Comments by "Digital Nomad" (@digitalnomad9985) on "Candace Owens Vs The Daily Wire - Andrew Klavan" video.

@calatianupriser "Nick Fuentes. Nobody has been maligned as much as him, he at least deserves a chance to defend himself, does he not?" No, not every villain has a right to equal time on decent folk's shows. He wouldn't extend the courtesy to us. He shouldn't be censored so long as he doesn't say something illegal, but he doesn't have an inalienable right to have the run of everybody else's show. He has his own forum, listen to him there. Conservatives don't have to give equal time. Conservatives ARE equal time. Leftists have a field day accusing US of being the groypers. We don't need to support that narrative.
2
Using "Christ is King" as an antisemitic trope is equivocation. How groypers are trying to use the phrase is the equivalent of how the left used "Black Lives Matter". True, but the baggage you're carrying with it is a lie. You know what you're doing and will answer for it on the day of judgement unless you repent.
1
"Honestly"? There is nothing honest about your take on this. You groypers filibuster and spam the comment section of every DW vid no matter what the subject, "Talk about Candice!" Then when he does talk about Candice and blows away your slanderous narrative, it's "You can't talk about Candice." You invent this "gag order" crap to explain why the indefensible hasn't been defended. Hamas are the bad guys, they don't have a cause and if they ever did their terrorism is such that it becomes the primary issue. Candice CAN defend herself if she has a defense. She's been invited on this show to do just that.
1
@ashishkhatri2771 "What about Nick Fuentes? Seems whoever this guy is" Why advocate putting somebody on somebody else's channel if you don't know what he stands for? Find out for yourself what he's about BEFORE you recommend him.
1
@Ilovethepatriarchy "So does saying water is wet also depend on the context?" Of course, everything depends on the context. You know this before you asked. You are deliberately trying to offend, and pleading innocence when offense is taken. It is equivocation in the name of G_d.
1
@jer3887 "Provoking is not antisemitism" There is provoking that is not antisemitism. Provoking OVER JUDISM is antisemitic. Provoking in the name of God because you lost your temper over losing an argument is using the name of God in vain.
1