Comments by "DXR" (@MrDXRamirez) on "DW News" channel.

  1. 27
  2. 10
  3. 7
  4. 5
  5. 5
  6. 4
  7. 4
  8. 4
  9. 3
  10. 3
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 1
  16. A Vote for Trump will have two major and severe consequences for American people. The first is a tariff on imports that will force every American to pay up more in price for the same product that is American made. American manufacturers do not sell direct to the Public but through agents and dealers who add to the price of an American product. The second negative effect a vote for Trump would entail is the death of the American Gulf Coast Fishing and Farm Industry resulting from more ‘drill baby drill” policies on the Gulf of Mexico the spills and big rigs tear up the coniferous habitats of shrimp in the Gulf Coast. The disappearance of shrimp is a vote for Trump. There are social effects to having a demagogue like Trump in charge. Protectionism is one part of the problem, the other part is the shrinking size of the US workforce. Harris refers to this shrinking workforce as in need of “opportunity”, she is right, there is no opportunity for the workforce under the economic conditions of the past 45 years. As the economic slowdown procedes breaking up and changing how America does business is the least kind of policies we need. The policies needed are how America works, how to expand this workforce, adding value in communities versus extracting value from them, leaving them desperate and broke. There are only different classes of workers stuck in different industries serving a life-sentence while the expectation this workforce has for itself is “opportunity”. A vote for Trump will further shrink this workforce, millions more thrown into poverty, homelessness, shoeless, and mentally unstable the whole society is a hot house for the mentally sick. We can go deeper into this but suffice it say, a vote for Trump is a death sentence for Americans.
    1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. American business was against Covid policies. They want the workers in the office and in the factory and not working from home. Too bad if they got Covid they still have to work or be replaced was and still is the position of American business. The CDC came up with the idea of ‘shelter in place’, and those workers who could did and have not changed their way is now a battle line for the bosses. Shelter in place here was mild compared to China which was forced sheltering in place that many Americans felt the Americans should do and Fauci came close to doing it to the consternation of America’s big bosses. Trump came out with we don’t want the problem to become the problem was a win for the bosses and a loss for the workers. All governments are fearful of different groups linking up in different places, different workers linking up with other workers and shutting down the economic system, this would be a serious loss in profits to the bosses, if commerce can to standstill. They reacted by firing people and closing stores in neighborhoods where robberies and break-ins happened. That and Covid restrictions tanked profits which were compensated for by government. thanks to the government the bosses did not lose but gained more profits while the workers were home sheltering from Covid and getting vaccinated. The bosses moderated their positions and ordered their workers be vaccinated and get back to work or be fired the CDC gave a near 100% effectiveness in the vaccinations as did Big Pharma. Now the test trials of Covid vaccine data is a subject of an investigation if they are so sure its safe why hide the data from the public? The battle between bosses and workers show no signs of slowing down, to the contrary, it was on Covid restriction two years ago but now the battleground is on inflation and shrinking airplane seats with bad service, low wage incomes and high energy costs, work/life issues, and general food and necessities. Bosses barraging workers on all grounds the battle got wider and is spread over a range of issues proving to be an acid test for the next president.
    1
  29. 1
  30. If the coup took place and the new cabinet installed the armed forces of Germany would not be disbanded but its high command would lose the power of commanding the army and thus, unable to defend Germany from the coup if ordered by a new high command. Democracy is a weak system in the end. Once you cut off the head the body no longer operates or functions. Unfortunately, citizens are the least empowered social group in society would have no choice but to either rebel or submit since democracies are not direct democracies but are representative democracies operating on a constitution which would have been annulled by the new head of state. Our friend Heinrich the whatever it is to his title, would be Germany’s new dictator. I would consider this a serious problem for the German people. This could happen in the US as well. Assuming Trump had succeeded and he later announced the nullification of the US Constitution, and if the insurrectionist were armed, they would have immediately decapitated the US military with the nullification of the Constitution and established Trump as America’s first dictator. America’s constitutional republic is also a representative democracy, all the people we know and have come love or hate in Congress, would have been either arrested on trumped up charges for their removal or forced to resign. We are living in times where coups are standard operating procedure used by the Right more than the Left. Its time people defend their society from these forces and the best way is to take the military away from a high command and create a war department that is not under the command of a prime minister or a president. The power of the military must rest with the majority which was the original point behind the US Constitutions 2nd amendment, that the militia of 1779 later evolving into a modern industrialized military be autonomous from the government of elected officials.
    1
  31. Women can be dictators too. The AG is one, Poras (spelling?) using her office to prevent a popular elected president, she blocks the transfer of power is a dictatorial move. If anything is learned from Jan 6th it would be you have to put your money where your mouth is. The Washington establishment on both sides united against Trump and the AG Garland, appointed a Special Prosecutor to try Trump, consequently remove him from the ballot. This action constitutes a coup dé état by democrats. A coup is anything that blocks the transfer of power from proceeding...what is gained...Poras gains the use of her office to crush the opposition of the indigenous people of Guatemala, the Maya. Lula DeSilva was jailed in Brazil and popular presidents elected in Peru, Ecuador removed. It is an international conspiracy but that would mean they meet up in secret and strategize among republican ruling elites, some do but most are caught up in their own societies, in struggles like this one, fight like their existence is at stake too busy to be part of a conspiracy, crush any opposition. Who do meet once a year are the international billionaire class at DAVOS and they conspire all day and night. But give dictators an inch they take an arm. Question remains why even bother with institutions that are inherent contradictions the people of Mexico, Canada, and the US are living under regimes who stay in power by means of a coup. If we scan across to Europe the people there are living under monarchies, some quietly rule, others rule overtly in the open with Public acceptance. Monarchies rule the Middle East as well that this century is more like a restoration of the politics of the 18th century.
    1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 4 parties likely to vote No Confidence. Will the government fall? Even ranks within the Republican party will vote against the bill. Unions urge the working classes to be calm. Heavy street action and confrontations is making a real mess. Do the protests pose a threat to the government? Yes, or No. The government is under pressure...but will it fall is not answered? Who can predict. Why is Macron bent on attacking the retirement system? Good question. Associated with the retirement system is the working day to which employer and employees are brought together contribute a value to society as productive only when together and not apart. One side no longer wants to be partnered with labor in production the sentiment they no longer want to make this contribution and by extending the retirement age they extend the working day. A worker does not retire at 6 pm they now retire at 8 pm closer to the hour of the end of the natural lives while the two additional hours are given for nothing, mind you, to the the whole class of employers. The retirement battle is a matter of a fight between one class against another class dragging society down with it. Will the government of Macron fall, it could and will if this keeps up. A cabal of capitalists Macron is representing as its leader have a profit interest in extending the retirement age as a motive. The legislation on the floors of many European Parliaments and in Congress serve the same cabal. A vote of no confidence is the surest way the government of Macron will not fall. But he isn’t worth saving is the problem. France is the weakest link in the whole capitalist chain thanks to him is directly concerning to the rest of the nations stuck together through NATO and the EU involved in a war against Russia. Macron is making it more real that France will leave NATO; the anger of the masses is not only about the retirement age. The spread of mass revolt is under reported in the US for this reason. Germany the strongest link in the chain but no matter to the International cabal of capitalists all working in lock step that after all anti-working class laws are in place this cabal will crush government ending the Age of Constitutional Republics. In effect a pro-slavery rebellion of a Capitalist Class. Unions have a little more of a cushion and protection than do the rest of the working classes they have more to be conservative about compared to non-union workers who have nothing to lose and more of them are willing to cut the chain, and strike and take down government(s) for what they have become in the name of humanity.
    1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. 1