Youtube comments of Ad Ici De (@adicide9070).
-
33
-
14
-
12
-
10
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
to me it's a shame it's curly braces across the board with some minor, if notable exceptions. these new languages like Gleam, this one, and more could really do more to move things along here. Kudos to Scala 3 for making a move towards a quieter syntax. see, while it's a cliche, almost, to say, syntax does not matter, it absolutely does. it's what your eyes see, so the quieter it is, in general, the less noise it has, the better, imo.
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@seanlestermiranda sure hope they improve the generics that it took them +10 years to get into the language ;) look, dude, there's slow, and then there's being authoritarian and backwards. And I'm saying this even as I like Go, with all of its quirks and stupid shit (hello, nil). They need to improve a lot of shit for real instead of trying to make it seem like they're doing it while maintaining things as they are. Improve generics, for one, because they seem to be designed to be impotent (impossible to put on receivers, func types, and more). Come on, now.
So, of course, we're looking at Rust as a proper language. And if there's something else that takes Go's strengths (simplicity, fast compile time) and runs with it with better syntax/semantics, I say BRING IT.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1