Comments by "DXR" (@MrDXRamirez) on "The Hill" channel.

  1. 9
  2. 4
  3. 3
  4. 3
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14.  @johnsuder7671  Well, the nation is not an oligarchy but it has an oligarcy in the nation the multinational corporations most other nation's oligarchy's do business with...notice throughout this entire social explosion the oligargical private sector is quiet. The law I will state is an economic law not a political one. In human history the division of labor alters earlier forms of labor exploitation. Plato called it the "curse of mankind" in his Republic Bk I. Applied to now the earlier form of exploiting labor during the height of America's economic successes is gone, vanished by the deskilling of labor and more automation making the objective conditions so organized that more subjective freedom is lost in the process of reporducing individuals and families in society. I will state that the progressives have completely embraced the democratic party's approval of these new objective restrictions taking all our freedom away and subjecting us to a modern division of labor Plato would call not the curse of mankind but the death of mankind. If you cannot see that it is the oligarchical political establishment the far right is reacting with anarchism and violence, fearless, has scared the bejheezus out of the entire political establishment that all of them on the left and the right have united as one social class against the people who they cannot distinguish if one is an anarchists or neo fascist militia except now given the technology, they have a profile and made arrests. This constitutes my point about objective restriction resulting in arrests of anyone for any reason. None of the apprehended earn a living by a minimum wage but it is the whole class of minimum wage earners who are subjected to no freedom at all.
    2
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. Bill Gates does what a monopolist does, stifles progress. The under capacity of machine products made by the machine industries cuts their production down. Employment and income levels fall in several industries. An example people can understand what Bill Gates does in the field of public health and the vaccine world is what McDonalds does to every franchise owner in the burger world with their Ice Cream Machine that are forever broken. It is written into the contract that the machines are to be repaired only by the maker of the machine or else! Taylor the Ice Cream Machine manufacturer can then corner the market and keep employed the small machine Taylor authorized machine repair men as independent business owners. Stifling new machine makers from entering the market and then Taylor goes on to own the other machine makers in the event you do go to another maker its still Taylor your doing business with. How these monopolists move to get larger shares of the market is by making more industries dependent on them for the instruction manual, the How To's Fix a Problem is kept secret. Of course the other side of the problem of the constant broken ice cream machines is a work crew poorly paid and not well secure do not care about a machine that does not belong to them or the manager is unorganized to time the cleaning of the machine just right so that it can be used by lunch. The work crew hired by Bill Gates are not as indifferent to the machines they work on for Bill Gates, his machines, they are better paid, secure, more respected by their peers and society. But when it comes down to it,--- both work crews in McDonalds and in the Gates Empire have renounced their right or claim to the product they make and to its use value derived from that product the second they signed on to work for McDonald's or the Bill Gates Foundation.
    1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. 1
  53. 1
  54. 1
  55. 1
  56. What this shows is that there is enough material wealth and productive power for all to be rich. People do not have to worry about starvation by revolution. Without a job that is the thief of all social time humanity can pursue the goal of transforming the brain and society from poor thoughts to rich thoughts from poor people to rich people as long as shelter and susbsistence is not threatened. Every forebearing social movement who sought to change society had the problem of material deprivation. Russia and China overcame material deprivation and proved a nation can. But their's are not yet a full affluent and democratized society, therefore, partial democratic and socialized societies in whatever variant is all we will see on this earth and in our lifetime as long as the world gets smaller because we number more and there is little room for two systems to exist and one of them depends on expansion for survival. For all to be rich there cannot be any major class differences among people and nations. It cost societies and the planet to maintain and sustain social class imbalances in the consumption of productive power. This cost in the form of human labor consumed more by one and not the other is a key a generator of social inequality. Social classes take up more productive power and economic development depriving others of an affluent life. Everything will have to be completely and 100% democratized for a true affluent society to arise and for a new species of man and woman to develop.
    1
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. 1
  61. 1
  62. 1
  63. 1
  64. 1
  65. 1
  66. 1
  67. 1
  68. 1
  69. 1
  70. 1
  71. 1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84. I'd like to see Cenk, Crystal and Saagar, raise the question of what kind of society Americans want because it has been 163 years that the question of the will of the people in America has been deferred and distracted by all the periods of American history, by every president, and by every counter movement that came up to repress the will of the people when this question was on their minds, or when risen to a higher level than just swallowing the bitter pill democrats and republicans dished out. Whether that was the aftermath of the Civil War, to the Great Depression, the Vietnam War, to the present day with how we treat South America, always deferred and the capitalists remained in power for a little under two centuries, from the Civil War to now. What kind of society do you want America? Mexico has this same problem? Two centuries of two parties really one dominant class and one party with two faces. Do you want a society that meets your needs or the needs of the capitalists, because if you look at American history every single far left liberal and democrat managed to corrupt the People's will. Whenever the will of the people came to the foreground the capitalists still held power, even during FDR, we still had corporationsn and big banks, industrialists and robber barons, and capitalists controlling Washington DC., during the New Deal. It just baffles me that people want to get money out of politics but never tackle the classes of money and most likely still stay in power with Bernie as president. Older Americans like myself can see this but I do not see younger Americans deviating from the same patterns of the 20th century, they are probably just so fearful to be associated with communism that Bernie, Ocasio-Cortez, and others like them do not take a stand on eliminating money from politics...how do you expect to ever get money out of politics if you do not remove an economy that is built around money? Eventually, the power of money will undo whatever Bernie will do just like what FDR had accomplished was undone as soon as money came back into power in 1980 with Reagan. This is crazy cycle of insanity that Americans do over an over again and expect a different result each time they do find a progressive candidate, this will only demoralize the generation that comes after yourselves, your children in the near future. They will become despondent and demoralized, depressed people when they grow thinking things will never change and we may as well all be slaves is all you passing on to your children.
    1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. US manufacturing sector brings in $2 trillion, 10% of the US economy so what is the cost and benefits of going one way or the other? Bernie has a good chance building on this manufacturing sector and position the US as a green climate change producer. This manufacturing is largely in Texas is half the size of German GDP! Not to be snuffed at. So how will we choose our value units? Trump has a impoverishment of ideas, no alternative and the internal deficit gets worse. Left populism is big but corporate new media focuses on the right populism as more news worthy becausee it is uglier than the left populism. Europe in the next ten years will be a tragedy. Supply side metrics, everybody cannot be an exporter. For the system to work you need buyers and sellers. If Trump wins, his tariff war with China will be extended to Europe. Not good news for Europe, which is why Pompeo speech in the Munich conference did not go over well at all saying the West is winning. Winning what, and this implies somebody is losing...namely, Europe. Europe is caught in the middle with bad and weak governments no ideas, no solutions, embarrassed by a little girl so they ignore the problems. Between China and the US, Europe is trying to run a surplus against the world of two major supply chains is ridiculous. But since people do not feel they have any skin in the game there is more going on then a spread sheet. Austerity is the response to all the ingredients of the cake there for a long time the economic system should have been reset ten years ago and ten years out the politics has changed. Conditions were right for the left, instead the putative left were all in charge when it all went down and what did they do, they bailed the banks and this invited the right with "this is not capitalism". It wasn't capitalism. So there is a loss of credibility of the left. This will take time to rebuild but Corbyn did it brining in more members to the labor party. The supply side does everything, doesn't add up. Europe cannot agree on anything at this time and will be playing in the margins for the next ten years. No wonder Salvini in Italy is popular and Germany's right wing rears its ugly head. Governments just pull a magic cap over the heads and pretend the monsters are not there. Bernie can do more than just America First, he can level the supply chain imbalances between China, Russia and the US, raise rates, and ease Europe's push toward austerity, but they have to get rid of their current leaders. Nobody can work with Trump, and Europe's leaders are incompetent, a bad mix, as he is impossible to work with and the west needs pragmatists such as Putin and Xi are.
    1
  90. 1
  91. 1