Comments by "Digital Nomad" (@digitalnomad9985) on "" video.

@CapriOne3 This is not a case of fighting back. Rather it is naked oppression. The people doing the murders were not oppressed by anybody but the leaders they support, the current government of South Africa. The people being murdered didn't oppress anybody. PERSONAL freedom is the only meaningful sort. "Group freedom" is invariably a smoke screen for tyranny. Taiwan votes to maintain its democracy, group freedom says mainland China owns them because they're Chinese. Northern Ireland votes to remain in the UK, group freedom says Ireland owns them because they're Irish. Many Blacks in the US vote Republican, Joe Biden and many other Democrats say the Democrat Party owns them because they're Black. (My! That sounds familiar!) Hitler says the destiny of Germany is important and Germans are being oppressed, he proceeds to steal other countries and murder racial minorities. Legitimate political organizations group to protect personal freedom from threats. That is the lone and essential purpose of government: to FORCE people to mind their own business. Because left to themselves, THEY WILL NOT. Bigotry is a leftist value. You will attack someone because of his identity in groups you define and your victim has no choice about and will seek to punish him for "collective" crimes he hasn't personally committed.
1
@bjornagaintobywilde No. "Picketing" involves some sort of communication, like a sign or word spoken aloud. That would, in a free country, still be a legal activity, of course, but it is not what the victim was doing.
1
@Chosenjin1 "It's not helpful at all to talk about race in this conversation." The folk who said "kill the whites" are the ones that brought up the subject. And the immediate subject is whites being killed for being white. Obviously, we're not going to fix or mitigate the situation if we're not allowed to talk about it. But, you knew that. "we need a real economic reform." Certainly the South African economy is a basket case. This is because of the economic and RACIAL policies of the South African government, the senior members of which are very rich indeed. These are the current and decades long oppressors of South Africa, who divert the resentment they have legitimately earned toward an outsider group with no political power. Perhaps this situation would never have arisen if Apartheid had never been. But the current victims didn't cause either Apartheid or the current economic or criminal disaster. Only the South African government is in a position to reform the economy. And a transfer of farm property from productive farmers to friends of the government is not economic reform. It's the same recipe for famine that decimated Rhodesia. The current course will not bode well for anyone but the black ruling elite who busy themselves feasting on the flesh of the country they're destroying. The white minority will be murdered and the black majority will starve. THIS is the status quo you're defending. Shame on you.
1
@chrisbronson5341 "Lots of gold and diamonds" Yea, and Venezuela has oil. It won't help.
1
@DedicationDeservesRespect Don't care, dgaf passes for corporate virtue these days, it's better than what you'll get from Disney.
1
@jjbv2147 "He never uttered a word" If you'll search through his back catalogue you'll find that's not true. I know he dedicated at least one episode to the deteriorating situation in SA, including the murders. This IS a China channel, that's true, and there's nothing wrong with that. Why shouldn't he talk about it now that it's in the news? It is a better use of effort to comment on a subject when folk are most interested in it. As for talking about South Africa when he LIVED IN CHINA, why don't YOU try that? The Chicoms are thick as thieves with the oppressive SA government.
1
@DANIEL-fp2uq "Aparthe1d ended in 1994." And those still alive are the ones that ended it. It was a decision made when only whites had the franchise, it's not like there was a revolution or a coup.
1
@normal_side "The answer is Apartheid system, where the majority are denied" "ARE denied"? Are you aware that Apartheid began to be dismantled in the 1980s and the last vestige of it was eliminated in the 1990s, and it was eliminated by a government elected when only whites had the franchise? That only those white folk in their 40s and older have adult memory of Aparthied, and they are the ones who voted it out? My apologies if English is not your native language and you don't understand English tenses.
1