Comments by "Digital Nomad" (@digitalnomad9985) on "Ben Shapiro: 'I Appreciate The Chutzpah' Of This Argument By House Democrats" video.

  1. Nice company you have here. ' Be a shame if something were to happen to it.
    2
  2.  @zahraali3007  Still not censorship. It's decent and humane to be against Hamas' genocidal goals, pretty much entry level humanity.
    2
  3. It's a hearing about Internet censorship and government involvement in it.
    1
  4. Yea, he's also the one whose mistress was a Chicom spy.
    1
  5. Isreal's enemies are our enemies. If you don't believe me ask THEM. They hate and want to conquer and suppress our way of life. Maybe you're okay with that, patriots aren't.
    1
  6.  @noughbaughty8951  "As the law stands.." [falsehood] No, the Supreme Court has ruled that an identity groups supposed immunity from criticism doesn't trump another citizens freedom of speech or association or religion. The baker didn't refuse to do business with them, he refused to express his art to promulgate a message he found unconscionable. Black isn't gay, and gay isn't black. Black is an immutable characteristic. Gay marriage is a choice.
    1
  7. Well, Ben is great, but for that matter there's no need to bring out the big guns against your lot.
    1
  8. Mussolini was a socialist. He and Roosevelt were besties before the war.
    1
  9. Hearing on censorship and government action leading to censorship (1st amendment).
    1
  10. Ben Shapiro has never advocated the punishment of Israel's critics unless they do illegal things like calling for murder or genocide. He points out the objective fact that many of them are demonic lunatics, but that is his free speech, not theirs. Words are not violence.
    1
  11. No, that's actually what's at stake here. Galileo was placed under house arrest for insulting the Pope. We're supposed to have gotten away from that sort of thing. Dems would like to bring back the old aristocratic rules where you couldn't speak ill of your "betters". In the old days proving what you said was true was NOT a valid defense against slander charges. If you're bored with freedom of speech and an egalitarian society with no legal support for "class" or "elite" privileges, do us both a favor and move somewhere more regressive and interesting to you. This is actually the subject of the hearing. Government agencies and officials using threats to muzzle the critics of politicians and policies they favor. It's about First Amendment violations. Our rights are under attack and a generation can't be bothered.
    1