Comments by "Digital Nomad" (@digitalnomad9985) on "Sen. Ted Cruz: It’s a frightening thing we’re watching" video.

  1. Yea, he's running now and it's difficult. Or was that what you meant?
    2
  2. Yea, and Ted didn't endorse him that year. What's he supposed to do, challenge him to a duel?
    2
  3. That's not the net direction of migration. People are leaving to live.
    1
  4. Are you going to play semantic games while young black men are denied an opportunity to enter the workforce and build a resume? Not exclusively black men, of course, but ESPECIALLY black men. That is a generally destructive policy, but also racist.
    1
  5. He said he will control the border and enforce the immigration laws the current administration is violating. That's good. Not partizan good, good for the country.
    1
  6. I think defecting at hazard to his life is a repudiation of Castro. Yes, his father was fooled once. What's your excuse?
    1
  7. Glad to hear it.
    1
  8. Yes, I'm sure a Democrat Senator, who can do nothing to alleviate a natural disaster, would be crowding the TV camera from day one. And you id-iots eat it up. Symbolism over substance, that's Democrat politics in a nutshell.
    1
  9. We're the party of freedom and equality under the law, and have been throughout. We're on the freedom side of every issue, except harming children. The inner city needs to be liberated from a narrow orthodoxy and indoctrination of political outlook, solution: 1st amendment. The inner city needs to be liberated from organized crime, solution: 2nd amendment. The inner city needs to be liberated from an oppressive incompetent education system, solution: education choice. The incentives and opportunities for employment need to be enhanced, solution: entitlement reform, a low minimum wage, and enforcement of immigration laws. The inner city needs moral retrenchment, solution: Christianity and the Protestant work ethic. These are the solutions championed by the conservative wing of the Republican party, and they work wherever they are tried. Ask for us by name. And thank you for asking.
    1
  10. Good enough that they voted for him.
    1
  11. Give her a chance to try and run first before you say that.
    1
  12. Yes, the power establishment always dumps money on the Dems. Hillary outspent Trump 10 to 1 in 2016.
    1
  13. Then the hordes fleeing Cali would have nowhere to go. I bet you'd like that. Socialist utopias don't like their slaves escaping.
    1
  14. The Republican party, is, and has been in an uninterrupted continuum from its inception, the party of freedom and equality under the law. We're on the freedom side of every issue except harming children. The inner city needs to be liberated from a narrow orthodoxy and indoctrination of political outlook, solution: 1st amendment. The inner city needs to be liberated from organized crime, solution: 2nd amendment. The inner city needs to be liberated from an oppressive incompetent education system, solution: education choice. The incentives and opportunities for employment need to be enhanced, solution: entitlement reform, a low minimum wage, and enforcement of immigration laws. The inner city needs moral retrenchment, solution: Christianity and the Protestant work ethic. These are the solutions championed by the conservative wing of the Republican party, and they work wherever they are tried. Ask for us by name.
    1
  15. No, that's THEIR play. The side that seeks to settle a question of fact by the use of force is the obscurantist side. Leave THAT to the Dems.
    1
  16. My neighbor had a Biden sign up in 2020. Nothing this year.
    1
  17. You mean that thing that your boys are suppressing in social media and your allies are criminalizing abroad and tried to do here with the "ministry of truth" proposal? That thing you want to crush? Freedom of speech means we can criticize you. Deal.
    1
  18. He didn't endorse Trump at the convention. That's a BIG DEAL. What do you want him to do? Challenge him to a duel? Swear eternal emnity? Turn the country over to the Dems?
    1
  19.  @AntMain-l3b  Cancun is an excellent place for a SENATOR in a natural disaster. What's a senator going to do? This is a non-issue. Symbolism over substance. A GOVERNOR taking a vacation during a natural disaster would be another matter. Democrats can't think.
    1
  20. No, he didn't endorse Trump at the convention that year. That is a BIG DEAL. What do you want him to do? Challenge Trump to a duel? Surrender the nation to the authoritarian cabal? Cancun is a good place for a Senator in a natural disaster. What's he supposed to do about it? He's not the GOVERNOR, dummy! I'm sure that's what a Democrat senator would have done. Ham for the TV cameras. That's the essence of Democrat politics, symbolism over substance. Is that all you got?
    1
  21. Nowhere near, and thanks for asking. The most crime ridden areas in the US are city districts with Democrat mayors.
    1
  22. To an American citizen. Cope.
    1
  23. Actually, mobilizing the "justice system" to veto the opposing party's candidate choice doesn't seem to be working well for you. Go figure.
    1
  24.  @maga_mindFK4545  "Still beats red state living" That's not the direction the migration's going, skippy. Folk are "voting with their feet". Cope. Spin. Deny.
    1
  25. Yes, they are allowed to protest in Israel, if that's what you mean. Elsewhere in the Middle East, not so much. They have laws against murdering, raping, mayhem and the like, however.
    1
  26.  @BrianDarcy-1331  Never.
    1
  27. My neighbor had a Biden sign up in 2020. Nothing this year.
    1
  28.  @anticipatebacon7629  Texas' crisis is unchecked immigration. Cruz is at the forefront of that fight where he can do some good. Did you want him hamming the camera in a natural disaster where he could do nothing (SENATOR, NOT GOVERNOR)? That's exactly what a Dem senator would do. Symbolism over substance.
    1
  29.  @ES-ds3mn  The chief crisis he can deal with is unchecked immigration, and he fights that. Not much he could have done about the weather or disaster relief as SENATOR not GOVERNOR. But I'm sure that a Democrat senator would be all over those TV cameras, clogging essential communication for self serving face time.
    1
  30.  @lincolndachane1484  Escape what? Who needs a senator in a natural disaster? This is a non-issue. If the GOVERNOR took a vacation, that would be a scandal.
    1
  31. He is. But the Democrat machine is a corrupt authoritarian cabal hardening into totalitarianism. I wish we had a better choice, but I won't chose slavery to avoid bad manners.
    1
  32. For heaven's sake, not the "conservative shills" crap again. If you think that conservative content is the path to easy money, you haven't the merest clue about the media landscape. Every conservative spokesman goes into the field knowing he could make many times more hawking the other side. The side underwritten by oodles of well connected billionaire donors. The side that never has to worry about demonitization, cancellation, censorship or subsidized industrial strength slander, harassing litigation, organized subsidized pre-pardoned harassment and outright naked violence, and political prosecution from a lockstep monolithic power bloc of the bureaucratic state, legacy and state sponsored media, the electronic gatekeepers, their shady cynical oligarchs, and their many dupes and henchmen. It just irks the hell out of you that we work-stained Bob Cratchits in our deplorable masses can glean a ha'pence here, a tu'pence there and have the unmitigated gall to pool our penury and prayers; our blood, sweat, tears, and toil; our individually feeble voices and indomitable goodwill to collectively support a few brave and talented men and women to publish some genteel and diffident criticism against the most powerful corrupt political machine the world has known. "It's not FAIR", sobs the crybully in agony as he lays on the whip. "There oughta be a LAW!!" It never occurred to anyone in the history of mankind to speak the truth to power FOR MONEY, for good and sufficient reason. It's bad for business.
    1
  33.  @willoem2  Yep, that's a good place for a SENATOR in a natural disaster. What's he gonna do, organize relief efforts? He has no authority to do that. I'm sure a Democrat senator would be all over that TV camera, impeding the flow of useful and timely information and generally getting in the way. That's a pillar of Democrat policy, symbolism over substance.
    1
  34. @STARBLADE.INFINITY.X-TURBO Nobody stopped you from talking. Somebody disagreed with you. The difference is important because your side wants to keep us from talking. You basically just admitted it.
    1