Comments by "Digital Nomad" (@digitalnomad9985) on "Titus in the Hotseat on "Lunduke: The Alex Jones of Linux"" video.
-
4
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
@johanngambolputty5351
All Fascists and Nazis are Leftists. Mussolini was an editor of a leftist paper. Prior to the war Mussolini and FDR, the progressive (which at the time meant socialism plus eugenics plus Jim Crow laws) were exchanging political love letters praising one another and also in the American and Italian press.
Mussolini and his party developed Fascism because Marx's predicted proletarian uprising, long overdue by Communist prediction, never happened. Mussolini noted that despite ideology, people still fought for their country, so he added ardent nationalism to socialism. Unlike the Nazis, there was nothing acutely racial about Mussolini's nationalism (he was not anti-semitic, for example). When he took power he got a congratulatory telegram from Lenin for being a leftist leader who took control of Italy.
Hitler made no bones about being a leftist:
#1. “I have learned a great deal from Marxism” … “as I do not hesitate to admit”
#2. [My task is to] “convert the German volk (people) to socialism without simply killing off the old individualists”
#3. “If we are socialists, then we must definitely be anti-semites – and the opposite, in that case, is Materialism and Mammonism, which we seek to oppose.” “How, as a socialist, can you not be an anti-semite?”
#4. We must “find and travel the road from individualism to socialism without revolution”.
#5. “Why need we trouble to socialize banks and factories? We socialize human beings.”
#6. “We are socialists, we are enemies of today’s capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions” 1927
#7. “What Marxism, Leninism and Stalinism failed to accomplish we shall be in a position to achieve.”
Select planks from the Nazi party platform:
7. We demand that the State make it its duty to provide opportunities of employment first of all for its own Citizens. If it is not possible to maintain the entire population of the State, then foreign nationals (non-Citizens) are to be expelled from the Reich.
9. All German Citizens must have equal rights and duties.
10. It must be the first duty of every Citizen to carry out intellectual or physical work. Individual activity must not be harmful to the public interest and must be pursued within the framework of the community and for the general good.
We therefore demand:
11. The abolition of all income obtained without labor or effort.
Breaking the Servitude of Interest.
12. In view of the tremendous sacrifices in property and blood demanded of the nation by every war, personal gain from the war must be termed a crime against the nation. We therefore demand the total confiscation of all war profits.
13. We demand the nationalization of all enterprises (already) converted into corporations (trusts).
14. We demand profit-sharing in large enterprises.
15. We demand the large-scale development of old-age pension schemes.
16. We demand the creation and maintenance of a sound middle class; the immediate communalization of the large department stores, which are to be leased at low rates to small tradesmen. We demand the most careful consideration for the owners of small businesses in orders placed by national, state, or community authorities.
17. We demand land reform in accordance with our national needs and a law for expropriation without compensation of land for public purposes. Abolition of ground rent and prevention of all speculation in land.
18. We demand ruthless battle against those who harm the common good by their activities. Persons committing base crimes against the People, usurers, profiteers, etc., are to be punished by death without regard to religion or race.
20. In order to make higher education – and thereby entry into leading positions – available to every able and industrious German, the State must provide a thorough restructuring of our entire public educational system. The courses of study at all educational institutions are to be adjusted to meet the requirements of practical life. Understanding of the concept of the State must be achieved through the schools (teaching of civics) at the earliest age at which it can be grasped. We demand the education at the public expense of specially gifted children of poor parents, without regard to the latters’ position or occupation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Republicans are pretty much where they were in 1980. The Democrats have moved way to the left. I can demonstrate this:
The biggest thing, of course, is that a whole host of radical new issues have appeared out of the blue. Indoctrinating preadolescent children in dangerous sexual practices that will leave them more vulnerable to exploitation by sexual predators and a lucrative industry of quack elective drugs and procedures which will leave them impotent, frigid, and sterile; and dependent on continual, extra, and expensive medical care just to stay alive. Mainstreaming of censorship and political slander and violence. Mobilization of the "law enforcement" apparatus to suppress political dissent. Corporate and academic departments devoted to sequestration and punishment of political views. Mandatory Orwellian "struggle sessions" indoctrinating and enforcing the party line. Most of these things were not even being advocated quite recently, much less done. In the field of race relations, Democrats are utterly abandoning the ideal of the colorblind society in favor of "positive racism" and segregation:
<url excised so the post won't get autodeleted, if you want to see the links, see the version of this post I've posted on the BitChute version of this vid.>
But if you want to quantify the drastic leftward shift of the Democrat party, the easiest thing to graph and track is the shift in registered party members' views on issues that have actually existed long enough to be tracked over time. I can remember when free speech was not a partizan issue. Neither was support for Israel. Dems used to be, if anything, more hawkish about immigration control than Republicans. As recently as Obama's first presidential run, the definition of marriage as between a man and a woman (back when we could all agree on what those terms meant) was a plank in the DEMOCRAT party platform. Republicans haven't moved much since the 1980s when the Reagan revolution reversed the simultaneous double-digit inflation and unemployment and "national malaise" (Carter's phrase). The Democrats' leftward movement on a number of the same issues over time is a verifiable and quantifiable fact, as show in the charts and figures in these articles:
"Democrats and their water carriers in the press are like people on a boat that is drifting off to sea, but are convinced that it's the land that's moving, not them."
<url excised so the post won't get autodeleted, if you want to see the links, see the version of this post I've posted on the BitChute version of this vid.>
I would love to leave politics mostly alone. But politics won't leave me alone.
1
-
1
-
Absolutely. Republicans are pretty much where they were in 1980. The Democrats have moved way to the left. I can demonstrate this:
The biggest thing, of course, is that a whole host of radical new issues have appeared out of the blue. Indoctrinating preadolescent children in dangerous sexual practices that will leave them more vulnerable to exploitation by sexual predators and a lucrative industry of quack elective drugs and procedures which will leave them impotent, frigid, and sterile; and dependent on continual, extra, and expensive medical care just to stay alive. Mainstreaming of censorship and political slander and violence. Mobilization of the "law enforcement" apparatus to suppress political dissent. Corporate and academic departments devoted to sequestration and punishment of political views. Mandatory Orwellian "struggle sessions" indoctrinating and enforcing the party line. Most of these things were not even being advocated quite recently, much less done. In the field of race relations, Democrats are utterly abandoning the ideal of the colorblind society in favor of "positive racism" and segregation:
<url excised so the post won't get autodeleted, if you want to see the links, see the version of this post I've posted on the BitChute version of this vid.>
But if you want to quantify the drastic leftward shift of the Democrat party, the easiest thing to graph and track is the shift in registered party members' views on issues that have actually existed long enough to be tracked over time. I can remember when free speech was not a partizan issue. Neither was support for Israel. Dems used to be, if anything, more hawkish about immigration control than Republicans. As recently as Obama's first presidential run, the definition of marriage as between a man and a woman (back when we could all agree on what those terms meant) was a plank in the DEMOCRAT party platform. Republicans haven't moved much since the 1980s when the Reagan revolution reversed the simultaneous double-digit inflation and unemployment and "national malaise" (Carter's phrase). The Democrats' leftward movement on a number of the same issues over time is a verifiable and quantifiable fact, as show in the charts and figures in these articles:
"Democrats and their water carriers in the press are like people on a boat that is drifting off to sea, but are convinced that it's the land that's moving, not them."
<url excised so the post won't get autodeleted, if you want to see the links, see the version of this post I've posted on the BitChute version of this vid.>
I would love to leave politics mostly alone. But politics won't leave me alone.
1
-
What you're calling "polarization" is totally Democrats moving left. Republicans are pretty much where they were in 1980. The Democrats have moved way to the left. I can demonstrate this:
The biggest thing, of course, is that a whole host of radical new issues have appeared out of the blue. Indoctrinating preadolescent children in dangerous sexual practices that will leave them more vulnerable to exploitation by sexual predators and a lucrative industry of quack elective drugs and procedures which will leave them impotent, frigid, and sterile; and dependent on continual, extra, and expensive medical care just to stay alive. Mainstreaming of censorship and political slander and violence. Mobilization of the "law enforcement" apparatus to suppress political dissent. Corporate and academic departments devoted to sequestration and punishment of political views. Mandatory Orwellian "struggle sessions" indoctrinating and enforcing the party line. Most of these things were not even being advocated quite recently, much less done. In the field of race relations, Democrats are utterly abandoning the ideal of the colorblind society in favor of "positive racism" and segregation:
<url excised so the post won't get autodeleted, if you want to see the links, see the version of this post I've posted on the BitChute version of this vid.>
But if you want to quantify the drastic leftward shift of the Democrat party, the easiest thing to graph and track is the shift in registered party members' views on issues that have actually existed long enough to be tracked over time. I can remember when free speech was not a partizan issue. Neither was support for Israel. Dems used to be, if anything, more hawkish about immigration control than Republicans. As recently as Obama's first presidential run, the definition of marriage as between a man and a woman (back when we could all agree on what those terms meant) was a plank in the DEMOCRAT party platform. Republicans haven't moved much since the 1980s when the Reagan revolution reversed the simultaneous double-digit inflation and unemployment and "national malaise" (Carter's phrase). The Democrats' leftward movement on a number of the same issues over time is a verifiable and quantifiable fact, as show in the charts and figures in these articles:
"Democrats and their water carriers in the press are like people on a boat that is drifting off to sea, but are convinced that it's the land that's moving, not them."
<url excised so the post won't get autodeleted, if you want to see the links, see the version of this post I've posted on the BitChute version of this vid.>
I would love to leave politics mostly alone. But politics won't leave me alone.
1
-
1
-
1