Comments by "DXR" (@MrDXRamirez) on "The Humanist Report" channel.

  1. One has to reject the model of current thinking to understand what is possible. The ruling ideas have to be junked to let in the new ideas and technology supporting those ideas. Potentiality becomes reality when new ideas are grounded in the real world. Mainstream ideas are, well, that's just it, grounded, as ruins of past ideas unwilling to be let go by very ideologically oriented people. You have to throw out the framework and introduce a new one that is able to focus on the elements. More of this kind of argumentation will take place where the mainstream has nothing to say. Bankrupt ideas that carry on repeating themselves for the sake of those corroded ideas will come off very funny in some mainstream talking heads.
    1
  2. I did not know that...do you know what they are looking for and why to justify the raid?
    1
  3. ​@Estrogen Fury To prove the raid was not a totalitarian move by the state the documents would have to be de-classified and made public. If it is not made public through a certification of a commission or tribunal of democrats and republicans then the assumption is the government is totalitarian and the national security state is a dictatorship. America is not what Americans think it is. The FBI and AG, the whole national security apparatus are damned if they do and damned if they don’t. Either way the behavior of the government increases our disillusionment with the government. Am I wrong following this line of reasoning?
    1
  4. @Estrogen Fury Wow...I thought I was talking to an intelligent person...sure fooled me. When a 16 yr old asks a question regarding his thinking and has no experience in politics this is the best you can do is a true disappointment. F off!
    1
  5. I would coin it the Corbynization of the American Left, used to attack the left in Britain against Jeremy Corbyn and win over the working class vote by some measure. A successful misinformation tool in the hands of large scale media moguls in which to proliferate right wing stereotypes and allegations of race, gin up the fears of the left within the Jewish population, Black, Native or Latino population as the case may be. The question is, do the democrats side against Ilhan because they are in denial about AIPAC? Nieve?  Or, because they want her out, therefore, complicit with AIPAC in securing that 'special status' with the US ?
    1
  6. Who can make all these American companies look better, Boeing, Lockheed, Purdue Pharma, Monsanto, Bayer, and the smaller manufacturers recalling parts that go into finished products, nobody can? Their contracts with the federal government are guaranteed profits why invest all of their capital when half is met by the government. This is the deal Guillianni and his lawyers saved on behalf of these corporations, he outmaneuvered the government as the government in restoring white collar crime in civil life and gave government contracts to the corporations. Instead the corporations pay a fine.  As an ally of Trump, Guilliani kept intact the arrangement between government and corporation, he restored the nanny state relation and redistributed the tax fund from the corporations back to the government. We have reached a point where the government leads a parasitic existence off the tax payer and the corporations lead a parasitic existence off the government.
    1
  7. I am not surprised. Her constituency are the women of the middle classes of America who relate to her as own of their own. She captures the imagination of the young very little, especially compared to Bernie. The young are concerned they will inherit a fucked up world they will have to pay for is not appealing to them. I cannot even see a Bernie Warren ticket, I think, that would cost him the election. Bernie would have to go as a independent with a co-candidate of his own ilk. Its been the history that Americans expect politicians to resolve the problems and have voted for the new guy when the old guys suck. So, keep it pure Bernie, you understand?
    1
  8. Now is a good time to advance a 3rd party for 2024. The chance to take away the establishment's ability to form a coalition against Bernie was lost was when Warren went over to their side. The fault of that lay with the progressives, live and learn, but now you have a crisis even greater than what a political revolution would resolve, an economic crisis.
    1
  9. Oh please, Chris Matthews is a worm. It be great to psych him out with a mock firing squad and watch him beg for forgiveness for all his digressions of anti-humanism. He deserves to be publicly humiliated wearing Depends and nothing more on 5th avenue. The one thing I would like to see Bernie do, is not use a teleprompter to speak live. I grew up in a time when candidates did not read off a teleprompter.  When they spoke from their heart and mind. Reading off a teleprompter started with Nixon mimicking the news anchors of the day. LBJ read his speech from a piece of paper on his desk on camera. JFK spoke from memory and insight on camera. Eisenhower spoke from paper and heart and mind. FDR spoke from heart and mind. Eugene Debs was a great speaker so much so they jailed him. The audience could follow his thinking as if the audience was thinking and using the speakers voice to express themselves.  He would be the forerunner of the televangelical snake oil salesmen speakers but not acting a role. Speaking from heart and mind was the acid test for the public. It told you that person was the right man for the job. Jimmy Hoffa was great speaker, he was railing like Malcom X and King. These guys shook you when they spoke.   Reagan spoke from a prompt his acting skills helped him but he was boring speaker also. Bush was so bad it was likeable and humorous, he was the Alfred E. Newman of Mad comic books.  He knew he was bad at it and used that to persuade. Obama was a scoundrel but good reader and used prompts. This is why listening to Trump speak wrenches my brain, he is such a bad reader, actor and person to begin with. Very hard to listen and watch him speak his placid affect and monotoned voice there is no authenticity in him. Listening to Bloomberg and its like a person speaking with their nostril pinched closed. Mellineals speak like wusses, no strength in their voices lacking conviction. Timid. Amy Goodman's voicing is ragged, comes a time when you should move over. She is like watching Mick Jagger at age 78 prancing around in tights. I have not heard or seen Buttigieg speak I have a hard time watching his face, it repels me with dishonesty.  Biden is torture to listen I'd fall asleep on him. Bernie has conviction but he uses a prompt when he does not need one.  Jimmy Dore reminds of the insult comedian Don Rickles when he speaks. Polosi is a bad speaker and Warren sounds like pontificating Nun in Catholic school. Black people speak horribly when they have not been literized. When literized they are eloquent speakers. Latinos are the same way. I've heard Russians speak English better than English speakers with an undetectable Russian accent and they also speak Spanish well. Americans have a hard time with Spanish, they are better off using a Spanish translator.   Guilliani smacks his lips together that you want stand back fearing he'll spit on you when he speaks. I forgot his name because he sounds horribly gutteral when he speaks I get turned off, leader of the democrats...oh yeah, Schumer. Netanahu is the same way guttural. I think the best speakers of the English language past Shakespeare's English are the Scottish people, they speak like its music. Forces you to listen. The Irish have a great sing song inflexion to their tongue as well. Southern speakers are twanged in the tongue and Texans speak like molasses grips their dentures. Bostonians are horrible sounding English speakers. Oddly the outer borroughs of Manhattan are also horribly speaking English speakers but those born and raised in Manhattan are good English speakers with no discernable accent unlike the borrough speakers from the Bronx, Queens, Long Island, Staten Island...god awful speakers and vulgar English speakers. Lawyers are the biggest polluters of the English language.  I haven't heard midwesterners speak so I can't gauge how bad or good they speak. Prompts are the training wheels used when one learns how to ride a two wheel bike. Its gotten so bad that non-human computerized voices do the speaking which brings a thought to me. Who are the people who gave their voice to be replicated by a digital sound the corporations use? They should be publicly humiliated along with Chris Matthews in his Depends.
    1