Comments by "Digital Nomad" (@digitalnomad9985) on "Sky News Australia" channel.

@Enerrah The leftist cries in pain as she strikes you.
11
@patbrown5833 "firstly, the whole ughyur genocide thing is a charade invented by Adrian Zenz" Pictures and all, eh? Neat trick. No, with the MSM, the federal bureaucracy, Hollywood, and the Internet gatekeepers in the tank for China an ANTI-CHINA HOAX wouldn't have a snowballs chance in hell. "it would literally be impossible to run a country with over a billion people without it being authoritarian" Firstly, that doesn't explain how India is becoming more democratic and open even as it begins to pass China in population. Secondly, if China can't avoid being an oppressive hellhole because of its size, that is an excellent reason to break it up, rather than acquiescing to it's acquisitive demands for more territory and more subjects. Ultimately, to those charged with defending China's neighbors in Asia and the Pacific Rim, preventing the CCP from expanding it's hell to engulf their citizens is a more pressing issue than how or why China is oppressive. Communism/socialism is a common thread in totalitarian regimes (not all totalitarians are communist, but all communist governments are totalitarian), not country size. I'm sure you have a different excuse for Cuba, if anyone were foolish enough to listen.
5
@patbrown5833 You haven't made points (arguments) you have simply made diametrically counterfactual statements (assertions). China doesn't even deny the existence of the "reeducation camps" anymore, they just accuse the natives of "terrorism". International rights groups such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have documented the abuses: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/uighurs-accuse-china-mass-detention-torture-landmark-complaint-n1239493 https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/china-uighur-group-oppression-labour-camps-us-sanctions-human-rights-abuse-a9634396.html https://www.codastory.com/authoritarian-tech/china-oppression-uyghurs-history/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackkelly/2020/03/05/china-moves-uyghur-muslims-into-forced-labor-factories/ As for pictures, I was not talking about the standard regional establishing shots you find in any documentary or news story, I was talking about this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEkliuqQo-g https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMkHcZ5IwjU Since you seem to be denying the inhumanly repressive nature of the CCP regime, I will pile on with the organ harvesting from political prisoners: https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2019/11/16/china-covers-up-killing-of-prisoners-to-harvest-organs-for-transplant-new-report/ https://www.businessinsider.com/china-harvesting-organs-of-uighur-muslims-china-tribunal-tells-un-2019-9?op=1 China has territorial disputes with all it's neighbors because China seeks to expand and conquer. There is no comparison between India's democracy and the CCP's kleptocracy that favors the latter objectively. My point that the CCP is oppressive because it is communist, and not because it is big, stands the historical test. And, as I said, to China's neighbors why is not important. China is making no bones about being an existential threat to the whole region. If they're not trying to hide it, why should you? Democracy means the people choose their leaders. That doesn't happen in Cuba at all. There is no democracy in Cuba. Cuba is murderously oppressive, and the Cuban exile community in Florida is all the evidence you need. They risked their lives fleeing Cuba in homemade boats, inner tubes and inverted roofs. You don't do that if your life is fine where you are: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_Cuba https://www.cubacenter.org/articles-and-events/2016/4/27/continued-oppression-of-the-cuban-people https://www.cubacenter.org/ https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/nov/18/political-repression-raul-castro Now, for your future enlightenment, THOSE are POINTS. Arguments, documentation, evidence. Not spouting wild assertions that everybody including yourself knows are false.
3
@BuildBackNormal "I was given no vote on the matter." + Alan Childs "Neither was the US." Indeed in the US, it wasn't even driven by our legislature. As recently as Barack Obama's first presidential run, the definition of marriage as between a man and a woman was a plank in the platform of BOTH major parties. It could be said that at that time that more than 90% of those who voted effectively voted for that. The change came about through a US Supreme Court ruling. To an increasing degree, we in the US face de facto legislation by judges and bureaucrats not answerable to elections. This is an end run around democracy just as corporate censorship is an end run around our First Amendment and the Commonwealth's free speech protections, though in the UK at least, a frontal assault goes with it. Canada appears to be going this way as well.
3
Thanks, Australians for doing the job American's won't do (covering American politics honestly).
3
You groypers contradict yourself. You say that it is the Jewish religion that prompts Jews to hostility and domination plots toward gentiles and Christians and that Zionism is part of the plot, then when you list subversive Jews in places of power you list atheist Jews whose family has never darkened the door of a synagogue, sometimes for generations, and who are more hostile to Israel than you are. You say the Jews are to be blamed because they killed Christ, then you say modern Jews are not descendants of the Old and New Testament Jews. You deny the historical holocaust by way of trying to improve the image of Nazis, then call for a holocaust. If a holocaust is bad, why are you calling for one? If it is not bad, why do you spend so much energy trying to deny the 20th century European one? Not only are each of your claims unsupported and absurd in isolation, they don't even fit together into a consistent lie.
2
@rogergagnon5584 "Kangaroo Court" Such a harsh term. I prefer "marsupial jurisprudence".
2
The Palestinians have repeatedly rejected any peace plan that allows for the existence of Israel in any form. They won't accept a "two state solution".
2
@ra-neter6662 "clearly you respect you're veterans" Discharge papers are not a lifetime BS license.
2
@thelonertarianthelonertari7098 What is this "banning speech" BS? You can't ban speech with an executive order. You might be able to ban it from the Executive branch and government communiques, you can't ban citizens from lying, you are a case in point. It can be illegal to call for violence. Nowhere is it illegal to criticize someone. You don't know an American who went to prison IN AMERICA for posting anti-Jewish memes that weren't calls for violence. I love it when groypers drop the pretense that they are anticommunist.
1
The notion that an ethnicity is a conspiracy is absurd. You Jew haters help the socialists because you play into their narrative. The only effective lie the socialists have nowadays is accusing US of being YOU. If you did not exist, they could not win anything. They would have to invent you in order to have anything to say after their policies and ideology have been so totally discredited historically. In fact, every day in every way groypers support the same things the "cultural Marxists" support, from the centrality of "group identity" through the abolition of the civil rights enumerated in the US Constitution (all of them, without exception) through segregation, to the opposition to the ideal/goal of limited government and freedom itself. This is how you know they are false flag leftists-BECAUSE ALL OF THE THINGS THEY ADVOCATE ARE LEFTIST THINGS. Your man Spencer endorsed Biden/Harris in 20. Nick Fuentes tried to urge Georgia conservatives to stay home and not vote in the runoff elections that handed the Dems the effective majority. You are pulling out all the stops to ensure that conservatives lose, you are doing this OPENLY, and you expect us NOT TO NOTICE? That is why you denigrate EVERY EFFECTIVE CONSERVATIVE VOICE, not just the Jewish ones. Fascist and Marxists (two flavors of socialism) have been playing this game since the 1920s: "If you're not one of us you're one of them". BS. Occasionally they fight each other but most of the time they cooperate against liberty.
1
" if a NATO country fights, then all NATO countries are in." That is NOT what the charter says. It says if a NATO country is ATTACKED, then NATO is in.
1
@ScaredLight "why I plan to move out of America eventually." If I had a nickel for every time I heard that! Japan's loss would be America's gain, so what's in it for THEM? Eventually, indeed; but "Tomorrow never comes."
1
@deelicious8819 "see now this guy is not even Canadian" That is nothing to the point, of course.
1
@lastresort2446 "Why because he upholds the law?" What law? Not the laws against public violence, certainly. Islamists assault with impunity.
1
@colinstewart1432 That is a distinct possibility that has no political significance unless they can gain control of their "authority".
1
@KemetledAfrica "Give this message to Native Americans, take back your country" Native American here. We're doing fine, thanks. Just got to get rid of the illegal immigrants.
1
Congratulations.
1
@patbrown5833 So, your head lives in opposite land.
1
@michaelblakeney1 How would staying in the EU have made the immigration situation any better?
1
I'll still be here.
1
@hondaeownerreviews8608 You guys CAN'T be serious. Name a Hollywood movie that shows Israel in a positive light. Show me a pro-Israel MSM news story. You can't. Hollywood is woke, anti-Israel is woke. Everybody anti-West is anti-Israel. What planet are you from? The MSM narrative is totally anti-Israel. I love it when groypers drop the pretense that they are anti-communist.
1
@khadijasuleman8053 "Whenever it was a Muslim, they said it clearly on the news" Never at all.
1
Who are you talking about?
1
@sergioaguero7113 So, you agree.
1
"The soft racism of lowered expectations"
1
Don't know how it is in Australia. In the US it is mostly the evangelicals who are pro-Israel and Jew friendly, in other words, largely the most serious Christians. I suppose you would call them "proud Christians", except Christians generally regard pride as a vice. You may find this information useful if you happen to be a Jew in a country where you suddenly need a place to hide. It was mostly the evangelicals who hid Jews the last time. Seems like in most countries, in fact, Christian/conservative/pro-Israel tends to be a bundle while secular/leftist/anti-Israel tends to be the other, with exceptions to both, of course.
1
The past is a closed door, and he wasn't that sharp then, either.
1
" America deserves better than that global disaster." As an American, I hope you are right.
1
Lies need to be countered. Good on 'em.
1
@blairmccarthy427 "All the while extinction of living things never to come back" The extinction of living things was happening before people arrived. Or do you men ALL living things, in which case you're a loon. The only thing that could do that in the next million years is a big meteor impact, and soon we will have the means to prevent that.
1
1. Threaten to what? Nobody wants to invade your basket case country. You have nothing worth stealing. 2. Putin is all bombast. 3. The "stronger one's concern" is that he wants to own Ukraine and if Ukraine had ignored it instead of preparing he would by now own it as completely as he owns your sorry ass.
1
@jilliancopeland6825 HE hasn't been convicted of insurrection. In fact, he was tried and acquitted of insurrection by the Senate. You can't invoke the 14th Amendment because Joy Behar accused Trump of insurrection. Insurrection isn't even named in any of the current indictments. So no "Constitutional" ground.
1
@sergioaguero7113 A war in which only one side attacks and the other side only defends is a lost war for the defender. The double standard you're applying to us is the SAME double standard these "journalists" are applying to Israel. We can't complain about being attacked if we fight back.
1
@Woodzy698 "there would be peace if there was no religion" That has been tried many times and the result has always been an open ended bloodbath, from the Jacobite Reign of Terror in the French Revolution, through the Soviet Union, The Nazi Reich, Communist China, the Poll Pot regime and every single client state of the Soviet Bloc. The Soviet Union alone (excluding war casualties) killed more of its citizens in the eighty some odd years of its existence than were killed by all world religions in all of recorded history. That is not to mention the enormity of trying to generalize about a category like "religion", which covers such a broad range of belief and practice that no useful generalizations can hold concerning everything in the category. Your claim is about as wrong as it is possible for a claim to be.
1
that's "all OF recorded history". For some reason my edits won't take.
1
It counters the "vengeance" narrative. Harder to complain when the administration starts arresting crooks.
1
@TjJay-ev6mx If Hamas hadn't spent all the aid and charitable money pouring into Gaza on weapons and luxuries for the leaders, the Gazans wouldn't be dependent on Israel for these things. And, no, when you wage war on somebody, they are not obliged to support you while you're fighting them. The reason why Israel was their supplier is solely out if Israel's unilateral goodwill. There are rules to war, and Israel is following them and Hamas is not. Those rules never prevented civilian casualties. They didn't in WW2. Israel uses rockets to protect their citizens. Hamas uses Gazan civilians to protect their rockets.
1
@TjJay-ev6mx But that's not all we have.
1
@rgray3173 "They voted for this." The central and salient "this" is unchecked immigration, and they voted against it four times now.
1
@Smickster01 That sentence is missing a noun.
1