Comments by "Digital Nomad" (@digitalnomad9985) on "VICE"
channel.
-
@nickrose8733
About the election, the Maricopa county audit indicates otherwise. The audit shows thousands of ballots counted without signatures. The audit shows multiple duplicate ballots counted. The incriminating details are illustrated in the charts in the video presentation before the Arizona senate. Watch the video, it starts out slow, but it clearly shows far more ballots that were likely fraudulent and should not have been counted than the margin of victory.
Every time I try to post a link to the Arizona legislative briefing on the audit the YT chat algorithm shows it as posted, but when I reload the page, the post is deleted (it just happened 4 times in a row), but if I found the video, you can find it (at least with the Duck Duck Go search engine). Yes, the Moon landings happened, but you're not a credible defender of the fact. Do the truth a favor and get off my side.
"If the videos show proven lies, which they do, then I would rather a private company like YouTube have the right to remove them from their search algorithm, so that my kids don't look up moon landing, and watch a video that is full of lies."
I am a Buzz Aldrin fan who disagrees with you, and so would all the Apollo astronauts, even though they were personally affected. The side that tries to settle a question of fact by the use of force is the obscurantist side every time. Even when occasionally they suppress something false as cover. Nobody can be entrusted with that kind of power.
3
-
@nickrose8733 "If someone says they think Trump won, they have a right to say it, and they even have a right to refer to concocted evidence, or evidence that has been debunked or falsified."
You haven't watched the breifing, have you? The whole audit was conducted in the open with an invitation to bipartizan review. There was no room for accusations of falsification.
"I wish you all the very best with Biden as your President for the next 3 years." Yes, the theft is irreversible. There is no Constitutional procedure for removing a president once the election has been certified. All they had to do was drag their feet until the inauguration, and it was a done deal. That is not the same as saying what happened doesn't matter, or that the criminals should not be prosecuted. Also, this has implications for ongoing anti-fraud legislation. "We got away with it." For now.
You are an opponent of free speech, and, consequently, an obscurantist.
3