitution and patriotism now.
    2
  30. ... there's some really scary answers in this thread. How long is it now, since Trump said this was totally under control? That people got better just going to work?
    2
  31.  @GaryWilson-dm6ub  ... oh... maybe... stop lying, would be a good start.
    2
  32. Tucker Carlson is really a jerk ... Even O'Reilly was not that dishonest. It's nice Avanatti stands up to him, but ... I don't think the way he does it really raise the level of the conversation that much. Avanatti is right that the Democrats should nominate a fighter, but they way his own way of "fighting" does somewhat contribute to the name calling. He should have started out by pointing out the absurdity that the Federal government shouldn't be allowed to put surveillance on a suspected spy for the Russians just because he happened to be associated with the Trump campaign. Carter Paige was already long before the 2016 election under suspicion. They were just doing their job.
    2
  33. So ... I can't say much about the actual incident... but there's clearly some bad life choices here: 1) Showing up with a weapon to such a protest, 2) Taking Lin Wood as a lawyer, and 3) Going on Tucker Carlson.
    2
  34. "... an outstanding debater" ? Hey... I have an Eiffel tower I could sell cheap to that girl.
    1
  35. So again... why should we trust Koch over Bernie? Do we have the same goals? ... I want to tackle climate change before it steals the future of my kids. Does Charles Koch share that goal?
    1
  36. Americans are making a huge mistake if they do not elect this man for president. You might disagree with him on a few specific political issues (I do) ... but you won't get a chance to put a politician with that kind of integrity into office in many years.
    1
  37. Fox News created this fact-free obscene environment.
    1
  38. Yeah... Little Marco Low energy Jeb Lyin' Ted Corrked Hillary Crazy Bernie. ... and Chicken Trump
    1
  39. N Mil It seems to me your burp is based on the assumption that energy can only come from chemical oxidation of carbon. Is that your position?
    1
  40. N Mil Dear friend... I live in a country which is well under way with moving to alternatives. Meanwhile ... people like the Kochs (and their useful idiots) are doing what they can to crash the planet anyway.
    1
  41. N Mil Ehh... no thanks... I think you need to come out of your bubble. Many people I know won't even set foot in the US since George W was elected.
    1
  42. N Mil Another bubble. The people I'm talking about are highly educated engineers and IT professionals. Previously taking a few years working for a US company was something people considered. Now - people prefer to stay in Europe.
    1
  43. ... since facts doesn't matter anymore.
    1
  44. Zika is a virus. Toxoplasma is a parasite. I smell calculated appeal to emotions.
    1
  45. Is it really that hard to understand that quid-pro-quo is latin for "bribery" ???? The accusation has been the same all along. ... Nunes is just gaslighting.
    1
  46. Thanks Cavuto. Now we're awating the RubinReport segment on how the right eats it self.
    1
  47. Oh, for f*ck sake... how many of these morally depraved people are there in the US?
    1
  48. Oh come on ... Whatever you think about Holder or Barr as persons or their political view... You cannot ignore that Bill Barr has made SEVERAL statements effectively saying that he does not actually believe in basic principles of liberty and liberal democracy. He basically argues that the President is above the law and he just said that people would not be equal before the law if they didn't "respect" the police.
    1
  49.  @nath8282  It should be no secret to anyone that Barr has argued for a version of executive immunity, which includes that the president can't even be investigated. ... and that Trump's lawyers has in fact argued explicit that in court.
    1
  50. "If I don't like it, we don't take it up". Jesus... anyone who can't see that this principle is seriously flawed in a democracy, don't understand democracy.
    1
  51. DokktorDeth  I read Wymer as if he thinks Dershowitz is ignoring important parts for the hearing which speaks against Kavanaugh. And I agree. So if you also agree, I don't understand your comment.
    1
  52. You are not improving the impression of the "conservative" American mind in the eyes of the outside world with posts like that.
    1
  53. Barfing
    1
  54. By now, - I seriously wouldn't put it past Republicans to try to put this lunatic on the SCOTUS.
    1
  55. I thought ISIS was defeated. ... Oh... it was Trump saying it. ...
    1
  56. Well... he lied his way through that SOTU ...and turned it into a reality show handing out gifts like a Roman Emperor.
    1
  57. ... so ... meanwhile, in the real world...
    1
  58. What a whiner ... SHE BROKE THE F*CKING RULES!
    1
  59. Well ... this is of course absurd... but it's even more absurd, that it's highlighted by someone supporting their president being above the constitution.
    1
  60. So ... Tucker... is "bribery" an impeachable offense?
    1
  61. @PinkEye Sure... using "leverage". But not if what you want to obtain is for your personal benefit. That was EXACTLY why the founders put bribery in the constitution. The office shouldn't be used for personal gains. Actually - even if Trump had asked for this "favor" without extorting the Ukrainians it would be illegal due to campaign laws. It makes a world of difference whether what he demanded was for his personal gain or not. ... and it clearly was.
    1
  62. Quisling
    1
  63. There seem to be a lot of useful idiots in the Republican party these days ... Devin Nunes is not one of them. He's lying consciously.
    1
  64. So - prepare for this just getting worse and worse ... thanks to the Republican party obstructing meaningfull Climate action for decades.
    1
  65. Dear Jeanine ... People don't "hate" the president. They hate that he's a corrupt con-man who only has his own personal interest at heart. He abuse the office for personal gains, threatening national security and the very foundation of the US democracy.
    1
  66. Haha... "Getting along with Russia" ... sure... if you let the US become a Russian style oligarchy and opening it to Russian state organized crime, I'm sure you would "get along" pretty well with Russia. Tucker ... you're so transparent.
    1
  67. Well... The president DID praise the corrupt and he DID intimidate the patriot witness. It's hard to see how Fox can keep spinning this... The issue is not that she was fired. The issue is WHY she was fired and what that laid the ground work for.
    1
  68. "The House of Representatives...shall have the sole Power of Impeachment."  -- Article I, Section 2, Clause 5 At this point it gives me nausea to hear a Republican talk about how much they love the Constitution. BS ... it's never been about the Constitution. It's been about your egos.
    1
  69. So you're putting up conditions for obeying the constitution now? I'm so sick and tired of hearing "conservatives" preach about the constitution. They have no intention of obeying it if they don't like the result.
    1
  70. Oh... so now Americans want to know about history. Did you get to read about the 1930s yet?
    1
  71. What an idiot... that tweet was Jan. 9th. We all got wiser in the weeks after that ... except Trump and his sycophants
    1
  72. Oh shut up Tucker. ... I think these authoritarian antifa folks are idiots too. But I also despise your hypocritical dishonest lying face and Trumpism .
    1
  73. Yeah... he has never badmouth an entire segment of the population ... like... the 54% who don't approve of him. ... but apart from that... sure.
    1
  74. So ... I wonder ... Do Tucker think this smear of him will make Bolton want to spill the beans more or less?
    1
  75. Fox News ... tinfoil hats.
    1
  76. So ... Do Kellyanne really expect us to believe that Trump hadn't done anything suspect before August 1st? Who believes that? ... Certainly not her husband.
    1
  77. I agree ... the acting, disguise and accent of Sacha Baron Cohen are very mediocre ... which makes it even more ridiculous that he managed to fool politicians.
    1
  78. What?! ... you're f*cking insane. How low can the Republican party sink? They seem hell bend on ending the American republic.
    1
  79.  @edgaraponteful  Could you try reformulate that as a sentence?
    1
  80.  @edgaraponteful  ... sorry ... I didn't know sentences was that hard for you to make.
    1
  81. Sure... dirty play seems endemic to US elections. On both sides. Let's not forget that Republican primaries got cancelled in several places this year.
    1
  82.  @TheDantsu  Sure... but don't go around pointing fingers at other people for not being democratic then.
    1
  83.  @TheDantsu  We can discuss whether I was naive when it happens... until then we can just observe that you chose to argue in hypotheticals
    1
  84. ... or ... (says Occams razor) ... maybe it's just because having a lying con-man abusing his office for personal gain is a real danger to the Republic created by the founding fathers.
    1
  85. You're full of BS Gowdy. Your high horse is heavily burdened by the hypocrisy of all those stupid Benghazi hearings. I don't ever want to hear a Republican talk to me about morality again.
    1
  86. Why is Tucker incapable of honesty? ... and strange how Dershowitz is very alarmed by perjury ... but not all perjury.
    1
  87.  @paul.vulcon  That is strictly speaking not true. There are plenty of things you cannot "prove" logically, but I also fail to see what the argument is here. It should tell people a lot that the Republicans are more interested in getting the name of the person who blew the whistle on the crime than actually looking at the evidence for the crime ... and protecting the constitution against exactly the kind of corruption which worried the founding fathers the most: Bribery and Influence of foreign governments.
    1
  88. Actually Sean ... the sycophants who used to preach about the constitution, but now couldn't care less about what the founding fathers intended is what is embarrassing to America.
    1
  89.  @rawpoetfilm  I don't know whether she's bitter. She's right on the substance though. I think it's getting silly that each time someone points out how outrageous Trump has behaved, they are immediately accused of being partisan or the president tweets that they are "Never Trumpers". This is just an absurd argument. If the president actually behaves corrupt and as a threat to democracy, this is exactly how it would look. It should come as no surprise to anyone that the more people learn about such a president the more they come to believe he's a problem. His behavior is what makes people horrified about what he's doing to the future of democracy. You can't have it both ways. You can't demand that only his sycophants are credible if they criticize him and scream about that anyone criticizing him is "biased" against him. ... at some point you HAVE to actually try to relate objectively to the substance.
    1
  90.  Raven X  From what I can see, everything points to that Trump has done explicitly the thing the founders put impeachment in the constitution for: He leveraged the power of his office to solicit a bribe from a foreign power for personal gains - specifically to help him in his election. It doesn't matter that he got caught.
    1
  91.  Raven X  Trumps point-man Amb. Gordon Sondland explicitly said that he was following the presidents orders and that the investigations were a condition for a White House meeting.
    1
  92.  Raven X  Claiming that there's "nothing" is just blatantly denying the facts. Trump even committed an impeachable offense directly on camera by asking China to start investigations of Joe Biden. And even if we gave Trump the benefit of doubt wrt. all the bribes and election interference it's impossible to deny the obstruction of Congress ... but I'm sure you will try.
    1
  93.  Raven X  Which part of "Was there a quid-pro-quo? The answer is yes" is it you don't understand?
    1
  94.  @rawpoetfilm  You should grow up and let facts matter instead of this silly search for excuses.
    1
  95. I hope everyone is aware that he did EXPLICITLY have his lawyers ague in court that even if he actually shot someone on the street he couldn't even be investigated.
    1
  96. Bullshit. Graham is not interested in the factual part of Dr Fords testimony at all. He's just trying to fabricate a story about this being the Democrats plan for a last minute sabotage. ... and that narrative is fully in conflict with Dr. Ford having approach congress long before he was even nominated and have told others already in 2012. Grahams conspiracy theory has the big problem that ANY other nomination would have made this whole thing fall apart. There's a reason nobody came forward with accusations against Gorsuch, but that they came forward for Kavanaugh but Graham want's us to believe that this would have happened regardless of who was nominated. BS...
    1
  97. Well .... if you do something as blatantly corrupt as Trump did, it's hard to not be able to predict the outcome. And those democrats who have already votes for impeachment did it because of other high crimes he has committed. Heck... the emolument issues has been there basically since day 1.
    1
  98. Mitch McConnell ... proud of filling the judicial systems with people deemed unqualified by the bar association.
    1
  99.  colette s  ... taking pride in ignorance, I see.
    1
  100. It's strange though ... if this is a con game... how come nobody accused Gorsuch of sexual assult? .. .Could it be because he was not a heavy drinker when he was younger with a tendency to become sexually agressive when drunk?
    1
  101. Dr. Ford requested an FBI investigation from the moment she went public. HOW! is it "impossible" for you to do ask the WH to re-open the background check? BS. Lindsey... BS!
    1
  102. OMG ... this man is pure evil and totally detached from the facts of the real world. And Fox News is aiding him spread this misinformation!!?
    1
  103. ... and in related news: Nobody expects this will be the last violation of the Constitution Trump makes.
    1
  104. The dishonesty here is incredible ... To claim that (indirectly) hiring a British spy who hates the Russians is "collusion" with the Russians is just silly.
    1
  105. I'd hard to overstate how dishonest this video is.
    1
  106. Jesus! ... how can anyone expect anyone not to have an opinion on the crimes of the president?
    1
  107. "Trump derangement syndrome" is something apologists for the rampant corruption and authoritarianism says to avoid relating to the facts on the ground.
    1
  108. Lindsey is either willfully lying or having a very bad memory. Dr. Ford already described this years before Trump became president, she tried to contact congress before Kavanaugh was nominated and the letter she sent to Feinstein was forwarded to the FBI. However... it needs the republicans and the WH to actually re-open the background investigation. ... and THAT, Kavanaugh refused several times to say he wanted them to.
    1
  109. Other Talk  Jesus! I'm tired of these strawman evasion tactics. Get real. NO! I don't think it's up to the suspects to "decide". But that doesn't mean they can't state their wish for a proper investigation. "And she never named Kavanaugh before he was nominated. She even admitted that she made the allegation in order to change the outcome of the confirmation hearing. These are just facts." No it's not. She specifically said that the took contact to her representative to prevent him from being NOMINATED. You are simply wrong.
    1
  110. She meant to say "Diplomats".
    1
  111. Dear Kellyanne ... THIS IS NOT THE TRIAL. A bit of advice... you have a guy at home who can explain it all to you. PS: It must be some surreal atmosphere in the Conway household.
    1
  112. Hypocrites like Lindsey Graham is a danger to the constitution. The accuser is the f*cking House of Representatives. Trump will get every opportunity to confront them come the Trial. The whistle-blower has ZERO significance now. Everything in the whistle blower complaint has been confirmed, INCLUDING BY TRUMPS OWN FIRST HAND RELEASE OF THE PHONE CALL!
    1
  113. what?!? This is probably the most ridiculous thing I've seen in the whole Kavanaugh circus. OF COURSE Chelsea is not in any way responsible for her fathers actions... and yet, Broaddrick immediately throws herself into a weird guilt-by-association tantrum.
    1
  114. "Permanently tarnish" ? ... Ohh... like .. say... leaving the Climate agreement, enriching himself, constantly lying, Abusing the pardon power? ... should we go on?
    1
  115. Yeah... right... why haven't anyone taken this to law enforcement? ... Oh wait... the GOP senate and the WH doesn't want FBI involved.
    1
  116. No one is against finding out about government waste. People are against being filled with BS to distract from Musk financing tax breaks for his oligarch friends. ... Like when he posted about 120+ yo people getting social security and it was pure BS and based on a misunderstanding of the COBOL code.
    1
  117. So - Assuming Hannity is right that Sondland was the only "fact witness". He actually DID say that "yes" - there was a quid-pro-quo. He also quoted the president denying it... BUT that conversation was made AFTER Trump got caught.
    1
  118. Quisling
    1
  119. I'm Danish ... and this discussion is just ridiculous. First of all. Denmark is not a "socialist" country. It's a market economy with a welfare system which is a result of 100 years various conservative/liberal and social democrat governments. "Social Democrat" is NOT the same as socialism. Secondly ... Bernie might call himself "Democratic Socialist", but none of his proposals are actual socialist. Most of them are ordinary social democrat policies you'd find in any Scandinavian market economy (be it Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Iceland, Finland...) I'm not a social democrat and I'm not sure I agree with all of Bernies proposals, but equating him with Venezuela is simply STUPID.
    1
  120. These guys yelling at each other doesn't mean anything. What's important is that Trump has an agenda to abolish western democracy and install himself as a King the same way as Putin ... they are orchestrating a return to feudalism. All their fancy talk about democracy, free speech and the constitution doesn't mean anything. Watch what they do. He's explicitly declaring himself above the law and siding with dictators over democracies. You don't get many more chances to wake up ... And PS: China will be the one benefiting most by Trump abandoning it's allies and siding with the autocracies. If Europe can't trust the US the strong alliance against China is gone.
    1
  121. I certainly hope also Fox News viewers are capable of seeing past any verbal variations and seeing this for what it is. It's illegal for Trump to solicit aid from a foreign government ... regardless of whether he made it an exchange of favors. So, whether or not it was a "quid-pro-quo" doesn't really matter. This the nature of what he wanted which is illegal. That said... it was a "this-for-that"... in fact, it was soliciting a *bribe*: An extortion. This is as clearly impeachable as anything you could imagine: Treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors.
    1
  122.  @robertkleiman  Huh? This just makes no sense. There's no bilateral rules of diplomacy addressing this. It's probably very frowned upon in diplomatic circles (as witnessed by the Ukranians explicitly saying to Amb. Taylor that they wouldn't want to be involved in US elections), but it's really completely irrelevant. A "treaty" with the Ukrainians (which I would btw. encourage you to link to) couldn't supersede US law or the US constitution. Soliciting a favor for help in a US election from a foreign government is illegal AND the constitution explicitly forbids bribery and makes it an impeachable offense. Trump simply cannot use the power of the office for personal political campaign purposes. Especially not by extorting a foreign government tax payer funds allocated for national security purposes.
    1
  123.  @robertkleiman  > "The president has been talking about corruption since the day he ran for president " ... I think "talking" is the operative word here. Trump moved administration corruption into overdrive. Blatantly violating the emoluments clauses and nominating the most corrupt people ever. Just take Scott Pruitt ... Trump IS corruption. He runs the administration like a mob family. And - I have to repeat - NO treaty puts the constitution out of effect. You CANNOT use your office for personal gains by bribery and extortion. It doesn't matter which bilateral agreements you have. The office of the president is NOT at tool to be used in political campaigns by the president and soliciting a foreign power to manufacture dirt on your opponent is still a crime. Doing it by extortion at the expense of national security is clearly impeachable: Bribery is right there explicitly named. How can you think a bilateral agreement with any country would put the president above the law?
    1
  124.  @robertkleiman  > "if the president had violated the emolument clause dont you think it would be easier to impeach him on that " Maybe. Maybe not...I doubt it. Financial legal issues are hardly easier to explain, than a clear corrupt bribe. But how is that an argument?!? > "Actually all that shows is that you know nothing about the things your speaking about . " And how is THAT an argument??????? Even the Republicans objected to the Doral thing. You don't have to be a genius to see why military planes are being redirected to airports in Ireland next to Trumps properties. He's milking the presidency for private financial purposes and hasn't (unlike all other presidents) disassociated himself with his businesses. Heck... he even said explicitly the other day that he still considers himself to be in the Hotel business. And so what if what I say is not "original" !?. HOW is that an argument? Are you really saying you are only prepared to listen to reason if it's just a single person able to see it? This is not rocket science you know ... A LOT of people are able to see through this con man.
    1
  125.  @robertkleiman  ... so much wrong here. Let's just point out that if your business is running with a deficit, even selling you stuff "at cost" is an infusion of cash. It's simple economics. He's not allowed to direct business to his properties - even "at cost". Secondly... Please tell me that you are aware that when Joe Biden told the Ukrainians they had to fire the prosecutor, the prosecutor HAD STOPPED the investigation into Burisma. If there was any effect of Joe Bidens actions it would be to fire the guy who had SHELVED the investigation into the company his son was on the board of. How can that be corruption? Why is this so complicated? It's facts... go look it up.
    1
  126. Sycophants ... Is it so hard to grasp that Russia just want to undermine democracy? And no! Your cult leader was in no way exonerated. In fact Mueller explicitly said he COULD NOT do that.
    1
  127. What a blowhard. First complain about the process is unfair because the president can't defend himself (which is wrong)... and then when it's offered and the president denies doing it, complain about the offer was made. Idiot.
    1
  128. I'm 100% with Bill Maher ... but gee ... I also recall these people on Fox being all in for Trump ... which makes me have little confidence in their integrity. And NO! ... he's not taking "the things you said" and "dragging your common sense" into anything. He's being rational... something you guys only pretend to be when it suites you. His line of argumentation didn't originate with you ... and you are usually not the proponents of common sense. Jesus...
    1
  129. The intellectual dishonesty in this walkaway thing is astonishing. If you believe in liberal democracy, you don't suddenly become a Trumpist just because you witness some SJW idiocy.
    1
  130. Eh? ... maybe because you've never told anyone what the questions were?
    1
  131. @Erika Erikson There was a lot in the above thread. Which specific thing are you requesting a source for?
    1
  132. What a despicable little weasel.
    1
  133. What Strzok did was stupid, but somehow even Dershowitz fails to see the difference between personal political opinions and actual bias in his work. Sure, he should be removed - as Mueller did - for the appearance of bias alone. But saying that you automatically have bias in your work if you have a political opinion is just stupid.
    1
  134. I think it's a good thing for the Republicans in that committee that they are not under oath.
    1
  135. One thing is to become independent, but having seen how the Republicans have behaved without any moral integrity what so ever, it's pretty impressive that someone would want to seek out the party.
    1
  136. How stupid do Nunes thing we are?
    1
  137. Quisling
    1
  138. Why would Jim Jordan think it makes a difference whether the Ukrainians know that also the aid was held up until the 29th of August?? It's a fact that Zelensky actually caved after that and planned to do what Trump demanded in an interview with Fareed Zakaria on Sep. 13th. That it didn't happen is only because the aid was released 2 days after the plot became public. Failing to rob a bank doesn't make you innocent of bank robbery.
    1
  139. So ... if Mike Lee agree with Turley that this is "rushed" ... maybe he will stand up and DEMAND that Trump complies with subpoenas to allow the relevant witnesses to testify and hand over documents OR be impeached for obstruction of Congress???? Will he?
    1
  140.  @cw3598  ... Yeah... before they knew "individual 1".
    1
  141. Wow... a shitty argument. How does the president testifying constitute an imbalance between the branches?!?! Didn't they impeach Clinton for something he said during a testimony? The Republicans are soaked in hypocrisy.
    1
  142. Hate to break it to you Tucker ... but they are right. You're on the wrong side of history. ... and btw... seemingly incapable of being honest in just a single sentence. ... THAT's the reason it's impossible for you to have a normal conversation.
    1
  143. Having watched US politics for over a decade and having followed it very close the last 2 years ... if I were an American, I wouldn't trust the Supreme Court at all after this, if he's confirmed. Trump has broken the presidency. Contrary to what Trump claims, respect for the US in Europe is nose diving. Mitch McConnell have broken the senate and together they have now broken the SCOTUS. Btw... the person who it was claimed Ford helped with the polygraph has denied the story. It's actually appalling anyone would accuse her of deliberately lying. A lot of Americans need to look themselves deep in the mirror and decide whether they have any respect for morality.
    1
  144. There's nothing I'd like better than be able to mind my own business. ... but unfortunately, whether we like it or not, what happens in the US affects the whole planet and the future of every child. It's not a small thing that the worlds largest economy is led by a Climate Science Denier who thinks it's all a hoax perpetrated by the Chinese. And PS: ... you don't really have any basis for knowing what my attitude to islam is, do you?
    1
  145. Wrt... those "4 facts which will never change". ... the issue is though: Those are either not the relevant facts, lies, or a daring bet that no one will flip and admit what is otherwise obvious.
    1
  146. The only threat to American Democracy is the wanna-be autocrat in the WH and the fact-free sycophant covering for his corruption.
    1
  147. It's hopeless... people in this personality cult are completely delusional. ... if only the virus didn't have collateral damage, let them harvest as they sow.
    1
  148.  Regina Phalange  Hmm... I didn't show up with a weapon. I'm alive. Also... I wonder whether flaunting such a huge weapon was a part of what made people view him as a threat and chase him with weapons. (bear in mind, the other idiots showing up with guns were also idiots) ... seems like a non-sequitur to me.
    1
  149.  Regina Phalange  yep .... a good way to ensure not being the one dead.
    1
  150. So many dangerously stupid people ...
    1
  151. The collapse of the US Senate ... yeah... you can thank McConnell for that.
    1
  152. Hannity is just plain lying about Bidens history. The entire western world wanted that prosecutor fired, BECAUSE HE DIDN'T investigate corruption. Specifically the case against Burisma had been shelved. If anything Biden relaying international policy to the Ukrainians would result in NOT protecting Burisma.
    1