Comments by "Digital Nomad" (@digitalnomad9985) on "" video.

@Witty..UserName "I can't find "law abiding" anywhere in mine." 14th amendment section 1: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." So some of your rights are suspended while you are under arrest or incarcerated and if convicted of a felony, you can lose some (right to vote, right to keep guns). But I don't think that is the focus of her complaint. To many of the Soros type DA's and state attorneys general are inverting enforcement to facilitate the career criminal and target the responsible citizen.
4
@Witty..UserName "The person fresh out of prison can exercise all their other rights but not the 2nd? " No. If convicted of a felony they can't vote, either, going forward in some states. The "without due process" clause states the exception explicitly, that is the exception where a person can lose his rights. "There is a difference between people" The government trying to place itself as a routine judge of that sort of difference would undermine the whole concept of the rule of law. Basically, that is the leftist government officials' motive for treating conservatives differently from leftist. "The leftist's crime was in a good cause, he is the good guy so I say the law doesn't apply to him."
1
@AmigaWolf "i am not a citizen, i am a individual, i don't live in a society, i live as an individual amongst other individuals, and i am absolutely not a subject." Then an argument about laws doesn't apply to you.
1
@AmigaWolf "Natural law" has no legal force. You have changed the ground of what was a legal argument to a moral one.
1
@Witty..UserName "is for denial of life, liberty, & property... NOT Rights. " So, you assert, contrary to all the founding documents that life, liberty, and property are not rights?
1
@AmigaWolf "Illegality and legality are the constructs of the mind." Law is the practical basis of society. You assert that it is immoral to remove someones rights on the basis of his past behavior. This is not a moral principle or a moral theorem. It is not "natural law" in any generally or historically recognized sense.
1